Back to index

4.12.39

Jump to: Complete Features | Incomplete Features | Complete Epics | Incomplete Epics | Other Complete | Other Incomplete |

Changes from 4.11.59

Note: this page shows the Feature-Based Change Log for a release

Complete Features

These features were completed when this image was assembled

1. Proposed title of this feature request
Add runbook_url to alerts in the OCP UI

2. What is the nature and description of the request?
If an alert includes a runbook_url label, then it should appear in the UI for the alert as a link.

3. Why does the customer need this? (List the business requirements here)
Customer can easily reach the alert runbook and be able to address their issues.

4. List any affected packages or components.

Epic Goal

  • Make it possible to disable the console operator at install time, while still having a supported+upgradeable cluster.

Why is this important?

  • It's possible to disable console itself using spec.managementState in the console operator config. There is no way to remove the console operator, though. For clusters where an admin wants to completely remove console, we should give the option to disable the console operator as well.

Scenarios

  1. I'm an administrator who wants to minimize my OpenShift cluster footprint and who does not want the console installed on my cluster

Acceptance Criteria

  • It is possible at install time to opt-out of having the console operator installed. Once the cluster comes up, the console operator is not running.

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. Composable cluster installation

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1srswUYYHIbKT5PAC5ZuVos9T2rBnf7k0F1WV2zKUTrA/edit#heading=h.mduog8qznwz
  2. https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1U2zYAyrNGBooGBuyQME8Xn905RvOPbVv3XFw3stddZw/edit#slide=id.g10555cc0639_0_7

Open questions::

  1. The console operator manages the downloads deployment as well. Do we disable the downloads deployment? Long term we want to move to CLI manager: https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/6ae78842d4a87593c63274e02ac7a33cc7f296c3/enhancements/oc/cli-manager.md

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

In the console-operator repo we need to add `capability.openshift.io/console` annotation to all the manifests that the operator either contains creates on the fly.

 

Manifests are currently present in /bindata and /manifest directories.

 

Here is example of the insights-operator change.

Here is the overall enhancement doc.

 

Feature Overview
Provide CSI drivers to replace all the intree cloud provider drivers we currently have. These drivers will probably be released as tech preview versions first before being promoted to GA.

Goals

  • Framework for rapid creation of CSI drivers for our cloud providers
  • CSI driver for AWS EBS
  • CSI driver for AWS EFS
  • CSI driver for GCP
  • CSI driver for Azure
  • CSI driver for VMware vSphere
  • CSI Driver for Azure Stack
  • CSI Driver for Alicloud
  • CSI Driver for IBM Cloud

Requirements

Requirement Notes isMvp?
Framework for CSI driver  TBD Yes
Drivers should be available to install both in disconnected and connected mode   Yes
Drivers should upgrade from release to release without any impact   Yes
Drivers should be installable via CVO (when in-tree plugin exists)    

Out of Scope

This work will only cover the drivers themselves, it will not include

  • enhancements to the CSI API framework
  • the migration to said drivers from the the intree drivers
  • work for non-cloud provider storage drivers (FC-SAN, iSCSI) being converted to CSI drivers

Background, and strategic fit
In a future Kubernetes release (currently 1.21) intree cloud provider drivers will be deprecated and replaced with CSI equivalents, we need the drivers created so that we continue to support the ecosystems in an appropriate way.

Assumptions

  • Storage SIG won't move out the changeover to a later Kubernetes release

Customer Considerations
Customers will need to be able to use the storage they want.

Documentation Considerations

  • Target audience: cluster admins
  • Updated content: update storage docs to show how to use these drivers (also better expose the capabilities)

This Epic is to track the GA of this feature

Goal

  • Make available the Google Cloud File Service via a CSI driver, it is desirable that this implementation has dynamic provisioning
  • Without GCP filestore support, we are limited to block / RWO only (GCP PD 4.8 GA)
  • Align with what we support on other major public cloud providers.

Why is this important?

  • There is a know storage gap with google cloud where only block is supported
  • More customers deploying on GCE and asking for file / RWX storage.

Scenarios

  1. Install the CSI driver
  2. Remove the CSI Driver
  3. Dynamically provision a CSI Google File PV*
  4. Utilise a Google File PV
  5. Assess optional features such as resize & snapshot

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Customers::

  • Telefonica Spain
  • Deutsche Bank

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

As an OCP user, I want images for GCP Filestore CSI Driver and Operator, so that I can install them on my cluster and utilize GCP Filestore shares.

We need to continue to maintain specific areas within storage, this is to capture that effort and track it across releases.

Goals

  • To allow OCP users and cluster admins to detect problems early and with as little interaction with Red Hat as possible.
  • When Red Hat is involved, make sure we have all the information we need from the customer, i.e. in metrics / telemetry / must-gather.
  • Reduce storage test flakiness so we can spot real bugs in our CI.

Requirements

Requirement Notes isMvp?
Telemetry   No
Certification   No
API metrics   No
     

Out of Scope

n/a

Background, and strategic fit
With the expected scale of our customer base, we want to keep load of customer tickets / BZs low

Assumptions

Customer Considerations

Documentation Considerations

  • Target audience: internal
  • Updated content: none at this time.

Notes

In progress:

  • CI flakes:
    • Configurable timeouts for e2e tests
      • Azure is slow and times out often
      • Cinder times out formatting volumes
      • AWS resize test times out

 

High prio:

  • Env. check tool for VMware - users often mis-configure permissions there and blame OpenShift. If we had a tool they could run, it might report better errors.
    • Should it be part of the installer?
    • Spike exists
  • Add / use cloud API call metrics
    • Helps customers to understand why things are slow
    • Helps build cop to understand a flake
      • With a post-install step that filters data from Prometheus that’s still running in the CI job.
    • Ideas:
      • Cloud is throttling X% of API calls longer than Y seconds
      • Attach / detach / provisioning / deletion / mount / unmount / resize takes longer than X seconds?
    • Capture metrics of operations that are stuck and won’t finish.
      • Sweep operation map from executioner???
      • Report operation metric into the highest bucket after the bucket threshold (i.e. if 10minutes is the last bucket, report an operation into this bucket after 10 minutes and don’t wait for its completion)?
      • Ask the monitoring team?
    • Include in CSI drivers too.
      • With alerts too

Unsorted

  • As the number of storage operators grows, it would be grafana board for storage operators
    • CSI driver metrics (from CSI sidecars + the driver itself  + its operator?)
    • CSI migration?
  • Get aggregated logs in cluster
    • They're rotated too soon
    • No logs from dead / restarted pods
    • No tools to combine logs from multiple pods (e.g. 3 controller managers)
  • What storage issues customers have? it was 22% of all issues.
    • Insufficient docs?
    • Probably garbage
  • Document basic storage troubleshooting for our supports
    • What logs are useful when, what log level to use
    • This has been discussed during the GSS weekly team meeting; however, it would be beneficial to have this documented.
  • Common vSphere errors, their debugging and fixing. 
  • Document sig-storage flake handling - not all failed [sig-storage] tests are ours

Epic Goal

  • Update all images that we ship with OpenShift to the latest upstream releases and libraries.
  • Exact content of what needs to be updated will be determined as new images are released upstream, which is not known at the beginning of OCP development work. We don't know what new features will be included and should be tested and documented. Especially new CSI drivers releases may bring new, currently unknown features. We expect that the amount of work will be roughly the same as in the previous releases. Of course, QE or docs can reject an update if it's too close to deadline and/or looks too big.

Traditionally we did these updates as bugfixes, because we did them after the feature freeze (FF). Trying no-feature-freeze in 4.12. We will try to do as much as we can before FF, but we're quite sure something will slip past FF as usual.

Why is this important?

  • We want to ship the latest software that contains new features and bugfixes.

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.

Update all OCP and kubernetes libraries in storage operators to the appropriate version for OCP release.

This includes (but is not limited to):

  • Kubernetes:
    • client-go
    • controller-runtime
  • OCP:
    • library-go
    • openshift/api
    • openshift/client-go
    • operator-sdk

Operators:

  • aws-ebs-csi-driver-operator 
  • aws-efs-csi-driver-operator
  • azure-disk-csi-driver-operator
  • azure-file-csi-driver-operator
  • openstack-cinder-csi-driver-operator
  • gcp-pd-csi-driver-operator
  • gcp-filestore-csi-driver-operator
  • manila-csi-driver-operator
  • ovirt-csi-driver-operator
  • vmware-vsphere-csi-driver-operator
  • alibaba-disk-csi-driver-operator
  • ibm-vpc-block-csi-driver-operator
  • csi-driver-shared-resource-operator

 

  • cluster-storage-operator
  • csi-snapshot-controller-operator
  • local-storage-operator
  • vsphere-problem-detector

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->

Epic Goal

  • Rebase OpenShift components to k8s v1.24

Why is this important?

  • Rebasing ensures components work with the upcoming release of Kubernetes
  • Address tech debt related to upstream deprecations and removals.

Scenarios

  1. ...

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. k8s 1.24 release

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Feature Overview

  • As an infrastructure owner, I want a repeatable method to quickly deploy the initial OpenShift cluster.
  • As an infrastructure owner, I want to install the first (management, hub, “cluster 0”) cluster to manage other (standalone, hub, spoke, hub of hubs) clusters.

Goals

  • Enable customers and partners to successfully deploy a single “first” cluster in disconnected, on-premises settings

Requirements

4.11 MVP Requirements

  • Customers and partners needs to be able to download the installer
  • Enable customers and partners to deploy a single “first” cluster (cluster 0) using single node, compact, or highly available topologies in disconnected, on-premises settings
  • Installer must support advanced network settings such as static IP assignments, VLANs and NIC bonding for on-premises metal use cases, as well as DHCP and PXE provisioning environments.
  • Installer needs to support automation, including integration with third-party deployment tools, as well as user-driven deployments.
  • In the MVP automation has higher priority than interactive, user-driven deployments.
  • For bare metal deployments, we cannot assume that users will provide us the credentials to manage hosts via their BMCs.
  • Installer should prioritize support for platforms None, baremetal, and VMware.
  • The installer will focus on a single version of OpenShift, and a different build artifact will be produced for each different version.
  • The installer must not depend on a connected registry; however, the installer can optionally use a previously mirrored registry within the disconnected environment.

Use Cases

  • As a Telco partner engineer (Site Engineer, Specialist, Field Engineer), I want to deploy an OpenShift cluster in production with limited or no additional hardware and don’t intend to deploy more OpenShift clusters [Isolated edge experience].
  • As a Enterprise infrastructure owner, I want to manage the lifecycle of multiple clusters in 1 or more sites by first installing the first  (management, hub, “cluster 0”) cluster to manage other (standalone, hub, spoke, hub of hubs) clusters [Cluster before your cluster].
  • As a Partner, I want to package OpenShift for large scale and/or distributed topology with my own software and/or hardware solution.
  • As a large enterprise customer or Service Provider, I want to install a “HyperShift Tugboat” OpenShift cluster in order to offer a hosted OpenShift control plane at scale to my consumers (DevOps Engineers, tenants) that allows for fleet-level provisioning for low CAPEX and OPEX, much like AKS or GKE [Hypershift].
  • As a new, novice to intermediate user (Enterprise Admin/Consumer, Telco Partner integrator, RH Solution Architect), I want to quickly deploy a small OpenShift cluster for Poc/Demo/Research purposes.

Questions to answer…

  •  

Out of Scope

Out of scope use cases (that are part of the Kubeframe/factory project):

  • As a Partner (OEMs, ISVs), I want to install and pre-configure OpenShift with my hardware/software in my disconnected factory, while allowing further (minimal) reconfiguration of a subset of capabilities later at a different site by different set of users (end customer) [Embedded OpenShift].
  • As an Infrastructure Admin at an Enterprise customer with multiple remote sites, I want to pre-provision OpenShift centrally prior to shipping and activating the clusters in remote sites.

Background, and strategic fit

  • This Section: What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? What context can be provided to frame this feature.

Assumptions

  1. The user has only access to the target nodes that will form the cluster and will boot them with the image presented locally via a USB stick. This scenario is common in sites with restricted access such as government infra where only users with security clearance can interact with the installation, where software is allowed to enter in the premises (in a USB, DVD, SD card, etc.) but never allowed to come back out. Users can't enter supporting devices such as laptops or phones.
  2. The user has access to the target nodes remotely to their BMCs (e.g. iDrac, iLo) and can map an image as virtual media from their computer. This scenario is common in data centers where the customer provides network access to the BMCs of the target nodes.
  3. We cannot assume that we will have access to a computer to run an installer or installer helper software.

Customer Considerations

  • ...

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

  • What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
  • Does this feature have doc impact?
  • New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
  • If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
  • What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
  • How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
  • What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
  • Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
  • What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

 

References

 

 

Epic Goal

As a OpenShift infrastructure owner, I want to deploy OpenShift clusters with dual-stack IPv4/IPv6

As a OpenShift infrastructure owner, I want to deploy OpenShift clusters with single-stack IPv6

Why is this important?

IPv6 and dual-stack clusters are requested often by customers, especially from Telco customers. Working with dual-stack clusters is a requirement for many but also a transition into a single-stack IPv6 clusters, which for some of our users is the final destination.

Acceptance Criteria

  • Agent-based installer can deploy IPv6 clusters
  • Agent-based installer can deploy dual-stack clusters
  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.

Previous Work

Karim's work proving how agent-based can deploy IPv6: IPv6 deploy with agent based installer]

Done Checklist * CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.

  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>|

For dual-stack installations the agent-cluster-install.yaml must have both an IPv4 and IPv6 subnet in the networkking.MachineNetwork or assisted-service will throw an error. This field is in InstallConfig but it must be added to agent-cluster-install in its Generate().

For IPv4 and IPv6 installs, setting up the MachineNetwork is not needed but it also does not cause problems if its set, so it should be fine to set it all times.

Set the ClusterDeployment CRD to deploy OpenShift in FIPS mode and make sure that after deployment the cluster is set in that mode

In order to install FIPS compliant clusters, we need to make sure that installconfig + agentoconfig based deployments take into account the FIPS config in installconfig.

This task is about passing the config to agentclusterinstall so it makes it into the iso. Once there, AGENT-374 will give it to assisted service

Epic Goal

As an OpenShift infrastructure owner, I want to deploy a cluster zero with RHACM or MCE and have the required components installed when the installation is completed

Why is this important?

BILLI makes it easier to deploy a cluster zero. BILLI users know at installation time what the purpose of their cluster is when they plan the installation. Day-2 steps are necessary to install operators and users, especially when automating installations, want to finish the installation flow when their required components are installed.

Acceptance Criteria

  • A user can provide MCE manifests and have it installed without additional manual steps after the installation is completed
  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

User Story:

As a customer, I want to be able to:

  • Install MCE with the agent-installer

so that I can achieve

  • create an MCE hub with my openshift install

Acceptance Criteria:

Description of criteria:

  • Upstream documentation including examples of the extra manifests needed
  • Unit tests that include MCE extra manifests
  • Ability to install MCE using agent-installer is tested
  • Point 3

(optional) Out of Scope:

We are only allowing the user to provide extra manifests to install MCE at this time. We are not adding an option to "install mce" on the command line (or UI)

Engineering Details:

This requires/does not require a design proposal.
This requires/does not require a feature gate.

User Story:

As a customer, I want to be able to:

  • Install MCE with the agent-installer

so that I can achieve

  • create an MCE hub with my openshift install

Acceptance Criteria:

Description of criteria:

  • Upstream documentation including examples of the extra manifests needed
  • Unit tests that include MCE extra manifests
  • Ability to install MCE using agent-installer is tested
  • Point 3

(optional) Out of Scope:

We are only allowing the user to provide extra manifests to install MCE at this time. We are not adding an option to "install mce" on the command line (or UI)

Engineering Details:

This requires/does not require a design proposal.
This requires/does not require a feature gate.

Epic Goal

  • Rebase cluster autoscaler on top of Kubernetes 1.25

Why is this important?

  • Need to pick up latest upstream changes

Scenarios

  1. ...

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

User Story

As a user I would like to see all the events that the autoscaler creates, even duplicates. Having the CAO set this flag will allow me to continue to see these events.

Background

We have carried a patch for the autoscaler that would enable the duplication of events. This patch can now be dropped because the upstream added a flag for this behavior in https://github.com/kubernetes/autoscaler/pull/4921

Steps

  • add the --record-duplicated-events flag to all autoscaler deployments from the CAO

Stakeholders

  • openshift eng

Definition of Done

  • autoscaler continues to work as expected and produces events for everything
  • Docs
  • this does not require documentation as it preserves existing behavior and provides no interface for user interaction
  • Testing
  • current tests should continue to pass

Feature Overview

Add GA support for deploying OpenShift to IBM Public Cloud

Goals

Complete the existing gaps to make OpenShift on IBM Cloud VPC (Next Gen2) General Available

Requirements

Optional requirements

  • OpenShift can be deployed using Mint mode and STS for cloud provider credentials (future release, tbd)
  • OpenShift can be deployed in disconnected mode https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SPLAT-737)
  • OpenShift on IBM Cloud supports User Provisioned Infrastructure (UPI) deployment method (future release, 4.14?)

Epic Goal

  • Enable installation of private clusters on IBM Cloud. This epic will track associated work.

Why is this important?

  • This is required MVP functionality to achieve GA.

Scenarios

  1. Install a private cluster on IBM Cloud.

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Background and Goal

Currently in OpenShift we do not support distributing hotfix packages to cluster nodes. In time-sensitive situations, a RHEL hotfix package can be the quickest route to resolving an issue. 

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Under guidance from Red Hat CEE, customers can deploy RHEL hotfix packages to MachineConfigPools.
  2. Customers can easily remove the hotfix when the underlying RHCOS image incorporates the fix.

Before we ship OCP CoreOS layering in https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MCO-165 we need to switch the format of what is currently `machine-os-content` to be the new base image.

The overall plan is:

  • Publish the new base image as `rhel-coreos-8` in the release image
  • Also publish the new extensions container (https://github.com/openshift/os/pull/763) as `rhel-coreos-8-extensions`
  • Teach the MCO to use this without also involving layering/build controller
  • Delete old `machine-os-content`

As a OCP CoreOS layering developer, having telemetry data about number of cluster using osImageURL will help understand how broadly this feature is getting used and improve accordingly.

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Cluster using Custom osImageURL is available via telemetry

After https://github.com/openshift/os/pull/763 is in the release image, teach the MCO how to use it. This is basically:

  • Schedule the extensions container as a kubernetes service (just serves a yum repo via http)
  • Change the MCD to write a file into `/etc/yum.repos.d/machine-config-extensions.repo` that consumes it instead of what it does now in pulling RPMs from the mounted container filesystem

 

Why?

  • Decouple control and data plane. 
    • Customers do not pay Red Hat more to run HyperShift control planes and supporting infrastructure than Standalone control planes and supporting infrastructure.
  • Improve security
    • Shift credentials out of cluster that support the operation of core platform vs workload
  • Improve cost
    • Allow a user to toggle what they don’t need.
    • Ensure a smooth path to scale to 0 workers and upgrade with 0 workers.

 

Assumption

  • A customer will be able to associate a cluster as “Infrastructure only”
  • E.g. one option: management cluster has role=master, and role=infra nodes only, control planes are packed on role=infra nodes
  • OR the entire cluster is labeled infrastructure , and node roles are ignored.
  • Anything that runs on a master node by default in Standalone that is present in HyperShift MUST be hosted and not run on a customer worker node.

 

 

Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sXCaRt3PE0iFmq7ei0Yb1svqzY9bygR5IprjgioRkjc/edit 

Overview 

Customers do not pay Red Hat more to run HyperShift control planes and supporting infrastructure than Standalone control planes and supporting infrastructure.

Assumption

  • A customer will be able to associate a cluster as “Infrastructure only”
  • E.g. one option: management cluster has role=master, and role=infra nodes only, control planes are packed on role=infra nodes
  • OR the entire cluster is labeled infrastructure, and node roles are ignored.
  • Anything that runs on a master node by default in Standalone that is present in HyperShift MUST be hosted and not run on a customer worker node.

DoD 

Run cluster-storage-operator (CSO) + AWS EBS CSI driver operator + AWS EBS CSI driver control-plane Pods in the management cluster, run the driver DaemonSet in the hosted cluster.

More information here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sXCaRt3PE0iFmq7ei0Yb1svqzY9bygR5IprjgioRkjc/edit 

 

As HyperShift Cluster Instance Admin, I want to run cluster-storage-operator (CSO) in the management cluster, so the guest cluster runs just my applications.

  • Add a new cmdline option for the guest cluster kubeconfig file location
  • Parse both kubeconfigs:
    • One from projected service account, which leads to the management cluster.
    • Second from the new cmdline option introduced above. This one leads to the guest cluster.
  • Tag manifests of objects that should not be deployed by CVO in HyperShift
  • Only on HyperShift:
    • When interacting with Kubernetes API, carefully choose the right kubeconfig to watch / create / update objects in the right cluster.
    • Replace namespaces in all Deployments and other objects that are created in the management cluster. They must be created in the same namespace as the operator.
    • Pass only the guest kubeconfig to the operands (AWS EBS CSI driver operator).

Exit criteria:

  • CSO and AWS EBS CSI driver operator runs in the management cluster in HyperShift
  • Storage works in the guest cluster.
  • No regressions in standalone OCP.

As OCP support engineer I want the same guest cluster storage-related objects in output of "hypershift dump cluster --dump-guest-cluster" as in "oc adm must-gather ", so I can debug storage issues easily.

 

must-gather collects: storageclasses persistentvolumes volumeattachments csidrivers csinodes volumesnapshotclasses volumesnapshotcontents

hypershift collects none of this, the relevant code is here: https://github.com/openshift/hypershift/blob/bcfade6676f3c344b48144de9e7a36f9b40d3330/cmd/cluster/core/dump.go#L276

 

Exit criteria:

  • verify that hypershift dump cluster --dump-guest-cluster has storage objects from the guest cluster.

As HyperShift Cluster Instance Admin, I want to run AWS EBS CSI driver operator + control plane of the CSI driver in the management cluster, so the guest cluster runs just my applications.

  • Add a new cmdline option for the guest cluster kubeconfig file location
  • Parse both kubeconfigs:
    • One from projected service account, which leads to the management cluster.
    • Second from the new cmdline option introduced above. This one leads to the guest cluster.
  • Only on HyperShift:
    • When interacting with Kubernetes API, carefully choose the right kubeconfig to watch / create / update objects in the right cluster.
    • Replace namespaces in all Deployments and other objects that are created in the management cluster. They must be created in the same namespace as the operator.
  •  
  •  
    • Pass only the guest kubeconfig to the operand (control-plane Deployment of the CSI driver).

Exit criteria:

  • Control plane Deployment of AWS EBS CSI driver runs in the management cluster in HyperShift.
  • Storage works in the guest cluster.
  • No regressions in standalone OCP.

Overview 

Customers do not pay Red Hat more to run HyperShift control planes and supporting infrastructure than Standalone control planes and supporting infrastructure.

Assumption

  • A customer will be able to associate a cluster as “Infrastructure only”
  • E.g. one option: management cluster has role=master, and role=infra nodes only, control planes are packed on role=infra nodes
  • OR the entire cluster is labeled infrastructure, and node roles are ignored.
  • Anything that runs on a master node by default in Standalone that is present in HyperShift MUST be hosted and not run on a customer worker node.

DoD 

cluster-snapshot-controller-operator is running on the CP. 

More information here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sXCaRt3PE0iFmq7ei0Yb1svqzY9bygR5IprjgioRkjc/edit 

As OpenShift developer I want cluster-csi-snapshot-controller-operator to use existing controllers in library-go, so I don’t need to maintain yet another code that does the same thing as library-go.

  • Check and remove manifests/03_configmap.yaml, it does not seem to be useful.
  • Check and remove manifests/03_service.yaml, it does not seem to be useful (at least now).
  • Use DeploymentController from library-go to sync Deployments.
  • Get rid of common/ package? It does not seem to be useful.
  • Use StaticResourceController for static content, including the snapshot CRDs.

Note: if this refactoring introduces any new conditions, we must make sure that 4.11 snapshot controller clears them to support downgrade! This will need 4.11 BZ + z-stream update!

Similarly, if some conditions become obsolete / not managed by any controller, they must be cleared by 4.12 operator.

Exit criteria:

  • The operator code is smaller.
  • No regressions in standalone OCP.
  • Upgrade/downgrade from/to standalone OCP 4.11 works.

As HyperShift Cluster Instance Admin, I want to run cluster-csi-snapshot-controller-operator in the management cluster, so the guest cluster runs just my applications.

  • Add a new cmdline option for the guest cluster kubeconfig file location
  • Parse both kubeconfigs:
    • One from projected service account, which leads to the management cluster.
    • Second from the new cmdline option introduced above. This one leads to the guest cluster.
  • Move creation of manifests/08_webhook_service.yaml from CVO to the operator - it needs to be created in the management cluster.
  • Tag manifests of objects that should not be deployed by CVO in HyperShift by
  • Only on HyperShift:
    • When interacting with Kubernetes API, carefully choose the right kubeconfig to watch / create / update objects in the right cluster.
    • Replace namespaces in all Deployments and other objects that are created in the management cluster. They must be created in the same namespace as the operator.
    • Don’t create operand’s PodDisruptionBudget?
    • Update ValidationWebhookConfiguration to point directly to URL exposed by manifests/08_webhook_service.yaml instead of a Service. The Service is not available in the guest cluster.
    • Pass only the guest kubeconfig to the operands (both the webhook and csi-snapshot-controller).
    • Update unit tests to handle two kube clients.

Exit criteria:

  • cluster-csi-snapshot-controller-operator runs in the management cluster in HyperShift
  • csi-snapshot-controller runs in the management cluster in HyperShift
  • It is possible to take & restore volume snapshot in the guest cluster.
  • No regressions in standalone OCP.

Epic Goal

  • To improve debug-ability of ovn-k in hypershift
  • To verify the stability of of ovn-k in hypershift
  • To introduce a EgressIP reach-ability check that will work in hypershift

Why is this important?

  • ovn-k is supposed to be GA in 4.12. We need to make sure it is stable, we know the limitations and we are able to debug it similar to the self hosted cluster.

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. This will need consultation with the people working on HyperShift

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SDN-2589

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Feature Overview  

Much like core OpenShift operators, a standardized flow exists for OLM-managed operators to interact with the cluster in a specific way to leverage AWS STS authorization when using AWS APIs as opposed to insecure static, long-lived credentials. OLM-managed operators can implement integration with the CloudCredentialOperator in well-defined way to support this flow.

Goals:

Enable customers to easily leverage OpenShift's capabilities around AWS STS with layered products, for increased security posture. Enable OLM-managed operators to implement support for this in well-defined pattern.

Requirements:

  • CCO gets a new mode in which it can reconcile STS credential request for OLM-managed operators
  • A standardized flow is leveraged to guide users in discovering and preparing their AWS IAM policies and roles with permissions that are required for OLM-managed operators 
  • A standardized flow is defined in which users can configure OLM-managed operators to leverage AWS STS
  • An example operator is used to demonstrate the end2end functionality
  • Clear instructions and documentation for operator development teams to implement the required interaction with the CloudCredentialOperator to support this flow

Use Cases:

See Operators & STS slide deck.

 

Out of Scope:

  • handling OLM-managed operator updates in which AWS IAM permission requirements might change from one version to another (which requires user awareness and intervention)

 

Background:

The CloudCredentialsOperator already provides a powerful API for OpenShift's cluster core operator to request credentials and acquire them via short-lived tokens. This capability should be expanded to OLM-managed operators, specifically to Red Hat layered products that interact with AWS APIs. The process today is cumbersome to none-existent based on the operator in question and seen as an adoption blocker of OpenShift on AWS.

 

Customer Considerations

This is particularly important for ROSA customers. Customers are expected to be asked to pre-create the required IAM roles outside of OpenShift, which is deemed acceptable.

Documentation Considerations

  • Internal documentation needs to exists to guide Red Hat operator developer teams on the requirements and proposed implementation of integration with CCO and the proposed flow
  • External documentation needs to exist to guide users on:
    • how to become aware that the cluster is in STS mode
    • how to become aware of operators that support STS and the proposed CCO flow
    • how to become aware of the IAM permissions requirements of these operators
    • how to configure an operator in the proposed flow to interact with CCO

Interoperability Considerations

  • this needs to work with ROSA
  • this needs to work with self-managed OCP on AWS

Market Problem

This Section: High-Level description of the Market Problem ie: Executive Summary

  • As a customer of OpenShift layered products, I need to be able to fluidly, reliably and consistently install and use OpenShift layered product Kubernetes Operators into my ROSA STS clusters, while keeping a STS workflow throughout.
  •  
  • As a customer of OpenShift on the big cloud providers, overall I expect OpenShift as a platform to function equally well with tokenized cloud auth as it does with "mint-mode" IAM credentials. I expect the same from the Kubernetes Operators under the Red Hat brand (that need to reach cloud APIs) in that tokenized workflows are equally integrated and workable as with "mint-mode" IAM credentials.
  •  
  • As the managed services, including Hypershift teams, offering a downstream opinionated, supported and managed lifecycle of OpenShift (in the forms of ROSA, ARO, OSD on GCP, Hypershift, etc), the OpenShift platform should have as close as possible, native integration with core platform operators when clusters use tokenized cloud auth, driving the use of layered products.
  • .
  • As the Hypershift team, where the only credential mode for clusters/customers is STS (on AWS) , the Red Hat branded Operators that must reach the AWS API, should be enabled to work with STS credentials in a consistent, and automated fashion that allows customer to use those operators as easily as possible, driving the use of layered products.

Why it Matters

  • Adding consistent, automated layered product integrations to OpenShift would provide great added value to OpenShift as a platform, and its downstream offerings in Managed Cloud Services and related offerings.
  • Enabling Kuberenetes Operators (at first, Red Hat ones) on OpenShift for the "big3" cloud providers is a key differentiation and security requirement that our customers have been and continue to demand.
  • HyperShift is an STS-only architecture, which means that if our layered offerings via Operators cannot easily work with STS, then it would be blocking us from our broad product adoption goals.

Illustrative User Stories or Scenarios

  1. Main success scenario - high-level user story
    1. customer creates a ROSA STS or Hypershift cluster (AWS)
    2. customer wants basic (table-stakes) features such as AWS EFS or RHODS or Logging
    3. customer sees necessary tasks for preparing for the operator in OperatorHub from their cluster
    4. customer prepares AWS IAM/STS roles/policies in anticipation of the Operator they want, using what they get from OperatorHub
    5. customer's provides a very minimal set of parameters (AWS ARN of role(s) with policy) to the Operator's OperatorHub page
    6. The cluster can automatically setup the Operator, using the provided tokenized credentials and the Operator functions as expected
    7. Cluster and Operator upgrades are taken into account and automated
    8. The above steps 1-7 should apply similarly for Google Cloud and Microsoft Azure Cloud, with their respective token-based workload identity systems.
  2. Alternate flow/scenarios - high-level user stories
    1. The same as above, but the ROSA CLI would assist with AWS role/policy management
    2. The same as above, but the oc CLI would assist with cloud role/policy management (per respective cloud provider for the cluster)
  3. ...

Expected Outcomes

This Section: Articulates and defines the value proposition from a users point of view

  • See SDE-1868 as an example of what is needed, including design proposed, for current-day ROSA STS and by extension Hypershift.
  • Further research is required to accomodate the AWS STS equivalent systems of GCP and Azure
  • Order of priority at this time is
    • 1. AWS STS for ROSA and ROSA via HyperShift
    • 2. Microsoft Azure for ARO
    • 3. Google Cloud for OpenShift Dedicated on GCP

Effect

This Section: Effect is the expected outcome within the market. There are two dimensions of outcomes; growth or retention. This represents part of the “why” statement for a feature.

  • Growth is the acquisition of net new usage of the platform. This can be new workloads not previously able to be supported, new markets not previously considered, or new end users not previously served.
  • Retention is maintaining and expanding existing use of the platform. This can be more effective use of tools, competitive pressures, and ease of use improvements.
  • Both of growth and retention are the effect of this effort.
    • Customers have strict requirements around using only token-based cloud credential systems for workloads in their cloud accounts, which include OpenShift clusters in all forms.
      • We gain new customers from both those that have waited for token-based auth/auth from OpenShift and from those that are new to OpenShift, with strict requirements around cloud account access
      • We retain customers that are going thru both cloud-native and hybrid-cloud journeys that all inevitably see security requirements driving them towards token-based auth/auth.
      •  

References

As an engineer I want the capability to implement CI test cases that run at different intervals, be it daily, weekly so as to ensure downstream operators that are dependent on certain capabilities are not negatively impacted if changes in systems CCO interacts with change behavior.

Acceptance Criteria:

Create a stubbed out e2e test path in CCO and matching e2e calling code in release such that there exists a path to tests that verify working in an AWS STS workflow.

Pre-Work Objectives

Since some of our requirements from the ACM team will not be available for the 4.12 timeframe, the team should work on anything we can get done in the scope of the console repo so that when the required items are available in 4.13, we can be more nimble in delivering GA content for the Unified Console Epic.

Overall GA Key Objective
Providing our customers with a single simplified User Experience(Hybrid Cloud Console)that is extensible, can run locally or in the cloud, and is capable of managing the fleet to deep diving into a single cluster. 
Why customers want this?

  1. Single interface to accomplish their tasks
  2. Consistent UX and patterns
  3. Easily accessible: One URL, one set of credentials

Why we want this?

  • Shared code -  improve the velocity of both teams and most importantly ensure consistency of the experience at the code level
  • Pre-built PF4 components
  • Accessibility & i18n
  • Remove barriers for enabling ACM

Phase 2 Goal: Productization of the united Console 

  1. Enable user to quickly change context from fleet view to single cluster view
    1. Add Cluster selector with “All Cluster” Option. “All Cluster” = ACM
    2. Shared SSO across the fleet
    3. Hub OCP Console can connect to remote clusters API
    4. When ACM Installed the user starts from the fleet overview aka “All Clusters”
  2. Share UX between views
    1. ACM Search —> resource list across fleet -> resource details that are consistent with single cluster details view
    2. Add Cluster List to OCP —> Create Cluster

As a developer I would like to disable clusters like *KS that we can't support for multi-cluster (for instance because we can't authenticate). The ManagedCluster resource has a vendor label that we can use to know if the cluster is supported.

cc Ali Mobrem Sho Weimer Jakub Hadvig 

UPDATE: 9/20/22 : we want an allow-list with OpenShift, ROSA, ARO, ROKS, and  OpenShiftDedicated

Acceptance criteria:

  • Investigate if console-operator should pass info about which cluster are supported and unsupported to the frontend
  • Unsupported clusters should not appear in the cluster dropdown
  • Unsupported clusters based off
    • defined vendor label
    • non 4.x ocp clusters

Feature Overview

RHEL CoreOS should be updated to RHEL 9.2 sources to take advantage of newer features, hardware support, and performance improvements.

 

Requirements

  • RHEL 9.x sources for RHCOS builds starting with OCP 4.13 and RHEL 9.2.

 

Requirement Notes isMvp?
CI - MUST be running successfully with test automation This is a requirement for ALL features. YES
Release Technical Enablement Provide necessary release enablement details and documents. YES

(Optional) Use Cases

  • 9.2 Preview via Layering No longer necessary assuming we stay the course of going all in on 9.2

Assumptions

  • ...

Customer Considerations

  • ...

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

  • What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
  • Does this feature have doc impact?
  • New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
  • If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
  • What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
  • How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
  • What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
  • Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
  • What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

PROBLEM

We would like to improve our signal for RHEL9 readiness by increasing internal engineering engagement and external partner engagement on our community OpehShift offering, OKD.

PROPOSAL

Adding OKD to run on SCOS (a CentOS stream for CoreOS) brings the community offering closer to what a partner or an internal engineering team might expect on OCP.

ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA

Image has been switched/included: 

DEPENDENCIES

The SCOS build payload.

RELATED RESOURCES

OKD+SCOS proposal: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1_Xa9Z4tSqB7U2No7WA0KXb3lDIngNaQpS504ZLrCmg8/edit#slide=id.p

OKD+SCOS work draft: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1cuWOXhATexNLWGKLjaOcVF4V95JJjP1E3UmQ2kDVzsA/edit

 

Acceptance Criteria

A stable OKD on SCOS is built and available to the community sprintly.

 

This comes up when installing ipi-on-aws on arm64 with the custom payload build at quay.io/aleskandrox/okd-release:4.12.0-0.okd-centos9-full-rebuild-arm64 that is using scos as machine-content-os image

 

```

[root@ip-10-0-135-176 core]# crictl logs c483c92e118d8
2022-08-11T12:19:39+00:00 [cnibincopy] FATAL ERROR: Unsupported OS ID=scos
```

 

The probable fix has to land on https://github.com/openshift/cluster-network-operator/blob/master/bindata/network/multus/multus.yaml#L41-L53

Overview 

HyperShift came to life to serve multiple goals, some are main near-term, some are secondary that serve well long-term. 

Main Goals for hosted control planes (HyperShift)

  • Optimize OpenShift for Cost/footprint/ which improves our competitive stance against the *KSes
  • Establish separation of concerns which makes it more resilient for SRE to manage their workload clusters (be it security, configuration management, etc).
  • Simplify and enhance multi-cluster management experience especially since multi-cluster is becoming an industry need nowadays. 

Secondary Goals

HyperShift opens up doors to penetrate the market. HyperShift enables true hybrid (CP and Workers decoupled, mixed IaaS, mixed Arch,...). An architecture that opens up more options to target new opportunities in the cloud space. For more details on this one check: Hosted Control Planes (aka HyperShift) Strategy [Live Document]

 

Hosted Control Planes (HyperShift) Map 

To bring hosted control planes to our customers, we need the means to ship it. Today MCE is how HyperShift shipped, and installed so that customers can use it. There are two main customers for hosted-control-planes: 

 

  • Self-managed: In that case, Red Hat would provide hosted control planes as a service that is managed and SREed by the customer for their tenants (hence “self”-managed). In this management model, our external customers are the direct consumers of the multi-cluster control plane as a servie. Once MCE is installed, they can start to self-service dedicated control planes. 

 

  • Managed: This is OpenShift as a managed service, today we only “manage” the CP, and share the responsibility for other system components, more info here. To reduce management costs incurred by service delivery organizations which translates to operating profit (by reducing variable costs per control-plane), as well as to improve user experience, lower platform overhead (allow customers to focus mostly on writing applications and not concern themselves with infrastructure artifacts), and improve the cluster provisioning experience. HyperShift is shipped via MCE, and delivered to Red Hat managed SREs (same consumption route). However, for managed services, additional tooling needs to be refactored to support the new provisioning path. Furthermore, unlike self-managed where customers are free to bring their own observability stack, Red Hat managed SREs need to observe the managed fleet to ensure compliance with SLOs/SLIs/…

 

If you have noticed, MCE is the delivery mechanism for both management models. The difference between managed and self-managed is the consumer persona. For self-managed, it's the customer SRE for managed its the RH SRE

High-level Requirements

For us to ship HyperShift in the product (as hosted control planes) in either management model, there is a necessary readiness checklist that we need to satisfy. Below are the high-level requirements needed before GA: 

 

  • Hosted control planes fits well with our multi-cluster story (with MCE)
  • Hosted control planes APIs are stable for consumption  
  • Customers are not paying for control planes/infra components.  
  • Hosted control planes has an HA and a DR story
  • Hosted control planes is in parity with top-level add-on operators 
  • Hosted control planes reports metrics on usage/adoption
  • Hosted control planes is observable  
  • HyperShift as a backend to managed services is fully unblocked.

 

Please also have a look at our What are we missing in Core HyperShift for GA Readiness? doc. 

Hosted control planes fits well with our multi-cluster story

Multi-cluster is becoming an industry need today not because this is where trend is going but because it’s the only viable path today to solve for many of our customer’s use-cases. Below is some reasoning why multi-cluster is a NEED:

 

 

As a result, multi-cluster management is a defining category in the market where Red Hat plays a key role. Today Red Hat solves for multi-cluster via RHACM and MCE. The goal is to simplify fleet management complexity by providing a single pane of glass to observe, secure, police, govern, configure a fleet. I.e., the operand is no longer one cluster but a set, a fleet of clusters. 

HyperShift logically centralized architecture, as well as native separation of concerns and superior cluster lifecyle management experience, makes it a great fit as the foundation of our multi-cluster management story. 

Thus the following stories are important for HyperShift: 

  • When lifecycling OpenShift clusters (for any OpenShift form factor) on any of the supported providers from MCE/ACM/OCM/CLI as a Cluster Service Consumer  (RH managed SRE, or self-manage SRE/admin):
  • I want to be able to use a consistent UI so I can manage and operate (observe, govern,...) a fleet of clusters.
  • I want to specify HA constraints (e.g., deploy my clusters in different regions) while ensuring acceptable QoS (e.g., latency boundaries) to ensure/reduce any potential downtime for my workloads. 
  • When operating OpenShift clusters (for any OpenShift form factor) on any of the supported provider from MCE/ACM/OCM/CLI as a Cluster Service Consumer  (RH managed SRE, or self-manage SRE/admin):
  • I want to be able to backup any critical data so I am able to restore them in case of hosting service cluster (management cluster) failure. 

Refs:

Hosted control planes APIs are stable for consumption.

 

HyperShift is the core engine that will be used to provide hosted control-planes for consumption in managed and self-managed. 

 

Main user story:  When life cycling clusters as a cluster service consumer via HyperShift core APIs, I want to use a stable/backward compatible API that is less susceptible to future changes so I can provide availability guarantees. 

 

Ref: What are we missing in Core HyperShift for GA Readiness?

Customers are not paying for control planes/infra components. 

 

Customers do not pay Red Hat more to run HyperShift control planes and supporting infrastructure than Standalone control planes and supporting infrastructure.

Assumptions

  • A customer will be able to associate a cluster as “Infrastructure only”
  • E.g. one option: management cluster has role=master, and role=infra nodes only, control planes are packed on role=infra nodes
  • OR the entire cluster is labeled infrastructure , and node roles are ignored.
  • Anything that runs on a master node by default in Standalone that is present in HyperShift MUST be hosted and not run on a customer worker node.

HyperShift - proposed cuts from data plane

HyperShift has an HA and a DR story

When operating OpenShift clusters (for any OpenShift form factor) from MCE/ACM/OCM/CLI as a Cluster Service Consumer  (RH managed SRE, or self-manage SRE/admin) I want to be able to migrate CPs from one hosting service cluster to another:

  • as means for disaster recovery in the case of total failure
  • so that scaling pressures on a management cluster can be mitigated or a management cluster can be decommissioned.

More information: 

 

Hosted control planes reports metrics on usage/adoption

To understand usage patterns and inform our decision making for the product. We need to be able to measure adoption and assess usage.

See Hosted Control Planes (aka HyperShift) Strategy [Live Document]

Hosted control plane is observable  

Whether it's managed or self-managed, it’s pertinent to report health metrics to be able to create meaningful Service Level Objectives (SLOs), alert of failure to meet our availability guarantees. This is especially important for our managed services path. 

HyperShift is in parity with top-level add-on operators

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPPLAN-8901 

Unblock HyperShift as a backend to managed services

HyperShift for managed services is a strategic company goal as it improves usability, feature, and cost competitiveness against other managed solutions, and because managed services/consumption-based cloud services is where we see the market growing (customers are looking to delegate platform overhead). 

 

We should make sure our SD milestones are unblocked by the core team. 

 

Note 

This feature reflects HyperShift core readiness to be consumed. When all related EPICs and stories in this EPIC are complete HyperShift can be considered ready to be consumed in GA form. This does not describe a date but rather the readiness of core HyperShift to be consumed in GA form NOT the GA itself.

- GA date for self-managed will be factoring in other inputs such as adoption, customer interest/commitment, and other factors. 
- GA dates for ROSA-HyperShift are on track, tracked in milestones M1-7 (have a look at https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPPLAN-5771

Epic Goal*

The goal is to split client certificate trust chains from the global Hypershift root CA.

 
Why is this important? (mandatory)

This is important to:

  • assure a workload can be run on any kind of OCP flavor
  • reduce the blast radius in case of a sensitive material leak
  • separate trust to allow more granular control over client certificate authentication

 
Scenarios (mandatory) 

Provide details for user scenarios including actions to be performed, platform specifications, and user personas.  

  1. I would like to be able to run my workloads on any OpenShift-like platform.
    My workloads allow components to authenticate using client certificates based
    on a trust bundle that I am able to retrieve from the cluster.
  1. I don't want my users to have access to any CA bundle that would allow them
    to trust a random certificate from the cluster for client certificate authentication.

 
Dependencies (internal and external) (mandatory)

Hypershift team needs to provide us with code reviews and merge the changes we are to deliver

Contributing Teams(and contacts) (mandatory) 

  • Development - OpenShift Auth, Hypershift
  • Documentation -OpenShift Auth Docs team
  • QE - OpenShift Auth QE
  • PX - I have no idea what PX is
  • Others - others

Acceptance Criteria (optional)

The serviceaccount CA bundle automatically injected to all pods cannot be used to authenticate any client certificate generated by the control-plane.

Drawbacks or Risk (optional)

Risk: there is a throbbing time pressure as this should be delivered before first stable Hypershift release

Done - Checklist (mandatory)

  • CI Testing -  Basic e2e automationTests are merged and completing successfully
  • Documentation - Content development is complete.
  • QE - Test scenarios are written and executed successfully.
  • Technical Enablement - Slides are complete (if requested by PLM)
  • Engineering Stories Merged
  • All associated work items with the Epic are closed
  • Epic status should be “Release Pending” 
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

Incomplete Features

When this image was assembled, these features were not yet completed. Therefore, only the Jira Cards included here are part of this release

Epic Goal

  • Enabling integration of single hub cluster to install both ARM and x86 spoke clusters
  • Enabling support for heterogeneous OCP clusters
  • document requirements deployment flows
  • support in disconnected environment

Why is this important?

  • clients request

Scenarios

  1. Users manage both ARM and x86 machines, we should not require to have two different hub clusters
  2. Users manage a mixed architecture clusters without requirement of all the nodes to be of the same architecture

Acceptance Criteria

  • Process is well documented
  • we are able to install in a disconnected environment

We have a set of images

  • quay.io/edge-infrastructure/assisted-installer-agent:latest
  • quay.io/edge-infrastructure/assisted-installer-controller:latest
  • quay.io/edge-infrastructure/assisted-installer:latest

that should become multiarch images. This should be done both in upstream and downstream.

As a reference, we have built internally those images as multiarch and made them available as

  • registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-agent-rhel8:latest
  • registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-reporter-rhel8:latest
  • registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-rhel8:latest

They can be consumed by the Assisted Serivce pod via the following env

    - name: AGENT_DOCKER_IMAGE
      value: registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-agent-rhel8:latest
    - name: CONTROLLER_IMAGE
      value: registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-reporter-rhel8:latest
    - name: INSTALLER_IMAGE
      value: registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-rhel8:latest

OLM would have to support a mechanism like podAffinity which allows multiple architecture values to be specified which enables it to pin operators to the matching architecture worker nodes

Ref: https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/pull/1014

 

Cut a new release of the OLM API and update OLM API dependency version (go.mod) in OLM package; then
Bring the upstream changes from OLM-2674 to the downstream olm repo.

A/C:

 - New OLM API version release
 - OLM API dependency updated in OLM Project
 - OLM Subscription API changes  downstreamed
 - OLM Controller changes  downstreamed
 - Changes manually tested on Cluster Bot

Feature Overview

We drive OpenShift cross-market customer success and new customer adoption with constant improvements and feature additions to the existing capabilities of our OpenShift Core Networking (SDN and Network Edge). This feature captures that natural progression of the product.

Goals

  • Feature enhancements (performance, scale, configuration, UX, ...)
  • Modernization (incorporation and productization of new technologies)

Requirements

  • Core Networking Stability
  • Core Networking Performance and Scale
  • Core Neworking Extensibility (Multus CNIs)
  • Core Networking UX (Observability)
  • Core Networking Security and Compliance

In Scope

  • Network Edge (ingress, DNS, LB)
  • SDN (CNI plugins, openshift-sdn, OVN, network policy, egressIP, egress Router, ...)
  • Networking Observability

Out of Scope

There are definitely grey areas, but in general:

  • CNV
  • Service Mesh
  • CNF

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

  • What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
  • Does this feature have doc impact?
  • New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
  • If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
  • What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
  • How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
  • What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
  • Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
  • What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

Goal: Provide queryable metrics and telemetry for cluster routes and sharding in an OpenShift cluster.

Problem: Today we test OpenShift performance and scale with best-guess or anecdotal evidence for the number of routes that our customers use. Best practices for a large number of routes in a cluster is to shard, however we have no visibility with regard to if and how customers are using sharding.

Why is this important? These metrics will inform our performance and scale testing, documented cluster limits, and how customers are using sharding for best practice deployments.

Dependencies (internal and external):

Prioritized epics + deliverables (in scope / not in scope):

Not in scope:

Estimate (XS, S, M, L, XL, XXL):

Previous Work:

Open questions:

Acceptance criteria:

Epic Done Checklist:

  • CI - CI Job & Automated tests: <link to CI Job & automated tests>
  • Release Enablement: <link to Feature Enablement Presentation> 
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR orf GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>
  • Notes for Done Checklist
    • Adding links to the above checklist with multiple teams contributing; select a meaningful reference for this Epic.
    • Checklist added to each Epic in the description, to be filled out as phases are completed - tracking progress towards “Done” for the Epic.

Description:

As described in the Design Doc, the following information is needed to be exported from Cluster Ingress Operator:

  • Number of routes/shard

Design 2 will be implemented as part of this story.

 

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Support for exporting the above mentioned metrics by Cluster Ingress Operator

Description:

As described in the Metrics to be sent via telemetry section of the Design Doc, the following metrics is needed to be sent from OpenShift cluster to Red Hat premises:

  • Minimum Routes per Shard
    • Recording Rule – cluster:route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard:min  : min(route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard)
    • Gives the minimum value of Routes per Shard.
  • Maximum Routes per Shard
    • Recording Rule – cluster:route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard:max  : max(route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard)
    • Gives the maximum value of Routes per Shard.
  • Average Routes per Shard
    • Recording Rule – cluster:route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard:avg  : avg(route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard)
    • Gives the average value of Routes per Shard.
  • Median Routes per Shard
    • Recording Rule – cluster:route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard:median  : quantile(0.5, route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard)
    • Gives the median value of Routes per Shard.
  • Number of Routes summed by TLS Termination type
    • Recording Rule – cluster:openshift_route_info:tls_termination:sum : sum (openshift_route_info) by (tls_termination)
    • Gives the number of Routes for each tls_termination value. The possible values for tls_termination are edge, passthrough and reencrypt. 

The metrics should be allowlisted on the cluster side.

The steps described in Sending metrics via telemetry are needed to be followed. Specifically step 5.

Depends on CFE-478.

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Support for sending the above mentioned metrics from OpenShift clusters to the Red Hat premises by allowlisting metrics on the cluster side

This is a epic bucket for all activities surrounding the creation of declarative approach to release and maintain OLM catalogs.

Epic Goal

  • Allow Operator Authors to easily change the layout of the update graph in a single location so they can version/maintain/release it via git and have more approachable controls about graph vertices than today's replaces, skips and/or skipRange taxonomy
  • Allow Operators authors to have control over channel and bundle channel membership

Why is this important?

  • The imperative catalog maintenance approach so far with opm is being moved to a declarative format (OLM-2127 and OLM-1780) moving away from bundle-level controls but the update graph properties are still attached to a bundle
  • We've received feedback from the RHT internal developer community that maintaining and reasoning about the graph in the context of a single channel is still too hard, even with visualization tools
  • making the update graph easily changeable is important to deliver on some of the promises of declarative index configuration
  • The current interface for declarative index configuration still relies on skips, skipRange and replaces to shape the graph on a per-bundle level - this is too complex at a certain point with a lot of bundles in channels, we need to something at the package level

Scenarios

  1. An Operator author wants to release a new version replacing the latest version published previously
  2. After additional post-GA testing an Operator author wants to establish a new update path to an existing released version from an older, released version
  3. After finding a bug post-GA an Operator author wants to temporarily remove a known to be problematic update path
  4. An automated system wants to push a bundle inbetween an existing update path as a result of an Operator (base) image rebuild (Freshmaker use case)
  5. A user wants to take a declarative graph definition and turn it into a graphical image for visually ensuring the graph looks like they want
  6. An Operator author wants to promote a certain bundle to an additional / different channel to indicate progress in maturity of the operator.

Acceptance Criteria

  • The declarative format has to be user readable and terse enough to make quick modifications
  • The declarative format should be machine writeable (Freshmaker)
  • The update graph is declared and modified in a text based format aligned with the declarative config
  • it has to be possible to add / removes edges at the leave of the graph (releasing/unpublishing a new version)
  • it has to be possible to add/remove new vertices between existing edges (releasing/retracting a new update path)
  • it has to be possible to add/remove new edges in between existing vertices (releasing/unpublishing a version inbetween, freshmaker user case)
  • it has to be possible to change the channel member ship of a bundle after it's published (channel promotion)
  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • it has to be possible to add additional metadata later to implement OLM-2087 and OLM-259 if required

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. Declarative Index Config (OLM-2127)

Previous Work:

  1. Declarative Index Config (OLM-1780)

Related work

Open questions:

  1. What other manipulation scenarios are required?
    1. Answer: deprecation of content in the spirit of OLM-2087
    2. Answer: cross-channel update hints as described in OLM-2059 if that implementation requires it

 

When working on this Epic, it's important to keep in mind this other potentially related Epic: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OLM-2276

 

enhance the veneer rendering to be able to read the input veneer data from stdin, via a pipe, in a manner similar to https://dev.to/napicella/linux-pipes-in-golang-2e8j

then the command could be used in a manner similar to many k8s examples like

```shell
opm alpha render-veneer semver -o yaml < infile > outfile
```

Upstream issue link: https://github.com/operator-framework/operator-registry/issues/1011

Jira Description

As an OPM maintainer, I want to downstream the PR for (OCP 4.12 ) and backport it to OCP 4.11 so that IIB will NOT be impacted by the changes when it upgrades the OPM version to use the next/future opm upstream release (v1.25.0).

Summary / Background

IIB(the downstream service that manages the indexes) uses the upstream version and if they bump the OPM version to the next/future (v1.25.0) release with this change before having the downstream images updated then: the process to manage the indexes downstream will face issues and it will impact the distributions. 

Acceptance Criteria

  • The changes in the PR are available for the releases which uses FBC -> OCP 4.11, 4.12

Definition of Ready

  • PRs merged into downstream OCP repos branches 4.11/4.12

Definition of Done

  • We checked that the downstream images are with the changes applied (i.e.: we can try to verify in the same way that we checked if the changes were in the downstream for the fix OLM-2639 )

tldr: three basic claims, the rest is explanation and one example

  1. We cannot improve long term maintainability solely by fixing bugs.
  2. Teams should be asked to produce designs for improving maintainability/debugability.
  3. Specific maintenance items (or investigation of maintenance items), should be placed into planning as peer to PM requests and explicitly prioritized against them.

While bugs are an important metric, fixing bugs is different than investing in maintainability and debugability. Investing in fixing bugs will help alleviate immediate problems, but doesn't improve the ability to address future problems. You (may) get a code base with fewer bugs, but when you add a new feature, it will still be hard to debug problems and interactions. This pushes a code base towards stagnation where it gets harder and harder to add features.

One alternative is to ask teams to produce ideas for how they would improve future maintainability and debugability instead of focusing on immediate bugs. This would produce designs that make problem determination, bug resolution, and future feature additions faster over time.

I have a concrete example of one such outcome of focusing on bugs vs quality. We have resolved many bugs about communication failures with ingress by finding problems with point-to-point network communication. We have fixed the individual bugs, but have not improved the code for future debugging. In so doing, we chase many hard to diagnose problem across the stack. The alternative is to create a point-to-point network connectivity capability. this would immediately improve bug resolution and stability (detection) for kuryr, ovs, legacy sdn, network-edge, kube-apiserver, openshift-apiserver, authentication, and console. Bug fixing does not produce the same impact.

We need more investment in our future selves. Saying, "teams should reserve this" doesn't seem to be universally effective. Perhaps an approach that directly asks for designs and impacts and then follows up by placing the items directly in planning and prioritizing against PM feature requests would give teams the confidence to invest in these areas and give broad exposure to systemic problems.


Relevant links:

Epic Goal

  • Change the default value for the spec.tuningOptions.maxConnections field in the IngressController API, which configures the HAProxy maxconn setting, to 50000 (fifty thousand).

Why is this important?

  • The maxconn setting constrains the number of simultaneous connections that HAProxy accepts. Beyond this limit, the kernel queues incoming connections. 
  • Increasing maxconn enables HAProxy to queue incoming connections intelligently.  In particular, this enables HAProxy to respond to health probes promptly while queueing other connections as needed.
  • The default setting of 20000 has been in place since OpenShift 3.5 was released in April 2017 (see BZ#1405440, commit, RHBA-2017:0884). 
  • Hardware capabilities have increased over time, and the current default is too low for typical modern machine sizes. 
  • Increasing the default setting improves HAProxy's performance at an acceptable cost in the common case. 

Scenarios

  1. As a cluster administrator who is installing OpenShift on typical hardware, I want OpenShift router to be tuned appropriately to take advantage of my hardware's capabilities.

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI is passing. 
  • The new default setting is clearly documented. 
  • A release note informs cluster administrators of the change to the default setting. 

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. None.

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. The  haproxy-max-connections-tuning enhancement made maxconn configurable without changing the default.  The enhancement document details the tradeoffs in terms of memory for various settings of nbthreads and maxconn with various numbers of routes. 

Open questions::

  1. ...

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

 

OCP/Telco Definition of Done

Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

Epic Goal

Why is this important?

  • This regression is a major performance and stability issue and it has happened once before.

Drawbacks

  • The E2E test may be complex due to trying to determine what DNS pods are responding to DNS requests. This is straightforward using the chaos plugin.

Scenarios

  • CI Testing

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. SDN Team

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. N/A

Open questions::

  1. Where do these E2E test go? SDN Repo? DNS Repo?

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub
    Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub
    Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Enable the chaos plugin https://coredns.io/plugins/chaos/ in our CoreDNS configuration so that we can use a DNS query to easily identify what DNS pods are responding to our requests.

Feature Overview

  • This Section:* High-Level description of the feature ie: Executive Summary
  • Note: A Feature is a capability or a well defined set of functionality that delivers business value. Features can include additions or changes to existing functionality. Features can easily span multiple teams, and multiple releases.

 

Goals

  • This Section:* Provide high-level goal statement, providing user context and expected user outcome(s) for this feature

 

Requirements

  • This Section:* A list of specific needs or objectives that a Feature must deliver to satisfy the Feature.. Some requirements will be flagged as MVP. If an MVP gets shifted, the feature shifts. If a non MVP requirement slips, it does not shift the feature.

 

Requirement Notes isMvp?
CI - MUST be running successfully with test automation This is a requirement for ALL features. YES
Release Technical Enablement Provide necessary release enablement details and documents. YES

 

(Optional) Use Cases

This Section: 

  • Main success scenarios - high-level user stories
  • Alternate flow/scenarios - high-level user stories
  • ...

 

Questions to answer…

  • ...

 

Out of Scope

 

Background, and strategic fit

This Section: What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? What context can be provided to frame this feature.

 

Assumptions

  • ...

 

Customer Considerations

  • ...

 

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

  • What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
  • Does this feature have doc impact?  
  • New Content, Updates to existing content,  Release Note, or No Doc Impact
  • If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
  • What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
  • How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
  • What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
  • Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
  • What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

As a console user I want to have option to:

  • Restart Deployment
  • Retry latest DeploymentConfig if it failed

 

For Deployments we will add the 'Restart rollout' action button. This action will PATCH the Deployment object's 'spec.template.metadata.annotations' block, by adding 'openshift.io/restartedAt: <actual-timestamp>' annotation. This will restart the deployment, by creating a new ReplicaSet.

  • action is disabled if:
    • Deployment is paused

 

For DeploymentConfig we will add 'Retry rollout' action button.  This action will PATCH the latest revision of ReplicationController object's 'metadata.annotations' block by setting 'openshift.io/deployment/phase: "New"' and removing openshift.io/deployment.cancelled and openshift.io/deployment.status-reason.

  • action is enabled if:
    • latest revision of the ReplicationController resource is in Failed phase
  • action is disabled if:
    • latest revision of the ReplicationController resource is in Complete phase
    • DeploymentConfig does not have any rollouts
    • DeploymentConfigs is paused

 

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Add the 'Restart rollout' action button for the Deployment resource to both action menu and kebab menu
  • Add the 'Retry rollout' action button for the DeploymentConfig resource to both action menu and kebab menu

 

BACKGROUND:

OpenShift console will be updated to allow rollout restart deployment from the console itself.

Currently, from the OpenShift console, for the resource “deploymentconfigs” we can only start and pause the rollout, and for the resource “deployment” we can only resume the rollout. None of the resources (deployment & deployment config) has this option to restart the rollout. So, that is the reason why the customer wants this functionality to perform the same action from the CLI as well as the OpenShift console.

The customer wants developers who are not fluent with the oc tool and terminal utilities, can use the console instead of the terminal to restart deployment, just like we use to do it through CLI using the command “oc rollout restart deploy/<deployment-name>“.
Usually when developers change the config map that deployment uses they have to restart pods. Currently, the developers have to use the oc rollout restart deployment command. The customer wants the functionality to get this button/menu to perform the same action from the console as well.

Design
Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1i-jGtQGaA0OI4CYh8DH5BBIVbocIu_dxNt3vwWmPZdw/edit

When OCP is performing cluster upgrade user should be notified about this fact.

There are two possibilities how to surface the cluster upgrade to the users:

  • Display a console notification throughout OCP web UI saying that the cluster is currently under upgrade.
  • Global notification throughout OCP web UI saying that the cluster is currently under upgrade.
  • Have an alert firing for all the users of OCP stating the cluster is undergoing an upgrade. 

 

AC:

  • Console-operator will create a ConsoleNotification CR when the cluster is being upgraded. Once the upgrade is done console-operator will remote that CR. These are the three statuses based on which we are determining if the cluster is being upgraded.
  • Add unit tests

 

Note: We need to decide if we want to distinguish this particular notification by a different color? ccing Ali Mobrem 

 

Created from: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RFE-3024

As a developer, I want to make status.HostIP for Pods visible in the Pod details page of the OCP Web Console. Currently there is no way to view the node IP for a Pod in the OpenShift Web Console.  When viewing a Pod in the console, the field status.HostIP is not visible.

 

Acceptance criteria:

  • Make pod's HostIP field visible in the pod details page, similarly to PodIP field

Cloned from OCPSTRAT-377 to represent the backport to 4.12

Backport questions:

 
1) What's the impact/cost to any other critical items on the next release? 
 
Installer and edge are mostly focused on activation/retention and working the list top-to-bottom without release blockers. This is an activation item highly coveted by SD and applicable in existing versions.
 
2) Is it a breaking change to the existing fleet?
 
No.
 
 

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic —

Links:

Enhancement PR: https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/pull/1397 

API PR: https://github.com/openshift/api/pull/1460 

Ingress  Operator PR: https://github.com/openshift/cluster-ingress-operator/pull/928 

Background

Feature Goal: Support OpenShift installation in AWS Shared VPC scenario where AWS infrastructure resources (at least the Private Hosted Zone) belong to an account separate from the cluster installation target account.

The ingress operator is responsible for creating DNS records in AWS Route53 for cluster ingress. Prior to the implementation of this epic, the ingress operator doesn't have the capability to add DNS records into an existing Route 53 hosted zone in the shared VPC.

Epic Goal

  • Add support to the ingress operator for creating DNS records in preexisting Route53 private hosted zones for Shared VPC clusters

Non-Goals

  • Ingress operator support for day-2 operations (i.e. changes to the AWS IAM Role value after installation)  
  • E2E testing (will be handled by the Installer Team) 

Design

As described in the WIP PR https://github.com/openshift/cluster-ingress-operator/pull/928, the ingress operator will consume a new API field that contains the IAM Role ARN for configuring DNS records in the private hosted zone. If this field is present, then the ingress operator will use this account to create all private hosted zone records. The API fields will be described in the Enhancement PR.

The ingress operator code will accomplish this by defining a new provider implementation that wraps two other DNS providers, using one of them to publish records to the public zone and the other to publish records to the private zone.

External DNS Operator Impact

See NE-1299

AWS Load Balancer Operator (ALBO) Impact

See NE-1299

Why is this important?

  • Without this ingress operator support, OpenShift users are unable to create DNS records in a preexisting Route53 private hosted zone which means OpenShift users can't share the Route53 component with a Shared VPC
  • Shared VPCs are considers AWS best practice

Scenarios

  1. ...

Acceptance Criteria

  • Unit tests must be written and automatically run in CI (E2E tests will be handled by the Installer Team)
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • Ingress Operator creates DNS Records in preexisting Route53 private hosted zones for shared VPC Clusters
  • Network Edge Team has reviewed all of the related enhancements and code changes for Route53 in Shared VPC Clusters

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. Installer Team is adding the new API fields required for enabling sharing Route53 with in Shared VPCs in https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CORS-2613
  2. Testing this epic requires having access to two AWS account

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. Significant discussion was done in this thread: https://redhat-internal.slack.com/archives/C68TNFWA2/p1681997102492889?thread_ts=1681837202.378159&cid=C68TNFWA2
  1. Slack channel #tmp-xcmbu-114

Open questions:

  1.  

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

 

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->

Epic Goal

  • Enable/confirm installation in AWS shared VPC scenario where Private Hosted Zone belongs to an account separate from the cluster installation target account

Why is this important?

  • AWS best practices suggest this setup

Scenarios

  1. ...

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Feature Overview (aka. Goal Summary)  

The MCO should properly report its state in a way that's consistent and able to be understood by customers, troubleshooters, and maintainers alike. 

Some customer cases have revealed scenarios where the MCO state reporting is misleading and therefore could be unreliable to base decisions and automation on.

In addition to correcting some incorrect states, the MCO will be enhanced for a more granular view of update rollouts across machines.

The MCO should properly report its state in a way that's consistent and able to be understood by customers, troubleshooters, and maintainers alike. 

For this epic, "state" means "what is the MCO doing?" – so the goal here is to try to make sure that it's always known what the MCO is doing. 

This includes: 

  • Conditions
  • Some Logging 
  • Possibly Some Events 

While this probably crosses a little bit into the "status" portion of certain MCO objects, as some state is definitely recorded there, this probably shouldn't turn into a "better status reporting" epic.  I'm interpreting "status" to mean "how is it going" so status is maybe a "detail attached to a state". 

 

Exploration here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1j6Qea98aVP12kzmPbR_3Y-3-meJQBf0_K6HxZOkzbNk/edit?usp=sharing

 

https://docs.google.com/document/d/17qYml7CETIaDmcEO-6OGQGNO0d7HtfyU7W4OMA6kTeM/edit?usp=sharing

 

The current property description is:

configuration represents the current MachineConfig object for the machine config pool.

But in a 4.12.0-ec.4 cluster, the actual semantics seem to be something closer to "the most recent rendered config that we completely leveled on". We should at least update the godocs to be more specific about the intended semantics. And perhaps consider adjusting the semantics?

Feature Overview

Telecommunications providers continue to deploy OpenShift at the Far Edge. The acceleration of this adoption and the nature of existing Telecommunication infrastructure and processes drive the need to improve OpenShift provisioning speed at the Far Edge site and the simplicity of preparation and deployment of Far Edge clusters, at scale.

Goals

  • Simplicity The folks preparing and installing OpenShift clusters (typically SNO) at the Far Edge range in technical expertise from technician to barista. The preparation and installation phases need to be reduced to a human-readable script that can be utilized by a variety of non-technical operators. There should be as few steps as possible in both the preparation and installation phases.
  • Minimize Deployment Time A telecommunications provider technician or brick-and-mortar employee who is installing an OpenShift cluster, at the Far Edge site, needs to be able to do it quickly. The technician has to wait for the node to become in-service (CaaS and CNF provisioned and running) before they can move on to installing another cluster at a different site. The brick-and-mortar employee has other job functions to fulfill and can't stare at the server for 2 hours. The install time at the far edge site should be in the order of minutes, ideally less than 20m.
  • Utilize Telco Facilities Telecommunication providers have existing Service Depots where they currently prepare SW/HW prior to shipping servers to Far Edge sites. They have asked RH to provide a simple method to pre-install OCP onto servers in these facilities. They want to do parallelized batch installation to a set of servers so that they can put these servers into a pool from which any server can be shipped to any site. They also would like to validate and update servers in these pre-installed server pools, as needed.
  • Validation before Shipment Telecommunications Providers incur a large cost if forced to manage software failures at the Far Edge due to the scale and physical disparate nature of the use case. They want to be able to validate the OCP and CNF software before taking the server to the Far Edge site as a last minute sanity check before shipping the platform to the Far Edge site.
  • IPSec Support at Cluster Boot Some far edge deployments occur on an insecure network and for that reason access to the host’s BMC is not allowed, additionally an IPSec tunnel must be established before any traffic leaves the cluster once its at the Far Edge site. It is not possible to enable IPSec on the BMC NIC and therefore even OpenShift has booted the BMC is still not accessible.

Requirements

  • Factory Depot: Install OCP with minimal steps
    • Telecommunications Providers don't want an installation experience, just pick a version and hit enter to install
    • Configuration w/ DU Profile (PTP, SR-IOV, see telco engineering for details) as well as customer-specific addons (Ignition Overrides, MachineConfig, and other operators: ODF, FEC SR-IOV, for example)
    • The installation cannot increase in-service OCP compute budget (don't install anything other that what is needed for DU)
    • Provide ability to validate previously installed OCP nodes
    • Provide ability to update previously installed OCP nodes
    • 100 parallel installations at Service Depot
  • Far Edge: Deploy OCP with minimal steps
    • Provide site specific information via usb/file mount or simple interface
    • Minimize time spent at far edge site by technician/barista/installer
    • Register with desired RHACM Hub cluster for ongoing LCM
  • Minimal ongoing maintenance of solution
    • Some, but not all telco operators, do not want to install and maintain an OCP / ACM cluster at Service Depot
  • The current IPSec solution requires a libreswan container to run on the host so that all N/S OCP traffic is encrypted. With the current IPSec solution this feature would need to support provisioning host-based containers.

 

A list of specific needs or objectives that a Feature must deliver to satisfy the Feature. Some requirements will be flagged as MVP. If an MVP gets shifted, the feature shifts.  If a non MVP requirement slips, it does not shift the feature.

requirement Notes isMvp?
     
     
     

 

Describe Use Cases (if needed)

Telecommunications Service Provider Technicians will be rolling out OCP w/ a vDU configuration to new Far Edge sites, at scale. They will be working from a service depot where they will pre-install/pre-image a set of Far Edge servers to be deployed at a later date. When ready for deployment, a technician will take one of these generic-OCP servers to a Far Edge site, enter the site specific information, wait for confirmation that the vDU is in-service/online, and then move on to deploy another server to a different Far Edge site.

 

Retail employees in brick-and-mortar stores will install SNO servers and it needs to be as simple as possible. The servers will likely be shipped to the retail store, cabled and powered by a retail employee and the site-specific information needs to be provided to the system in the simplest way possible, ideally without any action from the retail employee.

 

Out of Scope

Q: how challenging will it be to support multi-node clusters with this feature?

Background, and strategic fit

< What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? >

Assumptions

< Are there assumptions being made regarding prerequisites and dependencies?>

< Are there assumptions about hardware, software or people resources?>

Customer Considerations

< Are there specific customer environments that need to be considered (such as working with existing h/w and software)?>

< Are there Upgrade considerations that customers need to account for or that the feature should address on behalf of the customer?>

<Does the Feature introduce data that could be gathered and used for Insights purposes?>

Documentation Considerations

< What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)? >

< What does success look like?>

< Does this feature have doc impact?  Possible values are: New Content, Updates to existing content,  Release Note, or No Doc Impact>

< If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy. If yes, complete the following.>

  • <What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?>
  • <How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?>
  • <What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?>
  • <Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available. >
  • <What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?>

Interoperability Considerations

< Which other products and versions in our portfolio does this feature impact?>

< What interoperability test scenarios should be factored by the layered product(s)?>

Questions

Question Outcome
   

 

 

Epic Goal

  • Install SNO within 10 minutes

Why is this important?

  • SNO installation takes around 40+ minutes.
  • This makes SNO less appealing when compared to k3s/microshift.
  • We should analyze the  SNO installation, figure our why it takes so long and come up with ways to optimize it

Scenarios

  1. ...

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

  1. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ULmKBzfT7MibbTS6Sy3cNtjqDX1o7Q0Rek3tAe1LSGA/edit?usp=sharing

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-14416. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

When installing SNO with bootstrap in place the cluster-policy-controller hangs for 6 minutes waiting for the lease to be acquired. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to Reproduce:

1.Run the PoC using the makefile here https://github.com/eranco74/bootstrap-in-place-poc
2.Observe the cluster-policy-controller logs post reboot

Actual results:

I0530 16:01:18.011988       1 leaderelection.go:352] lock is held by leaderelection.k8s.io/unknown and has not yet expired
I0530 16:01:18.012002       1 leaderelection.go:253] failed to acquire lease kube-system/cluster-policy-controller-lock
I0530 16:07:31.176649       1 leaderelection.go:258] successfully acquired lease kube-system/cluster-policy-controller-lock

Expected results:

Expected the bootstrap cluster-policy-controller to release the lease so that the cluster-policy-controller running post reboot won't have to wait the lease to expire.  

Additional info:

Suggested resolution for bootstrap in place: https://github.com/openshift/installer/pull/7219/files#diff-f12fbadd10845e6dab2999e8a3828ba57176db10240695c62d8d177a077c7161R44-R59

Complete Epics

This section includes Jira cards that are linked to an Epic, but the Epic itself is not linked to any Feature. These epics were completed when this image was assembled

Epic Goal

  • Update OpenShift components that are owned by the Builds + Jenkins Team to use Kubernetes 1.25

Why is this important?

  • Our components need to be updated to ensure that they are using the latest bug/CVE fixes, features, and that they are API compatible with other OpenShift components.

Acceptance Criteria

  • Existing CI/CD tests must be passing

This is epic tracks "business as usual" requirements / enhancements / bug fixing of Insights Operator.

Today the links point at a rule-scoped page, but that page lacks information about recommended resolution.  You can click through by cluster ID to your specific cluster and get that recommendation advice, but it would be more convenient and less confusing for customers if we linked directly to the cluster-scoped recommendation page.

We can implement by updating the template here to be:

fmt.Sprintf("https://console.redhat.com/openshift/insights/advisor/clusters/%s?first=%s%%7C%s", clusterID, ruleIDStr, rec.ErrorKey)

or something like that.

 

unknowns

request is clear, solution/implementation to be further clarified

This epic contains all the Dynamic Plugins related stories for OCP release-4.11 

Epic Goal

  • Track all the stories under a single epic

Acceptance Criteria

  •  

This story only covers API components. We will create a separate story for other utility functions.

Today we are generating documentation for Console's Dynamic Plugin SDK in
frontend/packages/dynamic-plugin-sdk. We are missing ts-doc for a set of hooks and components.

We are generating the markdown from the dynamic-plugin-sdk using

yarn generate-doc

Here is the list of the API that the dynamic-plugin-sdk is exposing:

https://gist.github.com/spadgett/0ddefd7ab575940334429200f4f7219a

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Add missing jsdocs for the API that dynamic-plugin-sdk exposes

Out of Scope:

  • This does not include work for integrating the API docs into the OpenShift docs
  • This does not cover other public utilities, only components.

This epic contains all the Dynamic Plugins related stories for OCP release-4.12

Epic Goal

  • Track all the stories under a single epic

Acceptance Criteria

`@openshift-console/plugin-shared` (NPM) is a package that will contain shared components that can be upversioned separately by the Plugins so they can keep core compatibility low but upversion and support more shared components as we need them.

This isn't documented today. We need to do that.

Acceptance Criteria

  • Add a note in the "SDK packages" section of the README about the existence of this package and it's purpose
    • The purpose of being a static utility delivery library intended not to be tied to OpenShift Console versions and compatible with multiple version of OpenShift Console

Based on API review CONSOLE-3145, we have decided to deprecate the following APIs:

  • useAccessReviewAllowed (use useAccessReview instead)
  • useSafetyFirst

cc Andrew Ballantyne Bryan Florkiewicz 

Currently our `api.md` does not generate docs with "tags" (aka `@deprecated`) – we'll need to add that functionality to the `generate-doc.ts` script. See the code that works for `console-extensions.md`

The extension `console.dashboards/overview/detail/item` doesn't constrain the content to fit the card.

The details-card has an expectation that a <dd> item will be the last item (for spacing between items). Our static details-card items use a component called 'OverviewDetailItem'. This isn't enforced in the extension and can cause undesired padding issues if they just do whatever they want.

I feel our approach here should be making the extension take the props of 'OverviewDetailItem' where 'children' is the new 'component'.

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Deprecate the old extension (in docs, with date/stamp)
  • Make a new extension that applies a stricter type
  • Include this new extension next to the old one (with the error boundary around it)

Move `frontend/public/components/nav` to `packages/console-app/src/components/nav` and address any issues resulting from the move.

There will be some expected lint errors relating to cyclical imports. These will require some refactoring to address.

To align with https://github.com/openshift/dynamic-plugin-sdk, plugin metadata field dependencies as well as the @console/pluginAPI entry contained within should be made optional.

If a plugin doesn't declare the @console/pluginAPI dependency, the Console release version check should be skipped for that plugin.

Following https://coreos.slack.com/archives/C011BL0FEKZ/p1650640804532309, it would be useful for us (network observability team) to have access to ResourceIcon in dynamic-plugin-sdk.

Currently ResourceLink is exported but not ResourceIcon

 

AC:

  • Require the ResourceIcon  from public to dynamic-plugin-sdk
  • Add the component to the dynamic-demo-plugin
  • Add a CI test to check for the ResourceIcon component

 

We neither use nor support static plugin nav extensions anymore so we should remove the API in the static plugin SDK and get rid of related cruft in our current nav components.

 

AC: Remove static plugin nav extensions code. Check the navigation code for any references to the old API.

Currently the ConsolePlugins API version is v1alpha1. Since we are going GA with dynamic plugins we should be creating a v1 version.

This would require updates in following repositories:

  1. openshift/api (add the v1 version and generate a new CRD)
  2. openshift/client-go (picku the changes in the openshift/api repo and generate clients & informers for the new v1 version)
  3. openshift/console-operator repository will using both the new v1 version and v1alpha1 in code and manifests folder.

AC:

  • both v1 and v1alpha1 ConsolePlugins should be passed to the console-config.yaml when the plugins are enabled and present on the cluster.

 

NOTE: This story does not include the conversion webhook change which will be created as a follow on story

The console has good error boundary components that are useful for dynamic plugin.
Exposing them will enable the plugins to get the same look and feel of handling react errors as console
The minimum requirement right now is to expose the ErrorBoundaryFallbackPage component from
https://github.com/openshift/console/blob/master/frontend/packages/console-shared/src/components/error/fallbacks/ErrorBoundaryFallbackPage.tsx

During the development of https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CONSOLE-3062, it was determined additional information is needed in order to assist a user when troubleshooting a Failed plugin (see https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/11664#issuecomment-1159024959). As it stands today, there is no data available to the console to relay to the user regarding why the plugin Failed. Presumably, a message should be added to NotLoadedDynamicPlugin to address this gap.

 

AC: Add `message` property to NotLoadedDynamicPluginInfo type.

We should have a global notification or the `Console plugins` page (e.g., k8s/cluster/operator.openshift.io~v1~Console/cluster/console-plugins) should alert users when console operator `spec.managementState` is `Unmanaged` as changes to `enabled` for plugins will have no effect.

when defining two proxy endpoints, 
apiVersion: console.openshift.io/v1alpha1
kind: ConsolePlugin
metadata:
...
name: forklift-console-plugin
spec:
displayName: Console Plugin Template
proxy:

  • alias: forklift-inventory
    authorize: true
    service:
    name: forklift-inventory
    namespace: konveyor-forklift
    port: 8443
    type: Service
  • alias: forklift-must-gather-api
    authorize: true
    service:
    name: forklift-must-gather-api
    namespace: konveyor-forklift
    port: 8443
    type: Service

service:
basePath: /
I get two proxy endpoints
/api/proxy/plugin/forklift-console-plugin/forklift-inventory
and
/api/proxy/plugin/forklift-console-plugin/forklift-must-gather-api

but both proxy to the `forklift-must-gather-api` service

e.g.
curl to:
[server url]/api/proxy/plugin/forklift-console-plugin/forklift-inventory
will point to the `forklift-must-gather-api` service, instead of the `forklift-inventory` service

This epic contains all the OLM related stories for OCP release-4.12

Epic Goal

  • Track all the stories under a single epic

This enhancement Introduces support for provisioning and upgrading heterogenous architecture clusters in phases.

 

We need to scan through the compute nodes and build a set of supported architectures from those. Each node on the cluster has a label for architecture: e.g. kubernetes.io/arch=arm64, kubernetes.io/arch=amd64 etc. Based on the set of supported architectures console will need to surface only those operators in the Operator Hub, which are supported on our Nodes.

 

AC: 

  1. Implement logic in the console-operator that will scan though all the nodes and build a set of all the architecture types that the cluster nodes run on and pass it to the console-config.yaml
  2. Add unit and e2e test cases in the console-operator repository.

 

@jpoulin is good to ask about heterogeneous clusters.

This enhancement Introduces support for provisioning and upgrading heterogenous architecture clusters in phases.

 

We need to scan through the compute nodes and build a set of supported architectures from those. Each node on the cluster has a label for architecture: e.g. `kuberneties.io/arch:arm64`, `kubernetes.io/arch:amd64` etc. Based on the set of supported architectures console will need to surface only those operators in the Operator Hub, which are supported on our Nodes. Each operator's PackageManifest contains a labels that indicates whats the operator's supported architecture, e.g.  `operatorframework.io/arch.s390x: supported`. An operator can be supported on multiple architectures

AC:

  1. Implement logic in the console's backend to read the set of architecture types from console-config.yaml and set it as a SERVER_FLAG.nodeArchitectures (Change similar to https://github.com/openshift/console/commit/39aabe171a2e89ed3757ac2146d252d087fdfd33)
  2. In Operator hub render only operators that are support on any given node, based on the SERVER_FLAG.nodeArchitectures field implemented in CONSOLE-3242.

 

OS and arch filtering: https://github.com/openshift/console/blob/2ad4e17d76acbe72171407fc1c66ca4596c8aac4/frontend/packages/operator-lifecycle-manager/src/components/operator-hub/operator-hub-items.tsx#L49-L86

 

@jpoulin is good to ask about heterogeneous clusters.

An epic we can duplicate for each release to ensure we have a place to catch things we ought to be doing regularly but can tend to fall by the wayside.

As a developer, I want to be able to clean up the css markup after making the css / scss changes required for dark mode and remove any old unused css / scss content. 

 

Acceptance criteria:

  • Remove any unused scss / css content after revamping for dark mode

Epic Goal

  • Enable OpenShift IPI Installer to deploy OCP to a shared VPC in GCP.
  • The host project is where the VPC and subnets are defined. Those networks are shared to one or more service projects.
  • Objects created by the installer are created in the service project where possible. Firewall rules may be the only exception.
  • Documentation outlines the needed minimal IAM for both the host and service project.

Why is this important?

  • Shared VPC's are a feature of GCP to enable granular separation of duties for organizations that centrally manage networking but delegate other functions and separation of billing. This is used more often in larger organizations where separate teams manage subsets of the cloud infrastructure. Enterprises that use this model would also like to create IPI clusters so that they can leverage the features of IPI. Currently organizations that use Shared VPC's must use UPI and implement the features of IPI themselves. This is repetative engineering of little value to the customer and an increased risk of drift from upstream IPI over time. As new features are built into IPI, organizations must become aware of those changes and implement them themselves instead of getting them "for free" during upgrades.

Scenarios

  1. Deploy cluster(s) into service project(s) on network(s) shared from a host project.

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

User Story:

As a user, I want to be able to:

  • skip creating service accounts in Terraform when using passthrough credentialsMode.
  • pass the installer service account to Terraform to be used as the service account for instances when using passthrough credentialsMode.

so that I can achieve

  • creating an IPI cluster using Shared VPC networks using a pre-created service account with the necessary permissions in the Host Project.

Acceptance Criteria:

Description of criteria:

  • Upstream documentation
  • Point 1
  • Point 2
  • Point 3

(optional) Out of Scope:

Detail about what is specifically not being delivered in the story

Engineering Details:

1. Proposed title of this feature request
Basic authentication for Helm Chart repository in helmchartrepositories.helm.openshift.io CRD.

2. What is the nature and description of the request?
As of v4.6.9, the HelmChartRepository CRD only supports client TLS authentication through spec.connectionConfig.tlsClientConfig.

3. Why do you need this? (List the business requirements here)
Basic authentication is widely used by many chart repositories managers (Nexus OSS, Artifactory, etc.)
Helm CLI also supports them with the helm repo add command.
https://helm.sh/docs/helm/helm_repo_add/

4. How would you like to achieve this? (List the functional requirements here)
Probably by extending the CRD:

spec:
connectionConfig:
username: username
password:
secretName: secret-name

The secret namespace should be openshift-config to align with the tlsClientConfig behavior.

5. For each functional requirement listed in question 4, specify how Red Hat and the customer can test to confirm the requirement is successfully implemented.
Trying to pull helm charts from remote private chart repositories that has disabled anonymous access and offers basic authentication.
E.g.: https://github.com/sonatype/docker-nexus

Owner: Architect:

Story (Required)

As an OCP user I will like to be able to install helm charts from repos added to ODC with basic authentication fields populated

Background (Required)

We need to support helm installs for Repos that have the basic authentication secret name and namespace.

Glossary

Out of scope

Updating the ProjectHelmChartRepository CRD, already done in diff story
Supporting the HelmChartRepository CR, this feature will be scoped first to project/namespace scope repos.

In Scope

<Defines what is included in this story>

Approach(Required)

If the new fields for basic auth are set in the repo CR then use those credentials when making API calls to helm to install/upgrade charts. We will error out if user logged in does not have access to the secret referenced by Repo CR. If basic auth fields are not present we assume is not an authenticated repo.

Dependencies

Nonet

Edge Case

NA

Acceptance Criteria

I can list, install and update charts on authenticated repos from ODC
Needs Documentation both upstream and downstream
Needs new unit test covering repo auth

INVEST Checklist

Dependencies identified
Blockers noted and expected delivery timelines set
Design is implementable
Acceptance criteria agreed upon
Story estimated

Legend

Unknown
Verified
Unsatisfied

Epic Goal

  • Support manifest lists by image streams and the integrated registry. Clients should be able to pull/push manifests lists from/into the integrated registry. They also should be able to import images via `oc import-image` and them pull them from the internal registry.

Why is this important?

  • Manifest lists are becoming more and more popular. Customers want to mirror manifest lists into the registry and be able to pull them by digest.

Scenarios

  1. Manifest lists can be pushed into the integrated registry
  2. Imported manifests list can be pulled from the integrated registry
  3. Image triggers work with manifest lists

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • Existing functionality shouldn't change its behavior

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional)

  1. https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/master/enhancements/manifestlist/manifestlist-support.md

Open questions

  1. Can we merge creation of images without having the pruner?

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA

  • The ImageStream object should contain a new flag indicating that it refers to a manifest list
  • openshift-controller-manager uses new openshift/api code to import image streams
  • changing `importMode` of an image stream tag triggers a new import (i.e. updates generation in the tag spec)

NOTES

This is a follow up Epic to https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MCO-144, which aimed to get in-place upgrades for Hypershift. This epic aims to capture additional work to focus on using CoreOS/OCP layering into Hypershift, which has benefits such as:

 

 - removing or reducing the need for ignition

 - maintaining feature parity between self-driving and managed OCP models

 - adding additional functionality such as hotfixes

Right now in https://github.com/openshift/hypershift/pull/1258 you can only perform one upgrade at a time. Multiple upgrades will break due to controller logic

 

Properly create logic to handle manifest creation/updates and deletion, so the logic is more bulletproof

Currently not implemented, and will require the MCD hypershift mode to be adjusted to handle disruptionless upgrades like regular MCD

Epic Goal

  • We need the installer to accept a LB type from user and then we could set type of LB in the following object.
    oc get ingress.config.openshift.io/cluster -o yaml
    Then we can fetch info from this object and reconcile the operator to have the NLB changes reflected.

 

This is an API change and we will consider this as a feature request.

Why is this important?

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/NE-799 Please check this for more details

 

Scenarios

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/NE-799 Please check this for more details

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. installer
  2. ingress operator

Previous Work (Optional):

 No

Open questions::

N/A

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

We need tests for the ovirt-csi-driver and the cluster-api-provider-ovirt. These tests help us to

  • minimize bugs,
  • reproduce and fix them faster and
  • pin down current behavior of the driver

Also, having dedicated tests on lower levels with a smaller scope (unit, integration, ...) has the following benefits:

  • fast feedback cycle (local test execution)
  • developer in-code documentation
  • easier onboarding for new contributers
  • lower resource consumption
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

Description

As a user, In the topology view, I would like to be updated intuitively if any of the deployments have reached quota limits

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Show a yellow border around deployments if any of the deployments have reached the quota limit
  2. For deployments, if there are any errors associated with resource limits or quotas, include a warning alert in the side panel.
    1. If we know resource limits are the cause, include link to Edit resource limits
    2. If we know pod count is the cause, include a link to Edit pod count

Additional Details:

 

Refer below for more details 

Description

As a user, I would like to be informed in an intuitive way,  when quotas have been reached in a namespace

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Show an alert banner on the Topology and add page for this project/namespace when there is a RQ (Resource Quota) / ACRQ (Applied Cluster Resource Quota) issue
    PF guideline: https://www.patternfly.org/v4/components/alert/design-guidelines#using-alerts 
  2. The above alert should have a CTA link to the search page with all RQ, ACRQ and if there is just one show the details page for the same
  3. For RQ, ACRQ list view show one more column called status with details as shown in the project view.

Additional Details:

 

Refer below for more details 

Goal

Provide a form driven experience to allow cluster admins to manage the perspectives to meet the ACs below.

Problem:

We have heard the following requests from customers and developer advocates:

  • Some admins do not want to provide access to the Developer Perspective from the console
  • Some admins do not want to provide non-priv users access to the Admin Perspective from the console

Acceptance criteria:

  1. Cluster administrator is able to "hide" the admin perspective for non-priv users
  2. Cluster administrator is able to "hide" the developer perspective for all users
  3. Be user that User Preferences for individual users behaves appropriately. If only one perspective is available, the perspective switcher is not needed.

Dependencies (External/Internal):

Design Artifacts:

Exploration:

Note:

Description

As an admin, I want to hide user perspective(s) based on the customization.

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Hide perspective(s) based on the customization
    1. When the admin perspective is disabled -> we hide the admin perspective for all unprivileged users
    2. When the dev perspective is disabled -> we hide the dev perspective for all users
  2. When all the perspectives are hidden from a user or for all users, show the Admin perspective by default

Additional Details:

Description

As an admin, I want to be able to use a form driven experience  to hide user perspective(s)

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Add checkboxes with the options
    1. Hide "Administrator" perspective for non-privileged users
    2.  Hide "Developer" perspective for all users
  2. The console configuration CR should be updated as per the selected option

Additional Details:

Description

As an admin, I want to hide the admin perspective for non-privileged users or hide the developer perspective for all users

Based on the https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-6730 enhancement proposal, it is required to extend the console configuration CRD to enable the cluster admins to configure this data in the console resource

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Extend the "customization" spec type definition for the CRD in the openshift/api project

Additional Details:

Previous customization work:

  1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5416
  2. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5020
  3. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5447

Description

As an admin, I should be able to see a code snippet that shows how to add user perspectives

Based on the https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-6732 enhancement proposal, the cluster admin can add user perspectives

To support the cluster-admin to configure the perspectives correctly, the developer console should provide a code snippet for the customization of yaml resource (Console CRD).

Customize Perspective Enhancement PR: https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/pull/1205

Acceptance Criteria

  1. When the admin opens the Console CRD there is a snippet in the sidebar which provides a default YAML which supports the admin to add user perspectives

Additional Details:

Previous work:

  1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5080
  2. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5449

Problem:

Customers don't want their users to have access to some/all of the items which are available in the Developer Catalog.  The request is to change access for the cluster, not per user or persona.

Goal:

Provide a form driven experience to allow cluster admins easily disable the Developer Catalog, or one or more of the sub catalogs in the Developer Catalog.

Why is it important?

Multiple customer requests.

Acceptance criteria:

  1. As a cluster admin, I can hide/disable access to the developer catalog for all users across all namespaces.
  2. As a cluster admin, I can hide/disable access to a specific sub-catalog in the developer catalog for all users across all namespaces.
    1. Builder Images
    2. Templates
    3. Helm Charts
    4. Devfiles
    5. Operator Backed

Notes

We need to consider how this will work with subcatalogs which are installed by operators: VMs, Event Sources, Event Catalogs, Managed Services, Cloud based services

Dependencies (External/Internal):

Design Artifacts:

Exploration:

Note:

Description

As an admin, I want to hide sub-catalogs in the developer catalog or hide the developer catalog completely based on the customization.

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Hide all links to the sub-catalog(s) from the add page, topology actions, empty states, quick search, and the catalog itself
  2. The sub-catalog should show Not found if the user opens the sub-catalog directly
  3. The feature should not be hidden if a sub-catalog option is disabled

Additional Details:

Description

As an admin, I want to hide/disable access to specific sub-catalogs in the developer catalog or the complete dev catalog for all users across all namespaces.

Based on the https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-6732 enhancement proposal, it is required to extend the console configuration CRD to enable the cluster admins to configure this data in the console resource

Acceptance Criteria

Extend the "customization" spec type definition for the CRD in the openshift/api project

Additional Details:

Previous customization work:

  1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5416
  2. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5020
  3. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5447

Description

As a cluster-admin, I should be able to see a code snippet that shows how to enable sub-catalogs or the entire dev catalog.

Based on the https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-6732 enhancement proposal, the cluster admin can add sub-catalog(s)  from the Developer Catalog or the Dev catalog as a whole.

To support the cluster-admin to configure the sub-catalog list correctly, the developer console should provide a code snippet for the customization yaml resource (Console CRD).

Acceptance Criteria

  1. When the admin opens the Console CRD there is a snippet in the sidebar which provides a default YAML, which supports the admin to add sub-catalogs/the whole dev catalog

Additional Details:

Previous work:

  1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5080
  2. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5449

Epic Goal

  • Facilitate the transition to for OLM and content to PSA enforcing the `restricted` security profile
  • Use the label synch'er to enforce the required security profile
  • Current content should work out-of-the-box as is
  • Upgrades should not be blocked

Why is this important?

  • PSA helps secure the cluster by enforcing certain security restrictions that the pod must meet to be scheduled
  • 4.12 will enforce the `restricted` profile, which will affect the deployment of operators in `openshift-*` namespaces 

Scenarios

  1. Admin installs operator in an `openshift-*`namespace that is not managed by the label syncher -> label should be applied
  2. Admin installs operator in an `openshift-*` namespace that has a label asking the label syncher to not reconcile it -> nothing changes

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • Done only downstream
  • Transition documentation written and reviewed

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. label syncher (still searching for the link)

Open questions::

  1. Is this only for openshift-* namespaces?

Resources

Stakeholders

  • Daniel S...?

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

As an admin, I would like openshift-* namespaces with an operator to be labeled with security.openshift.io/scc.podSecurityLabelSync=true to ensure the continual functioning of operators without manual intervention. The label should only be applied to openshift-* namespaces with an operator (the presence of a ClusterServiceVersion resource) IF the label is not already present. This automation will help smooth functioning of the cluster and avoid frivolous operational events.

Context: As part of the PSA migration period, Openshift will ship with the "label sync'er" - a controller that will automatically adjust PSA security profiles in response to the workloads present in the namespace. We can assume that not all operators (produced by Red Hat, the community or ISVs) will have successfully migrated their deployments in response to upstream PSA changes. The label sync'er will sync, by default, any namespace not prefixed with "openshift-", of which an explicit label (security.openshift.io/scc.podSecurityLabelSync=true) is required for sync.

A/C:
 - OLM operator has been modified (downstream only) to label any unlabelled "openshift-" namespace in which a CSV has been created
 - If a labeled namespace containing at least one non-copied csv becomes unlabelled, it should be relabelled 
 - The implementation should be done in a way to eliminate or minimize subsequent downstream sync work (it is ok to make slight architectural changes to the OLM operator in the upstream to enable this)

The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

As a SRE, I want hypershift operator to expose a metric when hosted control plane is ready. 

This should allow SRE to tune (or silence) alerts occurring while the hosted control plane is spinning up. 

 

 

The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

The Kube APIServer has a sidecar to output audit logs. We need similar sidecars for other APIServers that run on the control plane side. We also need to pass the same audit log policy that we pass to the KAS to these other API servers.

This epic tracks network tooling improvements for 4.12

New framework and process should be developed to make sharing network tools with devs, support and customers convenient. We are going to add some tools for ovn troubleshooting before ovn-k goes default, also some tools that we got from customer cases, and some more to help analyze and debug collected logs based on stable must-gather/sosreport format we get now thanks to 4.11 Epic.

Our estimation for this Epic is 1 engineer * 2 Sprints

WHY:
This epic is important to help improve the time it takes our customers and our team to understand an issue within the cluster.
A focus of this epic is to develop tools to quickly allow debugging of a problematic cluster. This is crucial for the engineering team to help us scale. We want to provide a tool to our customers to help lower the cognitive burden to get at a root cause of an issue.

 

Alert if any of the ovn controllers disconnected for a period of time from the southbound database using metric ovn_controller_southbound_database_connected.

The metric updates every 2 minutes so please be mindful of this when creating the alert.

If the controller is disconnected for 10 minutes, fire an alert.

DoD: Merged to CNO and tested by QE

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->

Epic Goal

  • Come up with a consistent way to detect node down on OCP and hypershift. Current mechanism for OCP (probe port 9) does not work for hypershift, meaning, hypershift node down detection will be longer (~40 secs). We should aim to have a common mechanism for both. As well, we should consider alternatives to the probing port 9. Perhaps BFD, or other detection.
  • Get clarification on node down detection times. Some customers have (apparently) asked for detection on the order of 100ms, recommendation is to use multiple Egress IPs, so this may not be a hard requirement. Need clarification from PM/Customers.

Why is this important?

Scenarios

  1. ...

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Add sock proxy to cluster-network-operator so egressip can use grpc to reach worker nodes.
 
With the introduction of grpc as means for determining the state of a given egress node, hypershift should
be able to leverage socks proxy and become able to know the state of each egress node.
 
References relevant to this work:
1281-network-proxy
[+https://coreos.slack.com/archives/C01C8502FMM/p1658427627751939+]
[+https://github.com/openshift/hypershift/pull/1131/commits/28546dc587dc028dc8bded715847346ff99d65ea+]

This Epic is here to track the rebase we need to do when kube 1.25 is GA https://www.kubernetes.dev/resources/release/

Keeping this in mind can help us plan our time better. ATTOW GA is planned for August 23

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1h1XsEt1Iug-W9JRheQas7YRsUJ_NQ8ghEMVmOZ4X-0s/edit --> this is the link for rebase help

Incomplete Epics

This section includes Jira cards that are linked to an Epic, but the Epic itself is not linked to any Feature. These epics were not completed when this image was assembled

Place holder epic to track spontaneous task which does not deserve its own epic.

Once the HostedCluster and NodePool gets stopped using PausedUntil statement, the awsprivatelink controller will continue reconciling.

 

How to test this:

  • Deploy a private cluster
  • Put it in pause once deployed
  • Delete the AWSEndPointService and the Service from the HCP namespace
  • And wait for a reconciliation, the result it's that they should not be recreated
  • Unpause it and wait for recreation.

AC:

We have connectDirectlyToCloudAPIs flag in konnectiviy socks5 proxy to dial directly to cloud providers without going through konnectivity.

This introduce another path for exception https://github.com/openshift/hypershift/pull/1722

We should consolidate both by keep using connectDirectlyToCloudAPIs until there's a reason to not.

 

DoD:

At the moment if the input etcd kms encryption (key and role) is invalid we fail transparently.

We should check that both key and role are compatible/operational for a given cluster and fail in a condition otherwise

AWS has a hard limit of 100 OIDC providers globally. 
Currently each HostedCluster created by e2e creates its own OIDC provider, which results in hitting the quota limit frequently and causing the tests to fail as a result.

 
DOD:
Only a single OIDC provider should be created and shared between all e2e HostedClusters. 

Changes made in METAL-1 open up opportunities to improve our handling of images by cleaning up redundant code that generates extra work for the user and extra load for the cluster.

We only need to run the image cache DaemonSet if there is a QCOW URL to be mirrored (effectively this means a cluster installed with 4.9 or earlier). We can stop deploying it for new clusters installed with 4.10 or later.

Currently, the image-customization-controller relies on the image cache running on every master to provide the shared hostpath volume containing the ISO and initramfs. The first step is to replace this with a regular volume and an init container in the i-c-c pod that extracts the images from machine-os-images. We can use the copy-metal -image-build flag (instead of -all used in the shared volume) to provide only the required images.

Once i-c-c has its own volume, we can switch the image extraction in the metal3 Pod's init container to use the -pxe flag instead of -all.

The machine-os-images init container for the image cache (not the metal3 Pod) can be removed. The whole image cache deployment is now optional and need only be started if provisioningOSDownloadURL is set (and in fact should be deleted if it is not).

Epic Goal

  • To improve the reliability of disk cleaning before installation and to provide the user with sufficient warning regarding the consequences of the cleaning

Why is this important?

  • Insufficient cleaning can lead to installation failure
  • Insufficient warning can lead to complaints of unexpected data loss

Scenarios

  1.  

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Description of the problem:
When running assisted-installer on a machine where is more than one volume group per physical volume. Only the first volume group will be cleaned up. This leads to problems later and will lead to errors such as

Failed - failed executing nsenter [--target 1 --cgroup --mount --ipc --pid -- pvremove /dev/sda -y -ff], Error exit status 5, LastOutput "Can't open /dev/sda exclusively. Mounted filesystem? 

How reproducible:

Set up a VM with more than one volume group per physical volume. As an example, look at the following sample from a customer cluster.

List block devices
/usr/bin/lsblk -o NAME,MAJ:MIN,SIZE,TYPE,FSTYPE,KNAME,MODEL,UUID,WWN,HCTL,VENDOR,STATE,TRAN,PKNAME
NAME              MAJ:MIN   SIZE TYPE FSTYPE      KNAME MODEL            UUID                                   WWN                HCTL       VENDOR   STATE   TRAN PKNAME
loop0               7:0   125.9G loop xfs         loop0                  c080b47b-2291-495c-8cc0-2009ebc39839                                                       
loop1               7:1   885.5M loop squashfs    loop1                                                                                                             
sda                 8:0   894.3G disk             sda   INTEL SSDSC2KG96                                        0x55cd2e415235b2db 1:0:0:0    ATA      running sas  
|-sda1              8:1     250M part             sda1                                                          0x55cd2e415235b2db                                  sda
|-sda2              8:2     750M part ext2        sda2                   3aa73c72-e342-4a07-908c-a8a49767469d   0x55cd2e415235b2db                                  sda
|-sda3              8:3      49G part xfs         sda3                   ffc3ccfe-f150-4361-8ae5-f87b17c13ac2   0x55cd2e415235b2db                                  sda
|-sda4              8:4   394.2G part LVM2_member sda4                   Ua3HOc-Olm4-1rma-q0Ug-PtzI-ZOWg-RJ63uY 0x55cd2e415235b2db                                  sda
`-sda5              8:5     450G part LVM2_member sda5                   W8JqrD-ZvaC-uNK9-Y03D-uarc-Tl4O-wkDdhS 0x55cd2e415235b2db                                  sda
  `-nova-instance 253:0     3.1T lvm  ext4        dm-0                   d15e2de6-2b97-4241-9451-639f7b14594e                                          running      sda5
sdb                 8:16  894.3G disk             sdb   INTEL SSDSC2KG96                                        0x55cd2e415235b31b 1:0:1:0    ATA      running sas  
`-sdb1              8:17  894.3G part LVM2_member sdb1                   6ETObl-EzTd-jLGw-zVNc-lJ5O-QxgH-5wLAqD 0x55cd2e415235b31b                                  sdb
  `-nova-instance 253:0     3.1T lvm  ext4        dm-0                   d15e2de6-2b97-4241-9451-639f7b14594e                                          running      sdb1
sdc                 8:32  894.3G disk             sdc   INTEL SSDSC2KG96                                        0x55cd2e415235b652 1:0:2:0    ATA      running sas  
`-sdc1              8:33  894.3G part LVM2_member sdc1                   pBuktx-XlCg-6Mxs-lddC-qogB-ahXa-Nd9y2p 0x55cd2e415235b652                                  sdc
  `-nova-instance 253:0     3.1T lvm  ext4        dm-0                   d15e2de6-2b97-4241-9451-639f7b14594e                                          running      sdc1
sdd                 8:48  894.3G disk             sdd   INTEL SSDSC2KG96                                        0x55cd2e41521679b7 1:0:3:0    ATA      running sas  
`-sdd1              8:49  894.3G part LVM2_member sdd1                   exVSwU-Pe07-XJ6r-Sfxe-CQcK-tu28-Hxdnqo 0x55cd2e41521679b7                                  sdd
  `-nova-instance 253:0     3.1T lvm  ext4        dm-0                   d15e2de6-2b97-4241-9451-639f7b14594e                                          running      sdd1
sr0                11:0     989M rom  iso9660     sr0   Virtual CDROM0   2022-06-17-18-18-33-00                                    0:0:0:0    AMI      running usb  

Now run the assisted installer and try to install an SNO node on this machine, you will find that the installation will fail with a message that indicates that it could not exclusively access /dev/sda

Actual results:

 The installation will fail with a message that indicates that it could not exclusively access /dev/sda

Expected results:

The installation should proceed and the cluster should start to install.

Suspected Cases
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/AITRIAGE-3809
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/AITRIAGE-3802
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/AITRIAGE-3810

Description of the problem:

Cluster Installation fail if installation disk has lvm on raid:

Host: test-infra-cluster-3cc862c9-master-0, reached installation stage Failed: failed executing nsenter [--target 1 --cgroup --mount --ipc --pid -- mdadm --stop /dev/md0], Error exit status 1, LastOutput "mdadm: Cannot get exclusive access to /dev/md0:Perhaps a running process, mounted filesystem or active volume group?" 

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to reproduce:

1. Install a cluster while master nodes has disk with LVM on RAID (reproduces using test: https://gitlab.cee.redhat.com/ocp-edge-qe/kni-assisted-installer-auto/-/blob/master/api_tests/test_disk_cleanup.py#L97)

Actual results:

Installation failed

Expected results:

Installation success

Epic Goal

  • Increase success-rate of of our CI jobs
  • Improve debugability / visibility or tests 

Why is this important?

  • Failed presubmit jobs (required or optional) can make an already tested+approved PR to not get in
  • Failed periodic jobs interfere our visibility around stability of features

Epic Goal

Why is this important?

Scenarios
1. …

Acceptance Criteria

  • (Enter a list of Acceptance Criteria unique to the Epic)

Dependencies (internal and external)
1. …

Previous Work (Optional):
1. …

Open questions::
1. …

Done Checklist

  • CI - For new features (non-enablement), existing Multi-Arch CI jobs are not broken by the Epic
  • Release Enablement: <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR orf GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - If the Epic is adding a new stream, downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Test Plan tracking software (e.g. Polarion, RQM, etc.): <link or reference to the Test Plan>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • QE - QE to verify documentation when testing
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>
  • All the stories, tasks, sub-tasks and bugs that belong to this epic need to have been completed and indicated by a status of 'Done'.

This is a clone of issue MULTIARCH-3683. The following is the description of the original issue:

Flags similar to these https://github.com/openshift/hypershift/blob/main/cmd/cluster/powervs/create.go#L57toL61 from create command are missing in destroy command, so that infra destroy functionality not getting these flags for proper destroy of infra with existing resources.

This is a clone of issue MULTIARCH-3708. The following is the description of the original issue:

Following issues need to be take care on cluster deletion with resource reuse flags.

  1. Currently it's trying to remove DHCP server on an existing PowerVS instance, need to reuse the existing one to keep it simple.
  2. In case reusing existing VPC, load balancer is not getting removed. 

Description of problem:

check_pkt_length cannot be offloaded without
1) sFlow offload patches in Openvswitch
2) Hardware driver support.

Since 1) will not be done anytime soon. We need a work around for the check_pkt_length issue.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11/4.12

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Any flow that has check_pkt_len()
  5-b: Pod -> NodePort Service traffic (Pod Backend - Different Node)
  6-b: Pod -> NodePort Service traffic (Host Backend - Different Node)
  4-b: Pod -> Cluster IP Service traffic (Host Backend - Different Node)
  10-b: Host Pod -> Cluster IP Service traffic (Host Backend - Different Node)
  11-b: Host Pod -> NodePort Service traffic (Pod Backend - Different Node)
  12-b: Host Pod -> NodePort Service traffic (Host Backend - Different Node)   

Actual results:

Poor performance due to upcalls when check_pkt_len() is not supported.

Expected results:

Good performance.

Additional info:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1LHY-Af-2kQHVwtW4aVdHnmwZLTiatiyf-ySffC8O5NM/edit#gid=670206692

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->

Epic Goal

  • Run OpenShift builds that do not execute as the "root" user on the host node.

Why is this important?

  • OpenShift builds require an elevated set of capabilities to build a container image
  • Builds currently run as root to maintain adequate performance
  • Container workloads should run as non-root from the host's perspective. Containers running as root are a known security risk.
  • Builds currently run as root and require a privileged container. See BUILD-225 for removing the privileged container requirement.

Scenarios

  1. Run BuildConfigs in a multi-tenant environment
  2. Run BuildConfigs in a heightened security environment/deployment

Acceptance Criteria

  • Developers can opt into running builds in a cri-o user namespace by providing an environment variable with a specific value.
  • When the correct environment variable is provided, builds run in a cri-o user namespace, and the build pod does not require the "privileged: true" security context.
  • User namespace builds can pass basic test scenarios for the Docker and Source strategy build.
  • Steps to run unprivileged builds are documented.

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. Buildah supports running inside a non-privileged container
  2. CRI-O allows workloads to opt into running containers in user namespaces.

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. BUILD-225 - remove privileged requirement for builds.

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

User Story

As a developer building container images on OpenShift
I want to specify that my build should run without elevated privileges
So that builds do not run as root from the host's perspective with elevated privileges

Acceptance Criteria

  • Developers can provide an environment variable to indicate the build should not use privileged containers
  • When the correct env var + value is specified, builds run in a user namespace (non-root on the host)

QE Impact

No QE required for Dev Preview. OpenShift regression testing will verify that existing behavior is not impacted.

Docs Impact

We will need to document how to enable this feature, with sufficient warnings regarding Dev Preview.

PX Impact

This likely warrants an OpenShift blog post, potentially?

Notes

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->

Epic Goal

  • ...

Why is this important?

Scenarios

  1. ...

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

We have been running into a number of problems with configure-ovs and nodeip-configuration selecting different interfaces in OVNK deployments. This causes connectivity issues, so we need some way to ensure that everything uses the same interface/IP.

Currently configure-ovs runs before nodeip-configuration, but since nodeip-configuration is the source of truth for IP selection regardless of CNI plugin, I think we need to look at swapping that order. That way configure-ovs could look at what nodeip-configuration chose and not have to implement its own interface selection logic.

I'm targeting this at 4.12 because even though there's probably still time to get it in for 4.11, changing the order of boot services is always a little risky and I'd prefer to do it earlier in the cycle so we have time to tease out any issues that arise. We may need to consider backporting the change though since this has been an issue at least back to 4.10.

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->

Epic Goal

  • Any ERRORs produces by TuneD will result in Degraded Tuned Profiles.  Cleanup upstream and NTO/PPC-shipped TuneD profiles and add ways of limiting the ERROR message count.
  • Review the policy of restarting TuneD on errors every resync period.  See: OCPBUGS-11150

Why is this important?

  •  

Scenarios

  1. ...

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/PSAP-908

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Description of problem:

CU cluster of the Mavenir deployment has cluster-node-tuning-operator in a CrashLoopBackOff state and does not apply performance profile

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.14rc0 and 4.14rc1

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Deploy CU cluster with ZTP gitops method
2. Wait for Policies to be complient
3. Check worker nodes and cluster-node-tuning-operator status 

Actual results:

Nodes do not have performance profile applied
cluster-node-tuning-operator is crashing with following in logs:

E0920 12:16:57.820680       1 runtime.go:79] Observed a panic: &runtime.TypeAssertionError{_interface:(*runtime._type)(nil), concrete:(*runtime._type)(nil), asserted:(*runtime._type)(0x1e68ec0), missingMethod:""} (interface conversion: interface is nil, not v1.Object)
goroutine 615 [running]:
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/runtime.logPanic({0x1c98c20?, 0xc0006b7a70})
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-node-tuning-operator/vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/runtime/runtime.go:75 +0x99
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/runtime.HandleCrash({0x0, 0x0, 0xc000d49500?})
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-node-tuning-operator/vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/runtime/runtime.go:49 +0x75
panic({0x1c98c20, 0xc0006b7a70})
        /usr/lib/golang/src/runtime/panic.go:884 +0x213
github.com/openshift/cluster-node-tuning-operator/pkg/util.ObjectInfo({0x0?, 0x0})
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-node-tuning-operator/pkg/util/objectinfo.go:10 +0x39
github.com/openshift/cluster-node-tuning-operator/pkg/operator.(*ProfileCalculator).machineConfigLabelsMatch(0xc000a23ca0?, 0xc000445620, {0xc0001b38e0, 0x1, 0xc0010bd480?})
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-node-tuning-operator/pkg/operator/profilecalculator.go:374 +0xc7
github.com/openshift/cluster-node-tuning-operator/pkg/operator.(*ProfileCalculator).calculateProfile(0xc000607290, {0xc000a40900, 0x33})
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-node-tuning-operator/pkg/operator/profilecalculator.go:208 +0x2b9
github.com/openshift/cluster-node-tuning-operator/pkg/operator.(*Controller).syncProfile(0xc000195b00, 0x0?, {0xc000a40900, 0x33})
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-node-tuning-operator/pkg/operator/controller.go:664 +0x6fd
github.com/openshift/cluster-node-tuning-operator/pkg/operator.(*Controller).sync(0xc000195b00, {{0x1f48661, 0x7}, {0xc000000fc0, 0x26}, {0xc000a40900, 0x33}, {0x0, 0x0}})
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-node-tuning-operator/pkg/operator/controller.go:371 +0x1571
github.com/openshift/cluster-node-tuning-operator/pkg/operator.(*Controller).eventProcessor.func1(0xc000195b00, {0x1dd49c0?, 0xc000d49500?})
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-node-tuning-operator/pkg/operator/controller.go:193 +0x1de
github.com/openshift/cluster-node-tuning-operator/pkg/operator.(*Controller).eventProcessor(0xc000195b00)
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-node-tuning-operator/pkg/operator/controller.go:212 +0x65
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait.BackoffUntil.func1(0x30?)
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-node-tuning-operator/vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait/backoff.go:226 +0x3e
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait.BackoffUntil(0x0?, {0x224ee20, 0xc000c48ab0}, 0x1, 0xc00087ade0)
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-node-tuning-operator/vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait/backoff.go:227 +0xb6
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait.JitterUntil(0x0?, 0x3b9aca00, 0x0, 0x0?, 0xc0004e6710?)
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-node-tuning-operator/vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait/backoff.go:204 +0x89
k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait.Until(0xc0004e67d0?, 0x91af86?, 0xc000ace0c0?)
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-node-tuning-operator/vendor/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/wait/backoff.go:161 +0x25
created by github.com/openshift/cluster-node-tuning-operator/pkg/operator.(*Controller).run
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/cluster-node-tuning-operator/pkg/operator/controller.go:1407 +0x1ba5
panic: interface conversion: interface is nil, not v1.Object [recovered]
        panic: interface conversion: interface is nil, not v1.Object

Expected results:

cluster-node-tuning-operator is functional, performance profiles applied to worker nodes

Additional info:

There is no issue on a DU node of the same deployment coming from same repository, DU node is configured as requested and cluster-node-tuning-operator is functioning correctly.

must gather from rc0: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1DlzrjQiKTVnQKXdcRIijBkEKjAGsOFn1/view?usp=sharing
must gather from rc1: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qSqQtIunQe5e1hDVDYwa90L9MpEjEA4j/view?usp=sharing

performance profile: https://gitlab.cee.redhat.com/agurenko/mavenir-ztp/-/blob/airtel-4.14/policygentemplates/group-cu-mno-ranGen.yaml

Goal
Provide an indication that advanced features are used

Problem

Today, customers and RH don't have the information on the actual usage of advanced features.

Why is this important?

  1. Better focus upsell efforts
  2. Compliance information for customers that are not aware they are not using the right subscription

 

Prioritized Scenarios

In Scope
1. Add a boolean variable in our telemetry to mark if the customer is using advanced features (PV encryption, encryption with KMS, external mode). 

Not in Scope

Integrate with subscription watch - will be done by the subscription watch team with our help.

Customers

All

Customer Facing Story
As a compliance manager, I should be able to easily see if all my clusters are using the right amount of subscriptions

What does success look like?

A clear indication in subscription watch for ODF usage (either essential or advanced). 

1. Proposed title of this feature request

  • Request to add a bool variable into telemetry which indicates the usage of any of the advanced feature, like PV encryption or KMS encryption or external mode etc.

2. What is the nature and description of the request?

  • Today, customers and RH don't have the information on the actual usage of advanced features. This feature will help RH to have a better indication on the statistics of customers using the advanced features and focus better on upsell efforts.

3. Why does the customer need this? (List the business requirements here)

  • As a compliance manager, I should be able to easily see if all my clusters are using the right amount of subscriptions.

4. List any affected packages or components.

  • Telemetry

_____________________

Link to main epic: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHSTOR-3173

 

Other Complete

This section includes Jira cards that are not linked to either an Epic or a Feature. These tickets were completed when this image was assembled

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4654. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

When we introduced aarch64 support for IPI on Azure, we changed the Installer from using managed images (no architecture support) to using Image Galleries (architecture support). This means that the place where the Installer looks for rhcos bootimages has changed from "/resourceGroups/$rg_name/providers/Microsoft.Compute/images/$cluster_id" to "/resourceGroups/$rg_name/providers/Microsoft.Compute/galleries/gallery_$cluster_id/images/$cluster_id/versions/$rhcos_version".
This has been properly handled in the IPI workflow, with changes to the terraform configs [1]. However, our ARM template for UPI installs [2] still uploads images via Managed Images and therefore breaks workflows provisioning compute nodes with MAO.

[1] https://github.com/openshift/installer/pull/6304
[2] https://github.com/openshift/installer/blob/release-4.12/upi/azure/02_storage.json

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.13 and 4.12

How reproducible:

always

Steps to Reproduce:

Any workflow that provisions compute nodes with MAO. For example, in the UPI deploy with ARM templates:
1. Execute 06_workers.json template with compute.replicas: 0 in the install-config, then run the oc scale command to "activate" MAO provision (`oc scale --replicas=1 machineset $machineset_name -n openshift-machine-api`)
2. Skip 06_workers.json but set compute.replicas: 3 in the install-config. MAO will provision nodes as part of the cluster deploy.

Actual results:

Error Message:           failed to reconcile machine 
"maxu-upi2-gc7n8-worker-eastus3-68gdx": failed to create vm 
maxu-upi2-gc7n8-worker-eastus3-68gdx: failure sending request for 
machine maxu-upi2-gc7n8-worker-eastus3-68gdx: cannot create vm: 
compute.VirtualMachinesClient#CreateOrUpdate: Failure sending request: 
StatusCode=404 -- Original Error: Code="GalleryImageNotFound" 
Message=""The gallery image 
/subscriptions/53b8f551-.../resourceGroups/maxu-upi2-gc7n8-rg/providers/Microsoft.Compute/galleries/gallery_maxu_upi2_gc7n8/images/maxu-upi2-gc7n8-gen2/versions/412.86.20220930
 is not available in eastus region. Please contact image owner to 
replicate to this region, or change your requested region."" 
Target="imageReference"

But the image can be found at:
/subscriptions/53b8f551-.../resourceGroups/maxu-upi2-gc7n8-rg/providers/Microsoft.Compute/images/maxu-upi2-gc7n8-gen2

Expected results:

No errors and the bootimage is loaded from the Image Gallery.

Additional info:

02_storage.json template will have to be rewritten to use Image Gallery instead of Managed Images.

Description of problem: After I run the golang script for OCP-53608, I find the created 

ingress-controller couldn't be deleted

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-08-15-150248

How reproducible: Run the script and try to delete the custom ingress-controller

Steps to Reproduce:
1.

% oc get clusterversion

NAME      VERSION                              AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   SINCE   STATUS

version   4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-08-15-150248   True        False         43m     Cluster version is 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-08-15-150248

shudi@Shudis-MacBook-Pro openshift-tests-private %

2. Run the script

shudi@Shudis-MacBook-Pro openshift-tests-private % ./bin/extended-platform-tests run all --dry-run | grep 53608 | ./bin/extended-platform-tests run -f -

...

---------------------------------------------------------

Received interrupt.  Running AfterSuite...

^C again to terminate immediately

Aug 18 10:35:51.087: INFO: Running AfterSuite actions on all nodes

Aug 18 10:35:51.088: INFO: Waiting up to 7m0s for all (but 100) nodes to be ready

STEP: Destroying namespace "e2e-test-router-tunning-77627" for this suite.

Aug 18 10:35:54.654: INFO: Running AfterSuite actions on node 1

 

failed: (15m4s) 2022-08-18T02:35:54 "[sig-network-edge] Network_Edge should Author:shudili-Low-53608-Negative Test of Expose a Configurable Reload Interval in HAproxy [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]"

 

Failing tests:

 

[sig-network-edge] Network_Edge should Author:shudili-Low-53608-Negative Test of Expose a Configurable Reload Interval in HAproxy [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]

 

error: 1 fail, 0 pass, 0 skip (15m4s)

shudi@Shudis-MacBook-Pro openshift-tests-private % 

3.  show the ingress-controllers

shudi@Shudis-MacBook-Pro openshift-tests-private % oc -n openshift-ingress-operator get ingresscontroller

NAME       AGE

default    113m

ocp53608   42m

shudi@Shudis-MacBook-Pro openshift-tests-private %

 

4. Try to delete the ingress-controller ocp53608, when the message "ingresscontroller.operator.openshift.io "ocp53608" deleted" appears, it is hanged for a long time until the error message appears.

shudi@Shudis-MacBook-Pro openshift-tests-private % oc -n openshift-ingress-operator delete ingresscontroller ocp53608

ingresscontroller.operator.openshift.io "ocp53608" deleted

error: An error occurred while waiting for the object to be deleted: an error on the server ("unable to decode an event from the watch stream: http2: client connection lost") has prevented the request from succeedingUnable to connect to the server: dial tcp 35.194.1.60:6443: i/o timeout

shudi@Shudis-MacBook-Pro openshift-tests-private %

 

5. After "ingresscontroller.operator.openshift.io "ocp53608" deleted" message appears, show the ingress-controller, ocp53608 isn't deleted

shudi@Shudis-MacBook-Pro golang % oc -n openshift-ingress-operator get ingresscontroller

NAME       AGE

default    3h

ocp53608   109m

shudi@Shudis-MacBook-Pro golang %

 

6.  After the error message(rror: An error occurred while waiting for the object to be deleted) appears, try to show the ingresscontroller

shudi@Shudis-MacBook-Pro openshift-tests-private % oc -n openshift-ingress-operator get ingresscontroller

E0818 12:21:57.272967    4168 request.go:1085] Unexpected error when reading response body: net/http: request canceled (Client.Timeout or context cancellation while reading body)

E0818 12:21:57.273379    4168 request.go:1085] Unexpected error when reading response body: net/http: request canceled (Client.Timeout or context cancellation while reading body)

E0818 12:21:57.274306    4168 request.go:1085] Unexpected error when reading response body: net/http: request canceled (Client.Timeout or context cancellation while reading body)

Unable to connect to the server: dial tcp 35.194.1.60:6443: i/o timeout

shudi@Shudis-MacBook-Pro openshift-tests-private %

 

Actual results:  ingress-controller ocp53608  is still there after executed the oc delete command

Expected results:

ingress-controller ocp53608  will be deleted soon after executed the oc delete command

Additional info:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4850. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

Kuryr might take a while to create Pods because it has to create Neutron ports for the pods. If a pod gets deleted while this is being processed, a
warning Event will be generated causing the "[sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network" to fail.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

SYN packets for new tcp connections from inside the cluster to an external destination are dropped at random. After few seconds (i.e. few retries), they eventually succeed and no more packet drop happens. Hence, this is perceived as too long TCP connection establishment delay.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.10.0

How reproducible:

Frequently at a concrete cluster. Other clusters with apparently similar configuration don't show the issue.

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Establish TCP connection from pod to external destination.
2.
3.

Actual results:

SYN packets dropped, long TCP establishment time, leading to timeouts.

Expected results:

No drops

Additional info:

This becomes especially harmful because it impacts communication from openshift-apiserver (not to be confused with kube-apiserver) and etcd, because the former is inside the SDN and etcd isn't.

More details will follow in comments.

Description of problem:
Pipelines Repository support is Tech Preview, this is shown when search for repositories or checking the details page.

But the tabbed pipelines tab (in admin and dev perspective doesn't show this). Also, the "Add Git Repository" form page doesn't mention this.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.11 - 4.13 (master)

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:

  1. Install OpenShift Pipelines operator
  2. Navigate to Pipelines > Repository tab
  3. Select Create > Repository

Actual results:
The Repository tab and the "Add Git Repository" form page doesn't show a Tech Preview badge.

Expected results:
The Repository tab and the "Add Git Repository" form page should show a Tech Preview badge.

Additional info:
Check how the Shipwright Builds show this Tech Preview badge for the tab.

This bug is a backport clone of [Bugzilla Bug 2100429](https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2100429). The following is the description of the original bug:

Description of problem:
[apiserver-auth] default SCC restricted allow volumes don't have "ephemeral" caused deployment with Generic Ephemeral Volumes stuck at Pending

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Cluster version is 4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-06-22-190830
$ oc version
Client Version: 4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-05-11-054135
Kustomize Version: v4.5.4
Server Version: 4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-06-22-190830
Kubernetes Version: v1.24.0+284d62a

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Set up a AWS OCP cluster with 4.11 nightly
2. Create a deployment with Generic Ephemeral Volumes
3. Waiting for the deployment ready and check the volume could write and read data

Test data:
wangpenghao@MacBook-Pro ~ cat temp.yaml
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
name: my-dep
spec:
replicas: 1
selector:
matchLabels:
app: my-dep
template:
metadata:
labels:
app: my-dep
spec:
containers:

  • image: >-
    quay.io/openshifttest/hello-openshift@sha256:b1aabe8c8272f750ce757b6c4263a2712796297511e0c6df79144ee188933623
    name: my-container
    ports:
  • containerPort: 80
    volumeMounts:
  • mountPath: /mnt/storage
    name: inline-volume
    volumes:
  • name: inline-volume
    ephemeral:
    volumeClaimTemplate:
    metadata:
    labels:
    workloadName: my-dep
    spec:
    accessModes:
  • ReadWriteOnce
    storageClassName: gp3-csi
    resources:
    requests:
    storage: 1Gi
    wangpenghao@MacBook-Pro ~ oc apply -f temp.yaml
    Warning: would violate PodSecurity "restricted:v1.24": allowPrivilegeEscalation != false (container "my-dep-mcxx803w" must set securityContext.allowPrivilegeEscalation=false), unrestricted capabilities (container "my-dep-mcxx803w" must set securityContext.capabilities.drop=["ALL"]), runAsNonRoot != true (pod or container "my-dep-mcxx803w" must set securityContext.runAsNonRoot=true), seccompProfile (pod or container "my-dep-mcxx803w" must set securityContext.seccompProfile.type to "RuntimeDefault" or "Localhost")
    deployment.apps/my-dep created
    wangpenghao@MacBook-Pro ~ oc get deploy
    NAME READY UP-TO-DATE AVAILABLE AGE
    my-dep 0/1 0 0 7s
    wangpenghao@MacBook-Pro ~ oc get event
    LAST SEEN TYPE REASON OBJECT MESSAGE
    5s Warning FailedCreate replicaset/my-dep-6bd958d877 Error creating: pods "my-dep-6bd958d877-" is forbidden: unable to validate against any security context constraint: [provider "anyuid": Forbidden: not usable by user or serviceaccount, spec.volumes[0]: Invalid value: "ephemeral": ephemeral volumes are not allowed to be used, provider "restricted": Forbidden: not usable by user or serviceaccount, provider "nonroot-v2": Forbidden: not usable by user or serviceaccount, provider "nonroot": Forbidden: not usable by user or serviceaccount, provider "hostmount-anyuid": Forbidden: not usable by user or serviceaccount, provider "machine-api-termination-handler": Forbidden: not usable by user or serviceaccount, provider "hostnetwork-v2": Forbidden: not usable by user or serviceaccount, provider "hostnetwork": Forbidden: not usable by user or serviceaccount, provider "hostaccess": Forbidden: not usable by user or serviceaccount, provider "node-exporter": Forbidden: not usable by user or serviceaccount, provider "privileged": Forbidden: not usable by user or serviceaccount]
    16s Normal ScalingReplicaSet deployment/my-dep Scaled up replica set my-dep-6bd958d877 to 1

Actual results:
In Step3 : The deployment stucked at Pending caused by unable to validate against any security context constraint

Expected results:
In Step3 : The deployment should ready with the default scc restricted, the default scc restricted should allow
volumes:

  • ephemeral

Additional info:

Generic ephemeral volumes are the safer option of these two - it just creates/deletes PVCs on behalf of users. And most users can already create PVCs.

ephemeral type volume not in scc.volumes list definition
https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.10/authentication/managing-security-context-constraints.html#authorization-cont[…]ing-internal-oauth

So currently if customers want to use ephemeral type volume have to use scc with:
volumes:

  • '*'
    E.g. scc/privileged

Discuss record: https://coreos.slack.com/archives/CB48XQ4KZ/p1655465586780419

Generic Ephemeral Volumes docs:
https://kubernetes.io/blog/2020/09/01/ephemeral-volumes-with-storage-capacity-tracking/#generic-ephemeral-volumes

Master Log:

Node Log (of failed PODs):

PV Dump:

PVC Dump:

StorageClass Dump (if StorageClass used by PV/PVC):

Description of problem:

This is a clone of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2074299 for backporting purposes.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-266. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem: I am working with a customer who uses the web console.  From the Developer Perspective's Project Access tab, they cannot differentiate between users and groups and furthermore cannot add groups from this web console.  This has led to confusion whether existing resources were in fact users or groups, and furthermore they have added users when they intended to add groups instead.  What we really need is a third column in the Project Access tab that says whether a resource is a user or group.

 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): This is an issue in OCP 4.10 and 4.11, and I presume future versions as well

How reproducible: Every time.  My customer is running on ROSA, but I have determined this issue to be general to OpenShift.

Steps to Reproduce:

From the oc cli, I create a group and add a user to it.

$ oc adm groups new techlead
group.user.openshift.io/techlead created
$ oc adm groups add-users techlead admin
group.user.openshift.io/techlead added: "admin"
$ oc get groups
NAME                                     USERS
cluster-admins                           
dedicated-admins                         admin
techlead   admin
I create a new namespace so that I can assign a group project level access:

$ oc new-project my-namespace

$ oc adm policy add-role-to-group edit techlead -n my-namespace
I then went to the web console -> Developer perspective -> Project -> Project Access.  I verified the rolebinding named 'edit' is bound to a group named 'techlead'.

$ oc get rolebinding
NAME                                                              ROLE                                   AGE
admin                                                             ClusterRole/admin                      15m
admin-dedicated-admins                                            ClusterRole/admin                      15m
admin-system:serviceaccounts:dedicated-admin                      ClusterRole/admin                      15m
dedicated-admins-project-dedicated-admins                         ClusterRole/dedicated-admins-project   15m
dedicated-admins-project-system:serviceaccounts:dedicated-admin   ClusterRole/dedicated-admins-project   15m
edit                                                              ClusterRole/edit                       2m18s
system:deployers                                                  ClusterRole/system:deployer            15m
system:image-builders                                             ClusterRole/system:image-builder       15m
system:image-pullers                                              ClusterRole/system:image-puller        15m

$ oc get rolebinding edit -o yaml
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: RoleBinding
metadata:
  creationTimestamp: "2022-08-15T14:16:56Z"
  name: edit
  namespace: my-namespace
  resourceVersion: "108357"
  uid: 4abca27d-08e8-43a3-b9d3-d20d5c294bbe
roleRef:
  apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
  kind: ClusterRole
  name: edit
subjects:

  • apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
      kind: Group
      name: techlead
    Now, from the same Project Access tab in the web console, I added the developer with role "View".  From this web console, it is unclear whether developer and techlead are users or groups.

Now back to the CLI, I view the newly created rolebinding named 'developer-view-c15b720facbc8deb', and find that the "View" role is assigned to a user named 'developer', rather than a group.

$ oc get rolebinding                                                                      
NAME                                                              ROLE                                   AGE
admin                                                             ClusterRole/admin                      17m
admin-dedicated-admins                                            ClusterRole/admin                      17m
admin-system:serviceaccounts:dedicated-admin                      ClusterRole/admin                      17m
dedicated-admins-project-dedicated-admins                         ClusterRole/dedicated-admins-project   17m
dedicated-admins-project-system:serviceaccounts:dedicated-admin   ClusterRole/dedicated-admins-project   17m
edit                                                              ClusterRole/edit                       4m25s
developer-view-c15b720facbc8deb     ClusterRole/view                       90s
system:deployers                                                  ClusterRole/system:deployer            17m
system:image-builders                                             ClusterRole/system:image-builder       17m
system:image-pullers                                              ClusterRole/system:image-puller        17m
[10:21:21] kechung:~ $ oc get rolebinding developer-view-c15b720facbc8deb -o yaml
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: RoleBinding
metadata:
  creationTimestamp: "2022-08-15T14:19:51Z"
  name: developer-view-c15b720facbc8deb
  namespace: my-namespace
  resourceVersion: "113298"
  uid: cc2d1b37-922b-4e9b-8e96-bf5e1fa77779
roleRef:
  apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
  kind: ClusterRole
  name: view
subjects:

  • apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
      kind: User
      name: developer

So in conclusion, from the Project Access tab, we're unable to add groups and unable to differentiate between users and groups.  This is in essence our ask for this RFE.

 

Actual results:

Developer perspective -> Project -> Project Access tab shows a list of resources which can be users or groups, but does not differentiate between them.  Furthermore, when we add resources, they are only users and there is no way to add a group from this tab in the web console.

 

Expected results:

Should have the ability to add groups and differentiate between users and groups.  Ideally, we're looking at a third column for user or group.

 

Additional info:

Description of problem:

Deployed hypershift cluster with recent multi-arch build. 
Storage cluster operator has become available but having below warning message


PowerVSBlockCSIDriverOperatorCRDegraded: PowerVSBlockCSIDriverStaticResourcesControllerDegraded: "rbac/attacher_role.yaml" (string): clusterroles.rbac.authorization.k8s.io "ibm-powervs-block-external-attacher-role" is forbidden: user "system:serviceaccount:openshift-cluster-csi-drivers:powervs-block-csi-driver-operator" (groups=["system:serviceaccounts" "system:serviceaccounts:openshift-cluster-csi-drivers" "system:authenticated"]) is attempting to grant RBAC permissions not currently held:
PowerVSBlockCSIDriverOperatorCRDegraded: PowerVSBlockCSIDriverStaticResourcesControllerDegraded: {APIGroups:["csi.storage.k8s.io"], Resources:["csinodeinfos"], Verbs:["get" "list" "watch"]}
PowerVSBlockCSIDriverOperatorCRDegraded: PowerVSBlockCSIDriverStaticResourcesControllerDegraded: "rbac/attacher_binding.yaml" (string): clusterroles.rbac.authorization.k8s.io "ibm-powervs-block-external-attacher-role" not found

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1.Deploy 4.12.0-0.nightly-multi-2022-09-01-220105 nightly build

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

The current version of openshift's corendns is based on Kubernetes 1.24 packages.  OpenShift 4.12 is based on Kubernetes 1.25.  

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Check https://github.com/openshift/coredns/blob/release-4.12/go.mod 

Actual results:

Kubernetes packages (k8s.io/api, k8s.io/apimachinery, and k8s.io/client-go) are at version v0.24.0.

Expected results:

Kubernetes packages are at version v0.25.0 or later.

Additional info:

Using old Kubernetes API and client packages brings risk of API compatibility issues.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-17430. The following is the description of the original issue:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-13825. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:
As a part of Chaos Monkey testing we tried to delete pod machine-config-controller in SNO+1. The pod machine-config-controller restart results in restart of daemonset/sriov-network-config-daemon and linuxptp-daemonpods pods as well.

      

1m47s       Normal   Killing            pod/machine-config-controller-7f46c5d49b-w4p9s    Stopping container machine-config-controller
1m47s       Normal   Killing            pod/machine-config-controller-7f46c5d49b-w4p9s    Stopping container oauth-proxy

 

 

 

openshift-sriov-network-operator   23m         Normal   Killing            pod/sriov-network-config-daemon-pv4tr   Stopping container sriov-infiniband-cni
openshift-sriov-network-operator   23m         Normal   SuccessfulDelete   daemonset/sriov-network-config-daemon   Deleted pod: sriov-network-config-daemon-pv4tr 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

4.12

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:

Restart the machine-config-controller pod in openshift-machine-config-operator namespace. 
1. oc get pod -n openshift-machine-config-operator 
2. oc delete  pod/machine-config-controller-xxx -n openshift-machine-config-operator 

 

 

Actual results:

It restarting the daemonset/sriov-network-config-daemon and linuxptp-daemonpods pods 

Expected results:

It should not restart these pod

Additional info:

logs : https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1XxYen8tzENrcIJdde8sortpyY5ZFZCPW?usp=share_link

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4168. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

Prometheus continuously restarts due to slow WAL replay

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

openshift - 4.11.13

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-15848. The following is the description of the original issue:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-15773. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

The upgrade Helm Release tab in OpenShift GUI Developer console is not refreshing with updated values.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Add below Helm chart repository from CLI

~~~
apiVersion: helm.openshift.io/v1beta1
kind: HelmChartRepository
metadata:
  name: prometheus-community
spec:
  connectionConfig:
    url: 'https://prometheus-community.github.io/helm-charts'
  name: prometheus-community
~~~
2. Goto GUI and select Developer console --> +Add --> Developer Catalog --> Helm Chart --> Select Prometheus Helm chart --> Install Helm chart --> From dropdown of chart version select 22.3.0 --> Install

3. You will see the image tag as v0.63.0
~~~
    image:
      digest: ''
      pullPolicy: IfNotPresent
      repository: quay.io/prometheus-operator/prometheus-config-reloader
      tag: v0.63.0
~~~ 
4. Once that is installed Goto Helm --> Helm Releases --> Prometheus --> Upgrade --> From dropdown of chart version select 22.4.0 --> the page does not refresh with new value of the tag.

~~~
    image:
      digest: ''
      pullPolicy: IfNotPresent
      repository: quay.io/prometheus-operator/prometheus-config-reloader
      tag: v0.63.0
~~~

NOTE: The same steps before installing the helm chart, when we select different versions the value is being updated.
Goto GUI and select Developer console --> +Add --> Developer Catalog --> Helm Chart --> Select Prometheus Helm chart --> Install Helm chart --> From dropdown of chart version select 22.3.0 --> Now select different chart version like 22.7.0 or 22.4.0

Actual results:

The The yaml view of Upgrade Helm Release tab shows the values of older chart version.

Expected results:

The yaml view of Upgrade Helm Release tab should contain latest values as per selected chart version.

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

In ZTP input, we can put AdditionalNTPSources in order to have assisted-service mix the provided sources with those the nodes receive from DHCP.

AdditionalNTPSources in AgentConfig needs to be generated in InfraEnv in order for it to be applied in the installation

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11 MVP patch 2

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Create AgentConfig with AdditionalNTPSources like for example "0.fedora.pool.ntp.org"
2. Generate ISO
3. Deploy
4. Check the resulting cluster nodes /etc/chrony.conf

Actual results:

chrony.conf only contains DHCP provided NTP sources (if not static network deplooyment)

Expected results:

/etc/chrony.conf in all the cluster nodes should have at least a server listed:
server 0.fedora.pool.ntp.org iburst

Additional info:

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-6829. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

While/after upgrading to 4.11 2023-01-14 CoreDNS has a problem with UDP overflows so DNS lookups are very slow and cause the ingress operator upgrade to stall. We needed to work around with force_tcp following this: https://access.redhat.com/solutions/5984291

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

100%, but seems to depend on the network environemnt (excact cause unknown)

Steps to Reproduce:

1. install cluster with OKD 4.11-2022-12-02 or earlier
2. initiate upgrade to OKD 4.11-2023-01-14
3. upgrade will stall after upgrading CoreDNS

Actual results:

CoreDNS logs: [ERROR] plugin/errors: 2 oauth-openshift.apps.okd-admin.muc.lv1871.de. AAAA: dns: overflowing header size 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

This bug is a copy of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2137616 as fix needs to go on OCP side.
For must gather and attached screenshots please refer the bugzilla.
Add Capacity button does not exist after upgrade OCP version [OCP4.11->OCP4.12]

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

ODF Version:4.11.3-3
OCP Version: 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-24-103753
Provider: AWS

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1.Install ODF4.11 +OCP4.11
2.Upgrade OCP4.11 to OCP4.12
3.Log in to the OpenShift Web Console.
4.Click Operators → Installed Operators.
5.Click OpenShift Data Foundation Operator.
6.Click the Storage Systems tab.
7.Click the Action Menu (⋮) on the far right of the storage system name to extend the options menu.
"Add Capacity" button does not exist on menu.
*Attached Screenshot 

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

Tracker issue for bootimage bump in 4.12. This issue should block issues which need a bootimage bump to fix.

The previous bump was OCPBUGS-7529.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-9956. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

PipelineRun default template name has been updated in the backend in Pipeline operator 1.10, So we need to update the name in the UI code as well.

 

https://github.com/openshift/console/blob/master/frontend/packages/pipelines-plugin/src/components/pac/const.ts#L9

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-6270. The following is the description of the original issue:

Similar to how, due to the install-config validation, the baremetal platform previously required a bunch of fields that are actually ignored (OCPBUGS-3278), we similarly require values for the following fields in the platform.vsphere section:

  • vCenter
  • username
  • password
  • datacenter
  • defaultDatastore

None of these values are actually used in the agent-based installer at present, and they should not be required.

Users can work around this by specifying dummy values in the platform config (note that the VIP values are required and must be genuine):

platform:
  vsphere:
    apiVIP: 192.168.111.1
    ingressVIP: 192.168.111.2
    vCenter: a
    username: b
    password: c
    datacenter: d
    defaultDatastore: e

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-11054. The following is the description of the original issue:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-11038. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

Backport support starting in 4.12.z to a new GCP region europe-west12

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.z and 4.13.z

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Use openhift-install to deploy OCP in europe-west12

Actual results:

europe-west12 is not available as a supported region in the user survey

Expected results:

europe-west12 to be available as a supported region in the user survey

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

On storageclass creation page, the dropdown items for "Reclaim policy" and "Volume binding tyep" are not marked for i18n.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-08-22-143022

How reproducible:

always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Go to storageclass creation page, check if dropdown items for "Reclaim policy" and "Volume binding type" support i18n.
2.
3.

Actual results:

1. They are not marked for i18n.

Expected results:

1. Should support i18n.

Additional info:

TL;DR

4.12 requires backport of commit:

commit 0111e1faec20d16505a110449966273b430b7ad1
Author: Surya Seetharaman <suryaseetharaman.9@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue Sep 6 21:20:57 2022 +0200

    Support AllocateLoadBalancerNodePortsFalse
    
    This PR supports having allocateloadbalancernodeports
    set to false along with etp=local on lgw mode.
    
    Signed-off-by: Surya Seetharaman <suryaseetharaman.9@gmail.com>

Analysis

Missing BP of LoadBalancerServiceHasNodePortAllocation into 4.12 causes problems with flow creation for these services, even in shared gateway mode

This issue affects services with `allocateLoadBalancerNodePorts: false` in OCP 4.12.

Any deletion of services with `allocateLoadBalancerNodePorts: false` will fail and go into a 15 minute long retry loop. When one recreates a service while a failed deletion is still in progress, the flows on br-ex are not recreated.

Deletion will fail with:

(...)
obj_retry.go:257] Retry object setup: *factory.serviceForGateway <ns>/<service>
obj_retry.go:290] Removing old object: *factory.serviceForGateway <ns>/<service> (failed: %!s(uint8=<retry>))
(...)
obj_retry.go: 298] Retry delete failed for *factory.serviceForGateway <ns><service>, will try again later: error removing port claim for service: <ns>/<service>: invalid service port <service>, err: invalid port number: 0

And while a deletion is still ongoing, add will fail with:

obj_retry.go: 476] Failed to delete old object <ns>/<service> of type *factory.serviceForGateway, during add event: error removing port claim for service: <ns>/<service>: invalid service port <service>, err: invalid port number: 0

onvkube-node will retry 15 times with a 1 minute backoff before it gives up, and while this fails, the object cannot be recreated.

That also means that there are currently 2 workarounds for this (tested):

  • restart all ovnkube-node pods --> this will get rid of the bad cache entries and recreate the br-ex flows
  • delete the service. Wait for +15 minutes (until you no longer see the error message about failed deletion and retries) and recreate the service

The problem can easily be reproduced in 4.12, I tested this on 4.12.17 with SNO:

$ cat fedora-test.yaml 
---
apiVersion: v1
kind: Service
metadata:
  name: fedora-service
  labels:
    app: fedora-deployment
spec:
  selector:
    app: fedora-pod
  ports:
    - protocol: TCP
      port: 80
      targetPort: 8080
  sessionAffinity: None
  type: LoadBalancer
  allocateLoadBalancerNodePorts: false
---
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
  name: fedora-deployment
  labels:
    app: fedora-deployment
spec:
  replicas: 1
  selector:
    matchLabels:
      app: fedora-pod
  template:
    metadata:
      labels:
        app: fedora-pod
    spec:
      containers:
      - name: fedora-a
        image: registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora:latest
        imagePullPolicy: Always
        command:
        - sleep
        - infinity
      - name: fedora-b
        image: registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora:latest
        imagePullPolicy: Always
        command:
        - sleep
        - infinity
oc apply -f fedora-test.yaml
oc delete svc fedora-service
oc apply -f fedora-test.yaml

Logs:

oc logs -n openshift-ovn-kubernetes ovnkube-node-4xg6w -c ovnkube-node -f | grep fedora-service
(...)
I0714 01:59:30.867309    9291 obj_retry.go:491] Creating *factory.serviceForGateway default/fedora-service took: 70.803µs
I0714 01:59:30.875170    9291 obj_retry.go:491] Creating *factory.endpointSliceForGateway default/fedora-service-5bmf8 took: 15.941µs
I0714 01:59:30.875210    9291 obj_retry.go:491] Creating *factory.endpointSliceForStaleConntrackRemoval default/fedora-service-5bmf8 took: 169ns
E0714 01:59:52.496754    9291 obj_retry.go:673] Failed to delete *factory.serviceForGateway default/fedora-service, error: error removing port claim for service: default/fedora-service: invalid service port fedora-service, err: invalid port number: 0
I0714 02:00:02.969493    9291 obj_retry.go:471] Detected stale object during new object add of type *factory.serviceForGateway with the same key: default/fedora-service
W0714 02:00:02.969523    9291 gateway_shared_intf.go:656] Delete service: no service found in cache for endpoint fedora-service in namespace default
I0714 02:00:02.971917    9291 obj_retry.go:491] Creating *factory.endpointSliceForGateway default/fedora-service-74vf8 took: 62.416µs
I0714 02:00:02.971926    9291 obj_retry.go:491] Creating *factory.endpointSliceForStaleConntrackRemoval default/fedora-service-74vf8 took: 255ns
E0714 02:00:03.086557    9291 obj_retry.go:476] Failed to delete old object default/fedora-service of type *factory.serviceForGateway, during add event: error removing port claim for service: default/fedora-service: invalid service port fedora-service, err: invalid port number: 0
I0714 02:00:13.982590    9291 obj_retry.go:257] Retry object setup: *factory.serviceForGateway default/fedora-service
I0714 02:00:13.982621    9291 obj_retry.go:290] Removing old object: *factory.serviceForGateway default/fedora-service (failed: %!s(uint8=1))
I0714 02:00:14.104772    9291 obj_retry.go:298] Retry delete failed for *factory.serviceForGateway default/fedora-service, will try again later: error removing port claim for service: default/fedora-service: invalid service port fedora-service, err: invalid port number: 0
I0714 02:00:22.397338    9291 obj_retry.go:571] Found retry entry for *factory.serviceForGateway default/fedora-service marked for deletion: will delete the object
W0714 02:00:22.397400    9291 gateway_shared_intf.go:656] Delete service: no service found in cache for endpoint fedora-service in namespace default
E0714 02:00:22.601603    9291 obj_retry.go:575] Failed to delete stale object default/fedora-service, during update: error removing port claim for service: default/fedora-service: invalid service port fedora-service, err: invalid port number: 0
I0714 02:00:43.980921    9291 obj_retry.go:257] Retry object setup: *factory.serviceForGateway default/fedora-service
I0714 02:00:43.980948    9291 obj_retry.go:290] Removing old object: *factory.serviceForGateway default/fedora-service (failed: %!s(uint8=1))
W0714 02:00:43.980976    9291 gateway_shared_intf.go:656] Delete service: no service found in cache for endpoint fedora-service in namespace default
I0714 02:00:44.199215    9291 obj_retry.go:298] Retry delete failed for *factory.serviceForGateway default/fedora-service, will try again later: error removing port claim for service: default/fedora-service: invalid service port fedora-service, err: invalid port number: 0

And the following watch shows that the flows are created initially, then upon deletion the flows vanish, then as the service is recreated the flows do not reappear:

watch "ovs-ofctl dump-flows br-ex | grep 192.168.18.100"

I can delete the ovnkube-node pod to recreate the flows:

oc delete pod -n openshift-ovn-kubernetes ovnkube-node-4xg6w

And the flows reappaer:

[root@sno ~]# ovs-ofctl dump-flows br-ex | grep 192.168.18.100 
 cookie=0x849b956ca97beaee, duration=27.925s, table=0, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0, idle_age=27, priority=110,arp,in_port=1,arp_tpa=192.168.18.100,arp_op=1 actions=LOCAL
 cookie=0x849b956ca97beaee, duration=27.925s, table=0, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0, idle_age=27, priority=110,tcp,in_port=1,nw_dst=192.168.18.100,tp_dst=80 actions=output:2
 cookie=0x849b956ca97beaee, duration=27.925s, table=0, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0, idle_age=27, priority=110,tcp,in_port=2,nw_src=192.168.18.100,tp_src=80 actions=output:1

--------------------------------------

The problem does not manifest in 4.13. The difference between 4.12 an 4.13 is a missing backport of 0111e1faec20d16505a110449966273b430b7ad1

Log for service deletion in OCP 4.13:

I0718 13:27:35.699982  334002 obj_retry.go:656] Delete event received for *factory.serviceForGateway default/fedora-service
I0718 13:27:35.700010  334002 gateway_shared_intf.go:679] Deleting service fedora-service in namespace default
I0718 13:27:35.769565  334002 obj_retry.go:656] Delete event received for *factory.endpointSliceForGateway default/fedora-service-6hhds
I0718 13:27:35.769596  334002 gateway_shared_intf.go:856] Deleting endpointslice fedora-service-6hhds in namespace default
I0718 13:27:35.769610  334002 gateway_shared_intf.go:431] No serviceConfig found for service fedora-service in namespace default
I0718 13:27:35.769618  334002 obj_retry.go:656] Delete event received for *factory.endpointSliceForStaleConntrackRemoval default/fedora-service-6hhds

Log for service deletion in OCP 4.12:

I0718 13:28:14.253695   52007 obj_retry.go:653] Delete event received for *factory.serviceForGateway default/fedora-service
I0718 13:28:14.253717   52007 port_claim.go:197] Handle NodePort service fedora-service port 0
I0718 13:28:14.253726   52007 gateway_shared_intf.go:649] Deleting service fedora-service in namespace default
I0718 13:28:14.288844   52007 obj_retry.go:653] Delete event received for *factory.endpointSliceForGateway default/fedora-service-2m857
I0718 13:28:14.288870   52007 gateway_shared_intf.go:817] Deleting endpointslice fedora-service-2m857 in namespace default
I0718 13:28:14.288876   52007 gateway_shared_intf.go:407] No serviceConfig found for service fedora-service in namespace default
I0718 13:28:14.288881   52007 obj_retry.go:653] Delete event received for *factory.endpointSliceForStaleConntrackRemoval default/fedora-service-2m857
E0718 13:28:14.402407   52007 obj_retry.go:673] Failed to delete *factory.serviceForGateway default/fedora-service, error: error removing port claim for service: default/fedora-service: invalid service port fedora-service, err: invalid port number: 0

Both 4.12 and 4.13 have similar code, and `handleService` looks the same as well:

  189 func handleService(svc *kapi.Service, handler handler) []error {                                                        
  190     errors := []error{}                                                                                                 
  191     if !util.ServiceTypeHasNodePort(svc) && len(svc.Spec.ExternalIPs) == 0 {                                            
  192         return errors                                                                                                   
  193     }                                                                                                                   
  194                                                                                                                         
  195     for _, svcPort := range svc.Spec.Ports {                                                                            
  196         if util.ServiceTypeHasNodePort(svc) {                                                                           
  197             klog.V(5).Infof("Handle NodePort service %s port %d", svc.Name, svcPort.NodePort) 

But ServiceTypeHasNodePort in 4.13 correctly differentiates between allocateLoadBalancerNodePorts whereas 4.12 does not:

go-controller/pkg/util/kube.go

  273 func LoadBalancerServiceHasNodePortAllocation(service *kapi.Service) bool {                                             
  274     return service.Spec.AllocateLoadBalancerNodePorts == nil || *service.Spec.AllocateLoadBalancerNodePorts             
  275 }   

  277 // ServiceTypeHasNodePort checks if the service has an associated NodePort or not                                       
  278 func ServiceTypeHasNodePort(service *kapi.Service) bool {                                                               
  279     return service.Spec.Type == kapi.ServiceTypeNodePort ||                                                             
  280         (service.Spec.Type == kapi.ServiceTypeLoadBalancer && LoadBalancerServiceHasNodePortAllocation(service))        
  281 }

In OCP 4.12:

  221 // ServiceTypeHasNodePort checks if the service has an associated NodePort or not                                       
  222 func ServiceTypeHasNodePort(service *kapi.Service) bool {                                                               
  223     return service.Spec.Type == kapi.ServiceTypeNodePort || service.Spec.Type == kapi.ServiceTypeLoadBalancer           
  224 }

Description of problem:

scale up more worker nodes but they are not added to the Load Balancer instances (backend pool), if moving the router pod to the new worker nodes then co/ingress becomes degraded

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to Reproduce:

1. ensure the fresh install cluster works well.
2. scale up worker nodes.
$ oc -n openshift-machine-api get machineset
NAME                                  DESIRED   CURRENT   READY   AVAILABLE   AGE
hongli-1024-hnkrm-worker-us-east-2a   1         1         1       1           5h21m
hongli-1024-hnkrm-worker-us-east-2b   1         1         1       1           5h21m
hongli-1024-hnkrm-worker-us-east-2c   1         1         1       1           5h21m

$ oc -n openshift-machine-api scale machineset hongli-1024-hnkrm-worker-us-east-2a --replicas=2
machineset.machine.openshift.io/hongli-1024-hnkrm-worker-us-east-2a scaled

$ oc -n openshift-machine-api scale machineset hongli-1024-hnkrm-worker-us-east-2b --replicas=2
machineset.machine.openshift.io/hongli-1024-hnkrm-worker-us-east-2b scaled

(about 5 minutes later)
$ oc -n openshift-machine-api get machineset
NAME                                  DESIRED   CURRENT   READY   AVAILABLE   AGE
hongli-1024-hnkrm-worker-us-east-2a   2         2         2       2           5h29m
hongli-1024-hnkrm-worker-us-east-2b   2         2         2       2           5h29m
hongli-1024-hnkrm-worker-us-east-2c   1         1         1       1           5h29m


3. delete router pods and to make new ones running on new workers

$ oc get node
NAME                                         STATUS   ROLES                  AGE     VERSION
ip-10-0-128-45.us-east-2.compute.internal    Ready    worker                 71m     v1.25.2+4bd0702
ip-10-0-131-192.us-east-2.compute.internal   Ready    control-plane,master   6h35m   v1.25.2+4bd0702
ip-10-0-139-51.us-east-2.compute.internal    Ready    worker                 6h29m   v1.25.2+4bd0702
ip-10-0-162-228.us-east-2.compute.internal   Ready    worker                 71m     v1.25.2+4bd0702
ip-10-0-172-216.us-east-2.compute.internal   Ready    control-plane,master   6h35m   v1.25.2+4bd0702
ip-10-0-190-82.us-east-2.compute.internal    Ready    worker                 6h25m   v1.25.2+4bd0702
ip-10-0-196-26.us-east-2.compute.internal    Ready    control-plane,master   6h35m   v1.25.2+4bd0702
ip-10-0-199-158.us-east-2.compute.internal   Ready    worker                 6h28m   v1.25.2+4bd0702

$ oc -n openshift-ingress get pod -owide
NAME                              READY   STATUS    RESTARTS   AGE   IP           NODE                                         NOMINATED NODE   READINESS GATES
router-default-86444dcd84-cm96l   1/1     Running   0          65m   10.130.2.7   ip-10-0-128-45.us-east-2.compute.internal    <none>           <none>
router-default-86444dcd84-vpnjz   1/1     Running   0          65m   10.131.2.7   ip-10-0-162-228.us-east-2.compute.internal   <none>           <none>


Actual results:

$ oc get co ingress console authentication
NAME             VERSION                              AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   DEGRADED   SINCE   MESSAGE
ingress          4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         True       66m     The "default" ingress controller reports Degraded=True: DegradedConditions: One or more other status conditions indicate a degraded state: CanaryChecksSucceeding=False (CanaryChecksRepetitiveFailures: Canary route checks for the default ingress controller are failing)
console          4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   False       False         False      66m     RouteHealthAvailable: failed to GET route (https://console-openshift-console.apps.hongli-1024.qe.devcluster.openshift.com): Get "https://console-openshift-console.apps.hongli-1024.qe.devcluster.openshift.com": EOF
authentication   4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   False       False         True       66m     OAuthServerRouteEndpointAccessibleControllerAvailable: Get "https://oauth-openshift.apps.hongli-1024.qe.devcluster.openshift.com/healthz": EOF


checked the Load Balancer on AWS console and found that new created nodes are not added to load balancer. see the snapshot attached.

Expected results:

the LB should added new created instances automatically and ingress should work with new workers.

Additional info:

1. this is also reproducible with common user created LoadBalancer service.
2. if the LB service is created after adding the new nodes then it works well, we can see that all nodes are added to LB on AWS console.  

 

Description of problem: upon attempting to install OCP 4.10 UPI on baremetal ppc64le, the openshift-install gather command returns `panic: unsupported platform "none"`

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

OCP 4.10.16

openshift-install 4.10.24 

How reproducible:

easily

Steps to Reproduce:
1. create install config
2. create manifests
3. create ignition configs

4. openshift-install gather bootstrap --log-level "debug"

Actual results:

DEBUG OpenShift Installer 4.10.24                  
DEBUG Built from commit d63a12ba0ec33d492093a8fc0e268a01a075f5da 
DEBUG Fetching Bootstrap SSH Key Pair...           
DEBUG Loading Bootstrap SSH Key Pair...            
DEBUG Using Bootstrap SSH Key Pair loaded from state file 
DEBUG Reusing previously-fetched Bootstrap SSH Key Pair 
DEBUG Fetching Install Config...                   
DEBUG Loading Install Config...                    
DEBUG   Loading SSH Key...                         
DEBUG   Loading Base Domain...                     
DEBUG     Loading Platform...                      
DEBUG   Loading Cluster Name...                    
DEBUG     Loading Base Domain...                   
DEBUG     Loading Platform...                      
DEBUG   Loading Networking...                      
DEBUG     Loading Platform...                      
DEBUG   Loading Pull Secret...                     
DEBUG   Loading Platform...                        
DEBUG Loading Install Config from both state file and target directory 
DEBUG On-disk Install Config matches asset in state file 
DEBUG Using Install Config loaded from state file  
DEBUG Reusing previously-fetched Install Config    
panic: unsupported platform "none"

goroutine 1 [running]:
github.com/openshift/installer/pkg/terraform/stages/platform.StagesForPlatform({0x146f2d0a, 0x1619aa08})
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/installer/pkg/terraform/stages/platform/stages.go:55 +0x2ff
main.runGatherBootstrapCmd({0x14d8e028, 0x1})
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/installer/cmd/openshift-install/gather.go:115 +0x2d6
main.newGatherBootstrapCmd.func1(0xc001364500, {0xc0005a0b40, 0x2, 0x2})
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/installer/cmd/openshift-install/gather.go:65 +0x59
github.com/spf13/cobra.(*Command).execute(0xc001364500, {0xc0005a0b20, 0x2, 0x2})
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/installer/vendor/github.com/spf13/cobra/command.go:860 +0x5f8
github.com/spf13/cobra.(*Command).ExecuteC(0xc001334c80)
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/installer/vendor/github.com/spf13/cobra/command.go:974 +0x3bc
github.com/spf13/cobra.(*Command).Execute(...)
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/installer/vendor/github.com/spf13/cobra/command.go:902
main.installerMain()
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/installer/cmd/openshift-install/main.go:72 +0x29e
main.main()
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/installer/cmd/openshift-install/main.go:50 +0x125

Expected results:

I'm not really sure what I expected to happen.  I've never used that gather before..

I would assume at least no panicking.

Additional info:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3706. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

While running ./openshift-install agent wait-for install-complete --dir billi --log-level debug on a real bare metal dual stack compact cluster installation it errors out with ERROR Attempted to gather ClusterOperator status after wait failure: Listing ClusterOperator objects: Get "https://api.kni-qe-0.lab.eng.rdu2.redhat.com:6443/apis/config.openshift.io/v1/clusteroperators": dial tcp [2620:52:0:11c::10]:6443: connect: connection refused but installation is still progressing

DEBUG Uploaded logs for host openshift-master-1 cluster d8b0979d-3d69-4e65-874a-d1f7da79e19e 
DEBUG Host: openshift-master-1, reached installation stage Rebooting 
DEBUG Host: openshift-master-1, reached installation stage Configuring 
DEBUG Host: openshift-master-2, reached installation stage Configuring 
DEBUG Host: openshift-master-2, reached installation stage Joined 
DEBUG Host: openshift-master-1, reached installation stage Joined 
DEBUG Host: openshift-master-0, reached installation stage Waiting for bootkube 
DEBUG Host openshift-master-1: updated status from installing-in-progress to installed (Done) 
DEBUG Host: openshift-master-1, reached installation stage Done 
DEBUG Host openshift-master-2: updated status from installing-in-progress to installed (Done) 
DEBUG Host: openshift-master-2, reached installation stage Done 
DEBUG Host: openshift-master-0, reached installation stage Waiting for controller: waiting for controller pod ready event 
ERROR Attempted to gather ClusterOperator status after wait failure: Listing ClusterOperator objects: Get "https://api.kni-qe-0.lab.eng.rdu2.redhat.com:6443/apis/config.openshift.io/v1/clusteroperators": dial tcp [2620:52:0:11c::10]:6443: connect: connection refused 
ERROR Cluster initialization failed because one or more operators are not functioning properly. 
ERROR 				The cluster should be accessible for troubleshooting as detailed in the documentation linked below, 
ERROR 				https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/latest/support/troubleshooting/troubleshooting-installations.html 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-rc.0

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to Reproduce:

1. ./openshift-install agent create image --dir billi --log-level debug 
2. mount resulting iso image and reboot nodes via iLO
3. /openshift-install agent wait-for install-complete --dir billi --log-level debug 

Actual results:

 ERROR Attempted to gather ClusterOperator status after wait failure: Listing ClusterOperator objects: Get "https://api.kni-qe-0.lab.eng.rdu2.redhat.com:6443/apis/config.openshift.io/v1/clusteroperators": dial tcp [2620:52:0:11c::10]:6443: connect: connection refused 

cluster installation is not complete and it needs more time to complete 

Expected results:

waits until the cluster installation completes

Additional info:

The cluster installation eventually completes fine if waiting after the error.

Attaching install-config.yaml and agent-config.yaml

In order to support 4.12 there needs to be an entry for OS_IMAGES in images.env.template.

 

Note that the actual url isn't important, just that there is an entry for 4.12.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3358. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:
Due to changes in BUILD-407 which merged into release-4.12, we have a permafailing test `e2e-aws-csi-driver-no-refreshresource` and are unable to merge subsequent pull requests.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Bring up cluster using release-4.12 or release-4.13 or master branch
2. Run `e2e-aws-csi-driver-no-refreshresource` test
3.

Actual results:
I1107 05:18:31.131666 1 mount_linux.go:174] Cannot run systemd-run, assuming non-systemd OS
I1107 05:18:31.131685 1 mount_linux.go:175] systemd-run failed with: exit status 1
I1107 05:18:31.131702 1 mount_linux.go:176] systemd-run output: System has not been booted with systemd as init system (PID 1). Can't operate.
Failed to create bus connection: Host is down

Expected results:
Test should pass

Additional info:


Description of problem:

See: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CPSYN-143

tldr:  Based on the previous direction that 4.12 was going to enforce PSA restricted by default, OLM had to make a few changes because the way we run catalog pods (and we have to run them that way because of how the opm binary worked) was incompatible w/ running restricted.

1) We set openshift-marketplace to enforce restricted (this was our choice, we didn't have to do it, but we did)
2) we updated the opm binary so catalog images using a newer opm binary don't have to run privileged
3) we added a field to catalogsource that allows you to choose whether to run the pod privileged(legacy mode) or restricted.  The default is restricted.  We made that the default so that users running their own catalogs in their own NSes (which would be default PSA enforcing) would be able to be successful w/o needing their NS upgraded to privileged.

Unfortunately this means:
1) legacy catalog images(i.e. using older opm binaries) won't run on 4.12 by default (the catalogsource needs to be modified to specify legacy mode.
2) legacy catalog images cannot be run in the openshift-marketplace NS since that NS does not allow privileged pods.  This means legacy catalogs can't contribute to the global catalog (since catalogs must be in that NS to be in the global catalog).

Before 4.12 ships we need to:
1) remove the PSA restricted label on the openshift-marketplace NS
2) change the catalogsource securitycontextconfig mode default to use "legacy" as the default, not restricted.

This gives catalog authors another release to update to using a newer opm binary that can run restricted, or get their NSes explicitly labeled as privileged (4.12 will not enforce restricted, so in 4.12 using the legacy mode will continue to work)

In 4.13 we will need to revisit what we want the default to be, since at that point catalogs will start breaking if they try to run in legacy mode in most NSes.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:


We should deprecate and eventually remove react-helmet as a shared plugin dependency. This dependency is small, and plugins can bring their own version if needed.

This requires updated our webpack plugin to allow dependency fallbacks when a shared dependency is not present.

cc Vojtech Szocs 

 

AC:

  • Update docs in the GitHub pages to state that we are deprecating the react-helmet as a shared plugin dependency

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-14635. The following is the description of the original issue:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-13140. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

According to the Red Hat documentation https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.12/networking/ovn_kubernetes_network_provider/configuring-egress-ips-ovn.html, the maximum number of IP aliases per node is 10 - "Per node, the maximum number of IP aliases, both IPv4 and IPv6, is 10.".

Looking at the code base, the number of allowed IPs is calculated as
Capacity = defaultGCPPrivateIPCapacity (which is set to 10) + cloudPrivateIPsCount (that is number of available IPs from the range) - currentIPv4Usage (number of assigned v4 IPs) - currentIPv6Usage (number of assigned v6 IPs)
https://github.com/openshift/cloud-network-config-controller/blob/master/pkg/cloudprovider/gcp.go#L18-L22

Speaking to GCP, they support up to 100 alias IP ranges (not IPs) per vNIC.

Can Red Hat confirm
1) If there is a limitation of 10 from OCP and why?
2) If there isn't a limit, what is the maximum number of egress IPs that could be supported per node?

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Case:  03487893
It is one of the most highlighted bug from our customer.

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3069. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

On cluster setting page, it shows available upgrade on page. After user chooses one target version and clicks "Upgrade", wait for a long time, there is no info about upgrade status.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-25-210451

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1.Login console with available upgrade for the cluster, select a target version in the available version list. Then click "Update". Check the upgrade progress on the cluster setting page.
2.Check upgrade info from client with "oc adm upgrade".
3.

Actual results:

1.There is not any information or upgrade progress shown on the page.
2.It shows info about retrieving target version failed.
$ oc adm upgrade 
Cluster version is 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-25-210451
  ReleaseAccepted=False  
  Reason: RetrievePayload
  Message: Retrieving payload failed version="4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-27-053332" image="registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release@sha256:fd4e9bec095b845c6f726f9ce17ee70449971b8286bb9b7478c06c5f697f05f1" failure=The update cannot be verified: unable to verify sha256:fd4e9bec095b845c6f726f9ce17ee70449971b8286bb9b7478c06c5f697f05f1 against keyrings: verifier-public-key-redhatUpstream: https://openshift-release.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/graph
Channel: stable-4.12
Recommended updates:  
  VERSION                            IMAGE
  4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-11-01-135441 registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release@sha256:f79d25c821a73496f4664a81a123925236d0c7818fd6122feb953bc64e91f5d0
  4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-31-232349 registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release@sha256:cb2d157805abc413394fc579776d3f4406b0a2c2ed03047b6f7958e6f3d92622
  4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-28-001703 registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release@sha256:c914c11492cf78fb819f4b617544cd299c3a12f400e106355be653c0013c2530
  4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-27-053332 registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release@sha256:fd4e9bec095b845c6f726f9ce17ee70449971b8286bb9b7478c06c5f697f05f1

Expected results:

1. It should also show this kind of message on console page if retrieving target payload failed, so that user knows the actual result after try to upgrade.

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

The icon color of Alerts in the Topology list view should be based on alert type.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1. create a deployment
2. Create a resource quota so that quota alert will be visible in topology list page
3. navigate to topology list page
3.

Actual results:

Alert icon color is black and white. See the screenshots

Expected results:

Alert icon color should be base on alert type. 

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

Container networking pods cannot access the host network pods on another node which caused some operators DEGRADED

$ oc get co
NAME                                       VERSION                              AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   DEGRADED   SINCE   MESSAGE
authentication                             4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   False       True          True       63m     OAuthServerRouteEndpointAccessibleControllerAvailable: Get "https://oauth-openshift.apps.jhou.arm.eng.rdu2.redhat.com/healthz": context deadline exceeded (Client.Timeout exceeded while awaiting headers)...
baremetal                                  4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      62m     
cloud-controller-manager                   4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      68m     
cloud-credential                           4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      78m     
cluster-autoscaler                         4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      62m     
config-operator                            4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      63m     
console                                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   False       False         False      30m     RouteHealthAvailable: failed to GET route (https://console-openshift-console.apps.jhou.arm.eng.rdu2.redhat.com): Get "https://console-openshift-console.apps.jhou.arm.eng.rdu2.redhat.com": context deadline exceeded (Client.Timeout exceeded while awaiting headers)
control-plane-machine-set                  4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      62m     
csi-snapshot-controller                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      62m     
dns                                        4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      62m     
etcd                                       4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   False       True          True       13m     EtcdMembersAvailable: 1 of 2 members are available, openshift-qe-048.arm.eng.rdu2.redhat.com is unhealthy
image-registry                             4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      39m     
ingress                                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         True       47m     The "default" ingress controller reports Degraded=True: DegradedConditions: One or more other status conditions indicate a degraded state: CanaryChecksSucceeding=False (CanaryChecksRepetitiveFailures: Canary route checks for the default ingress controller are failing)
insights                                   4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      56m     
kube-apiserver                             4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      50m     
kube-controller-manager                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         True       60m     GarbageCollectorDegraded: error querying alerts: client_error: client error: 403
kube-scheduler                             4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      54m     
kube-storage-version-migrator              4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      63m     
machine-api                                4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      51m     
machine-approver                           4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      62m     
machine-config                             4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      29m     
marketplace                                4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      62m     
monitoring                                 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      38m     
network                                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      62m     
node-tuning                                4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      62m     
openshift-apiserver                        4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      30m     
openshift-controller-manager               4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      56m     
openshift-samples                          4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      43m     
operator-lifecycle-manager                 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      62m     
operator-lifecycle-manager-catalog         4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      62m     
operator-lifecycle-manager-packageserver   4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      43m     
service-ca                                 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      63m     
storage                                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408   True        False         False      63m


$ oc get pod -n openshift-ingress -o wide
NAME                              READY   STATUS    RESTARTS      AGE   IP                                  NODE                                       NOMINATED NODE   READINESS GATES
router-default-58f6498646-gf6ns   1/1     Running   1 (79m ago)   93m   2620:52:0:1eb:3673:5aff:fe9e:5abc   openshift-qe-049.arm.eng.rdu2.redhat.com   <none>           <none>
router-default-58f6498646-qjtbk   1/1     Running   1 (79m ago)   93m   2620:52:0:1eb:3673:5aff:fe9e:593c   openshift-qe-052.arm.eng.rdu2.redhat.com   <none>           <none>


$ oc get pod -n openshift-network-diagnostics -o wide
NAME                                    READY   STATUS    RESTARTS   AGE    IP              NODE                                       NOMINATED NODE   READINESS GATES
network-check-source-5f967d78bc-cfwz4   1/1     Running   0          103m   fd01:0:0:3::9   openshift-qe-052.arm.eng.rdu2.redhat.com   <none>           <none>
network-check-target-52krv              1/1     Running   0          91m    fd01:0:0:4::3   openshift-qe-049.arm.eng.rdu2.redhat.com   <none>           <none>
network-check-target-56q9q              1/1     Running   0          91m    fd01:0:0:3::5   openshift-qe-052.arm.eng.rdu2.redhat.com   <none>           <none>
network-check-target-ggqsf              1/1     Running   0          103m   fd01:0:0:2::4   openshift-qe-048.arm.eng.rdu2.redhat.com   <none>           <none>
network-check-target-xfrq4              1/1     Running   0          103m   fd01:0:0:1::3   openshift-qe-047.arm.eng.rdu2.redhat.com   <none>           <none>
network-check-target-zrglr              1/1     Running   0          73m    fd01:0:0:6::4   openshift-qe-051.arm.eng.rdu2.redhat.com   <none>           <none>
network-check-target-zwb4t              1/1     Running   0          91m    fd01:0:0:5::5   openshift-qe-053.arm.eng.rdu2.redhat.com   <none>           <none>

####Failed from containers pod on openshift-qe-053.arm.eng.rdu2.redhat.com to access ingress pods

$ oc rsh -n openshift-network-diagnostics network-check-target-zwb4t
sh-4.4$ curl https://[2620:52:0:1eb:3673:5aff:fe9e:5abc]:443 -k -I
^C
sh-4.4$ curl https://[2620:52:0:1eb:3673:5aff:fe9e:593c]:443 -k -I
^C

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-23-204408

How reproducible:

always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Deploy ipv6 disconnect single cluster
2. 
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4701. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

In at least 4.12.0-rc.0, a user with read-only access to ClusterVersion can see a "Control plane is hosted" banner (despite the control plane not being hosted), because hasPermissionsToUpdate is false, so canPerformUpgrade is false.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-rc.0. Likely more. I haven't traced it out.

How reproducible:

Always.

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install 4.12.0-rc.0
2. Create a user with cluster-wide read-only permissions. For me, it's via binding to a sudoer ClusterRole. I'm not sure where that ClusterRole comes from, but it's:

$ oc get -o yaml clusterrole sudoer
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: ClusterRole
metadata:
  annotations:
    rbac.authorization.kubernetes.io/autoupdate: "true"
  creationTimestamp: "2020-05-21T19:39:09Z"
  name: sudoer
  resourceVersion: "7715"
  uid: 28eb2ffa-dccd-47e8-a2d5-6a95e0e8b1e9
rules:
- apiGroups:
  - ""
  - user.openshift.io
  resourceNames:
  - system:admin
  resources:
  - systemusers
  - users
  verbs:
  - impersonate
- apiGroups:
  - ""
  - user.openshift.io
  resourceNames:
  - system:masters
  resources:
  - groups
  - systemgroups
  verbs:
  - impersonate

3. View /settings/cluster

Actual results:

See the "Control plane is hosted" banner.

Expected results:

Possible cases:

  • For me in my impersonate group, I can trigger updates via the command-line by using --as system:admin. I don't know if the console supports impersonation, or wants to mention the option if it does not.
  • For users with read-only access in stand-alone clusters, telling the user they are not authorized to update makes sense. Maybe mention that their cluster admins may be able to update, or just leave that unsaid.
  • For users with managed/dedicated branding, possibly point out that updates in that environment happen via OCM. And leave it up to OCM to decide if that user has access.
  • For users with externally-hosted control planes, possibly tell them this regardless of whether they have the ability to update via some external interface or not. For externally-hosted, Red-Hat-managed clusters, the interface will presumably be OCM. For externally-hosted, customer-managed clusters, there may be some ACM or other interface? I'm not sure. But the message of "this in-cluster web console is not where you configure this stuff, even if you are one of the people who can make these decisions for this cluster" will apply for all hosted situations.

Description of problem:

Currently we are not gathering Machine objects. We got nomination for a rule that will use this resource.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:
project viewer is able to see a 'Create Pod Disruption Budget' button on Pods list page while the creation will fail finally due to less permission, in this way console should not show a 'Create Pod Disruption Budget' button for project viewer, other resources list page doesn’t have the issue

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.10.0-0.nightly-2021-09-16-212009

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. normal user has a project and workloads

  1. oc get all -n yapei1-project
    NAME READY STATUS RESTARTS AGE
    pod/example-787f749bb-czkms 1/1 Running 0 79s
    pod/example-787f749bb-m7wxt 1/1 Running 0 79s
    pod/example-787f749bb-mw8jv 1/1 Running 0 79s

NAME READY UP-TO-DATE AVAILABLE AGE
deployment.apps/example 3/3 3 3 79s

NAME DESIRED CURRENT READY AGE
replicaset.apps/example-787f749bb 3 3 3 79s

2. grant another user with view access to user project 'yapei1-project'

  1. oc adm policy add-role-to-user view uiauto1 -n yapei1-project
    clusterrole.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/view added: "uiauto1"
    3. login with user 'uiauto1' and check the permissions on Pods list page

Actual results:
3. project viewer 'uiauto1' can see pods list successfully, at the same time console also shows a 'Create Pod Disruption Budget' button while the creation will finally fail if project viewer tries to create a pod

Expected results:
3. console should not show 'Create Pod Disruption Budget' button for a project viewer

Additional info:
For comparison: we doesn't show resource creation button('Create xxx' button) on other workloads list page for a project viewer, such as Deployments, DeploymentConfigs list etc

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-16617. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

LB skip_snat improperly applied with affinity_timeout

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/FD-3041

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4950. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

A PR bumping OLM's k8s dependencies to 1.25 wasn't merged into openshift 4.12

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

openshift-4.12

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Check OLM's repository for k8s dependencies in the 4.12 branch

Actual results:

Has 1.24 k8s dependencies

Expected results:

Has 1.25 k8s dependencies

Additional info:

 

 

Description of problem:

If we use a macvlan with the configuration...
spec:
  config: '{ "cniVersion": "0.3.1", "name": "ran-bh-macvlan-test", "plugins": [ {"type": "macvlan","master": "vlan306", "mode": "bridge", "ipam": { "type": "whereabouts", "range": "2001:1b74:480:603d:0304:0403:000:0000-2001:1b74:480:603d:0304:0403:0000:0004/64","gateway": "2001:1b74:480:603d::1" } } ]}'

there is an error creating the pod:

  Warning  FailedCreatePodSandBox  17s (x3 over 55s)  kubelet            (combined from similar events): Failed to create pod sandbox: rpc error: code = Unknown desc = failed to create pod network sandbox k8s_test31_test-ecoloma-01_a593bd0a-83e7-4d31-857e-0c31491e849e_0(5cf36bd99ffa532fd34735e68caecfbc69d820ba6cb04e348c9f9f168498022f): error adding pod test-ecoloma-01_test31 to CNI network "multus-cni-network": [test-ecoloma-01/test31:ran-bh-macvlan-test]: error adding container to network "ran-bh-macvlan-test": Error at storage engine: OverlappingRangeIPReservation.whereabouts.cni.cncf.io "2001-1b74-480-603d-304-403--" is invalid: metadata.name: Invalid value: "2001-1b74-480-603d-304-403--": a lowercase RFC 1123 subdomain must consist of lower case alphanumeric characters, '-' or '.', and must start and end with an alphanumeric character (e.g. 'example.com', regex used for validation is '[a-z0-9]([-a-z0-9]*[a-z0-9])?(\.[a-z0-9]([-a-z0-9]*[a-z0-9])?)*')
  
  
If we change the start IP address to 2001:1b74:480:603d:0304:0403:000:0001, it works ok ok.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.13

How reproducible:

Always reproducible

Steps to Reproduce:

1. See description of problem.

Actual results:

Unable to create pod

Expected results:

IP range should be valid and pod should get created

Additional info:

 

Manoj noticed that the cluster registration fails for SNO clusters when the network type is set to OpenShiftSDN. We should add some validation to prevent this combination.

Failed to register cluster with assisted-service: AssistedServiceError Code: 400 Href: ID: 400 Kind: Error Reason: OpenShiftSDN network type is not allowed in single node mode

Documentation also indicates OpenShiftSDN is not compatible: https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.11/installing/installing_sno/install-sno-preparing-to-install-sno.html

There is a bug where creating OLM subscription manifests early in the installation process results in those OLM operators not being installed.

This is because the OLM installation Jobs fail when they are tried early in the installation process, and OLM does not retry those jobs sufficiently and eventually gives up on them.

This should be solved starting OCP 4.12, but until then, we should solve this using Assisted.

A way to solve this is to delay the installation of OLM operators to only occur after the cluster is up and healthy. 

This can be done by creating the subscriptions with "installPlanApproval" set to "Manual" instead of "Automatic". Then once the cluster is up and healthy, the assisted-controller should approve the InstallPlans that OLM will create for the operators. This will then trigger the installation which is more likely to succeed since the cluster is up and healthy at this point

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-12910. The following is the description of the original issue:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-12904. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

In order to test proxy installations, the CI base image for OpenShift on OpenStack needs netcat.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-12913. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem

CI is flaky because the TestRouterCompressionOperation test fails.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable)

I have seen these failures on 4.14 CI jobs.

How reproducible

Presently, search.ci reports the following stats for the past 14 days:

Found in 7.71% of runs (16.58% of failures) across 402 total runs and 24 jobs (46.52% failed)

GCP is most impacted:

pull-ci-openshift-cluster-ingress-operator-master-e2e-gcp-operator (all) - 44 runs, 86% failed, 37% of failures match = 32% impact

Azure and AWS are also impacted:

pull-ci-openshift-cluster-ingress-operator-master-e2e-azure-operator (all) - 36 runs, 64% failed, 43% of failures match = 28% impact
pull-ci-openshift-cluster-ingress-operator-master-e2e-aws-operator (all) - 38 runs, 79% failed, 23% of failures match = 18% impact

Steps to Reproduce

1. Post a PR and have bad luck.
2. Check https://search.ci.openshift.org/?search=compression+error%3A+expected&maxAge=336h&context=1&type=build-log&name=cluster-ingress-operator&excludeName=&maxMatches=5&maxBytes=20971520&groupBy=job.

Actual results

The test fails:

TestAll/serial/TestRouterCompressionOperation 
=== RUN   TestAll/serial/TestRouterCompressionOperation
    router_compression_test.go:209: compression error: expected "gzip", got "" for canary route

Expected results

CI passes, or it fails on a different test.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5734. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

In https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGSM-46450, the VIP was added to noProxy for StackCloud but it should also be added for all national clouds.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.10.20

How reproducible:

always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Set up a proxy
2. Deploy a cluster in a national cloud using the proxy
3.

Actual results:

Installation fails

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

The inconsistence was discovered when testing the cluster-network-operator changes https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-5559

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-10864. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

APIServer service not selected correctly for PublicAndPrivate when external-dns isn't configured. 
Image: 4.14 Hypershift operator + OCP 4.14.0-0.nightly-2023-03-23-050449

jiezhao-mac:hypershift jiezhao$ oc get hostedcluster/jz-test -n clusters -ojsonpath='{.spec.platform.aws.endpointAccess}{"\n"}'
PublicAndPrivate

    - lastTransitionTime: "2023-03-24T15:13:15Z"
      message: Cluster operators console, dns, image-registry, ingress, insights,
        kube-storage-version-migrator, monitoring, openshift-samples, service-ca are
        not available
      observedGeneration: 3
      reason: ClusterOperatorsNotAvailable
      status: "False"
      type: ClusterVersionSucceeding

services:
  - service: APIServer
   servicePublishingStrategy:
    type: LoadBalancer
  - service: OAuthServer
   servicePublishingStrategy:
    type: Route
  - service: Konnectivity
   servicePublishingStrategy:
    type: Route
  - service: Ignition
   servicePublishingStrategy:
    type: Route
  - service: OVNSbDb
   servicePublishingStrategy:
    type: Route

jiezhao-mac:hypershift jiezhao$ oc get service -n clusters-jz-test | grep kube-apiserver
kube-apiserver            LoadBalancer  172.30.211.131  aa029c422933444139fb738257aedb86-9e9709e3fa1b594e.elb.us-east-2.amazonaws.com  6443:32562/TCP         34m
kube-apiserver-private        LoadBalancer  172.30.161.79  ab8434aa316e845c59690ca0035332f0-d818b9434f506178.elb.us-east-2.amazonaws.com  6443:32100/TCP         34m
jiezhao-mac:hypershift jiezhao$

jiezhao-mac:hypershift jiezhao$ cat hostedcluster.kubeconfig | grep server
  server: https://ab8434aa316e845c59690ca0035332f0-d818b9434f506178.elb.us-east-2.amazonaws.com:6443
jiezhao-mac:hypershift jiezhao$

jiezhao-mac:hypershift jiezhao$ oc get node --kubeconfig=hostedcluster.kubeconfig 
E0324 11:17:44.003589   95300 memcache.go:238] couldn't get current server API group list: Get "https://ab8434aa316e845c59690ca0035332f0-d818b9434f506178.elb.us-east-2.amazonaws.com:6443/api?timeout=32s": dial tcp 10.0.129.24:6443: i/o timeout

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1.Create a PublicAndPrivate cluster without external-dns
2.access the guest cluster (it should fail)
3.

Actual results:

unable to access the guest cluster via 'oc get node --kubeconfig=<guest cluster kubeconfig>', some guest cluster co are not available

Expected results:

The cluster is up and running, the guest cluster can be accessed via 'oc get node --kubeconfig=<guest cluster kubeconfig>'

Additional info:

 

 

job=pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-gcp-builds=all

This test has started permafailing on e2e-gcp-builds:

[sig-builds][Feature:Builds][Slow] s2i build with environment file in sources Building from a template should create a image from "test-env-build.json" template and run it in a pod [apigroup:build.openshift.io][apigroup:image.openshift.io]

The error in the test says

Sep 13 07:03:30.345: INFO: At 2022-09-13 07:00:21 +0000 UTC - event for build-test-pod: {kubelet ci-op-kg1t2x13-4e3c6-7hrm8-worker-a-66nwd} Pulling: Pulling image "image-registry.openshift-image-registry.svc:5000/e2e-test-build-sti-env-nglnt/test@sha256:262820fd1a94d68442874346f4c4024fdf556631da51cbf37ce69de094f56fe8"
Sep 13 07:03:30.345: INFO: At 2022-09-13 07:00:23 +0000 UTC - event for build-test-pod: {kubelet ci-op-kg1t2x13-4e3c6-7hrm8-worker-a-66nwd} Pulled: Successfully pulled image "image-registry.openshift-image-registry.svc:5000/e2e-test-build-sti-env-nglnt/test@sha256:262820fd1a94d68442874346f4c4024fdf556631da51cbf37ce69de094f56fe8" in 1.763914719s
Sep 13 07:03:30.345: INFO: At 2022-09-13 07:00:23 +0000 UTC - event for build-test-pod: {kubelet ci-op-kg1t2x13-4e3c6-7hrm8-worker-a-66nwd} Created: Created container test
Sep 13 07:03:30.345: INFO: At 2022-09-13 07:00:23 +0000 UTC - event for build-test-pod: {kubelet ci-op-kg1t2x13-4e3c6-7hrm8-worker-a-66nwd} Started: Started container test
Sep 13 07:03:30.345: INFO: At 2022-09-13 07:00:24 +0000 UTC - event for build-test-pod: {kubelet ci-op-kg1t2x13-4e3c6-7hrm8-worker-a-66nwd} Pulled: Container image "image-registry.openshift-image-registry.svc:5000/e2e-test-build-sti-env-nglnt/test@sha256:262820fd1a94d68442874346f4c4024fdf556631da51cbf37ce69de094f56fe8" already present on machine
Sep 13 07:03:30.345: INFO: At 2022-09-13 07:00:25 +0000 UTC - event for build-test-pod: {kubelet ci-op-kg1t2x13-4e3c6-7hrm8-worker-a-66nwd} Unhealthy: Readiness probe failed: Get "http://10.129.2.63:8080/": dial tcp 10.129.2.63:8080: connect: connection refused
Sep 13 07:03:30.345: INFO: At 2022-09-13 07:00:26 +0000 UTC - event for build-test-pod: {kubelet ci-op-kg1t2x13-4e3c6-7hrm8-worker-a-66nwd} BackOff: Back-off restarting failed container

Description of problem:

IPI installation failed with master nodes being NotReady and CCM error "alicloud: unable to split instanceid and region from providerID".

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-05-053337

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. try IPI installation on alibabacloud, with credentialsMode being "Manual"
2.
3.

Actual results:

Installation failed.

Expected results:

Installation should succeed.

Additional info:

$ oc get clusterversion
NAME      VERSION   AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   SINCE   STATUS
version             False       True          34m     Unable to apply 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-05-053337: an unknown error has occurred: MultipleErrors
$ 
$ oc get nodes
NAME                           STATUS     ROLES                  AGE   VERSION
jiwei-1012-02-9jkj4-master-0   NotReady   control-plane,master   30m   v1.25.0+3ef6ef3
jiwei-1012-02-9jkj4-master-1   NotReady   control-plane,master   30m   v1.25.0+3ef6ef3
jiwei-1012-02-9jkj4-master-2   NotReady   control-plane,master   30m   v1.25.0+3ef6ef3
$ 

CCM logs:
E1012 03:46:45.223137       1 node_controller.go:147] node-controller "msg"="fail to find ecs" "error"="cloud instance api fail, alicloud: unable to split instanceid and region from providerID, error unexpected providerID="  "providerId"="alicloud://"
E1012 03:46:45.223174       1 controller.go:317] controller/node-controller "msg"="Reconciler error" "error"="find ecs: cloud instance api fail, alicloud: unable to split instanceid and region from providerID, error unexpected providerID=" "name"="jiwei-1012-02-9jkj4-master-0" "namespace"="" 

https://mastern-jenkins-csb-openshift-qe.apps.ocp-c1.prod.psi.redhat.com/job/ocp-common/job/Flexy-install/145768/ (Finished: FAILURE)
10-12 10:55:15.987  ./openshift-install 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-05-053337
10-12 10:55:15.987  built from commit 84aa8222b622dee71185a45f1e0ba038232b114a
10-12 10:55:15.987  release image registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release@sha256:41fe173061b00caebb16e2fd11bac19980d569cd933fdb4fab8351cdda14d58e
10-12 10:55:15.987  release architecture amd64

FYI the installation could succeed with 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419:
https://mastern-jenkins-csb-openshift-qe.apps.ocp-c1.prod.psi.redhat.com/job/ocp-common/job/Flexy-install/145756/ (Finished: SUCCESS)
10-12 09:59:19.914  ./openshift-install 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419
10-12 09:59:19.914  built from commit 9eb0224926982cdd6cae53b872326292133e532d
10-12 09:59:19.914  release image registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release@sha256:2c8e617830f84ac1ee1bfcc3581010dec4ae5d9cad7a54271574e8d91ef5ecbc
10-12 09:59:19.914  release architecture amd64

 

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3761. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

Events.Events: event view displays created pod
https://search.ci.openshift.org/?search=event+view+displays+created+pod&maxAge=168h&context=1&type=junit&name=pull-ci-openshift-console-master-e2e-gcp-console&excludeName=&maxMatches=5&maxBytes=20971520&groupBy=job

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1.Run event scenario tests and note below results: 

Actual results:

{Expected '' to equal 'test-vjxfx-event-test-pod'. toEqual Error: Failed expectation
    at /go/src/github.com/openshift/console/frontend/integration-tests/tests/event.scenario.ts:65:72
    at Generator.next (<anonymous>:null:null)
    at fulfilled (/go/src/github.com/openshift/console/frontend/integration-tests/tests/event.scenario.ts:5:58)
    at runMicrotasks (<anonymous>:null:null)
    at processTicksAndRejections (internal/process/task_queues.js:93:5)
   }

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

when egress firewall is applied in a namespace which name is longer than 43 symbols, acl names gets cropped and all acls for the same egress firewall object are considered equivalent. It is a known problem that we faced for network policies too.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

Description

As a user, I would like to see the type of technology used by the samples on the samples view similar to the all services view. 

On the samples view:

It is showing different types of samples, e.g. devfile, helm and all showing as .NET. It is difficult for user to decide which .Net entry to select on the list. We'll need something like the all service view where it shows the type of technology on the top right of each card for users to differentiate between the entries:

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Add visible label as the all services view on each card to show the technology used by the sample on the samples view.

Additional Details:

libovsdb builds transaction log messages for every transaction and then throws them away if the log level is not 4 or above. This wastes a bunch of CPU at scale and increases pod ready latency.

Searching recent 4.12 CI, there are a number of failures in the clusteroperator/machine-config should not change condition/Available test case:

$ w3m -dump -cols 200 'https://search.ci.openshift.org/?search=clusteroperator%2Fmachine-config+should+not+change+condition%2FAvailable&maxAge=48h&type=junit' | grep '4[.]12.*failures match' | sort
periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade (all) - 129 runs, 53% failed, 6% of failures match = 3% impact
periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-e2e-aws-sdn-techpreview-serial (all) - 6 runs, 50% failed, 67% of failures match = 33% impact
periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade (all) - 60 runs, 50% failed, 3% of failures match = 2% impact
periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade (all) - 129 runs, 56% failed, 8% of failures match = 5% impact
periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-azure-sdn-upgrade (all) - 129 runs, 69% failed, 12% of failures match = 9% impact
periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-gcp-ovn-rt-upgrade (all) - 8 runs, 38% failed, 67% of failures match = 25% impact
periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade (all) - 60 runs, 57% failed, 6% of failures match = 3% impact
periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-gcp-sdn-upgrade (all) - 12 runs, 42% failed, 20% of failures match = 8% impact
periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.12-e2e-aws-sdn-upgrade (all) - 60 runs, 40% failed, 4% of failures match = 2% impact
periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.12-e2e-metal-ipi-sdn-serial-virtualmedia (all) - 6 runs, 100% failed, 17% of failures match = 17% impact
periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.12-e2e-metal-ipi-sdn-upgrade (all) - 6 runs, 67% failed, 25% of failures match = 17% impact
periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.12-e2e-metal-ipi-serial-ovn-dualstack (all) - 6 runs, 67% failed, 25% of failures match = 17% impact
periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.12-e2e-vsphere-ovn-techpreview-serial (all) - 9 runs, 56% failed, 20% of failures match = 11% impact
periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-metal-ipi-upgrade (all) - 6 runs, 100% failed, 17% of failures match = 17% impact
periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-metal-ipi-upgrade-ovn-ipv6 (all) - 6 runs, 83% failed, 20% of failures match = 17% impact
periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-okd-4.12-e2e-vsphere (all) - 25 runs, 100% failed, 4% of failures match = 4% impact
release-openshift-ocp-installer-e2e-gcp-serial-4.12 (all) - 6 runs, 83% failed, 20% of failures match = 17% impact

Doesn't seem like reason is getting set?

$ curl -s 'https://search.ci.openshift.org/search?name=periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade&search=clusteroperator%2Fmachine-config+should+not+change+condition%2FAvailable&maxAge=48h&type=junit&context=15' | jq -r 'to_entries[].value | to_entries[].value[].context[]' | grep 'clusteroperator/machine-config condition/Available status/False reason'
Aug 31 01:13:56.724 - 698s  E clusteroperator/machine-config condition/Available status/False reason/Cluster not available for [{operator 4.12.0-0.ci-2022-08-30-194744}]
Aug 31 09:09:15.460 - 1078s E clusteroperator/machine-config condition/Available status/False reason/Cluster not available for [{operator 4.12.0-0.ci-2022-08-30-194744}]
Sep 01 03:31:24.808 - 1131s E clusteroperator/machine-config condition/Available status/False reason/Cluster not available for [{operator 4.12.0-0.ci-2022-08-31-111359}]
Sep 01 07:15:58.029 - 1085s E clusteroperator/machine-config condition/Available status/False reason/Cluster not available for [{operator 4.12.0-0.ci-2022-08-31-111359}]

Example runs in the job I've randomly selected to drill into:

$ curl -s 'https://search.ci.openshift.org/search?name=periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade&search=clusteroperator%2Fmachine-config+should+not+change+condition%2FAvailable&maxAge=48h&type=junit' | jq -r 'keys[]'
https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade/1564757706458271744
https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade/1564879945233076224
https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade/1565158084484009984
https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade/1565212566194491392

Drilling into that last run, the Available=False was the whole pool-update phase:

And details from the origin's monitor:

$ curl -s https://gcsweb-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/gcs/origin-ci-test/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade/1565212566194491392/artifacts/e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade/openshift-e2e-test/build-log.txt | grep clusteroperator/machine-config
Sep 01 07:15:57.629 E clusteroperator/machine-config condition/Degraded status/True reason/RenderConfigFailed changed: Failed to resync 4.12.0-0.ci-2022-08-31-111359 because: refusing to read osImageURL version "4.12.0-0.ci-2022-09-01-053740", operator version "4.12.0-0.ci-2022-08-31-111359"
Sep 01 07:15:57.629 - 49s   E clusteroperator/machine-config condition/Degraded status/True reason/Failed to resync 4.12.0-0.ci-2022-08-31-111359 because: refusing to read osImageURL version "4.12.0-0.ci-2022-09-01-053740", operator version "4.12.0-0.ci-2022-08-31-111359"
Sep 01 07:15:58.029 E clusteroperator/machine-config condition/Available status/False changed: Cluster not available for [{operator 4.12.0-0.ci-2022-08-31-111359}]
Sep 01 07:15:58.029 - 1085s E clusteroperator/machine-config condition/Available status/False reason/Cluster not available for [{operator 4.12.0-0.ci-2022-08-31-111359}]
Sep 01 07:16:47.000 I /machine-config reason/OperatorVersionChanged clusteroperator/machine-config-operator started a version change from [{operator 4.12.0-0.ci-2022-08-31-111359}] to [{operator 4.12.0-0.ci-2022-09-01-053740}]
Sep 01 07:16:47.377 W clusteroperator/machine-config condition/Progressing status/True changed: Working towards 4.12.0-0.ci-2022-09-01-053740
Sep 01 07:16:47.377 - 1037s W clusteroperator/machine-config condition/Progressing status/True reason/Working towards 4.12.0-0.ci-2022-09-01-053740
Sep 01 07:16:47.405 W clusteroperator/machine-config condition/Degraded status/False changed: 
Sep 01 07:18:02.614 W clusteroperator/machine-config condition/Upgradeable status/False reason/PoolUpdating changed: One or more machine config pools are updating, please see `oc get mcp` for further details
Sep 01 07:34:03.000 I /machine-config reason/OperatorVersionChanged clusteroperator/machine-config-operator version changed from [{operator 4.12.0-0.ci-2022-08-31-111359}] to [{operator 4.12.0-0.ci-2022-09-01-053740}]
Sep 01 07:34:03.699 W clusteroperator/machine-config condition/Available status/True changed: Cluster has deployed [{operator 4.12.0-0.ci-2022-08-31-111359}]
Sep 01 07:34:03.715 W clusteroperator/machine-config condition/Upgradeable status/True changed: 
Sep 01 07:34:04.065 I clusteroperator/machine-config versions: operator 4.12.0-0.ci-2022-08-31-111359 -> 4.12.0-0.ci-2022-09-01-053740
Sep 01 07:34:04.663 W clusteroperator/machine-config condition/Progressing status/False changed: Cluster version is 4.12.0-0.ci-2022-09-01-053740
[bz-Machine Config Operator] clusteroperator/machine-config should not change condition/Available
[bz-Machine Config Operator] clusteroperator/machine-config should not change condition/Degraded

No idea if whatever was happening there is the same thing that was happening in other runs, and I haven't checked 4.11 and earlier either. The test-case is non-fatal, so it doesn't break CI, but it can cause noise like ClusterOperatorDown if it continues for 10 or more minutes. Whic PromeCIeus says actually fired in this run, although apparently the origin monitors didn't notice to complain:

So parallel asks (and I'm happy to shard into separate bugs, if that's helpful):

  • Set a reason when you go Available=False, so Telemetry can collect information to aggregate and hunt for frequent reasons to prioritize improvements.
  • Figure out at least one reason why we're going Available=False in apparently healthy CI runs. If we find and fix one reason, we can circle back later to see if there are more that remain unfixed.

Name: DNS
Description: Please change the "DNS" component to be a subcomponent "DNS" of the "Networking" component.

Component: change to "Networking".
Subcomponent: change to "DNS".

Existing fields (default assignee, default QA contact, default CC email list, etc.) should remain the same as they currently are.
Default Assignee: aos-network-edge-staff@bot.bugzilla.redhat.com
Default QA Contact: hongli@redhat.com
Default CC List: aos-network-edge-staff@bot.bugzilla.redhat.com
Additional Notes:
I filled in "Default CC email list" because the form validation would not permit me to omit it. However, it can be left empty in Bugzilla (it is currently empty).

If possible, we would like this change to be done prior to the Bugzilla-to-Jira migration to avoid the need to make the change after the migration.

Description of problem:

KafkSink current desctiption in odc is `Kafka Sink is Addressable, it receives events and send them to a Kafka topic.` and this should be `A KafkaSink takes a CloudEvent, and sends it to an Apache Kafka Topic.  Events can be specified in either Structured or Binary mode.` as provided by Serverless team

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install Serverless operator
2. Create CR for knativeKafka in knative-eventing ns
3. go to dev perspective -> add -> event sink
4. Check the description of kafka sink

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

Update the description to as provided by serverless team

Additional info:

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-14426. The following is the description of the original issue:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-14149. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

Cannot list Kepler CSV

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install Kepler Community Operator
2. Create Kepler Instance
3. Console gets error and shows "Oops, something went wrong"

Actual results:

Console gets error and shows "Oops, something went wrong"

Expected results:

Should list Kepler Instance

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

This is just a clone of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105570 for purposes of cherry-picking.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.13

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

Insights operator gathers related clusteroperator's related objects from operators.openshift.io group. Ingresscontrollers are now missing, because it's a namespaceed resource and the "default" name is not provided in the related objects of the ingress clusteroperator

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

QE has one vsphere6.7 u3 env, privilege "InventoryService.Tagging.ObjectAttachable" does not exist, and installer fails as below.

FATAL failed to fetch Terraform Variables: failed to fetch dependency of "Terraform Variables": failed to generate asset "Platform Provisioning Check": platform.vsphere.defaultD