Back to index

4.12.24

Jump to: Complete Features | Incomplete Features | Complete Epics | Incomplete Epics | Other Complete | Other Incomplete |

Changes from 4.11.59

Note: this page shows the Feature-Based Change Log for a release

Complete Features

These features were completed when this image was assembled

1. Proposed title of this feature request
Add runbook_url to alerts in the OCP UI

2. What is the nature and description of the request?
If an alert includes a runbook_url label, then it should appear in the UI for the alert as a link.

3. Why does the customer need this? (List the business requirements here)
Customer can easily reach the alert runbook and be able to address their issues.

4. List any affected packages or components.

Epic Goal

  • Make it possible to disable the console operator at install time, while still having a supported+upgradeable cluster.

Why is this important?

  • It's possible to disable console itself using spec.managementState in the console operator config. There is no way to remove the console operator, though. For clusters where an admin wants to completely remove console, we should give the option to disable the console operator as well.

Scenarios

  1. I'm an administrator who wants to minimize my OpenShift cluster footprint and who does not want the console installed on my cluster

Acceptance Criteria

  • It is possible at install time to opt-out of having the console operator installed. Once the cluster comes up, the console operator is not running.

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. Composable cluster installation

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1srswUYYHIbKT5PAC5ZuVos9T2rBnf7k0F1WV2zKUTrA/edit#heading=h.mduog8qznwz
  2. https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1U2zYAyrNGBooGBuyQME8Xn905RvOPbVv3XFw3stddZw/edit#slide=id.g10555cc0639_0_7

Open questions::

  1. The console operator manages the downloads deployment as well. Do we disable the downloads deployment? Long term we want to move to CLI manager: https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/6ae78842d4a87593c63274e02ac7a33cc7f296c3/enhancements/oc/cli-manager.md

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

In the console-operator repo we need to add `capability.openshift.io/console` annotation to all the manifests that the operator either contains creates on the fly.

 

Manifests are currently present in /bindata and /manifest directories.

 

Here is example of the insights-operator change.

Here is the overall enhancement doc.

 

Feature Overview
Provide CSI drivers to replace all the intree cloud provider drivers we currently have. These drivers will probably be released as tech preview versions first before being promoted to GA.

Goals

  • Framework for rapid creation of CSI drivers for our cloud providers
  • CSI driver for AWS EBS
  • CSI driver for AWS EFS
  • CSI driver for GCP
  • CSI driver for Azure
  • CSI driver for VMware vSphere
  • CSI Driver for Azure Stack
  • CSI Driver for Alicloud
  • CSI Driver for IBM Cloud

Requirements

Requirement Notes isMvp?
Framework for CSI driver  TBD Yes
Drivers should be available to install both in disconnected and connected mode   Yes
Drivers should upgrade from release to release without any impact   Yes
Drivers should be installable via CVO (when in-tree plugin exists)    

Out of Scope

This work will only cover the drivers themselves, it will not include

  • enhancements to the CSI API framework
  • the migration to said drivers from the the intree drivers
  • work for non-cloud provider storage drivers (FC-SAN, iSCSI) being converted to CSI drivers

Background, and strategic fit
In a future Kubernetes release (currently 1.21) intree cloud provider drivers will be deprecated and replaced with CSI equivalents, we need the drivers created so that we continue to support the ecosystems in an appropriate way.

Assumptions

  • Storage SIG won't move out the changeover to a later Kubernetes release

Customer Considerations
Customers will need to be able to use the storage they want.

Documentation Considerations

  • Target audience: cluster admins
  • Updated content: update storage docs to show how to use these drivers (also better expose the capabilities)

This Epic is to track the GA of this feature

Goal

  • Make available the Google Cloud File Service via a CSI driver, it is desirable that this implementation has dynamic provisioning
  • Without GCP filestore support, we are limited to block / RWO only (GCP PD 4.8 GA)
  • Align with what we support on other major public cloud providers.

Why is this important?

  • There is a know storage gap with google cloud where only block is supported
  • More customers deploying on GCE and asking for file / RWX storage.

Scenarios

  1. Install the CSI driver
  2. Remove the CSI Driver
  3. Dynamically provision a CSI Google File PV*
  4. Utilise a Google File PV
  5. Assess optional features such as resize & snapshot

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Customers::

  • Telefonica Spain
  • Deutsche Bank

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

As an OCP user, I want images for GCP Filestore CSI Driver and Operator, so that I can install them on my cluster and utilize GCP Filestore shares.

We need to continue to maintain specific areas within storage, this is to capture that effort and track it across releases.

Goals

  • To allow OCP users and cluster admins to detect problems early and with as little interaction with Red Hat as possible.
  • When Red Hat is involved, make sure we have all the information we need from the customer, i.e. in metrics / telemetry / must-gather.
  • Reduce storage test flakiness so we can spot real bugs in our CI.

Requirements

Requirement Notes isMvp?
Telemetry   No
Certification   No
API metrics   No
     

Out of Scope

n/a

Background, and strategic fit
With the expected scale of our customer base, we want to keep load of customer tickets / BZs low

Assumptions

Customer Considerations

Documentation Considerations

  • Target audience: internal
  • Updated content: none at this time.

Notes

In progress:

  • CI flakes:
    • Configurable timeouts for e2e tests
      • Azure is slow and times out often
      • Cinder times out formatting volumes
      • AWS resize test times out

 

High prio:

  • Env. check tool for VMware - users often mis-configure permissions there and blame OpenShift. If we had a tool they could run, it might report better errors.
    • Should it be part of the installer?
    • Spike exists
  • Add / use cloud API call metrics
    • Helps customers to understand why things are slow
    • Helps build cop to understand a flake
      • With a post-install step that filters data from Prometheus that’s still running in the CI job.
    • Ideas:
      • Cloud is throttling X% of API calls longer than Y seconds
      • Attach / detach / provisioning / deletion / mount / unmount / resize takes longer than X seconds?
    • Capture metrics of operations that are stuck and won’t finish.
      • Sweep operation map from executioner???
      • Report operation metric into the highest bucket after the bucket threshold (i.e. if 10minutes is the last bucket, report an operation into this bucket after 10 minutes and don’t wait for its completion)?
      • Ask the monitoring team?
    • Include in CSI drivers too.
      • With alerts too

Unsorted

  • As the number of storage operators grows, it would be grafana board for storage operators
    • CSI driver metrics (from CSI sidecars + the driver itself  + its operator?)
    • CSI migration?
  • Get aggregated logs in cluster
    • They're rotated too soon
    • No logs from dead / restarted pods
    • No tools to combine logs from multiple pods (e.g. 3 controller managers)
  • What storage issues customers have? it was 22% of all issues.
    • Insufficient docs?
    • Probably garbage
  • Document basic storage troubleshooting for our supports
    • What logs are useful when, what log level to use
    • This has been discussed during the GSS weekly team meeting; however, it would be beneficial to have this documented.
  • Common vSphere errors, their debugging and fixing. 
  • Document sig-storage flake handling - not all failed [sig-storage] tests are ours

Epic Goal

  • Update all images that we ship with OpenShift to the latest upstream releases and libraries.
  • Exact content of what needs to be updated will be determined as new images are released upstream, which is not known at the beginning of OCP development work. We don't know what new features will be included and should be tested and documented. Especially new CSI drivers releases may bring new, currently unknown features. We expect that the amount of work will be roughly the same as in the previous releases. Of course, QE or docs can reject an update if it's too close to deadline and/or looks too big.

Traditionally we did these updates as bugfixes, because we did them after the feature freeze (FF). Trying no-feature-freeze in 4.12. We will try to do as much as we can before FF, but we're quite sure something will slip past FF as usual.

Why is this important?

  • We want to ship the latest software that contains new features and bugfixes.

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.

Update all OCP and kubernetes libraries in storage operators to the appropriate version for OCP release.

This includes (but is not limited to):

  • Kubernetes:
    • client-go
    • controller-runtime
  • OCP:
    • library-go
    • openshift/api
    • openshift/client-go
    • operator-sdk

Operators:

  • aws-ebs-csi-driver-operator 
  • aws-efs-csi-driver-operator
  • azure-disk-csi-driver-operator
  • azure-file-csi-driver-operator
  • openstack-cinder-csi-driver-operator
  • gcp-pd-csi-driver-operator
  • gcp-filestore-csi-driver-operator
  • manila-csi-driver-operator
  • ovirt-csi-driver-operator
  • vmware-vsphere-csi-driver-operator
  • alibaba-disk-csi-driver-operator
  • ibm-vpc-block-csi-driver-operator
  • csi-driver-shared-resource-operator

 

  • cluster-storage-operator
  • csi-snapshot-controller-operator
  • local-storage-operator
  • vsphere-problem-detector

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->

Epic Goal

  • Rebase OpenShift components to k8s v1.24

Why is this important?

  • Rebasing ensures components work with the upcoming release of Kubernetes
  • Address tech debt related to upstream deprecations and removals.

Scenarios

  1. ...

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. k8s 1.24 release

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Feature Overview

  • As an infrastructure owner, I want a repeatable method to quickly deploy the initial OpenShift cluster.
  • As an infrastructure owner, I want to install the first (management, hub, “cluster 0”) cluster to manage other (standalone, hub, spoke, hub of hubs) clusters.

Goals

  • Enable customers and partners to successfully deploy a single “first” cluster in disconnected, on-premises settings

Requirements

4.11 MVP Requirements

  • Customers and partners needs to be able to download the installer
  • Enable customers and partners to deploy a single “first” cluster (cluster 0) using single node, compact, or highly available topologies in disconnected, on-premises settings
  • Installer must support advanced network settings such as static IP assignments, VLANs and NIC bonding for on-premises metal use cases, as well as DHCP and PXE provisioning environments.
  • Installer needs to support automation, including integration with third-party deployment tools, as well as user-driven deployments.
  • In the MVP automation has higher priority than interactive, user-driven deployments.
  • For bare metal deployments, we cannot assume that users will provide us the credentials to manage hosts via their BMCs.
  • Installer should prioritize support for platforms None, baremetal, and VMware.
  • The installer will focus on a single version of OpenShift, and a different build artifact will be produced for each different version.
  • The installer must not depend on a connected registry; however, the installer can optionally use a previously mirrored registry within the disconnected environment.

Use Cases

  • As a Telco partner engineer (Site Engineer, Specialist, Field Engineer), I want to deploy an OpenShift cluster in production with limited or no additional hardware and don’t intend to deploy more OpenShift clusters [Isolated edge experience].
  • As a Enterprise infrastructure owner, I want to manage the lifecycle of multiple clusters in 1 or more sites by first installing the first  (management, hub, “cluster 0”) cluster to manage other (standalone, hub, spoke, hub of hubs) clusters [Cluster before your cluster].
  • As a Partner, I want to package OpenShift for large scale and/or distributed topology with my own software and/or hardware solution.
  • As a large enterprise customer or Service Provider, I want to install a “HyperShift Tugboat” OpenShift cluster in order to offer a hosted OpenShift control plane at scale to my consumers (DevOps Engineers, tenants) that allows for fleet-level provisioning for low CAPEX and OPEX, much like AKS or GKE [Hypershift].
  • As a new, novice to intermediate user (Enterprise Admin/Consumer, Telco Partner integrator, RH Solution Architect), I want to quickly deploy a small OpenShift cluster for Poc/Demo/Research purposes.

Questions to answer…

  •  

Out of Scope

Out of scope use cases (that are part of the Kubeframe/factory project):

  • As a Partner (OEMs, ISVs), I want to install and pre-configure OpenShift with my hardware/software in my disconnected factory, while allowing further (minimal) reconfiguration of a subset of capabilities later at a different site by different set of users (end customer) [Embedded OpenShift].
  • As an Infrastructure Admin at an Enterprise customer with multiple remote sites, I want to pre-provision OpenShift centrally prior to shipping and activating the clusters in remote sites.

Background, and strategic fit

  • This Section: What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? What context can be provided to frame this feature.

Assumptions

  1. The user has only access to the target nodes that will form the cluster and will boot them with the image presented locally via a USB stick. This scenario is common in sites with restricted access such as government infra where only users with security clearance can interact with the installation, where software is allowed to enter in the premises (in a USB, DVD, SD card, etc.) but never allowed to come back out. Users can't enter supporting devices such as laptops or phones.
  2. The user has access to the target nodes remotely to their BMCs (e.g. iDrac, iLo) and can map an image as virtual media from their computer. This scenario is common in data centers where the customer provides network access to the BMCs of the target nodes.
  3. We cannot assume that we will have access to a computer to run an installer or installer helper software.

Customer Considerations

  • ...

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

  • What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
  • Does this feature have doc impact?
  • New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
  • If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
  • What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
  • How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
  • What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
  • Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
  • What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

 

References

 

 

Epic Goal

As a OpenShift infrastructure owner, I want to deploy OpenShift clusters with dual-stack IPv4/IPv6

As a OpenShift infrastructure owner, I want to deploy OpenShift clusters with single-stack IPv6

Why is this important?

IPv6 and dual-stack clusters are requested often by customers, especially from Telco customers. Working with dual-stack clusters is a requirement for many but also a transition into a single-stack IPv6 clusters, which for some of our users is the final destination.

Acceptance Criteria

  • Agent-based installer can deploy IPv6 clusters
  • Agent-based installer can deploy dual-stack clusters
  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.

Previous Work

Karim's work proving how agent-based can deploy IPv6: IPv6 deploy with agent based installer]

Done Checklist * CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.

  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>|

For dual-stack installations the agent-cluster-install.yaml must have both an IPv4 and IPv6 subnet in the networkking.MachineNetwork or assisted-service will throw an error. This field is in InstallConfig but it must be added to agent-cluster-install in its Generate().

For IPv4 and IPv6 installs, setting up the MachineNetwork is not needed but it also does not cause problems if its set, so it should be fine to set it all times.

Set the ClusterDeployment CRD to deploy OpenShift in FIPS mode and make sure that after deployment the cluster is set in that mode

In order to install FIPS compliant clusters, we need to make sure that installconfig + agentoconfig based deployments take into account the FIPS config in installconfig.

This task is about passing the config to agentclusterinstall so it makes it into the iso. Once there, AGENT-374 will give it to assisted service

Epic Goal

As an OpenShift infrastructure owner, I want to deploy a cluster zero with RHACM or MCE and have the required components installed when the installation is completed

Why is this important?

BILLI makes it easier to deploy a cluster zero. BILLI users know at installation time what the purpose of their cluster is when they plan the installation. Day-2 steps are necessary to install operators and users, especially when automating installations, want to finish the installation flow when their required components are installed.

Acceptance Criteria

  • A user can provide MCE manifests and have it installed without additional manual steps after the installation is completed
  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

User Story:

As a customer, I want to be able to:

  • Install MCE with the agent-installer

so that I can achieve

  • create an MCE hub with my openshift install

Acceptance Criteria:

Description of criteria:

  • Upstream documentation including examples of the extra manifests needed
  • Unit tests that include MCE extra manifests
  • Ability to install MCE using agent-installer is tested
  • Point 3

(optional) Out of Scope:

We are only allowing the user to provide extra manifests to install MCE at this time. We are not adding an option to "install mce" on the command line (or UI)

Engineering Details:

This requires/does not require a design proposal.
This requires/does not require a feature gate.

User Story:

As a customer, I want to be able to:

  • Install MCE with the agent-installer

so that I can achieve

  • create an MCE hub with my openshift install

Acceptance Criteria:

Description of criteria:

  • Upstream documentation including examples of the extra manifests needed
  • Unit tests that include MCE extra manifests
  • Ability to install MCE using agent-installer is tested
  • Point 3

(optional) Out of Scope:

We are only allowing the user to provide extra manifests to install MCE at this time. We are not adding an option to "install mce" on the command line (or UI)

Engineering Details:

This requires/does not require a design proposal.
This requires/does not require a feature gate.

Epic Goal

  • Rebase cluster autoscaler on top of Kubernetes 1.25

Why is this important?

  • Need to pick up latest upstream changes

Scenarios

  1. ...

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

User Story

As a user I would like to see all the events that the autoscaler creates, even duplicates. Having the CAO set this flag will allow me to continue to see these events.

Background

We have carried a patch for the autoscaler that would enable the duplication of events. This patch can now be dropped because the upstream added a flag for this behavior in https://github.com/kubernetes/autoscaler/pull/4921

Steps

  • add the --record-duplicated-events flag to all autoscaler deployments from the CAO

Stakeholders

  • openshift eng

Definition of Done

  • autoscaler continues to work as expected and produces events for everything
  • Docs
  • this does not require documentation as it preserves existing behavior and provides no interface for user interaction
  • Testing
  • current tests should continue to pass

Feature Overview

Add GA support for deploying OpenShift to IBM Public Cloud

Goals

Complete the existing gaps to make OpenShift on IBM Cloud VPC (Next Gen2) General Available

Requirements

Optional requirements

  • OpenShift can be deployed using Mint mode and STS for cloud provider credentials (future release, tbd)
  • OpenShift can be deployed in disconnected mode https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SPLAT-737)
  • OpenShift on IBM Cloud supports User Provisioned Infrastructure (UPI) deployment method (future release, 4.14?)

Epic Goal

  • Enable installation of private clusters on IBM Cloud. This epic will track associated work.

Why is this important?

  • This is required MVP functionality to achieve GA.

Scenarios

  1. Install a private cluster on IBM Cloud.

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Background and Goal

Currently in OpenShift we do not support distributing hotfix packages to cluster nodes. In time-sensitive situations, a RHEL hotfix package can be the quickest route to resolving an issue. 

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Under guidance from Red Hat CEE, customers can deploy RHEL hotfix packages to MachineConfigPools.
  2. Customers can easily remove the hotfix when the underlying RHCOS image incorporates the fix.

Before we ship OCP CoreOS layering in https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MCO-165 we need to switch the format of what is currently `machine-os-content` to be the new base image.

The overall plan is:

  • Publish the new base image as `rhel-coreos-8` in the release image
  • Also publish the new extensions container (https://github.com/openshift/os/pull/763) as `rhel-coreos-8-extensions`
  • Teach the MCO to use this without also involving layering/build controller
  • Delete old `machine-os-content`

After https://github.com/openshift/os/pull/763 is in the release image, teach the MCO how to use it. This is basically:

  • Schedule the extensions container as a kubernetes service (just serves a yum repo via http)
  • Change the MCD to write a file into `/etc/yum.repos.d/machine-config-extensions.repo` that consumes it instead of what it does now in pulling RPMs from the mounted container filesystem

As a OCP CoreOS layering developer, having telemetry data about number of cluster using osImageURL will help understand how broadly this feature is getting used and improve accordingly.

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Cluster using Custom osImageURL is available via telemetry

 

Why?

  • Decouple control and data plane. 
    • Customers do not pay Red Hat more to run HyperShift control planes and supporting infrastructure than Standalone control planes and supporting infrastructure.
  • Improve security
    • Shift credentials out of cluster that support the operation of core platform vs workload
  • Improve cost
    • Allow a user to toggle what they don’t need.
    • Ensure a smooth path to scale to 0 workers and upgrade with 0 workers.

 

Assumption

  • A customer will be able to associate a cluster as “Infrastructure only”
  • E.g. one option: management cluster has role=master, and role=infra nodes only, control planes are packed on role=infra nodes
  • OR the entire cluster is labeled infrastructure , and node roles are ignored.
  • Anything that runs on a master node by default in Standalone that is present in HyperShift MUST be hosted and not run on a customer worker node.

 

 

Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sXCaRt3PE0iFmq7ei0Yb1svqzY9bygR5IprjgioRkjc/edit 

Overview 

Customers do not pay Red Hat more to run HyperShift control planes and supporting infrastructure than Standalone control planes and supporting infrastructure.

Assumption

  • A customer will be able to associate a cluster as “Infrastructure only”
  • E.g. one option: management cluster has role=master, and role=infra nodes only, control planes are packed on role=infra nodes
  • OR the entire cluster is labeled infrastructure, and node roles are ignored.
  • Anything that runs on a master node by default in Standalone that is present in HyperShift MUST be hosted and not run on a customer worker node.

DoD 

Run cluster-storage-operator (CSO) + AWS EBS CSI driver operator + AWS EBS CSI driver control-plane Pods in the management cluster, run the driver DaemonSet in the hosted cluster.

More information here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sXCaRt3PE0iFmq7ei0Yb1svqzY9bygR5IprjgioRkjc/edit 

 

As HyperShift Cluster Instance Admin, I want to run AWS EBS CSI driver operator + control plane of the CSI driver in the management cluster, so the guest cluster runs just my applications.

  • Add a new cmdline option for the guest cluster kubeconfig file location
  • Parse both kubeconfigs:
    • One from projected service account, which leads to the management cluster.
    • Second from the new cmdline option introduced above. This one leads to the guest cluster.
  • Only on HyperShift:
    • When interacting with Kubernetes API, carefully choose the right kubeconfig to watch / create / update objects in the right cluster.
    • Replace namespaces in all Deployments and other objects that are created in the management cluster. They must be created in the same namespace as the operator.
  •  
  •  
    • Pass only the guest kubeconfig to the operand (control-plane Deployment of the CSI driver).

Exit criteria:

  • Control plane Deployment of AWS EBS CSI driver runs in the management cluster in HyperShift.
  • Storage works in the guest cluster.
  • No regressions in standalone OCP.

As OCP support engineer I want the same guest cluster storage-related objects in output of "hypershift dump cluster --dump-guest-cluster" as in "oc adm must-gather ", so I can debug storage issues easily.

 

must-gather collects: storageclasses persistentvolumes volumeattachments csidrivers csinodes volumesnapshotclasses volumesnapshotcontents

hypershift collects none of this, the relevant code is here: https://github.com/openshift/hypershift/blob/bcfade6676f3c344b48144de9e7a36f9b40d3330/cmd/cluster/core/dump.go#L276

 

Exit criteria:

  • verify that hypershift dump cluster --dump-guest-cluster has storage objects from the guest cluster.

As HyperShift Cluster Instance Admin, I want to run cluster-storage-operator (CSO) in the management cluster, so the guest cluster runs just my applications.

  • Add a new cmdline option for the guest cluster kubeconfig file location
  • Parse both kubeconfigs:
    • One from projected service account, which leads to the management cluster.
    • Second from the new cmdline option introduced above. This one leads to the guest cluster.
  • Tag manifests of objects that should not be deployed by CVO in HyperShift
  • Only on HyperShift:
    • When interacting with Kubernetes API, carefully choose the right kubeconfig to watch / create / update objects in the right cluster.
    • Replace namespaces in all Deployments and other objects that are created in the management cluster. They must be created in the same namespace as the operator.
    • Pass only the guest kubeconfig to the operands (AWS EBS CSI driver operator).

Exit criteria:

  • CSO and AWS EBS CSI driver operator runs in the management cluster in HyperShift
  • Storage works in the guest cluster.
  • No regressions in standalone OCP.

Epic Goal

  • To improve debug-ability of ovn-k in hypershift
  • To verify the stability of of ovn-k in hypershift
  • To introduce a EgressIP reach-ability check that will work in hypershift

Why is this important?

  • ovn-k is supposed to be GA in 4.12. We need to make sure it is stable, we know the limitations and we are able to debug it similar to the self hosted cluster.

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. This will need consultation with the people working on HyperShift

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SDN-2589

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Overview 

Customers do not pay Red Hat more to run HyperShift control planes and supporting infrastructure than Standalone control planes and supporting infrastructure.

Assumption

  • A customer will be able to associate a cluster as “Infrastructure only”
  • E.g. one option: management cluster has role=master, and role=infra nodes only, control planes are packed on role=infra nodes
  • OR the entire cluster is labeled infrastructure, and node roles are ignored.
  • Anything that runs on a master node by default in Standalone that is present in HyperShift MUST be hosted and not run on a customer worker node.

DoD 

cluster-snapshot-controller-operator is running on the CP. 

More information here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sXCaRt3PE0iFmq7ei0Yb1svqzY9bygR5IprjgioRkjc/edit 

As HyperShift Cluster Instance Admin, I want to run cluster-csi-snapshot-controller-operator in the management cluster, so the guest cluster runs just my applications.

  • Add a new cmdline option for the guest cluster kubeconfig file location
  • Parse both kubeconfigs:
    • One from projected service account, which leads to the management cluster.
    • Second from the new cmdline option introduced above. This one leads to the guest cluster.
  • Move creation of manifests/08_webhook_service.yaml from CVO to the operator - it needs to be created in the management cluster.
  • Tag manifests of objects that should not be deployed by CVO in HyperShift by
  • Only on HyperShift:
    • When interacting with Kubernetes API, carefully choose the right kubeconfig to watch / create / update objects in the right cluster.
    • Replace namespaces in all Deployments and other objects that are created in the management cluster. They must be created in the same namespace as the operator.
    • Don’t create operand’s PodDisruptionBudget?
    • Update ValidationWebhookConfiguration to point directly to URL exposed by manifests/08_webhook_service.yaml instead of a Service. The Service is not available in the guest cluster.
    • Pass only the guest kubeconfig to the operands (both the webhook and csi-snapshot-controller).
    • Update unit tests to handle two kube clients.

Exit criteria:

  • cluster-csi-snapshot-controller-operator runs in the management cluster in HyperShift
  • csi-snapshot-controller runs in the management cluster in HyperShift
  • It is possible to take & restore volume snapshot in the guest cluster.
  • No regressions in standalone OCP.

As OpenShift developer I want cluster-csi-snapshot-controller-operator to use existing controllers in library-go, so I don’t need to maintain yet another code that does the same thing as library-go.

  • Check and remove manifests/03_configmap.yaml, it does not seem to be useful.
  • Check and remove manifests/03_service.yaml, it does not seem to be useful (at least now).
  • Use DeploymentController from library-go to sync Deployments.
  • Get rid of common/ package? It does not seem to be useful.
  • Use StaticResourceController for static content, including the snapshot CRDs.

Note: if this refactoring introduces any new conditions, we must make sure that 4.11 snapshot controller clears them to support downgrade! This will need 4.11 BZ + z-stream update!

Similarly, if some conditions become obsolete / not managed by any controller, they must be cleared by 4.12 operator.

Exit criteria:

  • The operator code is smaller.
  • No regressions in standalone OCP.
  • Upgrade/downgrade from/to standalone OCP 4.11 works.

Feature Overview

RHEL CoreOS should be updated to RHEL 9.2 sources to take advantage of newer features, hardware support, and performance improvements.

 

Requirements

  • RHEL 9.x sources for RHCOS builds starting with OCP 4.13 and RHEL 9.2.

 

Requirement Notes isMvp?
CI - MUST be running successfully with test automation This is a requirement for ALL features. YES
Release Technical Enablement Provide necessary release enablement details and documents. YES

(Optional) Use Cases

  • 9.2 Preview via Layering No longer necessary assuming we stay the course of going all in on 9.2

Assumptions

  • ...

Customer Considerations

  • ...

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

  • What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
  • Does this feature have doc impact?
  • New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
  • If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
  • What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
  • How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
  • What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
  • Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
  • What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

PROBLEM

We would like to improve our signal for RHEL9 readiness by increasing internal engineering engagement and external partner engagement on our community OpehShift offering, OKD.

PROPOSAL

Adding OKD to run on SCOS (a CentOS stream for CoreOS) brings the community offering closer to what a partner or an internal engineering team might expect on OCP.

ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA

Image has been switched/included: 

DEPENDENCIES

The SCOS build payload.

RELATED RESOURCES

OKD+SCOS proposal: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1_Xa9Z4tSqB7U2No7WA0KXb3lDIngNaQpS504ZLrCmg8/edit#slide=id.p

OKD+SCOS work draft: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1cuWOXhATexNLWGKLjaOcVF4V95JJjP1E3UmQ2kDVzsA/edit

 

Acceptance Criteria

A stable OKD on SCOS is built and available to the community sprintly.

 

This comes up when installing ipi-on-aws on arm64 with the custom payload build at quay.io/aleskandrox/okd-release:4.12.0-0.okd-centos9-full-rebuild-arm64 that is using scos as machine-content-os image

 

```

[root@ip-10-0-135-176 core]# crictl logs c483c92e118d8
2022-08-11T12:19:39+00:00 [cnibincopy] FATAL ERROR: Unsupported OS ID=scos
```

 

The probable fix has to land on https://github.com/openshift/cluster-network-operator/blob/master/bindata/network/multus/multus.yaml#L41-L53

Overview 

HyperShift came to life to serve multiple goals, some are main near-term, some are secondary that serve well long-term. 

Main Goals for hosted control planes (HyperShift)

  • Optimize OpenShift for Cost/footprint/ which improves our competitive stance against the *KSes
  • Establish separation of concerns which makes it more resilient for SRE to manage their workload clusters (be it security, configuration management, etc).
  • Simplify and enhance multi-cluster management experience especially since multi-cluster is becoming an industry need nowadays. 

Secondary Goals

HyperShift opens up doors to penetrate the market. HyperShift enables true hybrid (CP and Workers decoupled, mixed IaaS, mixed Arch,...). An architecture that opens up more options to target new opportunities in the cloud space. For more details on this one check: Hosted Control Planes (aka HyperShift) Strategy [Live Document]

 

Hosted Control Planes (HyperShift) Map 

To bring hosted control planes to our customers, we need the means to ship it. Today MCE is how HyperShift shipped, and installed so that customers can use it. There are two main customers for hosted-control-planes: 

 

  • Self-managed: In that case, Red Hat would provide hosted control planes as a service that is managed and SREed by the customer for their tenants (hence “self”-managed). In this management model, our external customers are the direct consumers of the multi-cluster control plane as a servie. Once MCE is installed, they can start to self-service dedicated control planes. 

 

  • Managed: This is OpenShift as a managed service, today we only “manage” the CP, and share the responsibility for other system components, more info here. To reduce management costs incurred by service delivery organizations which translates to operating profit (by reducing variable costs per control-plane), as well as to improve user experience, lower platform overhead (allow customers to focus mostly on writing applications and not concern themselves with infrastructure artifacts), and improve the cluster provisioning experience. HyperShift is shipped via MCE, and delivered to Red Hat managed SREs (same consumption route). However, for managed services, additional tooling needs to be refactored to support the new provisioning path. Furthermore, unlike self-managed where customers are free to bring their own observability stack, Red Hat managed SREs need to observe the managed fleet to ensure compliance with SLOs/SLIs/…

 

If you have noticed, MCE is the delivery mechanism for both management models. The difference between managed and self-managed is the consumer persona. For self-managed, it's the customer SRE for managed its the RH SRE

High-level Requirements

For us to ship HyperShift in the product (as hosted control planes) in either management model, there is a necessary readiness checklist that we need to satisfy. Below are the high-level requirements needed before GA: 

 

  • Hosted control planes fits well with our multi-cluster story (with MCE)
  • Hosted control planes APIs are stable for consumption  
  • Customers are not paying for control planes/infra components.  
  • Hosted control planes has an HA and a DR story
  • Hosted control planes is in parity with top-level add-on operators 
  • Hosted control planes reports metrics on usage/adoption
  • Hosted control planes is observable  
  • HyperShift as a backend to managed services is fully unblocked.

 

Please also have a look at our What are we missing in Core HyperShift for GA Readiness? doc. 

Hosted control planes fits well with our multi-cluster story

Multi-cluster is becoming an industry need today not because this is where trend is going but because it’s the only viable path today to solve for many of our customer’s use-cases. Below is some reasoning why multi-cluster is a NEED:

 

 

As a result, multi-cluster management is a defining category in the market where Red Hat plays a key role. Today Red Hat solves for multi-cluster via RHACM and MCE. The goal is to simplify fleet management complexity by providing a single pane of glass to observe, secure, police, govern, configure a fleet. I.e., the operand is no longer one cluster but a set, a fleet of clusters. 

HyperShift logically centralized architecture, as well as native separation of concerns and superior cluster lifecyle management experience, makes it a great fit as the foundation of our multi-cluster management story. 

Thus the following stories are important for HyperShift: 

  • When lifecycling OpenShift clusters (for any OpenShift form factor) on any of the supported providers from MCE/ACM/OCM/CLI as a Cluster Service Consumer  (RH managed SRE, or self-manage SRE/admin):
  • I want to be able to use a consistent UI so I can manage and operate (observe, govern,...) a fleet of clusters.
  • I want to specify HA constraints (e.g., deploy my clusters in different regions) while ensuring acceptable QoS (e.g., latency boundaries) to ensure/reduce any potential downtime for my workloads. 
  • When operating OpenShift clusters (for any OpenShift form factor) on any of the supported provider from MCE/ACM/OCM/CLI as a Cluster Service Consumer  (RH managed SRE, or self-manage SRE/admin):
  • I want to be able to backup any critical data so I am able to restore them in case of hosting service cluster (management cluster) failure. 

Refs:

Hosted control planes APIs are stable for consumption.

 

HyperShift is the core engine that will be used to provide hosted control-planes for consumption in managed and self-managed. 

 

Main user story:  When life cycling clusters as a cluster service consumer via HyperShift core APIs, I want to use a stable/backward compatible API that is less susceptible to future changes so I can provide availability guarantees. 

 

Ref: What are we missing in Core HyperShift for GA Readiness?

Customers are not paying for control planes/infra components. 

 

Customers do not pay Red Hat more to run HyperShift control planes and supporting infrastructure than Standalone control planes and supporting infrastructure.

Assumptions

  • A customer will be able to associate a cluster as “Infrastructure only”
  • E.g. one option: management cluster has role=master, and role=infra nodes only, control planes are packed on role=infra nodes
  • OR the entire cluster is labeled infrastructure , and node roles are ignored.
  • Anything that runs on a master node by default in Standalone that is present in HyperShift MUST be hosted and not run on a customer worker node.

HyperShift - proposed cuts from data plane

HyperShift has an HA and a DR story

When operating OpenShift clusters (for any OpenShift form factor) from MCE/ACM/OCM/CLI as a Cluster Service Consumer  (RH managed SRE, or self-manage SRE/admin) I want to be able to migrate CPs from one hosting service cluster to another:

  • as means for disaster recovery in the case of total failure
  • so that scaling pressures on a management cluster can be mitigated or a management cluster can be decommissioned.

More information: 

 

Hosted control planes reports metrics on usage/adoption

To understand usage patterns and inform our decision making for the product. We need to be able to measure adoption and assess usage.

See Hosted Control Planes (aka HyperShift) Strategy [Live Document]

Hosted control plane is observable  

Whether it's managed or self-managed, it’s pertinent to report health metrics to be able to create meaningful Service Level Objectives (SLOs), alert of failure to meet our availability guarantees. This is especially important for our managed services path. 

HyperShift is in parity with top-level add-on operators

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPPLAN-8901 

Unblock HyperShift as a backend to managed services

HyperShift for managed services is a strategic company goal as it improves usability, feature, and cost competitiveness against other managed solutions, and because managed services/consumption-based cloud services is where we see the market growing (customers are looking to delegate platform overhead). 

 

We should make sure our SD milestones are unblocked by the core team. 

 

Note 

This feature reflects HyperShift core readiness to be consumed. When all related EPICs and stories in this EPIC are complete HyperShift can be considered ready to be consumed in GA form. This does not describe a date but rather the readiness of core HyperShift to be consumed in GA form NOT the GA itself.

- GA date for self-managed will be factoring in other inputs such as adoption, customer interest/commitment, and other factors. 
- GA dates for ROSA-HyperShift are on track, tracked in milestones M1-7 (have a look at https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPPLAN-5771

Epic Goal*

The goal is to split client certificate trust chains from the global Hypershift root CA.

 
Why is this important? (mandatory)

This is important to:

  • assure a workload can be run on any kind of OCP flavor
  • reduce the blast radius in case of a sensitive material leak
  • separate trust to allow more granular control over client certificate authentication

 
Scenarios (mandatory) 

Provide details for user scenarios including actions to be performed, platform specifications, and user personas.  

  1. I would like to be able to run my workloads on any OpenShift-like platform.
    My workloads allow components to authenticate using client certificates based
    on a trust bundle that I am able to retrieve from the cluster.
  1. I don't want my users to have access to any CA bundle that would allow them
    to trust a random certificate from the cluster for client certificate authentication.

 
Dependencies (internal and external) (mandatory)

Hypershift team needs to provide us with code reviews and merge the changes we are to deliver

Contributing Teams(and contacts) (mandatory) 

  • Development - OpenShift Auth, Hypershift
  • Documentation -OpenShift Auth Docs team
  • QE - OpenShift Auth QE
  • PX - I have no idea what PX is
  • Others - others

Acceptance Criteria (optional)

The serviceaccount CA bundle automatically injected to all pods cannot be used to authenticate any client certificate generated by the control-plane.

Drawbacks or Risk (optional)

Risk: there is a throbbing time pressure as this should be delivered before first stable Hypershift release

Done - Checklist (mandatory)

  • CI Testing -  Basic e2e automationTests are merged and completing successfully
  • Documentation - Content development is complete.
  • QE - Test scenarios are written and executed successfully.
  • Technical Enablement - Slides are complete (if requested by PLM)
  • Engineering Stories Merged
  • All associated work items with the Epic are closed
  • Epic status should be “Release Pending” 
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

Incomplete Features

When this image was assembled, these features were not yet completed. Therefore, only the Jira Cards included here are part of this release

OLM would have to support a mechanism like podAffinity which allows multiple architecture values to be specified which enables it to pin operators to the matching architecture worker nodes

Ref: https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/pull/1014

 

Cut a new release of the OLM API and update OLM API dependency version (go.mod) in OLM package; then
Bring the upstream changes from OLM-2674 to the downstream olm repo.

A/C:

 - New OLM API version release
 - OLM API dependency updated in OLM Project
 - OLM Subscription API changes  downstreamed
 - OLM Controller changes  downstreamed
 - Changes manually tested on Cluster Bot

Epic Goal

  • Enabling integration of single hub cluster to install both ARM and x86 spoke clusters
  • Enabling support for heterogeneous OCP clusters
  • document requirements deployment flows
  • support in disconnected environment

Why is this important?

  • clients request

Scenarios

  1. Users manage both ARM and x86 machines, we should not require to have two different hub clusters
  2. Users manage a mixed architecture clusters without requirement of all the nodes to be of the same architecture

Acceptance Criteria

  • Process is well documented
  • we are able to install in a disconnected environment

We have a set of images

  • quay.io/edge-infrastructure/assisted-installer-agent:latest
  • quay.io/edge-infrastructure/assisted-installer-controller:latest
  • quay.io/edge-infrastructure/assisted-installer:latest

that should become multiarch images. This should be done both in upstream and downstream.

As a reference, we have built internally those images as multiarch and made them available as

  • registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-agent-rhel8:latest
  • registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-reporter-rhel8:latest
  • registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-rhel8:latest

They can be consumed by the Assisted Serivce pod via the following env

    - name: AGENT_DOCKER_IMAGE
      value: registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-agent-rhel8:latest
    - name: CONTROLLER_IMAGE
      value: registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-reporter-rhel8:latest
    - name: INSTALLER_IMAGE
      value: registry.redhat.io/rhai-tech-preview/assisted-installer-rhel8:latest

Feature Overview

We drive OpenShift cross-market customer success and new customer adoption with constant improvements and feature additions to the existing capabilities of our OpenShift Core Networking (SDN and Network Edge). This feature captures that natural progression of the product.

Goals

  • Feature enhancements (performance, scale, configuration, UX, ...)
  • Modernization (incorporation and productization of new technologies)

Requirements

  • Core Networking Stability
  • Core Networking Performance and Scale
  • Core Neworking Extensibility (Multus CNIs)
  • Core Networking UX (Observability)
  • Core Networking Security and Compliance

In Scope

  • Network Edge (ingress, DNS, LB)
  • SDN (CNI plugins, openshift-sdn, OVN, network policy, egressIP, egress Router, ...)
  • Networking Observability

Out of Scope

There are definitely grey areas, but in general:

  • CNV
  • Service Mesh
  • CNF

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

  • What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
  • Does this feature have doc impact?
  • New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
  • If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
  • What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
  • How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
  • What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
  • Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
  • What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

Goal: Provide queryable metrics and telemetry for cluster routes and sharding in an OpenShift cluster.

Problem: Today we test OpenShift performance and scale with best-guess or anecdotal evidence for the number of routes that our customers use. Best practices for a large number of routes in a cluster is to shard, however we have no visibility with regard to if and how customers are using sharding.

Why is this important? These metrics will inform our performance and scale testing, documented cluster limits, and how customers are using sharding for best practice deployments.

Dependencies (internal and external):

Prioritized epics + deliverables (in scope / not in scope):

Not in scope:

Estimate (XS, S, M, L, XL, XXL):

Previous Work:

Open questions:

Acceptance criteria:

Epic Done Checklist:

  • CI - CI Job & Automated tests: <link to CI Job & automated tests>
  • Release Enablement: <link to Feature Enablement Presentation> 
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR orf GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>
  • Notes for Done Checklist
    • Adding links to the above checklist with multiple teams contributing; select a meaningful reference for this Epic.
    • Checklist added to each Epic in the description, to be filled out as phases are completed - tracking progress towards “Done” for the Epic.

Description:

As described in the Design Doc, the following information is needed to be exported from Cluster Ingress Operator:

  • Number of routes/shard

Design 2 will be implemented as part of this story.

 

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Support for exporting the above mentioned metrics by Cluster Ingress Operator

Description:

As described in the Metrics to be sent via telemetry section of the Design Doc, the following metrics is needed to be sent from OpenShift cluster to Red Hat premises:

  • Minimum Routes per Shard
    • Recording Rule – cluster:route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard:min  : min(route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard)
    • Gives the minimum value of Routes per Shard.
  • Maximum Routes per Shard
    • Recording Rule – cluster:route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard:max  : max(route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard)
    • Gives the maximum value of Routes per Shard.
  • Average Routes per Shard
    • Recording Rule – cluster:route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard:avg  : avg(route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard)
    • Gives the average value of Routes per Shard.
  • Median Routes per Shard
    • Recording Rule – cluster:route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard:median  : quantile(0.5, route_metrics_controller_routes_per_shard)
    • Gives the median value of Routes per Shard.
  • Number of Routes summed by TLS Termination type
    • Recording Rule – cluster:openshift_route_info:tls_termination:sum : sum (openshift_route_info) by (tls_termination)
    • Gives the number of Routes for each tls_termination value. The possible values for tls_termination are edge, passthrough and reencrypt. 

The metrics should be allowlisted on the cluster side.

The steps described in Sending metrics via telemetry are needed to be followed. Specifically step 5.

Depends on CFE-478.

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Support for sending the above mentioned metrics from OpenShift clusters to the Red Hat premises by allowlisting metrics on the cluster side

This is a epic bucket for all activities surrounding the creation of declarative approach to release and maintain OLM catalogs.

Epic Goal

  • Allow Operator Authors to easily change the layout of the update graph in a single location so they can version/maintain/release it via git and have more approachable controls about graph vertices than today's replaces, skips and/or skipRange taxonomy
  • Allow Operators authors to have control over channel and bundle channel membership

Why is this important?

  • The imperative catalog maintenance approach so far with opm is being moved to a declarative format (OLM-2127 and OLM-1780) moving away from bundle-level controls but the update graph properties are still attached to a bundle
  • We've received feedback from the RHT internal developer community that maintaining and reasoning about the graph in the context of a single channel is still too hard, even with visualization tools
  • making the update graph easily changeable is important to deliver on some of the promises of declarative index configuration
  • The current interface for declarative index configuration still relies on skips, skipRange and replaces to shape the graph on a per-bundle level - this is too complex at a certain point with a lot of bundles in channels, we need to something at the package level

Scenarios

  1. An Operator author wants to release a new version replacing the latest version published previously
  2. After additional post-GA testing an Operator author wants to establish a new update path to an existing released version from an older, released version
  3. After finding a bug post-GA an Operator author wants to temporarily remove a known to be problematic update path
  4. An automated system wants to push a bundle inbetween an existing update path as a result of an Operator (base) image rebuild (Freshmaker use case)
  5. A user wants to take a declarative graph definition and turn it into a graphical image for visually ensuring the graph looks like they want
  6. An Operator author wants to promote a certain bundle to an additional / different channel to indicate progress in maturity of the operator.

Acceptance Criteria

  • The declarative format has to be user readable and terse enough to make quick modifications
  • The declarative format should be machine writeable (Freshmaker)
  • The update graph is declared and modified in a text based format aligned with the declarative config
  • it has to be possible to add / removes edges at the leave of the graph (releasing/unpublishing a new version)
  • it has to be possible to add/remove new vertices between existing edges (releasing/retracting a new update path)
  • it has to be possible to add/remove new edges in between existing vertices (releasing/unpublishing a version inbetween, freshmaker user case)
  • it has to be possible to change the channel member ship of a bundle after it's published (channel promotion)
  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • it has to be possible to add additional metadata later to implement OLM-2087 and OLM-259 if required

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. Declarative Index Config (OLM-2127)

Previous Work:

  1. Declarative Index Config (OLM-1780)

Related work

Open questions:

  1. What other manipulation scenarios are required?
    1. Answer: deprecation of content in the spirit of OLM-2087
    2. Answer: cross-channel update hints as described in OLM-2059 if that implementation requires it

 

When working on this Epic, it's important to keep in mind this other potentially related Epic: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OLM-2276

 

enhance the veneer rendering to be able to read the input veneer data from stdin, via a pipe, in a manner similar to https://dev.to/napicella/linux-pipes-in-golang-2e8j

then the command could be used in a manner similar to many k8s examples like

```shell
opm alpha render-veneer semver -o yaml < infile > outfile
```

Upstream issue link: https://github.com/operator-framework/operator-registry/issues/1011

Jira Description

As an OPM maintainer, I want to downstream the PR for (OCP 4.12 ) and backport it to OCP 4.11 so that IIB will NOT be impacted by the changes when it upgrades the OPM version to use the next/future opm upstream release (v1.25.0).

Summary / Background

IIB(the downstream service that manages the indexes) uses the upstream version and if they bump the OPM version to the next/future (v1.25.0) release with this change before having the downstream images updated then: the process to manage the indexes downstream will face issues and it will impact the distributions. 

Acceptance Criteria

  • The changes in the PR are available for the releases which uses FBC -> OCP 4.11, 4.12

Definition of Ready

  • PRs merged into downstream OCP repos branches 4.11/4.12

Definition of Done

  • We checked that the downstream images are with the changes applied (i.e.: we can try to verify in the same way that we checked if the changes were in the downstream for the fix OLM-2639 )

tldr: three basic claims, the rest is explanation and one example

  1. We cannot improve long term maintainability solely by fixing bugs.
  2. Teams should be asked to produce designs for improving maintainability/debugability.
  3. Specific maintenance items (or investigation of maintenance items), should be placed into planning as peer to PM requests and explicitly prioritized against them.

While bugs are an important metric, fixing bugs is different than investing in maintainability and debugability. Investing in fixing bugs will help alleviate immediate problems, but doesn't improve the ability to address future problems. You (may) get a code base with fewer bugs, but when you add a new feature, it will still be hard to debug problems and interactions. This pushes a code base towards stagnation where it gets harder and harder to add features.

One alternative is to ask teams to produce ideas for how they would improve future maintainability and debugability instead of focusing on immediate bugs. This would produce designs that make problem determination, bug resolution, and future feature additions faster over time.

I have a concrete example of one such outcome of focusing on bugs vs quality. We have resolved many bugs about communication failures with ingress by finding problems with point-to-point network communication. We have fixed the individual bugs, but have not improved the code for future debugging. In so doing, we chase many hard to diagnose problem across the stack. The alternative is to create a point-to-point network connectivity capability. this would immediately improve bug resolution and stability (detection) for kuryr, ovs, legacy sdn, network-edge, kube-apiserver, openshift-apiserver, authentication, and console. Bug fixing does not produce the same impact.

We need more investment in our future selves. Saying, "teams should reserve this" doesn't seem to be universally effective. Perhaps an approach that directly asks for designs and impacts and then follows up by placing the items directly in planning and prioritizing against PM feature requests would give teams the confidence to invest in these areas and give broad exposure to systemic problems.


Relevant links:

OCP/Telco Definition of Done

Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

Epic Goal

Why is this important?

  • This regression is a major performance and stability issue and it has happened once before.

Drawbacks

  • The E2E test may be complex due to trying to determine what DNS pods are responding to DNS requests. This is straightforward using the chaos plugin.

Scenarios

  • CI Testing

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. SDN Team

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. N/A

Open questions::

  1. Where do these E2E test go? SDN Repo? DNS Repo?

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub
    Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub
    Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Enable the chaos plugin https://coredns.io/plugins/chaos/ in our CoreDNS configuration so that we can use a DNS query to easily identify what DNS pods are responding to our requests.

Epic Goal

  • Change the default value for the spec.tuningOptions.maxConnections field in the IngressController API, which configures the HAProxy maxconn setting, to 50000 (fifty thousand).

Why is this important?

  • The maxconn setting constrains the number of simultaneous connections that HAProxy accepts. Beyond this limit, the kernel queues incoming connections. 
  • Increasing maxconn enables HAProxy to queue incoming connections intelligently.  In particular, this enables HAProxy to respond to health probes promptly while queueing other connections as needed.
  • The default setting of 20000 has been in place since OpenShift 3.5 was released in April 2017 (see BZ#1405440, commit, RHBA-2017:0884). 
  • Hardware capabilities have increased over time, and the current default is too low for typical modern machine sizes. 
  • Increasing the default setting improves HAProxy's performance at an acceptable cost in the common case. 

Scenarios

  1. As a cluster administrator who is installing OpenShift on typical hardware, I want OpenShift router to be tuned appropriately to take advantage of my hardware's capabilities.

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI is passing. 
  • The new default setting is clearly documented. 
  • A release note informs cluster administrators of the change to the default setting. 

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. None.

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. The  haproxy-max-connections-tuning enhancement made maxconn configurable without changing the default.  The enhancement document details the tradeoffs in terms of memory for various settings of nbthreads and maxconn with various numbers of routes. 

Open questions::

  1. ...

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

 

Feature Overview

  • This Section:* High-Level description of the feature ie: Executive Summary
  • Note: A Feature is a capability or a well defined set of functionality that delivers business value. Features can include additions or changes to existing functionality. Features can easily span multiple teams, and multiple releases.

 

Goals

  • This Section:* Provide high-level goal statement, providing user context and expected user outcome(s) for this feature

 

Requirements

  • This Section:* A list of specific needs or objectives that a Feature must deliver to satisfy the Feature.. Some requirements will be flagged as MVP. If an MVP gets shifted, the feature shifts. If a non MVP requirement slips, it does not shift the feature.

 

Requirement Notes isMvp?
CI - MUST be running successfully with test automation This is a requirement for ALL features. YES
Release Technical Enablement Provide necessary release enablement details and documents. YES

 

(Optional) Use Cases

This Section: 

  • Main success scenarios - high-level user stories
  • Alternate flow/scenarios - high-level user stories
  • ...

 

Questions to answer…

  • ...

 

Out of Scope

 

Background, and strategic fit

This Section: What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? What context can be provided to frame this feature.

 

Assumptions

  • ...

 

Customer Considerations

  • ...

 

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

  • What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
  • Does this feature have doc impact?  
  • New Content, Updates to existing content,  Release Note, or No Doc Impact
  • If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
  • What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
  • How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
  • What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
  • Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
  • What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

When OCP is performing cluster upgrade user should be notified about this fact.

There are two possibilities how to surface the cluster upgrade to the users:

  • Display a console notification throughout OCP web UI saying that the cluster is currently under upgrade.
  • Global notification throughout OCP web UI saying that the cluster is currently under upgrade.
  • Have an alert firing for all the users of OCP stating the cluster is undergoing an upgrade. 

 

AC:

  • Console-operator will create a ConsoleNotification CR when the cluster is being upgraded. Once the upgrade is done console-operator will remote that CR. These are the three statuses based on which we are determining if the cluster is being upgraded.
  • Add unit tests

 

Note: We need to decide if we want to distinguish this particular notification by a different color? ccing Ali Mobrem 

 

Created from: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RFE-3024

As a developer, I want to make status.HostIP for Pods visible in the Pod details page of the OCP Web Console. Currently there is no way to view the node IP for a Pod in the OpenShift Web Console.  When viewing a Pod in the console, the field status.HostIP is not visible.

 

Acceptance criteria:

  • Make pod's HostIP field visible in the pod details page, similarly to PodIP field

As a console user I want to have option to:

  • Restart Deployment
  • Retry latest DeploymentConfig if it failed

 

For Deployments we will add the 'Restart rollout' action button. This action will PATCH the Deployment object's 'spec.template.metadata.annotations' block, by adding 'openshift.io/restartedAt: <actual-timestamp>' annotation. This will restart the deployment, by creating a new ReplicaSet.

  • action is disabled if:
    • Deployment is paused

 

For DeploymentConfig we will add 'Retry rollout' action button.  This action will PATCH the latest revision of ReplicationController object's 'metadata.annotations' block by setting 'openshift.io/deployment/phase: "New"' and removing openshift.io/deployment.cancelled and openshift.io/deployment.status-reason.

  • action is enabled if:
    • latest revision of the ReplicationController resource is in Failed phase
  • action is disabled if:
    • latest revision of the ReplicationController resource is in Complete phase
    • DeploymentConfig does not have any rollouts
    • DeploymentConfigs is paused

 

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Add the 'Restart rollout' action button for the Deployment resource to both action menu and kebab menu
  • Add the 'Retry rollout' action button for the DeploymentConfig resource to both action menu and kebab menu

 

BACKGROUND:

OpenShift console will be updated to allow rollout restart deployment from the console itself.

Currently, from the OpenShift console, for the resource “deploymentconfigs” we can only start and pause the rollout, and for the resource “deployment” we can only resume the rollout. None of the resources (deployment & deployment config) has this option to restart the rollout. So, that is the reason why the customer wants this functionality to perform the same action from the CLI as well as the OpenShift console.

The customer wants developers who are not fluent with the oc tool and terminal utilities, can use the console instead of the terminal to restart deployment, just like we use to do it through CLI using the command “oc rollout restart deploy/<deployment-name>“.
Usually when developers change the config map that deployment uses they have to restart pods. Currently, the developers have to use the oc rollout restart deployment command. The customer wants the functionality to get this button/menu to perform the same action from the console as well.

Design
Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1i-jGtQGaA0OI4CYh8DH5BBIVbocIu_dxNt3vwWmPZdw/edit

Feature Overview  

Much like core OpenShift operators, a standardized flow exists for OLM-managed operators to interact with the cluster in a specific way to leverage AWS STS authorization when using AWS APIs as opposed to insecure static, long-lived credentials. OLM-managed operators can implement integration with the CloudCredentialOperator in well-defined way to support this flow.

Goals:

Enable customers to easily leverage OpenShift's capabilities around AWS STS with layered products, for increased security posture. Enable OLM-managed operators to implement support for this in well-defined pattern.

Requirements:

  • CCO gets a new mode in which it can reconcile STS credential request for OLM-managed operators
  • A standardized flow is leveraged to guide users in discovering and preparing their AWS IAM policies and roles with permissions that are required for OLM-managed operators 
  • A standardized flow is defined in which users can configure OLM-managed operators to leverage AWS STS
  • An example operator is used to demonstrate the end2end functionality
  • Clear instructions and documentation for operator development teams to implement the required interaction with the CloudCredentialOperator to support this flow

Use Cases:

See Operators & STS slide deck.

 

Out of Scope:

  • handling OLM-managed operator updates in which AWS IAM permission requirements might change from one version to another (which requires user awareness and intervention)

 

Background:

The CloudCredentialsOperator already provides a powerful API for OpenShift's cluster core operator to request credentials and acquire them via short-lived tokens. This capability should be expanded to OLM-managed operators, specifically to Red Hat layered products that interact with AWS APIs. The process today is cumbersome to none-existent based on the operator in question and seen as an adoption blocker of OpenShift on AWS.

 

Customer Considerations

This is particularly important for ROSA customers. Customers are expected to be asked to pre-create the required IAM roles outside of OpenShift, which is deemed acceptable.

Documentation Considerations

  • Internal documentation needs to exists to guide Red Hat operator developer teams on the requirements and proposed implementation of integration with CCO and the proposed flow
  • External documentation needs to exist to guide users on:
    • how to become aware that the cluster is in STS mode
    • how to become aware of operators that support STS and the proposed CCO flow
    • how to become aware of the IAM permissions requirements of these operators
    • how to configure an operator in the proposed flow to interact with CCO

Interoperability Considerations

  • this needs to work with ROSA
  • this needs to work with self-managed OCP on AWS

Market Problem

This Section: High-Level description of the Market Problem ie: Executive Summary

  • As a customer of OpenShift layered products, I need to be able to fluidly, reliably and consistently install and use OpenShift layered product Kubernetes Operators into my ROSA STS clusters, while keeping a STS workflow throughout.
  •  
  • As a customer of OpenShift on the big cloud providers, overall I expect OpenShift as a platform to function equally well with tokenized cloud auth as it does with "mint-mode" IAM credentials. I expect the same from the Kubernetes Operators under the Red Hat brand (that need to reach cloud APIs) in that tokenized workflows are equally integrated and workable as with "mint-mode" IAM credentials.
  •  
  • As the managed services, including Hypershift teams, offering a downstream opinionated, supported and managed lifecycle of OpenShift (in the forms of ROSA, ARO, OSD on GCP, Hypershift, etc), the OpenShift platform should have as close as possible, native integration with core platform operators when clusters use tokenized cloud auth, driving the use of layered products.
  • .
  • As the Hypershift team, where the only credential mode for clusters/customers is STS (on AWS) , the Red Hat branded Operators that must reach the AWS API, should be enabled to work with STS credentials in a consistent, and automated fashion that allows customer to use those operators as easily as possible, driving the use of layered products.

Why it Matters

  • Adding consistent, automated layered product integrations to OpenShift would provide great added value to OpenShift as a platform, and its downstream offerings in Managed Cloud Services and related offerings.
  • Enabling Kuberenetes Operators (at first, Red Hat ones) on OpenShift for the "big3" cloud providers is a key differentiation and security requirement that our customers have been and continue to demand.
  • HyperShift is an STS-only architecture, which means that if our layered offerings via Operators cannot easily work with STS, then it would be blocking us from our broad product adoption goals.

Illustrative User Stories or Scenarios

  1. Main success scenario - high-level user story
    1. customer creates a ROSA STS or Hypershift cluster (AWS)
    2. customer wants basic (table-stakes) features such as AWS EFS or RHODS or Logging
    3. customer sees necessary tasks for preparing for the operator in OperatorHub from their cluster
    4. customer prepares AWS IAM/STS roles/policies in anticipation of the Operator they want, using what they get from OperatorHub
    5. customer's provides a very minimal set of parameters (AWS ARN of role(s) with policy) to the Operator's OperatorHub page
    6. The cluster can automatically setup the Operator, using the provided tokenized credentials and the Operator functions as expected
    7. Cluster and Operator upgrades are taken into account and automated
    8. The above steps 1-7 should apply similarly for Google Cloud and Microsoft Azure Cloud, with their respective token-based workload identity systems.
  2. Alternate flow/scenarios - high-level user stories
    1. The same as above, but the ROSA CLI would assist with AWS role/policy management
    2. The same as above, but the oc CLI would assist with cloud role/policy management (per respective cloud provider for the cluster)
  3. ...

Expected Outcomes

This Section: Articulates and defines the value proposition from a users point of view

  • See SDE-1868 as an example of what is needed, including design proposed, for current-day ROSA STS and by extension Hypershift.
  • Further research is required to accomodate the AWS STS equivalent systems of GCP and Azure
  • Order of priority at this time is
    • 1. AWS STS for ROSA and ROSA via HyperShift
    • 2. Microsoft Azure for ARO
    • 3. Google Cloud for OpenShift Dedicated on GCP

Effect

This Section: Effect is the expected outcome within the market. There are two dimensions of outcomes; growth or retention. This represents part of the “why” statement for a feature.

  • Growth is the acquisition of net new usage of the platform. This can be new workloads not previously able to be supported, new markets not previously considered, or new end users not previously served.
  • Retention is maintaining and expanding existing use of the platform. This can be more effective use of tools, competitive pressures, and ease of use improvements.
  • Both of growth and retention are the effect of this effort.
    • Customers have strict requirements around using only token-based cloud credential systems for workloads in their cloud accounts, which include OpenShift clusters in all forms.
      • We gain new customers from both those that have waited for token-based auth/auth from OpenShift and from those that are new to OpenShift, with strict requirements around cloud account access
      • We retain customers that are going thru both cloud-native and hybrid-cloud journeys that all inevitably see security requirements driving them towards token-based auth/auth.
      •  

References

As an engineer I want the capability to implement CI test cases that run at different intervals, be it daily, weekly so as to ensure downstream operators that are dependent on certain capabilities are not negatively impacted if changes in systems CCO interacts with change behavior.

Acceptance Criteria:

Create a stubbed out e2e test path in CCO and matching e2e calling code in release such that there exists a path to tests that verify working in an AWS STS workflow.

Pre-Work Objectives

Since some of our requirements from the ACM team will not be available for the 4.12 timeframe, the team should work on anything we can get done in the scope of the console repo so that when the required items are available in 4.13, we can be more nimble in delivering GA content for the Unified Console Epic.

Overall GA Key Objective
Providing our customers with a single simplified User Experience(Hybrid Cloud Console)that is extensible, can run locally or in the cloud, and is capable of managing the fleet to deep diving into a single cluster. 
Why customers want this?

  1. Single interface to accomplish their tasks
  2. Consistent UX and patterns
  3. Easily accessible: One URL, one set of credentials

Why we want this?

  • Shared code -  improve the velocity of both teams and most importantly ensure consistency of the experience at the code level
  • Pre-built PF4 components
  • Accessibility & i18n
  • Remove barriers for enabling ACM

Phase 2 Goal: Productization of the united Console 

  1. Enable user to quickly change context from fleet view to single cluster view
    1. Add Cluster selector with “All Cluster” Option. “All Cluster” = ACM
    2. Shared SSO across the fleet
    3. Hub OCP Console can connect to remote clusters API
    4. When ACM Installed the user starts from the fleet overview aka “All Clusters”
  2. Share UX between views
    1. ACM Search —> resource list across fleet -> resource details that are consistent with single cluster details view
    2. Add Cluster List to OCP —> Create Cluster

As a developer I would like to disable clusters like *KS that we can't support for multi-cluster (for instance because we can't authenticate). The ManagedCluster resource has a vendor label that we can use to know if the cluster is supported.

cc Ali Mobrem Sho Weimer Jakub Hadvig 

UPDATE: 9/20/22 : we want an allow-list with OpenShift, ROSA, ARO, ROKS, and  OpenShiftDedicated

Acceptance criteria:

  • Investigate if console-operator should pass info about which cluster are supported and unsupported to the frontend
  • Unsupported clusters should not appear in the cluster dropdown
  • Unsupported clusters based off
    • defined vendor label
    • non 4.x ocp clusters

Feature Overview (aka. Goal Summary)  

The MCO should properly report its state in a way that's consistent and able to be understood by customers, troubleshooters, and maintainers alike. 

Some customer cases have revealed scenarios where the MCO state reporting is misleading and therefore could be unreliable to base decisions and automation on.

In addition to correcting some incorrect states, the MCO will be enhanced for a more granular view of update rollouts across machines.

The MCO should properly report its state in a way that's consistent and able to be understood by customers, troubleshooters, and maintainers alike. 

For this epic, "state" means "what is the MCO doing?" – so the goal here is to try to make sure that it's always known what the MCO is doing. 

This includes: 

  • Conditions
  • Some Logging 
  • Possibly Some Events 

While this probably crosses a little bit into the "status" portion of certain MCO objects, as some state is definitely recorded there, this probably shouldn't turn into a "better status reporting" epic.  I'm interpreting "status" to mean "how is it going" so status is maybe a "detail attached to a state". 

 

Exploration here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1j6Qea98aVP12kzmPbR_3Y-3-meJQBf0_K6HxZOkzbNk/edit?usp=sharing

 

https://docs.google.com/document/d/17qYml7CETIaDmcEO-6OGQGNO0d7HtfyU7W4OMA6kTeM/edit?usp=sharing

 

The current property description is:

configuration represents the current MachineConfig object for the machine config pool.

But in a 4.12.0-ec.4 cluster, the actual semantics seem to be something closer to "the most recent rendered config that we completely leveled on". We should at least update the godocs to be more specific about the intended semantics. And perhaps consider adjusting the semantics?

Complete Epics

This section includes Jira cards that are linked to an Epic, but the Epic itself is not linked to any Feature. These epics were completed when this image was assembled

Epic Goal

  • Update OpenShift components that are owned by the Builds + Jenkins Team to use Kubernetes 1.25

Why is this important?

  • Our components need to be updated to ensure that they are using the latest bug/CVE fixes, features, and that they are API compatible with other OpenShift components.

Acceptance Criteria

  • Existing CI/CD tests must be passing

This is epic tracks "business as usual" requirements / enhancements / bug fixing of Insights Operator.

Today the links point at a rule-scoped page, but that page lacks information about recommended resolution.  You can click through by cluster ID to your specific cluster and get that recommendation advice, but it would be more convenient and less confusing for customers if we linked directly to the cluster-scoped recommendation page.

We can implement by updating the template here to be:

fmt.Sprintf("https://console.redhat.com/openshift/insights/advisor/clusters/%s?first=%s%%7C%s", clusterID, ruleIDStr, rec.ErrorKey)

or something like that.

 

unknowns

request is clear, solution/implementation to be further clarified

This epic contains all the Dynamic Plugins related stories for OCP release-4.11 

Epic Goal

  • Track all the stories under a single epic

Acceptance Criteria

  •  

This story only covers API components. We will create a separate story for other utility functions.

Today we are generating documentation for Console's Dynamic Plugin SDK in
frontend/packages/dynamic-plugin-sdk. We are missing ts-doc for a set of hooks and components.

We are generating the markdown from the dynamic-plugin-sdk using

yarn generate-doc

Here is the list of the API that the dynamic-plugin-sdk is exposing:

https://gist.github.com/spadgett/0ddefd7ab575940334429200f4f7219a

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Add missing jsdocs for the API that dynamic-plugin-sdk exposes

Out of Scope:

  • This does not include work for integrating the API docs into the OpenShift docs
  • This does not cover other public utilities, only components.

This epic contains all the Dynamic Plugins related stories for OCP release-4.12

Epic Goal

  • Track all the stories under a single epic

Acceptance Criteria

Move `frontend/public/components/nav` to `packages/console-app/src/components/nav` and address any issues resulting from the move.

There will be some expected lint errors relating to cyclical imports. These will require some refactoring to address.

Currently the ConsolePlugins API version is v1alpha1. Since we are going GA with dynamic plugins we should be creating a v1 version.

This would require updates in following repositories:

  1. openshift/api (add the v1 version and generate a new CRD)
  2. openshift/client-go (picku the changes in the openshift/api repo and generate clients & informers for the new v1 version)
  3. openshift/console-operator repository will using both the new v1 version and v1alpha1 in code and manifests folder.

AC:

  • both v1 and v1alpha1 ConsolePlugins should be passed to the console-config.yaml when the plugins are enabled and present on the cluster.

 

NOTE: This story does not include the conversion webhook change which will be created as a follow on story

Based on API review CONSOLE-3145, we have decided to deprecate the following APIs:

  • useAccessReviewAllowed (use useAccessReview instead)
  • useSafetyFirst

cc Andrew Ballantyne Bryan Florkiewicz 

Currently our `api.md` does not generate docs with "tags" (aka `@deprecated`) – we'll need to add that functionality to the `generate-doc.ts` script. See the code that works for `console-extensions.md`

The extension `console.dashboards/overview/detail/item` doesn't constrain the content to fit the card.

The details-card has an expectation that a <dd> item will be the last item (for spacing between items). Our static details-card items use a component called 'OverviewDetailItem'. This isn't enforced in the extension and can cause undesired padding issues if they just do whatever they want.

I feel our approach here should be making the extension take the props of 'OverviewDetailItem' where 'children' is the new 'component'.

Acceptance Criteria:

  • Deprecate the old extension (in docs, with date/stamp)
  • Make a new extension that applies a stricter type
  • Include this new extension next to the old one (with the error boundary around it)

when defining two proxy endpoints, 
apiVersion: console.openshift.io/v1alpha1
kind: ConsolePlugin
metadata:
...
name: forklift-console-plugin
spec:
displayName: Console Plugin Template
proxy:

  • alias: forklift-inventory
    authorize: true
    service:
    name: forklift-inventory
    namespace: konveyor-forklift
    port: 8443
    type: Service
  • alias: forklift-must-gather-api
    authorize: true
    service:
    name: forklift-must-gather-api
    namespace: konveyor-forklift
    port: 8443
    type: Service

service:
basePath: /
I get two proxy endpoints
/api/proxy/plugin/forklift-console-plugin/forklift-inventory
and
/api/proxy/plugin/forklift-console-plugin/forklift-must-gather-api

but both proxy to the `forklift-must-gather-api` service

e.g.
curl to:
[server url]/api/proxy/plugin/forklift-console-plugin/forklift-inventory
will point to the `forklift-must-gather-api` service, instead of the `forklift-inventory` service

The console has good error boundary components that are useful for dynamic plugin.
Exposing them will enable the plugins to get the same look and feel of handling react errors as console
The minimum requirement right now is to expose the ErrorBoundaryFallbackPage component from
https://github.com/openshift/console/blob/master/frontend/packages/console-shared/src/components/error/fallbacks/ErrorBoundaryFallbackPage.tsx

To align with https://github.com/openshift/dynamic-plugin-sdk, plugin metadata field dependencies as well as the @console/pluginAPI entry contained within should be made optional.

If a plugin doesn't declare the @console/pluginAPI dependency, the Console release version check should be skipped for that plugin.

We should have a global notification or the `Console plugins` page (e.g., k8s/cluster/operator.openshift.io~v1~Console/cluster/console-plugins) should alert users when console operator `spec.managementState` is `Unmanaged` as changes to `enabled` for plugins will have no effect.

We neither use nor support static plugin nav extensions anymore so we should remove the API in the static plugin SDK and get rid of related cruft in our current nav components.

 

AC: Remove static plugin nav extensions code. Check the navigation code for any references to the old API.

During the development of https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CONSOLE-3062, it was determined additional information is needed in order to assist a user when troubleshooting a Failed plugin (see https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/11664#issuecomment-1159024959). As it stands today, there is no data available to the console to relay to the user regarding why the plugin Failed. Presumably, a message should be added to NotLoadedDynamicPlugin to address this gap.

 

AC: Add `message` property to NotLoadedDynamicPluginInfo type.

`@openshift-console/plugin-shared` (NPM) is a package that will contain shared components that can be upversioned separately by the Plugins so they can keep core compatibility low but upversion and support more shared components as we need them.

This isn't documented today. We need to do that.

Acceptance Criteria

  • Add a note in the "SDK packages" section of the README about the existence of this package and it's purpose
    • The purpose of being a static utility delivery library intended not to be tied to OpenShift Console versions and compatible with multiple version of OpenShift Console

Following https://coreos.slack.com/archives/C011BL0FEKZ/p1650640804532309, it would be useful for us (network observability team) to have access to ResourceIcon in dynamic-plugin-sdk.

Currently ResourceLink is exported but not ResourceIcon

 

AC:

  • Require the ResourceIcon  from public to dynamic-plugin-sdk
  • Add the component to the dynamic-demo-plugin
  • Add a CI test to check for the ResourceIcon component

 

This epic contains all the OLM related stories for OCP release-4.12

Epic Goal

  • Track all the stories under a single epic

This enhancement Introduces support for provisioning and upgrading heterogenous architecture clusters in phases.

 

We need to scan through the compute nodes and build a set of supported architectures from those. Each node on the cluster has a label for architecture: e.g. `kuberneties.io/arch:arm64`, `kubernetes.io/arch:amd64` etc. Based on the set of supported architectures console will need to surface only those operators in the Operator Hub, which are supported on our Nodes. Each operator's PackageManifest contains a labels that indicates whats the operator's supported architecture, e.g.  `operatorframework.io/arch.s390x: supported`. An operator can be supported on multiple architectures

AC:

  1. Implement logic in the console's backend to read the set of architecture types from console-config.yaml and set it as a SERVER_FLAG.nodeArchitectures (Change similar to https://github.com/openshift/console/commit/39aabe171a2e89ed3757ac2146d252d087fdfd33)
  2. In Operator hub render only operators that are support on any given node, based on the SERVER_FLAG.nodeArchitectures field implemented in CONSOLE-3242.

 

OS and arch filtering: https://github.com/openshift/console/blob/2ad4e17d76acbe72171407fc1c66ca4596c8aac4/frontend/packages/operator-lifecycle-manager/src/components/operator-hub/operator-hub-items.tsx#L49-L86

 

@jpoulin is good to ask about heterogeneous clusters.

This enhancement Introduces support for provisioning and upgrading heterogenous architecture clusters in phases.

 

We need to scan through the compute nodes and build a set of supported architectures from those. Each node on the cluster has a label for architecture: e.g. kubernetes.io/arch=arm64, kubernetes.io/arch=amd64 etc. Based on the set of supported architectures console will need to surface only those operators in the Operator Hub, which are supported on our Nodes.

 

AC: 

  1. Implement logic in the console-operator that will scan though all the nodes and build a set of all the architecture types that the cluster nodes run on and pass it to the console-config.yaml
  2. Add unit and e2e test cases in the console-operator repository.

 

@jpoulin is good to ask about heterogeneous clusters.

An epic we can duplicate for each release to ensure we have a place to catch things we ought to be doing regularly but can tend to fall by the wayside.

As a developer, I want to be able to clean up the css markup after making the css / scss changes required for dark mode and remove any old unused css / scss content. 

 

Acceptance criteria:

  • Remove any unused scss / css content after revamping for dark mode

Epic Goal

  • Enable OpenShift IPI Installer to deploy OCP to a shared VPC in GCP.
  • The host project is where the VPC and subnets are defined. Those networks are shared to one or more service projects.
  • Objects created by the installer are created in the service project where possible. Firewall rules may be the only exception.
  • Documentation outlines the needed minimal IAM for both the host and service project.

Why is this important?

  • Shared VPC's are a feature of GCP to enable granular separation of duties for organizations that centrally manage networking but delegate other functions and separation of billing. This is used more often in larger organizations where separate teams manage subsets of the cloud infrastructure. Enterprises that use this model would also like to create IPI clusters so that they can leverage the features of IPI. Currently organizations that use Shared VPC's must use UPI and implement the features of IPI themselves. This is repetative engineering of little value to the customer and an increased risk of drift from upstream IPI over time. As new features are built into IPI, organizations must become aware of those changes and implement them themselves instead of getting them "for free" during upgrades.

Scenarios

  1. Deploy cluster(s) into service project(s) on network(s) shared from a host project.

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

User Story:

As a user, I want to be able to:

  • skip creating service accounts in Terraform when using passthrough credentialsMode.
  • pass the installer service account to Terraform to be used as the service account for instances when using passthrough credentialsMode.

so that I can achieve

  • creating an IPI cluster using Shared VPC networks using a pre-created service account with the necessary permissions in the Host Project.

Acceptance Criteria:

Description of criteria:

  • Upstream documentation
  • Point 1
  • Point 2
  • Point 3

(optional) Out of Scope:

Detail about what is specifically not being delivered in the story

Engineering Details:

1. Proposed title of this feature request
Basic authentication for Helm Chart repository in helmchartrepositories.helm.openshift.io CRD.

2. What is the nature and description of the request?
As of v4.6.9, the HelmChartRepository CRD only supports client TLS authentication through spec.connectionConfig.tlsClientConfig.

3. Why do you need this? (List the business requirements here)
Basic authentication is widely used by many chart repositories managers (Nexus OSS, Artifactory, etc.)
Helm CLI also supports them with the helm repo add command.
https://helm.sh/docs/helm/helm_repo_add/

4. How would you like to achieve this? (List the functional requirements here)
Probably by extending the CRD:

spec:
connectionConfig:
username: username
password:
secretName: secret-name

The secret namespace should be openshift-config to align with the tlsClientConfig behavior.

5. For each functional requirement listed in question 4, specify how Red Hat and the customer can test to confirm the requirement is successfully implemented.
Trying to pull helm charts from remote private chart repositories that has disabled anonymous access and offers basic authentication.
E.g.: https://github.com/sonatype/docker-nexus

Owner: Architect:

Story (Required)

As an OCP user I will like to be able to install helm charts from repos added to ODC with basic authentication fields populated

Background (Required)

We need to support helm installs for Repos that have the basic authentication secret name and namespace.

Glossary

Out of scope

Updating the ProjectHelmChartRepository CRD, already done in diff story
Supporting the HelmChartRepository CR, this feature will be scoped first to project/namespace scope repos.

In Scope

<Defines what is included in this story>

Approach(Required)

If the new fields for basic auth are set in the repo CR then use those credentials when making API calls to helm to install/upgrade charts. We will error out if user logged in does not have access to the secret referenced by Repo CR. If basic auth fields are not present we assume is not an authenticated repo.

Dependencies

Nonet

Edge Case

NA

Acceptance Criteria

I can list, install and update charts on authenticated repos from ODC
Needs Documentation both upstream and downstream
Needs new unit test covering repo auth

INVEST Checklist

Dependencies identified
Blockers noted and expected delivery timelines set
Design is implementable
Acceptance criteria agreed upon
Story estimated

Legend

Unknown
Verified
Unsatisfied

Epic Goal

  • Support manifest lists by image streams and the integrated registry. Clients should be able to pull/push manifests lists from/into the integrated registry. They also should be able to import images via `oc import-image` and them pull them from the internal registry.

Why is this important?

  • Manifest lists are becoming more and more popular. Customers want to mirror manifest lists into the registry and be able to pull them by digest.

Scenarios

  1. Manifest lists can be pushed into the integrated registry
  2. Imported manifests list can be pulled from the integrated registry
  3. Image triggers work with manifest lists

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • Existing functionality shouldn't change its behavior

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional)

  1. https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/master/enhancements/manifestlist/manifestlist-support.md

Open questions

  1. Can we merge creation of images without having the pruner?

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA

  • The ImageStream object should contain a new flag indicating that it refers to a manifest list
  • openshift-controller-manager uses new openshift/api code to import image streams
  • changing `importMode` of an image stream tag triggers a new import (i.e. updates generation in the tag spec)

NOTES

This is a follow up Epic to https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MCO-144, which aimed to get in-place upgrades for Hypershift. This epic aims to capture additional work to focus on using CoreOS/OCP layering into Hypershift, which has benefits such as:

 

 - removing or reducing the need for ignition

 - maintaining feature parity between self-driving and managed OCP models

 - adding additional functionality such as hotfixes

Currently not implemented, and will require the MCD hypershift mode to be adjusted to handle disruptionless upgrades like regular MCD

Right now in https://github.com/openshift/hypershift/pull/1258 you can only perform one upgrade at a time. Multiple upgrades will break due to controller logic

 

Properly create logic to handle manifest creation/updates and deletion, so the logic is more bulletproof

Epic Goal

  • We need the installer to accept a LB type from user and then we could set type of LB in the following object.
    oc get ingress.config.openshift.io/cluster -o yaml
    Then we can fetch info from this object and reconcile the operator to have the NLB changes reflected.

 

This is an API change and we will consider this as a feature request.

Why is this important?

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/NE-799 Please check this for more details

 

Scenarios

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/NE-799 Please check this for more details

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. installer
  2. ingress operator

Previous Work (Optional):

 No

Open questions::

N/A

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

We need tests for the ovirt-csi-driver and the cluster-api-provider-ovirt. These tests help us to

  • minimize bugs,
  • reproduce and fix them faster and
  • pin down current behavior of the driver

Also, having dedicated tests on lower levels with a smaller scope (unit, integration, ...) has the following benefits:

  • fast feedback cycle (local test execution)
  • developer in-code documentation
  • easier onboarding for new contributers
  • lower resource consumption
The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

Description

As a user, In the topology view, I would like to be updated intuitively if any of the deployments have reached quota limits

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Show a yellow border around deployments if any of the deployments have reached the quota limit
  2. For deployments, if there are any errors associated with resource limits or quotas, include a warning alert in the side panel.
    1. If we know resource limits are the cause, include link to Edit resource limits
    2. If we know pod count is the cause, include a link to Edit pod count

Additional Details:

 

Refer below for more details 

Description

As a user, I would like to be informed in an intuitive way,  when quotas have been reached in a namespace

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Show an alert banner on the Topology and add page for this project/namespace when there is a RQ (Resource Quota) / ACRQ (Applied Cluster Resource Quota) issue
    PF guideline: https://www.patternfly.org/v4/components/alert/design-guidelines#using-alerts 
  2. The above alert should have a CTA link to the search page with all RQ, ACRQ and if there is just one show the details page for the same
  3. For RQ, ACRQ list view show one more column called status with details as shown in the project view.

Additional Details:

 

Refer below for more details 

Goal

Provide a form driven experience to allow cluster admins to manage the perspectives to meet the ACs below.

Problem:

We have heard the following requests from customers and developer advocates:

  • Some admins do not want to provide access to the Developer Perspective from the console
  • Some admins do not want to provide non-priv users access to the Admin Perspective from the console

Acceptance criteria:

  1. Cluster administrator is able to "hide" the admin perspective for non-priv users
  2. Cluster administrator is able to "hide" the developer perspective for all users
  3. Be user that User Preferences for individual users behaves appropriately. If only one perspective is available, the perspective switcher is not needed.

Dependencies (External/Internal):

Design Artifacts:

Exploration:

Note:

Description

As an admin, I want to hide the admin perspective for non-privileged users or hide the developer perspective for all users

Based on the https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-6730 enhancement proposal, it is required to extend the console configuration CRD to enable the cluster admins to configure this data in the console resource

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Extend the "customization" spec type definition for the CRD in the openshift/api project

Additional Details:

Previous customization work:

  1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5416
  2. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5020
  3. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5447

Description

As an admin, I want to be able to use a form driven experience  to hide user perspective(s)

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Add checkboxes with the options
    1. Hide "Administrator" perspective for non-privileged users
    2.  Hide "Developer" perspective for all users
  2. The console configuration CR should be updated as per the selected option

Additional Details:

Description

As an admin, I want to hide user perspective(s) based on the customization.

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Hide perspective(s) based on the customization
    1. When the admin perspective is disabled -> we hide the admin perspective for all unprivileged users
    2. When the dev perspective is disabled -> we hide the dev perspective for all users
  2. When all the perspectives are hidden from a user or for all users, show the Admin perspective by default

Additional Details:

Description

As an admin, I should be able to see a code snippet that shows how to add user perspectives

Based on the https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-6732 enhancement proposal, the cluster admin can add user perspectives

To support the cluster-admin to configure the perspectives correctly, the developer console should provide a code snippet for the customization of yaml resource (Console CRD).

Customize Perspective Enhancement PR: https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/pull/1205

Acceptance Criteria

  1. When the admin opens the Console CRD there is a snippet in the sidebar which provides a default YAML which supports the admin to add user perspectives

Additional Details:

Previous work:

  1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5080
  2. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5449

Problem:

Customers don't want their users to have access to some/all of the items which are available in the Developer Catalog.  The request is to change access for the cluster, not per user or persona.

Goal:

Provide a form driven experience to allow cluster admins easily disable the Developer Catalog, or one or more of the sub catalogs in the Developer Catalog.

Why is it important?

Multiple customer requests.

Acceptance criteria:

  1. As a cluster admin, I can hide/disable access to the developer catalog for all users across all namespaces.
  2. As a cluster admin, I can hide/disable access to a specific sub-catalog in the developer catalog for all users across all namespaces.
    1. Builder Images
    2. Templates
    3. Helm Charts
    4. Devfiles
    5. Operator Backed

Notes

We need to consider how this will work with subcatalogs which are installed by operators: VMs, Event Sources, Event Catalogs, Managed Services, Cloud based services

Dependencies (External/Internal):

Design Artifacts:

Exploration:

Note:

Description

As a cluster-admin, I should be able to see a code snippet that shows how to enable sub-catalogs or the entire dev catalog.

Based on the https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-6732 enhancement proposal, the cluster admin can add sub-catalog(s)  from the Developer Catalog or the Dev catalog as a whole.

To support the cluster-admin to configure the sub-catalog list correctly, the developer console should provide a code snippet for the customization yaml resource (Console CRD).

Acceptance Criteria

  1. When the admin opens the Console CRD there is a snippet in the sidebar which provides a default YAML, which supports the admin to add sub-catalogs/the whole dev catalog

Additional Details:

Previous work:

  1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5080
  2. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5449

Description

As an admin, I want to hide sub-catalogs in the developer catalog or hide the developer catalog completely based on the customization.

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Hide all links to the sub-catalog(s) from the add page, topology actions, empty states, quick search, and the catalog itself
  2. The sub-catalog should show Not found if the user opens the sub-catalog directly
  3. The feature should not be hidden if a sub-catalog option is disabled

Additional Details:

Description

As an admin, I want to hide/disable access to specific sub-catalogs in the developer catalog or the complete dev catalog for all users across all namespaces.

Based on the https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-6732 enhancement proposal, it is required to extend the console configuration CRD to enable the cluster admins to configure this data in the console resource

Acceptance Criteria

Extend the "customization" spec type definition for the CRD in the openshift/api project

Additional Details:

Previous customization work:

  1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5416
  2. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5020
  3. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5447

Epic Goal

  • Facilitate the transition to for OLM and content to PSA enforcing the `restricted` security profile
  • Use the label synch'er to enforce the required security profile
  • Current content should work out-of-the-box as is
  • Upgrades should not be blocked

Why is this important?

  • PSA helps secure the cluster by enforcing certain security restrictions that the pod must meet to be scheduled
  • 4.12 will enforce the `restricted` profile, which will affect the deployment of operators in `openshift-*` namespaces 

Scenarios

  1. Admin installs operator in an `openshift-*`namespace that is not managed by the label syncher -> label should be applied
  2. Admin installs operator in an `openshift-*` namespace that has a label asking the label syncher to not reconcile it -> nothing changes

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • Done only downstream
  • Transition documentation written and reviewed

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. label syncher (still searching for the link)

Open questions::

  1. Is this only for openshift-* namespaces?

Resources

Stakeholders

  • Daniel S...?

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

As an admin, I would like openshift-* namespaces with an operator to be labeled with security.openshift.io/scc.podSecurityLabelSync=true to ensure the continual functioning of operators without manual intervention. The label should only be applied to openshift-* namespaces with an operator (the presence of a ClusterServiceVersion resource) IF the label is not already present. This automation will help smooth functioning of the cluster and avoid frivolous operational events.

Context: As part of the PSA migration period, Openshift will ship with the "label sync'er" - a controller that will automatically adjust PSA security profiles in response to the workloads present in the namespace. We can assume that not all operators (produced by Red Hat, the community or ISVs) will have successfully migrated their deployments in response to upstream PSA changes. The label sync'er will sync, by default, any namespace not prefixed with "openshift-", of which an explicit label (security.openshift.io/scc.podSecurityLabelSync=true) is required for sync.

A/C:
 - OLM operator has been modified (downstream only) to label any unlabelled "openshift-" namespace in which a CSV has been created
 - If a labeled namespace containing at least one non-copied csv becomes unlabelled, it should be relabelled 
 - The implementation should be done in a way to eliminate or minimize subsequent downstream sync work (it is ok to make slight architectural changes to the OLM operator in the upstream to enable this)

The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

As a SRE, I want hypershift operator to expose a metric when hosted control plane is ready. 

This should allow SRE to tune (or silence) alerts occurring while the hosted control plane is spinning up. 

 

 

The details of this Jira Card are restricted (Red Hat Employee and Contractors only)

The Kube APIServer has a sidecar to output audit logs. We need similar sidecars for other APIServers that run on the control plane side. We also need to pass the same audit log policy that we pass to the KAS to these other API servers.

This epic tracks network tooling improvements for 4.12

New framework and process should be developed to make sharing network tools with devs, support and customers convenient. We are going to add some tools for ovn troubleshooting before ovn-k goes default, also some tools that we got from customer cases, and some more to help analyze and debug collected logs based on stable must-gather/sosreport format we get now thanks to 4.11 Epic.

Our estimation for this Epic is 1 engineer * 2 Sprints

WHY:
This epic is important to help improve the time it takes our customers and our team to understand an issue within the cluster.
A focus of this epic is to develop tools to quickly allow debugging of a problematic cluster. This is crucial for the engineering team to help us scale. We want to provide a tool to our customers to help lower the cognitive burden to get at a root cause of an issue.

 

Alert if any of the ovn controllers disconnected for a period of time from the southbound database using metric ovn_controller_southbound_database_connected.

The metric updates every 2 minutes so please be mindful of this when creating the alert.

If the controller is disconnected for 10 minutes, fire an alert.

DoD: Merged to CNO and tested by QE

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->

Epic Goal

  • Come up with a consistent way to detect node down on OCP and hypershift. Current mechanism for OCP (probe port 9) does not work for hypershift, meaning, hypershift node down detection will be longer (~40 secs). We should aim to have a common mechanism for both. As well, we should consider alternatives to the probing port 9. Perhaps BFD, or other detection.
  • Get clarification on node down detection times. Some customers have (apparently) asked for detection on the order of 100ms, recommendation is to use multiple Egress IPs, so this may not be a hard requirement. Need clarification from PM/Customers.

Why is this important?

Scenarios

  1. ...

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Add sock proxy to cluster-network-operator so egressip can use grpc to reach worker nodes.
 
With the introduction of grpc as means for determining the state of a given egress node, hypershift should
be able to leverage socks proxy and become able to know the state of each egress node.
 
References relevant to this work:
1281-network-proxy
[+https://coreos.slack.com/archives/C01C8502FMM/p1658427627751939+]
[+https://github.com/openshift/hypershift/pull/1131/commits/28546dc587dc028dc8bded715847346ff99d65ea+]

This Epic is here to track the rebase we need to do when kube 1.25 is GA https://www.kubernetes.dev/resources/release/

Keeping this in mind can help us plan our time better. ATTOW GA is planned for August 23

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1h1XsEt1Iug-W9JRheQas7YRsUJ_NQ8ghEMVmOZ4X-0s/edit --> this is the link for rebase help

Incomplete Epics

This section includes Jira cards that are linked to an Epic, but the Epic itself is not linked to any Feature. These epics were not completed when this image was assembled

Place holder epic to track spontaneous task which does not deserve its own epic.

AC:

We have connectDirectlyToCloudAPIs flag in konnectiviy socks5 proxy to dial directly to cloud providers without going through konnectivity.

This introduce another path for exception https://github.com/openshift/hypershift/pull/1722

We should consolidate both by keep using connectDirectlyToCloudAPIs until there's a reason to not.

 

AWS has a hard limit of 100 OIDC providers globally. 
Currently each HostedCluster created by e2e creates its own OIDC provider, which results in hitting the quota limit frequently and causing the tests to fail as a result.

 
DOD:
Only a single OIDC provider should be created and shared between all e2e HostedClusters. 

Once the HostedCluster and NodePool gets stopped using PausedUntil statement, the awsprivatelink controller will continue reconciling.

 

How to test this:

  • Deploy a private cluster
  • Put it in pause once deployed
  • Delete the AWSEndPointService and the Service from the HCP namespace
  • And wait for a reconciliation, the result it's that they should not be recreated
  • Unpause it and wait for recreation.

DoD:

At the moment if the input etcd kms encryption (key and role) is invalid we fail transparently.

We should check that both key and role are compatible/operational for a given cluster and fail in a condition otherwise

Changes made in METAL-1 open up opportunities to improve our handling of images by cleaning up redundant code that generates extra work for the user and extra load for the cluster.

We only need to run the image cache DaemonSet if there is a QCOW URL to be mirrored (effectively this means a cluster installed with 4.9 or earlier). We can stop deploying it for new clusters installed with 4.10 or later.

Currently, the image-customization-controller relies on the image cache running on every master to provide the shared hostpath volume containing the ISO and initramfs. The first step is to replace this with a regular volume and an init container in the i-c-c pod that extracts the images from machine-os-images. We can use the copy-metal -image-build flag (instead of -all used in the shared volume) to provide only the required images.

Once i-c-c has its own volume, we can switch the image extraction in the metal3 Pod's init container to use the -pxe flag instead of -all.

The machine-os-images init container for the image cache (not the metal3 Pod) can be removed. The whole image cache deployment is now optional and need only be started if provisioningOSDownloadURL is set (and in fact should be deleted if it is not).

Epic Goal

  • To improve the reliability of disk cleaning before installation and to provide the user with sufficient warning regarding the consequences of the cleaning

Why is this important?

  • Insufficient cleaning can lead to installation failure
  • Insufficient warning can lead to complaints of unexpected data loss

Scenarios

  1.  

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Description of the problem:

Cluster Installation fail if installation disk has lvm on raid:

Host: test-infra-cluster-3cc862c9-master-0, reached installation stage Failed: failed executing nsenter [--target 1 --cgroup --mount --ipc --pid -- mdadm --stop /dev/md0], Error exit status 1, LastOutput "mdadm: Cannot get exclusive access to /dev/md0:Perhaps a running process, mounted filesystem or active volume group?" 

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to reproduce:

1. Install a cluster while master nodes has disk with LVM on RAID (reproduces using test: https://gitlab.cee.redhat.com/ocp-edge-qe/kni-assisted-installer-auto/-/blob/master/api_tests/test_disk_cleanup.py#L97)

Actual results:

Installation failed

Expected results:

Installation success

Description of the problem:
When running assisted-installer on a machine where is more than one volume group per physical volume. Only the first volume group will be cleaned up. This leads to problems later and will lead to errors such as

Failed - failed executing nsenter [--target 1 --cgroup --mount --ipc --pid -- pvremove /dev/sda -y -ff], Error exit status 5, LastOutput "Can't open /dev/sda exclusively. Mounted filesystem? 

How reproducible:

Set up a VM with more than one volume group per physical volume. As an example, look at the following sample from a customer cluster.

List block devices
/usr/bin/lsblk -o NAME,MAJ:MIN,SIZE,TYPE,FSTYPE,KNAME,MODEL,UUID,WWN,HCTL,VENDOR,STATE,TRAN,PKNAME
NAME              MAJ:MIN   SIZE TYPE FSTYPE      KNAME MODEL            UUID                                   WWN                HCTL       VENDOR   STATE   TRAN PKNAME
loop0               7:0   125.9G loop xfs         loop0                  c080b47b-2291-495c-8cc0-2009ebc39839                                                       
loop1               7:1   885.5M loop squashfs    loop1                                                                                                             
sda                 8:0   894.3G disk             sda   INTEL SSDSC2KG96                                        0x55cd2e415235b2db 1:0:0:0    ATA      running sas  
|-sda1              8:1     250M part             sda1                                                          0x55cd2e415235b2db                                  sda
|-sda2              8:2     750M part ext2        sda2                   3aa73c72-e342-4a07-908c-a8a49767469d   0x55cd2e415235b2db                                  sda
|-sda3              8:3      49G part xfs         sda3                   ffc3ccfe-f150-4361-8ae5-f87b17c13ac2   0x55cd2e415235b2db                                  sda
|-sda4              8:4   394.2G part LVM2_member sda4                   Ua3HOc-Olm4-1rma-q0Ug-PtzI-ZOWg-RJ63uY 0x55cd2e415235b2db                                  sda
`-sda5              8:5     450G part LVM2_member sda5                   W8JqrD-ZvaC-uNK9-Y03D-uarc-Tl4O-wkDdhS 0x55cd2e415235b2db                                  sda
  `-nova-instance 253:0     3.1T lvm  ext4        dm-0                   d15e2de6-2b97-4241-9451-639f7b14594e                                          running      sda5
sdb                 8:16  894.3G disk             sdb   INTEL SSDSC2KG96                                        0x55cd2e415235b31b 1:0:1:0    ATA      running sas  
`-sdb1              8:17  894.3G part LVM2_member sdb1                   6ETObl-EzTd-jLGw-zVNc-lJ5O-QxgH-5wLAqD 0x55cd2e415235b31b                                  sdb
  `-nova-instance 253:0     3.1T lvm  ext4        dm-0                   d15e2de6-2b97-4241-9451-639f7b14594e                                          running      sdb1
sdc                 8:32  894.3G disk             sdc   INTEL SSDSC2KG96                                        0x55cd2e415235b652 1:0:2:0    ATA      running sas  
`-sdc1              8:33  894.3G part LVM2_member sdc1                   pBuktx-XlCg-6Mxs-lddC-qogB-ahXa-Nd9y2p 0x55cd2e415235b652                                  sdc
  `-nova-instance 253:0     3.1T lvm  ext4        dm-0                   d15e2de6-2b97-4241-9451-639f7b14594e                                          running      sdc1
sdd                 8:48  894.3G disk             sdd   INTEL SSDSC2KG96                                        0x55cd2e41521679b7 1:0:3:0    ATA      running sas  
`-sdd1              8:49  894.3G part LVM2_member sdd1                   exVSwU-Pe07-XJ6r-Sfxe-CQcK-tu28-Hxdnqo 0x55cd2e41521679b7                                  sdd
  `-nova-instance 253:0     3.1T lvm  ext4        dm-0                   d15e2de6-2b97-4241-9451-639f7b14594e                                          running      sdd1
sr0                11:0     989M rom  iso9660     sr0   Virtual CDROM0   2022-06-17-18-18-33-00                                    0:0:0:0    AMI      running usb  

Now run the assisted installer and try to install an SNO node on this machine, you will find that the installation will fail with a message that indicates that it could not exclusively access /dev/sda

Actual results:

 The installation will fail with a message that indicates that it could not exclusively access /dev/sda

Expected results:

The installation should proceed and the cluster should start to install.

Suspected Cases
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/AITRIAGE-3809
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/AITRIAGE-3802
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/AITRIAGE-3810

Epic Goal

  • Increase success-rate of of our CI jobs
  • Improve debugability / visibility or tests 

Why is this important?

  • Failed presubmit jobs (required or optional) can make an already tested+approved PR to not get in
  • Failed periodic jobs interfere our visibility around stability of features

Description of problem:

check_pkt_length cannot be offloaded without
1) sFlow offload patches in Openvswitch
2) Hardware driver support.

Since 1) will not be done anytime soon. We need a work around for the check_pkt_length issue.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11/4.12

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Any flow that has check_pkt_len()
  5-b: Pod -> NodePort Service traffic (Pod Backend - Different Node)
  6-b: Pod -> NodePort Service traffic (Host Backend - Different Node)
  4-b: Pod -> Cluster IP Service traffic (Host Backend - Different Node)
  10-b: Host Pod -> Cluster IP Service traffic (Host Backend - Different Node)
  11-b: Host Pod -> NodePort Service traffic (Pod Backend - Different Node)
  12-b: Host Pod -> NodePort Service traffic (Host Backend - Different Node)   

Actual results:

Poor performance due to upcalls when check_pkt_len() is not supported.

Expected results:

Good performance.

Additional info:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1LHY-Af-2kQHVwtW4aVdHnmwZLTiatiyf-ySffC8O5NM/edit#gid=670206692

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->

Epic Goal

  • Run OpenShift builds that do not execute as the "root" user on the host node.

Why is this important?

  • OpenShift builds require an elevated set of capabilities to build a container image
  • Builds currently run as root to maintain adequate performance
  • Container workloads should run as non-root from the host's perspective. Containers running as root are a known security risk.
  • Builds currently run as root and require a privileged container. See BUILD-225 for removing the privileged container requirement.

Scenarios

  1. Run BuildConfigs in a multi-tenant environment
  2. Run BuildConfigs in a heightened security environment/deployment

Acceptance Criteria

  • Developers can opt into running builds in a cri-o user namespace by providing an environment variable with a specific value.
  • When the correct environment variable is provided, builds run in a cri-o user namespace, and the build pod does not require the "privileged: true" security context.
  • User namespace builds can pass basic test scenarios for the Docker and Source strategy build.
  • Steps to run unprivileged builds are documented.

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. Buildah supports running inside a non-privileged container
  2. CRI-O allows workloads to opt into running containers in user namespaces.

Previous Work (Optional):

  1. BUILD-225 - remove privileged requirement for builds.

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

User Story

As a developer building container images on OpenShift
I want to specify that my build should run without elevated privileges
So that builds do not run as root from the host's perspective with elevated privileges

Acceptance Criteria

  • Developers can provide an environment variable to indicate the build should not use privileged containers
  • When the correct env var + value is specified, builds run in a user namespace (non-root on the host)

QE Impact

No QE required for Dev Preview. OpenShift regression testing will verify that existing behavior is not impacted.

Docs Impact

We will need to document how to enable this feature, with sufficient warnings regarding Dev Preview.

PX Impact

This likely warrants an OpenShift blog post, potentially?

Notes

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->

Epic Goal

  • ...

Why is this important?

Scenarios

  1. ...

Acceptance Criteria

  • CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
  • Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
  • ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

  1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

Open questions::

Done Checklist

  • CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
  • Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
  • DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
  • DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
  • QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
  • QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
  • DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

We have been running into a number of problems with configure-ovs and nodeip-configuration selecting different interfaces in OVNK deployments. This causes connectivity issues, so we need some way to ensure that everything uses the same interface/IP.

Currently configure-ovs runs before nodeip-configuration, but since nodeip-configuration is the source of truth for IP selection regardless of CNI plugin, I think we need to look at swapping that order. That way configure-ovs could look at what nodeip-configuration chose and not have to implement its own interface selection logic.

I'm targeting this at 4.12 because even though there's probably still time to get it in for 4.11, changing the order of boot services is always a little risky and I'd prefer to do it earlier in the cycle so we have time to tease out any issues that arise. We may need to consider backporting the change though since this has been an issue at least back to 4.10.

Goal
Provide an indication that advanced features are used

Problem

Today, customers and RH don't have the information on the actual usage of advanced features.

Why is this important?

  1. Better focus upsell efforts
  2. Compliance information for customers that are not aware they are not using the right subscription

 

Prioritized Scenarios

In Scope
1. Add a boolean variable in our telemetry to mark if the customer is using advanced features (PV encryption, encryption with KMS, external mode). 

Not in Scope

Integrate with subscription watch - will be done by the subscription watch team with our help.

Customers

All

Customer Facing Story
As a compliance manager, I should be able to easily see if all my clusters are using the right amount of subscriptions

What does success look like?

A clear indication in subscription watch for ODF usage (either essential or advanced). 

1. Proposed title of this feature request

  • Request to add a bool variable into telemetry which indicates the usage of any of the advanced feature, like PV encryption or KMS encryption or external mode etc.

2. What is the nature and description of the request?

  • Today, customers and RH don't have the information on the actual usage of advanced features. This feature will help RH to have a better indication on the statistics of customers using the advanced features and focus better on upsell efforts.

3. Why does the customer need this? (List the business requirements here)

  • As a compliance manager, I should be able to easily see if all my clusters are using the right amount of subscriptions.

4. List any affected packages or components.

  • Telemetry

_____________________

Link to main epic: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHSTOR-3173

 

Other Complete

This section includes Jira cards that are not linked to either an Epic or a Feature. These tickets were completed when this image was assembled

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-13598. The following is the description of the original issue:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-6013. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

When utilizing the OSD "Edit Cluster Ingress" feature to change the default application router from public to private or vice versa, the external AWS load balancer is removed an replaced by the cloud-ingress-operator.

When this happens, the external load balancer health checks never receive a successful check from the backend nodes, and all nodes are marked out-of-service.

Cluster operators depending on *.apps.CLUSTERNAME.devshift.org begin to fail, initially with DNS errors, which is expected, but then with EOF messages attempting to get the routes associated with their health checks, eg: 

OAuthServerRouteEndpointAccessibleControllerAvailable: Get "https://oauth-openshift.apps.chcollin-mjtj.cvgo.s1.devshift.org/healthz": EOF

This always degrades the authentication, console and ingress (via ingress-canary) operators.

Logs from the `ovnkube-node-*` pods for the instance show VN properly updating the port for the endpoint healthcheck to that of the new port in use by the AWS LB.

The endpointSlices for the endpoint are updated/replaced, but with no change in config as far as I can tell.  They're just recreated.

The service backending the router-default pods has the proper HealthCheckNodePort configuration, matching the new AWS LB.

Curling the service via the CLUSTER_IP:NODE_PORT_HEALTH_CHECK/healthz results in a connection time out.

Curling the local health check for HAPROXY within the router-default pod via `localhost:1936/healthz` results in an OK response as expected.

After rolling the router-default pods manually with `oc rollout restart deployment router-default -n openshift-ingress`, or just deleting the pods, the cluster ends up healing, with the AWS LB seeing the backend infra nodes in service again, and cluster operators depending on the *apps.CLUSTERNAME.devshift.org domain healing on their own as well.

I'm unsure if this should go to network-ovn or network-multis (or some other component), so I'm starting here.  Please redirect me if necessary.

 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Login to the OCM console for the cluster (eg: https://qaprodauth.console.redhat.com/openshift for staging)
2. From the network tab, select "Edit Cluster Ingress"
3. Check or uncheck the "Make Router Private" box for the default application router - it does not matter which way you're swapping.

Actual results:

Ingress to the default router begins to fail for the *.apps routes; never becomes available

Expected results:

Ingress would fail for ~15 minutes as things are reconfigured, and then become available again.

Additional info:

Two must-gathers are available via Google drive https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1oIkNOSY0R9Mvo-BZ1Pa3W3iDDfF_726F and shared with Red Hat employees, from a test cluster I created .  The first is from before the change, and the second is from after the change.  This is on a brand new cluster, so logs should be clean-ish.

Description of problem:

While upgrading 3519 SNOs using the ZTP process from 4.12.16 to 4.13.0-rc.7 24 clusters failed to even begin upgrading because the clusterversion object reported 

Preconditions failed for payload loaded version="4.13.0-rc.7" image="quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-release@sha256:aae5131ec824c301c11d0bf11d81b3996a222be8b49ce4716e9d464229a2f92b":
        Precondition "ClusterVersionUpgradeable" failed because of "AsExpected": Cluster
        operator cloud-controller-manager should not be upgraded between minor versions: '

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Hub 4.12.14
SNOs upgrading from 4.12.16 to 4.13.0-rc.7
ACM version - 2.8.0-DOWNSTREAM-2023-04-30-18-44-29

How reproducible:

24 out of 3519 or ~0.7%

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

# oc --kubeconfig /root/hv-vm/kc/vm00488/kubeconfig get no
NAME      STATUS   ROLES                         AGE     VERSION
vm00488   Ready    control-plane,master,worker   2d20h   v1.25.8+37a9a08
# oc --kubeconfig /root/hv-vm/kc/vm00488/kubeconfig get clusterversion
NAME      VERSION   AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   SINCE   STATUS
version   4.12.16   True        False         2d      Cluster version is 4.12.16
# oc --kubeconfig /root/hv-vm/kc/vm00488/kubeconfig get clusterversion version -o yaml
apiVersion: config.openshift.io/v1
kind: ClusterVersion
metadata:
  creationTimestamp: "2023-05-16T23:18:55Z"
  generation: 6
  name: version
  resourceVersion: "647935"
  uid: c70fe530-450f-453d-9350-c0ac9e533d54
spec:
  channel: candidate-4.13
  clusterID: bc98b215-fd2e-47ba-acb7-42de6c5b4d4e
  desiredUpdate:
    version: 4.13.0-rc.7
  upstream: http://e27-h01-000-r650.rdu2.scalelab.redhat.com:8081/upgrade/upgrade-graph_candidate-4.13
status:
  availableUpdates:
  - channels:
    - candidate-4.13
    - candidate-4.14
    - fast-4.13
    - stable-4.13
    image: quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-release@sha256:74b23ed4bbb593195a721373ed6693687a9b444c97065ce8ac653ba464375711
    url: https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2023:1326
    version: 4.13.0
  - channels:
    - candidate-4.13
    - candidate-4.14
    image: quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-release@sha256:28e51227251e0b196fc51c62b57d9181d19b104ff63784d4bde7ba59260132fd
    version: 4.13.0-rc.8
  - channels:
    - candidate-4.13
    - candidate-4.14
    image: quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-release@sha256:aae5131ec824c301c11d0bf11d81b3996a222be8b49ce4716e9d464229a2f92b
    version: 4.13.0-rc.7
  - channels:
    - candidate-4.12
    - candidate-4.13
    image: quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-release@sha256:7ca5f8aa44bbc537c5a985a523d87365eab3f6e72abc50b7be4caae741e093f4
    url: https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2023:2699
    version: 4.12.17
  capabilities:
    enabledCapabilities:
    - CSISnapshot
    - Console
    - Insights
    - Storage
    - baremetal
    - marketplace
    - openshift-samples
    knownCapabilities:
    - CSISnapshot
    - Console
    - Insights
    - Storage
    - baremetal
    - marketplace
    - openshift-samples
  conditions:
  - lastTransitionTime: "2023-05-17T19:01:03Z"
    status: "True"
    type: RetrievedUpdates
  - lastTransitionTime: "2023-05-16T23:18:59Z"
    message: Capabilities match configured spec
    reason: AsExpected
    status: "False"
    type: ImplicitlyEnabledCapabilities
  - lastTransitionTime: "2023-05-18T21:15:01Z"
    message: 'Preconditions failed for payload loaded version="4.13.0-rc.7" image="quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-release@sha256:aae5131ec824c301c11d0bf11d81b3996a222be8b49ce4716e9d464229a2f92b":
      Precondition "ClusterVersionUpgradeable" failed because of "AsExpected": Cluster
      operator cloud-controller-manager should not be upgraded between minor versions: '
    reason: PreconditionChecks
    status: "False"
    type: ReleaseAccepted
  - lastTransitionTime: "2023-05-16T23:52:46Z"
    message: Done applying 4.12.16
    status: "True"
    type: Available
  - lastTransitionTime: "2023-05-18T18:15:53Z"
    status: "False"
    type: Failing
  - lastTransitionTime: "2023-05-17T19:56:23Z"
    message: Cluster version is 4.12.16
    status: "False"
    type: Progressing
  - lastTransitionTime: "2023-05-18T21:08:26Z"
    message: 'Cluster operator cloud-controller-manager should not be upgraded between
      minor versions: '
    reason: AsExpected
    status: "False"
    type: Upgradeable
  desired:
    channels:
    - candidate-4.12
    - candidate-4.13
    - eus-4.12
    - fast-4.12
    - fast-4.13
    - stable-4.12
    image: quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-release@sha256:5339b3c4686010dc42990e0addce5aa4fddd071d6d9504dffe08a4b5059f6f38
    url: https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2023:2110
    version: 4.12.16
  history:
  - completionTime: "2023-05-17T19:56:23Z"
    image: quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-release@sha256:5339b3c4686010dc42990e0addce5aa4fddd071d6d9504dffe08a4b5059f6f38
    startedTime: "2023-05-17T19:03:27Z"
    state: Completed
    verified: true
    version: 4.12.16
  - completionTime: "2023-05-16T23:52:46Z"
    image: e27-h01-000-r650.rdu2.scalelab.redhat.com:5000/ocp4/openshift4@sha256:0398462b1c54758fe83619022a98bbe65f6deed71663b6665224d3ba36e43f03
    startedTime: "2023-05-16T23:18:59Z"
    state: Completed
    verified: false
    version: 4.12.11
  observedGeneration: 6
  versionHash: Ir-CNe7dSao=

Description of problem: This is a follow-up to OCPBUGS-2795 and OCPBUGS-2941.

The installer fails to destroy the cluster when the OpenStack object storage omits 'content-type' from responses. This can happen on responses with HTTP status code 204, where a reverse proxy is truncating content-related headers (see this nginX bug report). In such cases, the Installer errors with:

level=error msg=Bulk deleting of container "5ifivltb-ac890-chr5h-image-registry-fnxlmmhiesrfvpuxlxqnkoxdbl" objects failed: Cannot extract names from response with content-type: []

Listing container object suffers from the same issue as listing the containers and this one isn't fixed in latest versions of gophercloud. I've reported https://github.com/gophercloud/gophercloud/issues/2509 and fixing it with https://github.com/gophercloud/gophercloud/issues/2510, however we likely won't be able to backport the bump to gophercloud master back to release-4.8 so we'll have to look for alternatives.

I'm setting the priority to critical as it's causing all our jobs to fail in master.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.8.z

How reproducible:

Likely not happening in customer environments where Swift is exposed directly. We're seeing the issue in our CI where we're using a non-RHOSP managed cloud.

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

Discovered in the must gather kubelet_service.log from https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-gcp-sdn-upgrade/1586093220087992320

It appears the guard pod names are too long, and being truncated down to where they will collide with those from the other masters.

From kubelet logs in this run:

❯ grep openshift-kube-scheduler-guard-ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-maste kubelet_service.log
Oct 28 23:58:55.693391 ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-master-1 kubenswrapper[1657]: E1028 23:58:55.693346    1657 kubelet_pods.go:413] "Hostname for pod was too long, truncated it" podName="openshift-kube-scheduler-guard-ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-master-1" hostnameMaxLen=63 truncatedHostname="openshift-kube-scheduler-guard-ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-maste"
Oct 28 23:59:03.735726 ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-master-0 kubenswrapper[1670]: E1028 23:59:03.735671    1670 kubelet_pods.go:413] "Hostname for pod was too long, truncated it" podName="openshift-kube-scheduler-guard-ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-master-0" hostnameMaxLen=63 truncatedHostname="openshift-kube-scheduler-guard-ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-maste"
Oct 28 23:59:11.168082 ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-master-2 kubenswrapper[1667]: E1028 23:59:11.168041    1667 kubelet_pods.go:413] "Hostname for pod was too long, truncated it" podName="openshift-kube-scheduler-guard-ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-master-2" hostnameMaxLen=63 truncatedHostname="openshift-kube-scheduler-guard-ci-op-3hj6pnwf-4f6ab-lv57z-maste"

This also looks to be happening for openshift-kube-scheduler-guard, kube-controller-manager-guard, possibly others.

Looks like they should be truncated further to make room for random suffixes in https://github.com/openshift/library-go/blame/bd9b0e19121022561dcd1d9823407cd58b2265d0/pkg/operator/staticpod/controller/guard/guard_controller.go#L97-L98

Unsure of the implications here, it looks a little scary.

And possibly other alerts.  Declaring namespace labels on alerts makes it easy to find the source or affected resource, as described here. But because Insights alerts are based on metrics exported by the cluster-version operator, they inherit source information from the CVO, and end up looking like:

ALERTS{alertname="SimpleContentAccessNotAvailable", alertstate="firing", condition="SCAAvailable", endpoint="metrics", instance="10.58.57.116:9099", job="cluster-version-operator", name="insights", namespace="openshift-cluster-version", pod="cluster-version-operator-5d8579fb58-p5hfn", prometheus="openshift-monitoring/k8s", reason="NotFound", receive="true", service="cluster-version-operator", severity="info"}

Adding namespace: openshift-insights to the labels block for InsightsDisabled and SimpleContentAccessNotAvailable would avoid this confusion.

You might also want to clear the job and service labels as irrelevant source information. And you might want to clear the pod label to avoid churning alerts when the CVO rolls out a new pod. You can get the label clearing by wrapping the expr with max without (job, pod, service) (...) or similar.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-10391. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

When installing SNO with bootstrap in place CVO hangs for 6 minutes waiting for the lease

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to Reproduce:

1.Run the POC using the makefile here https://github.com/eranco74/bootstrap-in-place-poc
2. Observe the CVO logs post reboot
3.

Actual results:

I0102 09:45:53.131061       1 leaderelection.go:248] attempting to acquire leader lease openshift-cluster-version/version...
I0102 09:51:37.219685       1 leaderelection.go:258] successfully acquired lease openshift-cluster-version/version

Expected results:

Expected the bootstrap CVO to release the lease so that the CVO running post reboot won't have to wait the lease duration  

Additional info:

POC (hack) that remove the lease and allows CVO to start immediately:
https://github.com/openshift/installer/pull/6757/files#diff-f12fbadd10845e6dab2999e8a3828ba57176db10240695c62d8d177a077c7161R38-R48
  
Slack thread:
https://redhat-internal.slack.com/archives/C04HSKR4Y1X/p1673345953183709

Description of problem:

According to OCP 4.11 doc (https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.11/installing/installing_gcp/installing-gcp-account.html#installation-gcp-enabling-api-services_installing-gcp-account), the Service Usage API (serviceusage.googleapis.com) is an optional API service to be enabled. But, the installation cannot succeed if this API is disabled.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-25-071630

How reproducible:

Always, if the Service Usage API is disabled in the GCP project.

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Make sure the Service Usage API (serviceusage.googleapis.com) is disabled in the GCP project.
2. Try IPI installation in the GCP project. 

Actual results:

The installation would fail finally, without any worker machines launched.

Expected results:

Installation should succeed, or the OCP doc should be updated.

Additional info:

Please see the attached must-gather logs (http://virt-openshift-05.lab.eng.nay.redhat.com/jiwei/jiwei-0926-03-cnxn5/) and the sanity check results. 
FYI if enabling the API, and without changing anything else, the installation could succeed. 

Customers have introduced Openshift using CloudFormation in "Example 4.55. CloudFormation template for the VPC", referring to the document below.
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/openshift_container_platform/4.8/html-single/installing/index#installing-restricted-networks-aws
CloudFormation uses python3.7 with Lambda.
Since it will be the EOL of Python 3.7, what kind of effect will it have if it becomes unusable?
Is there any immediate effect? Will there be any impact when adding worker nodes?
OCP Version & Channel: 4.10
Cloud Platform: AWS

This bug is a backport clone of [Bugzilla Bug 2115265](https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2115265). The following is the description of the original bug:

Description of problem:
Starting with https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/11866 the action (kebab icon) menu button on the right side in the search is changed from a `ResourceKebab` to a `LazyActionMenu` for `HelmChartRepositories`.

We use this implementation it in other places as well and maybe also in other table rows?

When the search shows multiple tables and the user opens the menu at the end of one table, the dropdown options is shown below the "Add from navigation" or "Remove from navigation" button of the next table.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.12

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Navigate to the search
2. Open the resource selector and search for HelmChartRepo, select HelmChartRepositories and ProjectHelmChartRepositories
3. HCR should have at least one repo. Click on the action menu of the first table.

Actual results:
The new menu is shown partly behind the button "Add from navigation" or "Remove from navigation"

Some buttons are not clickable.

Expected results:
The menu should shown above the button "Add from navigation" or "Remove from navigation"

All buttons should be clickable.

Additional info:

Description of the problem:

In case we are installing a cluster using the kubeapi the installer fails to send the logs due to a missing volume mount of the caCert

 

time="2022-07-06T08:25:59Z" level=info msg="failed executing nsenter [--target 1 --cgroup --mount --ipc --pid -- podman run --rm --privileged --net=host --pid=host -v /run/systemd/journal/socket:/run/systemd/journal/socket -v /var/log:/var/log quay.io/edge-infrastructure/assisted-installer-agent@sha256:20d9e31e37f881fcd34aed44b2ee9f143382f87cbf4b634325d2260f8dffe6c2 logs_sender -cluster-id 4d4be932-42a8-4d37-b5d2-41f42a487821 -url https://assisted-service-assisted-installer.apps.ostest.test.metalkube.org -host-id 17babad0-f2d0-419f-a69b-8c6895df26f4 -infra-env-id 37c26d69-6416-4888-bd2e-aec610f241b3 -pull-secret-token <SECRET> -insecure=false -bootstrap=true -cacert=/etc/assisted-service/service-ca-cert.crt], env vars [PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin TERM=xterm container=oci http_proxy= https_proxy= NO_PROXY= OPENSHIFT_BUILD_NAME=assisted-installer PULL_SECRET_TOKEN=<SECRET> no_proxy= HTTP_PROXY= HTTPS_PROXY= OPENSHIFT_BUILD_NAMESPACE=ci-op-8wiv6td6 BUILD_LOGLEVEL=0 HOME=/root HOSTNAME=extraworker-0], error exit status 1, waitStatus 1, Output \"time=\"06-07-2022 08:25:59\" level=fatal msg=\"Failed to initialize connection: &{%!e(string=open) %!e(string=/etc/assisted-service/service-ca-cert.crt) %!e(syscall.Errno=2)}\" file=\"send_logs.go:92\"\ntime=\"2022-07-06T08:25:59Z\" level=warning msg=\"lstat /sys/fs/cgroup/devices/machine.slice/libpod-8b070b62a9482fc0add228b77844b2c4e0a614e2b171ca87f76f56a4305a6ee7.scope: no such file or directory\"\""
time="2022-07-06T08:25:59Z" level=error msg="upload installation logs failed executing nsenter [--target 1 --cgroup --mount --ipc --pid -- podman run --rm --privileged --net=host --pid=host -v /run/systemd/journal/socket:/run/systemd/journal/socket -v /var/log:/var/log quay.io/edge-infrastructure/assisted-installer-agent@sha256:20d9e31e37f881fcd34aed44b2ee9f143382f87cbf4b634325d2260f8dffe6c2 logs_sender -cluster-id 4d4be932-42a8-4d37-b5d2-41f42a487821 -url https://assisted-service-assisted-installer.apps.ostest.test.metalkube.org -host-id 17babad0-f2d0-419f-a69b-8c6895df26f4 -infra-env-id 37c26d69-6416-4888-bd2e-aec610f241b3 -pull-secret-token <SECRET> -insecure=false -bootstrap=true -cacert=/etc/assisted-service/service-ca-cert.crt], Error exit status 1, LastOutput \"... :92\"\ntime=\"2022-07-06T08:25:59Z\" level=warning msg=\"lstat /sys/fs/cgroup/devices/machine.slice/libpod-8b070b62a9482fc0add228b77844b2c4e0a614e2b171ca87f76f56a4305a6ee7.scope: no such file or directory\"\"" 

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to reproduce:

1. Install a cluster using the kubeapi

2. look for the host logs after the host reboots or the installation complete

3.

Actual results:

no host logs

Expected results:
...

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-10427. The following is the description of the original issue:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-9969. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

OCP cluster born on 4.1 fails to scale-up node due to older podman version 1.0.2 present in 4.1 bootimage. This was observed while testing bug https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-7559?focusedCommentId=21889975&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-21889975

Journal log:
- Unit machine-config-daemon-update-rpmostree-via-container.service has finished starting up.
--
-- The start-up result is RESULT.
Mar 10 10:41:29 ip-10-0-218-217 podman[18103]: flag provided but not defined: -authfile
Mar 10 10:41:29 ip-10-0-218-217 podman[18103]: See 'podman run --help'.
Mar 10 10:41:29 ip-10-0-218-217 systemd[1]: machine-config-daemon-update-rpmostree-via-container.service: Main process exited, code=exited, status=125/n/a
Mar 10 10:41:29 ip-10-0-218-217 systemd[1]: machine-config-daemon-update-rpmostree-via-container.service: Failed with result 'exit-code'.
Mar 10 10:41:29 ip-10-0-218-217 systemd[1]: machine-config-daemon-update-rpmostree-via-container.service: Consumed 24ms CPU time

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

OCP 4.12 and later

Steps to Reproduce:

1.Upgrade a 4.1 based cluster to 4.12 or later version
2. Try to Scale up node
3. Node will fail to join

 

Additional info:  https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-7559?focusedCommentId=21890647&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-21890647

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-2141. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

4.12 cluster, no pv for prometheus, the doc still link to 4.8

# oc get co monitoring -o jsonpath='{.status.conditions}' | jq 'map(select(.type=="Degraded"))'
[
  {
    "lastTransitionTime": "2022-10-09T02:36:16Z",
    "message": "Prometheus is running without persistent storage which can lead to data loss during upgrades and cluster disruptions. Please refer to the official documentation to see how to configure storage for Prometheus: https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.8/monitoring/configuring-the-monitoring-stack.html",
    "reason": "PrometheusDataPersistenceNotConfigured",
    "status": "False",
    "type": "Degraded"
  }
]

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-05-053337

How reproducible:

always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. no PVs for prometheus, check the monitoring operator status
2.
3.

Actual results:

the doc still link to 4.8

Expected results:

links to the latest doc

Additional info:

slack thread: 
https://coreos.slack.com/archives/G79AW9Q7R/p1665283462123389

Description of problem:

KafkSink current desctiption in odc is `Kafka Sink is Addressable, it receives events and send them to a Kafka topic.` and this should be `A KafkaSink takes a CloudEvent, and sends it to an Apache Kafka Topic.  Events can be specified in either Structured or Binary mode.` as provided by Serverless team

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install Serverless operator
2. Create CR for knativeKafka in knative-eventing ns
3. go to dev perspective -> add -> event sink
4. Check the description of kafka sink

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

Update the description to as provided by serverless team

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

Cluster can not be installed when updating join network CIDR using v6InternalSubnet fdxx::/64 in the manifests/cluster-network-03-config.yml

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

v4.12

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

Using v6InternalSubnet: fd66::/48 in manifests/cluster-network-03-config.yml to install a dual stack cluster:

cp manifests/cluster-network-02-config.yml manifests/cluster-network-03-config.yml
 sed -i 's/config.openshift.io\/v1/operator.openshift.io\/v1/g' manifests/cluster-network-03-config.yml
cat > ovn_kube_config <<HEREDOC
  defaultNetwork:
    type: OVNKubernetes
    ovnKubernetesConfig:
      v6InternalSubnet: fd66::/48
HEREDOC
  sed -i $'/^status/{e cat ovn_kube_config\n}' manifests/cluster-network-03-config.yml 

Actual results:

Installation fail

Expected results:

Installation pass

Additional info:

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4874. The following is the description of the original issue:

OCPBUGS-3278 is supposed to fix the issue where the user was required to provide data about the baremetal hosts (including MAC addresses) in the install-config, even though this data is ignored.

However, we determine whether we should disable the validation by checking the second CLI arg to see if it is agent.

This works when the command is:

openshift-install agent create image --dir=whatever

But fails when the argument is e.g., as in dev-scripts:

openshift-install --log-level=debug --dir=whatever agent create image

Description of problem:

By creating network policies with a namespace that has maximum length, it can end up causing this error:

2023-06-22T17:34:40.804880959Z I0622 17:34:40.804851       1 obj_retry.go:318] Retry add failed for *v1.NetworkPolicy ocm-production-24gfm4t0rtdsg01bcqgihdrceh3t59na-mshen-incident/kas, will try again later: failed to create Network Policy ocm-production-24gfm4t0rtdsg01bcqgihdrceh3t59na-mshen-incident/kas: failed to create default deny port groups: error in transact with ops [
{Op:update Table:ACL Row:map[action:drop direction:to-lport external_ids:{GoMap:map[default-deny-policy-type:Ingress]} log:false match:outport == @a7686019953911959437_ingressDefaultDeny meter:{GoSet:[acl-logging]} name:{GoSet:[ocm-production-24gfm4t0rtdsg01bcqgihdrceh3t59na-mshen-incident_]} priority:1000] Rows:[] Columns:[] Mutations:[] Timeout:<nil> Where:[where column _uuid == {08cc8026-4c22-4c52-99cd-e8cd1469c8bd}] Until: Durable:<nil> Comment:<nil> Lock:<nil> UUIDName:} {Op:update Table:ACL Row:map[action:allow direction:to-lport external_ids:{GoMap:map[default-deny-policy-type:Ingress]} log:false match:outport == @a7686019953911959437_ingressDefaultDeny && (arp || nd) meter:{GoSet:[acl-logging]} name:{GoSet:[ocm-production-24gfm4t0rtdsg01bcqgihdrceh3t59na-mshen-incident_]} priority:1001] Rows:[] Columns:[] Mutations:[] Timeout:<nil> Where:[where column _uuid == {08cc8026-4c22-4c52-99cd-e8cd1469c8bd}] Until: Durable:<nil> Comment:<nil> Lock:<nil> UUIDName:} {Op:update Table:ACL Row:map[action:drop direction:from-lport external_ids:{GoMap:map[default-deny-policy-type:Egress]} log:false match:inport == @a7686019953911959437_egressDefaultDeny meter:{GoSet:[acl-logging]} name:{GoSet:[ocm-production-24gfm4t0rtdsg01bcqgihdrceh3t59na-mshen-incident_]} options:{GoMap:map[apply-after-lb:true]} priority:1000] Rows:[] Columns:[] Mutations:[] Timeout:<nil> Where:[where column _uuid == {f324353c-a47b-4044-9cd9-dbeef058ada3}] Until: Durable:<nil> Comment:<nil> Lock:<nil> UUIDName:}{Op:update Table:ACL Row:map[action:allow direction:from-lport external_ids:{GoMap:map[default-deny-policy-type:Egress]} log:false match:inport == @a7686019953911959437_egressDefaultDeny && (arp || nd) meter:{GoSet:[acl-logging]} name:{GoSet:[ocm-production-24gfm4t0rtdsg01bcqgihdrceh3t59na-mshen-incident_]} options:{GoMap:map[apply-after-lb:true]} priority:1001] Rows:[] Columns:[] Mutations:[] Timeout:<nil> Where:[where column _uuid == {f324353c-a47b-4044-9cd9-dbeef058ada3}] Until: Durable:<nil> Comment:<nil> Lock:<nil> UUIDName:}{Op:update Table:Port_Group Row:map[acls:{GoSet:[{GoUUID:08cc8026-4c22-4c52-99cd-e8cd1469c8bd} {GoUUID:08cc8026-4c22-4c52-99cd-e8cd1469c8bd}]} external_ids:{GoMap:map[name:a7686019953911959437_ingressDefaultDeny]} ports:{GoSet:[]}] Rows:[] Columns:[] Mutations:[] Timeout:<nil> Where:[where column _uuid == {d3b52500-963a-4f7b-8928-d869f298d2e8}] Until: Durable:<nil> Comment:<nil> Lock:<nil> UUIDName:}{Op:update Table:Port_Group Row:map[acls:{GoSet:[{GoUUID:f324353c-a47b-4044-9cd9-dbeef058ada3} {GoUUID:f324353c-a47b-4044-9cd9-dbeef058ada3}]} external_ids:{GoMap:map[name:a7686019953911959437_egressDefaultDeny]} ports:{GoSet:[]}] Rows:[] Columns:[] Mutations:[] Timeout:<nil> Where:[where column _uuid == {b128baec-6acd-4683-8c12-5b968bf73bd8}] Until: Durable:<nil> Comment:<nil> Lock:<nil> UUIDName:}]results [{Count:1 Error: Details: UUID:{GoUUID:} Rows:[]} {Count:1 Error: Details: UUID:{GoUUID:} Rows:[]} {Count:1 Error: Details: UUID:{GoUUID:} Rows:[]} {Count:1 Error: Details: UUID:{GoUUID:} Rows:[]} {Count:0 Error:ovsdb error Details:set contains duplicate UUID:{GoUUID:} Rows:[]} {Count:0 Error: Details: UUID:{GoUUID:} Rows:[]}] and errors [ovsdb error: set contains duplicate]: 1 ovsdb operations failed

 

This is not a problem in 4.14 as we moved to ACL indexes, but in 4.13 and before we compare the ACL name and the external ids. For default deny ACLs we simply store the direction in the external id, and the name of the ACL is limited to 63 characters in OVN. When we create default deny acls, we create one that denies everything, then we also create some allow acls to permit arp and neighbor discovery traffic. These 2 ACLs may be recognized as duplicate because their truncated name (namespace only) and their directions in external ids match.

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-2598. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

Liveness probe of ipsec pods fail with large clusters. Currently the command that is executed in the ipsec container is
ovs-appctl -t ovs-monitor-ipsec ipsec/status && ipsec status
The problem is with command "ipsec/status". In clusters with high node count this command will return a list with all the node daemons of the cluster. This means that as the node count raises the completion time of the command raises too. 

This makes the main command 

ovs-appctl -t ovs-monitor-ipsec

To hang until the subcommand is finished.

As the liveness and readiness probe values are hardcoded in the manifest of the ipsec container herehttps//github.com/openshift/cluster-network-operator/blob/9c1181e34316d34db49d573698d2779b008bcc20/bindata/network/ovn-kubernetes/common/ipsec.yaml] the liveness timeout of the container probe of 60 seconds start to be  insufficient as the node count list is growing. This resulted in a cluster with 170 + nodes to have 15+ ipsec pods in a crashloopbackoff state.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Openshift Container Platform 4.10 but i think the same will be visible to other versions too.

How reproducible:

I was not able to reproduce due to an extreamely high amount of resources are needed and i think that there is no point as we have spotted the issue.

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install an Openshift cluster with IPSEC enabled
2. Scale to 170+ nodes or more
3. Notice that the ipsec pods will start getting in a Crashloopbackoff state with failed Liveness/Readiness probes.

Actual results:

Ip Sec pods are stuck in a Crashloopbackoff state

Expected results:

Ip Sec pods to work normally

Additional info:

We have provided a workaround where CVO and CNO operators are scaled to 0 replicas in order for us to be able to increase the liveness probe limit to a value of 600 that recovered the cluster. 
As a next step the customer will try to reduce the node count and restore the default liveness timeout value along with bringing the operators back to see if the cluster will stabilize.

 

The test results in sippy look really bad on our less common platforms, but still pretty unacceptable even on core clouds. It's reasonably often the only test that fails. We need to decide what to do here, and we're going to need input from the etcd team.

As of Sep 13th:

  • several vsphere and openstack variant combo's fail this test around 24-32% of the time
  • aws, amd64, ovn, upgrade, upgrade-micro, ha - fails 6% of the time
  • aws, amd64, ovn, upgrade, upgrade-minor, ha - fails 4% of the time
  • gcp, amd64, sdn, upgrade, upgrade-minor, ha - fails 8% of the time
  • globally across all jobs fails around 3% of the time.

Even on some major variant combos, a 4-8% failure rate is too high.
On Sep 13 arch call (no etcd present), Damien mentioned this might be an upstream alert that just isn't well suited for OpenShift's use cases, is this the case and it needs tuning?

Has the problem been getting worse?

I believe this link https://datastudio.google.com/s/urkKwmmzvgo indicates that this may be the case for 4.12, AWS and Azure are both getting worse in ways that I don't see if we change the release to 4.11 where it looks consistent. gcp seems fine on 4.12. We do not have data for vsphere for some reason.

This link shows the grpc_methods most commonly involved: https://search.ci.openshift.org/?search=etcdGRPCRequestsSlow+was+at+or+above&maxAge=48h&context=7&type=junit&name=&excludeName=&maxMatches=5&maxBytes=20971520&groupBy=job

At a glance: LeaseGrant, MemberList, Txn, Status, Range.

Broken out of TRT-401
For linking with sippy:
[bz-etcd][invariant] alert/etcdGRPCRequestsSlow should not be at or above info
[sig-arch][bz-etcd][Late] Alerts alert/etcdGRPCRequestsSlow should not be at or above info [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]

 

Description of problem:

When a user tries to run `oc debug,` they end up getting errors about pod security labels:

 Ensure the target namespace has the appropriate security level set or consider creating a dedicated privileged namespace using:
	"oc create ns <namespace> -o yaml | oc label -f - security.openshift.io/scc.podSecurityLabelSync=false pod-security.kubernetes.io/enforce=privileged pod-security.kubernetes.io/audit=privileged pod-security.kubernetes.io/warn=privileged".
Original error:
pods "ip-10-0-129-209ec2internal-debug" is forbidden: violates PodSecurity "restricted:latest": host namespaces (hostNetwork=true, hostPID=true, hostIPC=true), privileged (container "container-00" must not set securityContext.privileged=true), allowPrivilegeEscalation != false (container "container-00" must set securityContext.allowPrivilegeEscalation=false), unrestricted capabilities (container "container-00" must set securityContext.capabilities.drop=["ALL"]), restricted volume types (volume "host" uses restricted volume type "hostPath"), runAsNonRoot != true (pod or container "container-00" must set securityContext.runAsNonRoot=true), runAsUser=0 (container "container-00" must not set runAsUser=0), seccompProfile (pod or container "container-00" must set securityContext.seccompProfile.type to "RuntimeDefault" or "Localhost")
command failed, 3 retries left

This happens since https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.11/authentication/understanding-and-managing-pod-security-admission.html

Fixing it requires the user running something like

oc create ns fips-check -o yaml | \
  oc label -f - \
  security.openshift.io/scc.podSecurityLabelSync=false \
  pod-security.kubernetes.io/enforce=privileged \
  pod-security.kubernetes.io/audit=privileged \
  pod-security.kubernetes.io/warn=privileged
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Try to run `oc debug node/....` in a new namespace

Actual results:

Error message

Expected results:

oc debug works without the user having to perform additional steps. If namespace is omitted, perhaps oc debug could create a temporary one with the correct pod security labels?

Additional info:

This ticket is linked with

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SDA-8177
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SDA-8178

As a summary, a base domain for a hosted cluster may already contain the "cluster-name".

But it seems that Hypershift also encodes it during some reconciliation step:

https://github.com/openshift/hypershift/blob/main/support/globalconfig/dns.go#L20

Then when using a DNS base domain like:

"rosa.lponce-prod-01.qtii.p3.openshiftapps.com"

we will have A records like:

"*.apps.lponce-prod-01.rosa.lponce-prod-01.qtii.p3.openshiftapps.com"

The expected behaviour would be that given a DNS base domain:

"rosa.lponce-prod-01.qtii.p3.openshiftapps.com"

The resulting wildcard for Ingress would be:

"*.apps.rosa.lponce-prod-01.qtii.p3.openshiftapps.com"

Note that trying to configure a specific IngressSpec for a hosted cluster didn't work for our case, as the wildcards records are not created.

Description of problem:

 

During ocp multinode spoke cluster creation agent provisioning is stuck on "configuring" because machineConfig service is crashing on the node.
After restarting the service still fails with 

Can't read link "/var/lib/containers/storage/overlay/l/V2OP2CCVMKSOHK2XICC546DUCG" because it does not exist. A storage corruption might have occurred, attempting to recreate the missing symlinks. It might be best wipe the storage to avoid further errors due to storage corruption. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Podman 4.0.2 + 

How reproducible:

sometimes

Steps to Reproduce:

1. deploy multinode spoke (ipxe + boot order )
2.
3.

Actual results:

4 agents in done state and 1 is in "configuring"

 

Expected results:

all agents are in "done" state

Additional info:

issue mentioned in https://github.com/containers/podman/issues/14003

 

Fix: https://github.com/containers/storage/issues/1136

 

 

 

Description of problem:

In the Konnectivity SOCKS proxy: currently the default is to proxy cloud endpoint traffic: https://github.com/openshift/hypershift/blob/main/konnectivity-socks5-proxy/main.go#L61

Due to this after this change: https://github.com/openshift/hypershift/commit/0c52476957f5658cfd156656938ae1d08784b202

The oauth server had a behavior change where it began to proxy iam traffic instead of not proxying it. This causes a regression in Satellite environments running with an HTTP_PROXY server. The original network traffic path needs to be restored

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.13 4.12

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Setup HTTP_PROXY IBM Cloud Satellite environment
2. In the oauth-server pod run a curl against iam (curl -v https://iam.cloud.ibm.com)
3. It will log it is using proxy

Actual results:

It is using proxy 

Expected results:

It should send traffic directly (as it does in 4.11 and 4.10)

Additional info:

 

During a normal installation, there are hundreds of debug logs reading:

bootstrap configmap not found: configmaps "bootstrap" not found

and dozens of the form:

Still waiting for cluster to initialize: ...

with duplicate data.

We should only log when we have some new information to report, not every time we poll.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-13970. The following is the description of the original issue:

if the kubeadmin secret was deleted successfully from the guest cluster, but the `SecretHashAnnotation` annotation deletion on the oauthDeployment failed, the annotation will not be reconciled again and the annotation will never be removed.

context: https://redhat-internal.slack.com/archives/C01C8502FMM/p1684765042825929

Tracker bug for bootimage bump in 4.12. This bug should block bugs which need a bootimage bump to fix.

Description of the problem:

During install, we assume all PVs on a host have been added to a volume group and only remove them if they are. This could let other PVs that are not attached to volume groups persist and prevent coreos from installing properly. 

Relevant assisted installer links:

https://github.com/openshift/assisted-installer/blob/9bec593930995220a2a4550b067f5a186de3b042/src/installer/installer.go#L809 

https://github.com/openshift/assisted-installer/blob/9bec593930995220a2a4550b067f5a186de3b042/src/ops/ops.go#L414

 

Found while investigating triage issue https://issues.redhat.com/browse/AITRIAGE-4017 

See slack thread for more details https://coreos.slack.com/archives/C02CP89N4VC/p1663263128420489 

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to reproduce:

1. Create a host with a PV w/o a volume group

2. Add host to cluster and install 

3. Observe the install fail

Actual results:

Installation fails with 

"Error: checking for exclusive access to /dev/sda 
Caused by:
| 0: couldn't reread partition table: device is in use |
| 1: EBUSY: Device or resource busy" 

Expected results:

All PVs and VGs are removed so that the installation will succeed

Description of problem:

This bug is a copy of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2137616 as fix needs to go on OCP side.
For must gather and attached screenshots please refer the bugzilla.
Add Capacity button does not exist after upgrade OCP version [OCP4.11->OCP4.12]

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

ODF Version:4.11.3-3
OCP Version: 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-24-103753
Provider: AWS

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1.Install ODF4.11 +OCP4.11
2.Upgrade OCP4.11 to OCP4.12
3.Log in to the OpenShift Web Console.
4.Click Operators → Installed Operators.
5.Click OpenShift Data Foundation Operator.
6.Click the Storage Systems tab.
7.Click the Action Menu (⋮) on the far right of the storage system name to extend the options menu.
"Add Capacity" button does not exist on menu.
*Attached Screenshot 

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

Description of the problem:

I installed a cluster with OCS and CNV.

The issue is that cluster event contain repeated messages:

1/9/2022, 6:17:31 PM    Operator ocs status: available message: install strategy completed with no errors
1/9/2022, 6:17:30 PM    Operator lso status: available message: install strategy completed with no errors
1/9/2022, 6:17:30 PM    Operator cnv status: available message: install strategy completed with no errors
1/9/2022, 6:17:06 PM    Successfully completed installing cluster
1/9/2022, 6:17:06 PM    Updated status of the cluster to installed
1/9/2022, 6:17:01 PM    Operator ocs status: available message: install strategy completed with no errors
1/9/2022, 6:17:00 PM    Operator lso status: available message: install strategy completed with no errors
1/9/2022, 6:17:00 PM    Operator cnv status: available message: install strategy completed with no errors
1/9/2022, 6:16:31 PM    Operator ocs status: progressing message: installing: waiting for deployment ocs-operator to become ready: deployment "ocs-operator" not available: Deployment does not have minimum availability.
1/9/2022, 6:16:30 PM    Operator lso status: available message: install strategy completed with no errors
1/9/2022, 6:16:30 PM    Operator cnv status: available message: install strategy completed with no errors
1/9/2022, 6:16:01 PM    Operator ocs status: progressing message: installing: waiting for deployment ocs-operator to become ready: deployment "ocs-operator" not available: Deployment does not have minimum availability.
1/9/2022, 6:16:00 PM    Operator lso status: available message: install strategy completed with no errors
1/9/2022, 6:16:00 PM    Operator cnv status: available message: install strategy completed with no errors
1/9/2022, 6:15:31 PM    Operator ocs status: progressing message: installing: waiting for deployment ocs-operator to become ready: deployment "ocs-operator" not available: Deployment does not have minimum availability.
1/9/2022, 6:15:31 PM    Operator lso status: available message: install strategy completed with no errors
1/9/2022, 6:15:30 PM    Operator cnv status: available message: install strategy completed with no errors

 

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to reproduce:

1. Install cluster with OCS and CNV

2. Watch cluster events

Actual results:

repeated message when olm operator completed installation

Expected results:

1 event record for olm operator finished successfully 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-6049. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

We show the UpdateInProgress component (the progress bars) when the cluster update status is Failing, UpdatingAndFailing, or Updating.  The inclusion of the Failing case results in a bug where the progress bars can display when an update is not occurring (see attached screenshot).  

Steps to Reproduce:

1.  Add the following overrides to ClusterVersion config (/k8s/cluster/config.openshift.io~v1~ClusterVersion/version)

spec:
  overrides:
    - group: apps
      kind: Deployment
      name: console-operator
      namespace: openshift-console-operator
      unmanaged: true    
    - group: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
      kind: ClusterRole
      name: console-operator
      namespace: ''
      unmanaged: true
2.  Wait for ClusterVersion changes to roll out.
3.  Visit /settings/cluster and note the progress bars are present and displaying 100% but the cluster is not updating

Actual results:

Progress bars are displaying when not updating.

Expected results:

Progress bars should not display when updating.

Description of problem:

Get the below error when upgrading to OCP 4.12 from 4.9->4.10->4.11.

MacBook-Pro:~ jianzhang$ oc get clusterversion
NAME      VERSION                              AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   SINCE   STATUS
version   4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-08-24-091058   True        True          4h      Unable to apply 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-08-24-053339: the workload openshift-operator-lifecycle-manager/package-server-manager cannot roll out
   - lastTransitionTime: "2022-08-25T04:47:36Z"
    lastUpdateTime: "2022-08-25T04:47:36Z"
    message: 'pods "package-server-manager-85b6dc4d89-sdzcc" is forbidden: violates
      PodSecurity "restricted:v1.24": seccompProfile (pod or container "package-server-manager"
      must set securityContext.seccompProfile.type to "RuntimeDefault" or "Localhost")'
    reason: FailedCreate
    status: "True"
    type: ReplicaFailure

 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

MacBook-Pro:~ jianzhang$ oc exec catalog-operator-c5c655d5c-b9lcn -- olm --version
OLM version: 0.19.0
git commit: 8a984d41acc67c0bc9bfe807fadeef23f83abd44 

How reproducible:

always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install OCP 4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-08-24-091058
2. Upgrade it to 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-08-24-053339

Actual results:

The cluster upgrading is blocked. Get the above errors as described.

Expected results:

 Upgraded to 4.12 from old OCP versions 4.5, 4.9 successfully.

Additional info:

MacBook-Pro:~ jianzhang$ oc get deployment package-server-manager -o yaml
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
  annotations:
    deployment.kubernetes.io/revision: "5"
    include.release.openshift.io/ibm-cloud-managed: "true"
    include.release.openshift.io/self-managed-high-availability: "true"
    include.release.openshift.io/single-node-developer: "true"
  creationTimestamp: "2022-08-25T00:14:08Z"
  generation: 5
  labels:
    app: package-server-manager
  name: package-server-manager
  namespace: openshift-operator-lifecycle-manager
  ownerReferences:
  - apiVersion: config.openshift.io/v1
    kind: ClusterVersion
    name: version
    uid: 3fd29082-0e76-4b09-988e-78cb5fc7c8b5
  resourceVersion: "169028"
  uid: c8f7cbe2-4f82-40ce-9468-817ffefa903f
spec:
  progressDeadlineSeconds: 600
  replicas: 1
  revisionHistoryLimit: 10
  selector:
    matchLabels:
      app: package-server-manager
  strategy:
    rollingUpdate:
      maxSurge: 25%
      maxUnavailable: 25%
    type: RollingUpdate
  template:
    metadata:
      annotations:
        target.workload.openshift.io/management: '{"effect": "PreferredDuringScheduling"}'
      creationTimestamp: null
      labels:
        app: package-server-manager
    spec:
      containers:
      - args:
        - --name
        - $(PACKAGESERVER_NAME)
        - --namespace
        - $(PACKAGESERVER_NAMESPACE)
        command:
        - /bin/psm
        - start
        env:
        - name: PACKAGESERVER_NAME
          value: packageserver
        - name: PACKAGESERVER_IMAGE
          value: quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev@sha256:d49e1e27114f4b719bc8f3c222b2c5934d3b8028c79ec8e2bd288f6e9b5b3d5c
        - name: PACKAGESERVER_NAMESPACE
          valueFrom:
            fieldRef:
              apiVersion: v1
              fieldPath: metadata.namespace
        - name: RELEASE_VERSION
          value: 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-08-24-053339
        image: quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev@sha256:d49e1e27114f4b719bc8f3c222b2c5934d3b8028c79ec8e2bd288f6e9b5b3d5c
        imagePullPolicy: IfNotPresent
        livenessProbe:
          failureThreshold: 3
          httpGet:
            path: /healthz
            port: 8080
            scheme: HTTP
          initialDelaySeconds: 30
          periodSeconds: 10
          successThreshold: 1
          timeoutSeconds: 1
        name: package-server-manager
        readinessProbe:
          failureThreshold: 3
          httpGet:
            path: /healthz
            port: 8080
            scheme: HTTP
          initialDelaySeconds: 30
          periodSeconds: 10
          successThreshold: 1
          timeoutSeconds: 1
        resources:
          requests:
            cpu: 10m
            memory: 50Mi
        securityContext:
          allowPrivilegeEscalation: false
          capabilities:
            drop:
            - ALL
        terminationMessagePath: /dev/termination-log
        terminationMessagePolicy: FallbackToLogsOnError
      dnsPolicy: ClusterFirst
      nodeSelector:
        kubernetes.io/os: linux
        node-role.kubernetes.io/master: ""
      priorityClassName: system-cluster-critical
      restartPolicy: Always
      schedulerName: default-scheduler
      securityContext:
        runAsNonRoot: true
      serviceAccount: olm-operator-serviceaccount
      serviceAccountName: olm-operator-serviceaccount
      terminationGracePeriodSeconds: 30
      tolerations:
      - effect: NoSchedule
        key: node-role.kubernetes.io/master
        operator: Exists
      - effect: NoExecute
        key: node.kubernetes.io/unreachable
        operator: Exists
        tolerationSeconds: 120
      - effect: NoExecute
        key: node.kubernetes.io/not-ready
        operator: Exists
        tolerationSeconds: 120
status:
  availableReplicas: 1
  conditions:
  - lastTransitionTime: "2022-08-25T03:14:20Z"
    lastUpdateTime: "2022-08-25T03:14:20Z"
    message: Deployment has minimum availability.
    reason: MinimumReplicasAvailable
    status: "True"
    type: Available
  - lastTransitionTime: "2022-08-25T04:47:36Z"
    lastUpdateTime: "2022-08-25T04:47:36Z"
    message: 'pods "package-server-manager-85b6dc4d89-sdzcc" is forbidden: violates
      PodSecurity "restricted:v1.24": seccompProfile (pod or container "package-server-manager"
      must set securityContext.seccompProfile.type to "RuntimeDefault" or "Localhost")'
    reason: FailedCreate
    status: "True"
    type: ReplicaFailure
  - lastTransitionTime: "2022-08-25T04:57:37Z"
    lastUpdateTime: "2022-08-25T04:57:37Z"
    message: ReplicaSet "package-server-manager-85b6dc4d89" has timed out progressing.
    reason: ProgressDeadlineExceeded
    status: "False"
    type: Progressing
  observedGeneration: 5
  readyReplicas: 1
  replicas: 1
  unavailableReplicas: 1 

We cache images by filename, which works when downloading from the Internet as the filename always includes the CoreOS version.

However, when extracting an image from the release payload, it always has the same name. Therefore, we will never update it to a newer image even when running different versions of the installer.

A possible solution:

  1. Check that the cached ISO's checksum matches the RHCOS metadata.
  2. If it doesn't, extract the expected checksum from the release payload and compare that to the cached ISO's checksum.
  3. If it still doesn't match, extract the ISO from the release payload.

An alternative might be to set the name of the cache file to something different. It's not clear how we'd guarantee a match between the release payload we've been given and the ISO unless the name was based on the release payload (which eliminates some of the point of the cache, since ordinarily most release payloads will point to a small number of images).

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-2988. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

openshift-apiserver, openshift-oauth-apiserver and kube-apiserver pods cannot validate the certificate when trying to reach etcd reporting certificate validation errors:

}. Err: connection error: desc = "transport: authentication handshake failed: x509: certificate is valid for ::1, 127.0.0.1, ::1, fd69::2, not 2620:52:0:198::10"
W1018 11:36:43.523673      15 logging.go:59] [core] [Channel #186 SubChannel #187] grpc: addrConn.createTransport failed to connect to {
  "Addr": "[2620:52:0:198::10]:2379",
  "ServerName": "2620:52:0:198::10",
  "Attributes": null,
  "BalancerAttributes": null,
  "Type": 0,
  "Metadata": null
}. Err: connection error: desc = "transport: authentication handshake failed: x509: certificate is valid for ::1, 127.0.0.1, ::1, fd69::2, not 2620:52:0:198::10"

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Deploy SNO with single stack IPv6 via ZTP procedure

Actual results:

Deployment times out and some of the operators aren't deployed successfully.

NAME                                       VERSION                              AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   DEGRADED   SINCE   MESSAGE
authentication                             4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   False       False         True       124m    APIServerDeploymentAvailable: no apiserver.openshift-oauth-apiserver pods available on any node....
baremetal                                  4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      112m    
cloud-controller-manager                   4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      111m    
cloud-credential                           4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      115m    
cluster-autoscaler                         4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      111m    
config-operator                            4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      124m    
console                                                                                                                      
control-plane-machine-set                  4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      111m    
csi-snapshot-controller                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      111m    
dns                                        4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      111m    
etcd                                       4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         True       121m    ClusterMemberControllerDegraded: could not get list of unhealthy members: giving up getting a cached client after 3 tries
image-registry                             4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   False       True          True       104m    Available: The registry is removed...
ingress                                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        True          True       111m    The "default" ingress controller reports Degraded=True: DegradedConditions: One or more other status conditions indicate a degraded state: DeploymentReplicasAllAvailable=False (DeploymentReplicasNotAvailable: 0/1 of replicas are available)
insights                                   4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      118s    
kube-apiserver                             4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      102m    
kube-controller-manager                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         True       107m    GarbageCollectorDegraded: error fetching rules: Get "https://thanos-querier.openshift-monitoring.svc:9091/api/v1/rules": dial tcp [fd02::3c5f]:9091: connect: connection refused
kube-scheduler                             4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      107m    
kube-storage-version-migrator              4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      117m    
machine-api                                4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      111m    
machine-approver                           4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      111m    
machine-config                             4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      115m    
marketplace                                4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      116m    
monitoring                                                                      False       True          True       98m     deleting Thanos Ruler Route failed: Timeout: request did not complete within requested timeout - context deadline exceeded, deleting UserWorkload federate Route failed: Timeout: request did not complete within requested timeout - context deadline exceeded, reconciling Alertmanager Route failed: retrieving Route object failed: the server was unable to return a response in the time allotted, but may still be processing the request (get routes.route.openshift.io alertmanager-main), reconciling Thanos Querier Route failed: retrieving Route object failed: the server was unable to return a response in the time allotted, but may still be processing the request (get routes.route.openshift.io thanos-querier), reconciling Prometheus API Route failed: retrieving Route object failed: the server was unable to return a response in the time allotted, but may still be processing the request (get routes.route.openshift.io prometheus-k8s), prometheuses.monitoring.coreos.com "k8s" not found
network                                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      124m    
node-tuning                                4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      111m    
openshift-apiserver                        4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      104m    
openshift-controller-manager               4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      107m    
openshift-samples                                                               False       True          False      103m    The error the server was unable to return a response in the time allotted, but may still be processing the request (get imagestreams.image.openshift.io) during openshift namespace cleanup has left the samples in an unknown state
operator-lifecycle-manager                 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      111m    
operator-lifecycle-manager-catalog         4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      111m    
operator-lifecycle-manager-packageserver   4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      106m    
service-ca                                 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      124m    
storage                                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      111m  

Expected results:

Deployment succeeds without issues.

Additional info:

I was unable to run must-gather so attaching the pods logs copied from the host file system.

Description of problem:

NPE on topology if creates a k8s svc and KSVC which has no metadata in template

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. create a KSVC from admin -> serving -> create service
2. create a k8s svc from search service (create)

Actual results:

topology breaks (see attached screenshot)

Expected results:

topology shouldn't break

Additional info:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-6663. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

When running openshift-install agent create image, and the install-config.yaml does not contain platform baremetal settings (except for VIPs) warnings are still generated as below:
DEBUG         Loading Install Config...            
WARNING Platform.Baremetal.ClusterProvisioningIP: 172.22.0.3 is ignored 
DEBUG Platform.Baremetal.BootstrapProvisioningIP: 172.22.0.2 is ignored 
WARNING Platform.Baremetal.ExternalBridge: baremetal is ignored 
WARNING Platform.Baremetal.ExternalMACAddress: 52:54:00:12:e1:68 is ignored 
WARNING Platform.Baremetal.ProvisioningBridge: provisioning is ignored 
WARNING Platform.Baremetal.ProvisioningMACAddress: 52:54:00:82:91:8d is ignored 
WARNING Platform.Baremetal.ProvisioningNetworkCIDR: 172.22.0.0/24 is ignored 
WARNING Platform.Baremetal.ProvisioningDHCPRange: 172.22.0.10,172.22.0.254 is ignored 
WARNING Capabilities: %!!(MISSING)s(*types.Capabilities=<nil>) is ignored 

It looks like these fields are populated with values from libvirt as shown in .openshift_install_state.json:
            "platform": {
                "baremetal": {
                    "libvirtURI": "qemu:///system",
                    "clusterProvisioningIP": "172.22.0.3",
                    "bootstrapProvisioningIP": "172.22.0.2",
                    "externalBridge": "baremetal",
                    "externalMACAddress": "52:54:00:12:e1:68",
                    "provisioningNetwork": "Managed",
                    "provisioningBridge": "provisioning",
                    "provisioningMACAddress": "52:54:00:82:91:8d",
                    "provisioningNetworkInterface": "",
                    "provisioningNetworkCIDR": "172.22.0.0/24",
                    "provisioningDHCPRange": "172.22.0.10,172.22.0.254",
                    "hosts": null,
                    "apiVIPs": [
                        "10.1.101.7",
                        "2620:52:0:165::7"
                    ],
                    "ingressVIPs": [
                        "10.1.101.9",
                        "2620:52:0:165::9"
                    ]

The install-config.yaml used to generate this has the following snippet:
platform:
  baremetal:
    apiVIPs:
    - 10.1.101.7
    - 2620:52:0:165::7
    ingressVIPs:
    - 10.1.101.9
    - 2620:52:0:165::9
additionalTrustBundle: |

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0

How reproducible:

Happens every time

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Use install-config.yaml with no platform baremetal fields except for the VIPs
2. run openshift-install agent create image 

Actual results:

Warning messages are output

Expected results:

No warning messags

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

In a 4.11 cluster with only openshift-samples enabled, the 4.12 introduced optional COs console and insights are installed. While upgrading to 4.12, CVO considers them to be disabled explicitly and skips reconciling them. So these COs are not upgraded to 4.12.

Installed COs cannot be disabled, so CVO is supposed to implicitly enable them.


$ oc get clusterversion -oyaml
{
  "apiVersion": "config.openshift.io/v1",
     "kind": "ClusterVersion",
     "metadata": {
         "creationTimestamp": "2022-09-30T05:02:31Z",
         "generation": 3,
         "name": "version",
         "resourceVersion": "134808",
         "uid": "bd95473f-ffda-402d-8fe3-74f852a9d6eb"
     },
     "spec": {
         "capabilities": {
             "additionalEnabledCapabilities": [
                 "openshift-samples"
             ],
             "baselineCapabilitySet": "None"
         },
         "channel": "stable-4.11",
         "clusterID": "8eda5167-a730-4b39-be1d-214a80506d34",
         "desiredUpdate": {
             "force": true,
             "image": "registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release@sha256:2c8e617830f84ac1ee1bfcc3581010dec4ae5d9cad7a54271574e8d91ef5ecbc",
             "version": ""
         }
     },
     "status": {
         "availableUpdates": null,
         "capabilities": {
             "enabledCapabilities": [
                 "openshift-samples"
             ],
             "knownCapabilities": [
                 "Console",
                 "Insights",
                 "Storage",
                 "baremetal",
                 "marketplace",
                 "openshift-samples"
             ]
         },
         "conditions": [
             {
                 "lastTransitionTime": "2022-09-30T05:02:33Z",
                 "message": "Unable to retrieve available updates: currently reconciling cluster version 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419 not found in the \"stable-4.11\" channel",
                 "reason": "VersionNotFound",
                 "status": "False",
                 "type": "RetrievedUpdates"
             },
             {
                 "lastTransitionTime": "2022-09-30T05:02:33Z",
                 "message": "Capabilities match configured spec",
                 "reason": "AsExpected",
                 "status": "False",
                 "type": "ImplicitlyEnabledCapabilities"
             },
             {
                 "lastTransitionTime": "2022-09-30T05:02:33Z",
                 "message": "Payload loaded version=\"4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419\" image=\"registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release@sha256:2c8e617830f84ac1ee1bfcc3581010dec4ae5d9cad7a54271574e8d91ef5ecbc\" architecture=\"amd64\"",
                 "reason": "PayloadLoaded",
                 "status": "True",
                 "type": "ReleaseAccepted"
             },
             {
                 "lastTransitionTime": "2022-09-30T05:23:18Z",
                 "message": "Done applying 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419",
                 "status": "True",
                 "type": "Available"
             },
             {
                 "lastTransitionTime": "2022-09-30T07:05:42Z",
                 "status": "False",
                 "type": "Failing"
             },
             {
                 "lastTransitionTime": "2022-09-30T07:41:53Z",
                 "message": "Cluster version is 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419",
                 "status": "False",
                 "type": "Progressing"
             }
         ],
         "desired": {
             "image": "registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release@sha256:2c8e617830f84ac1ee1bfcc3581010dec4ae5d9cad7a54271574e8d91ef5ecbc",
             "version": "4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419"
         },
         "history": [
             {
                 "completionTime": "2022-09-30T07:41:53Z",
                 "image": "registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release@sha256:2c8e617830f84ac1ee1bfcc3581010dec4ae5d9cad7a54271574e8d91ef5ecbc",
                 "startedTime": "2022-09-30T06:42:01Z",
                 "state": "Completed",
                 "verified": false,
                 "version": "4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419"
             },
             {
                 "completionTime": "2022-09-30T05:23:18Z",
                 "image": "registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release@sha256:5a6f6d1bf5c752c75d7554aa927c06b5ea0880b51909e83387ee4d3bca424631",
                 "startedTime": "2022-09-30T05:02:33Z",
                 "state": "Completed",
                 "verified": false,
                 "version": "4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-09-29-191451"
             }
         ],
         "observedGeneration": 3,
         "versionHash": "CSCJ2fxM_2o="
     }
 }

$ oc get co
 NAME                                       VERSION                              AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   DEGRADED   SINCE   MESSAGE
authentication                             4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      93m     
cloud-controller-manager                   4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      3h56m   
cloud-credential                           4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      3h59m   
cluster-autoscaler                         4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      3h53m   
config-operator                            4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      3h54m   
console                                    4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-09-29-191451   True        False         False      3h45m   
control-plane-machine-set                  4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      117m    
csi-snapshot-controller                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      3h54m   
dns                                        4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      3h53m   
etcd                                       4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      3h52m   
image-registry                             4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      3h46m   
ingress                                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      151m    
insights                                   4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-09-29-191451   True        False         False      3h48m   
kube-apiserver                             4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      3h50m   
kube-controller-manager                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      3h51m   
kube-scheduler                             4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      3h51m   
kube-storage-version-migrator              4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      91m     
machine-api                                4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      3h50m   
machine-approver                           4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      3h54m   
machine-config                             4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      3h52m   
monitoring                                 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      3h44m   
network                                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      3h55m   
node-tuning                                4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      113m    
openshift-apiserver                        4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      3h48m   
openshift-controller-manager               4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      113m    
openshift-samples                          4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      116m    
operator-lifecycle-manager                 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      3h54m   
operator-lifecycle-manager-catalog         4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      3h54m   
operator-lifecycle-manager-packageserver   4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      3h48m   
service-ca                                 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      3h54m   
storage                                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419   True        False         False      3h54m 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-28-204419

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install a 4.11 cluster with only openshift-samples enabled
2. Upgrade to 4.12
3.

Actual results:

The 4.12 introduced optional CO console and insights are not upgraded to 4.12

Expected results:

All the installed COs get upgraded

Additional info:

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-2513. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

Agent based installation is failing for Disconnected env due to pull secret is required for registry.ci.openshift.org. As we are installing cluster in disconnected env, only mirror registry secrets should be enough for pulling the image.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release:4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Setup mirror registry with this registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release:4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406 release. 
2. Add the ICSP information in the install-config file
4. Create agent.iso using install-config.yaml and agent-config.yaml
5. ssh to the node zero to see the error in create-cluster-and-infraenv.service. 

Actual results:

create-cluster-and-infraenv.service is failing with below error:
 
time="2022-10-18T09:36:13Z" level=fatal msg="Failed to register cluster with assisted-service: AssistedServiceError Code: 400 Href:  ID: 400 Kind: Error Reason: pull secret for new cluster is invalid: pull secret must contain auth for \"registry.ci.openshift.org\""

Expected results:

create-cluster-and-infraenv.service should be successfully started.

Additional info:

Refer this similar bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1990659

Description of problem:

In OCP 4.9, the package-server-manager was introduced to manage the packageserver CSV. However, when OCP 4.8 in upgraded to 4.9, the packageserver stays stuck in v0.17.0, which is the version in OCP 4.8, and v0.18.3 does not roll out, which is the version in OCP 4.9

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install OCP 4.8

2. Upgrade to OCP 4.9 

$ oc get clusterversion 
NAME      VERSION                             AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   SINCE   STATUS
version   4.8.0-0.nightly-2022-08-31-160214   True        True          50m     Working towards 4.9.47: 619 of 738 done (83% complete)

$ oc get clusterversion 
NAME      VERSION   AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   SINCE   STATUS
version   4.9.47    True        False         4m26s   Cluster version is 4.9.47
 

Actual results:

Check packageserver CSV. It's in v0.17.0 

$ oc get csv  NAME            DISPLAY          VERSION   REPLACES   PHASE packageserver   Package Server   0.17.0               Succeeded 

Expected results:

packageserver CSV is at 0.18.3 

Additional info:

packageserver CSV version in 4.8: https://github.com/openshift/operator-framework-olm/blob/release-4.8/manifests/0000_50_olm_15-packageserver.clusterserviceversion.yaml#L12

packageserver CSV version in 4.9: https://github.com/openshift/operator-framework-olm/blob/release-4.9/pkg/manifests/csv.yaml#L8

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-6270. The following is the description of the original issue:

Similar to how, due to the install-config validation, the baremetal platform previously required a bunch of fields that are actually ignored (OCPBUGS-3278), we similarly require values for the following fields in the platform.vsphere section:

  • vCenter
  • username
  • password
  • datacenter
  • defaultDatastore

None of these values are actually used in the agent-based installer at present, and they should not be required.

Users can work around this by specifying dummy values in the platform config (note that the VIP values are required and must be genuine):

platform:
  vsphere:
    apiVIP: 192.168.111.1
    ingressVIP: 192.168.111.2
    vCenter: a
    username: b
    password: c
    datacenter: d
    defaultDatastore: e

Catastrophic job runs where high numbers of tests fail are common. There are likely many root causes, but let's try to find one. This is a hard task because it's not "this one test failed, figure out why."

Clusters of failures are more common on certain platforms, it may be fruitful to start with the worst.

NURP's that average > 5 openshift-tests or openshift-tests-upgrade failures:

                      variants                       |          avg           
-----------------------------------------------------+------------------------
 {azure,amd64,ovn,upgrade,upgrade-micro,single-node} |   124.5294117647058824
 {azure,amd64,ovn,upgrade,upgrade-minor,single-node} |    92.9090909090909091
 {openstack,amd64,ovn,ha}                            |    49.2105263157894737
 {azure,amd64,sdn,ha,fips}                           |    25.6666666666666667
 {metal-ipi,amd64,ovn,ha}                            |    24.6000000000000000
 {openstack,amd64,ovn,ha,fips}                       |    23.5000000000000000
 {azure,amd64,ovn,ha,hypershift}                     |    22.6666666666666667
 {s390x,sdn,ha}                                      |    22.5454545454545455
 {gcp,amd64,ovn,ha}                                  |    21.5714285714285714
 {ppc64le,sdn,ha}                                    |    17.9545454545454545
 {metal-ipi,amd64,sdn,ha}                            |    17.6000000000000000
 {openstack,amd64,ovn,ha,serial}                     |    15.3333333333333333
 {azure,amd64,ovn,ha}                                |    15.1627906976744186
 {promote}                                           |    15.0000000000000000
 {aws,amd64,ovn,ha}                                  |    14.2558139534883721
 {metal-ipi,amd64,ovn,upgrade,upgrade-minor,ha}      |    13.9375000000000000
 {gcp,amd64,ovn,upgrade,upgrade-minor,ha,realtime}   |    11.2000000000000000
 {azure,amd64,sdn,upgrade,upgrade-minor,ha}          |     9.6842105263157895
 {never-stable}                                      |     9.0740740740740741
 {aws,amd64,ovn,single-node}                         |     8.8666666666666667
 {metal-ipi,amd64,sdn,upgrade,upgrade-micro,ha}      |     7.9090909090909091
 {azure,amd64,sdn,upgrade,upgrade-micro,ha}          |     6.4000000000000000
 {aws,amd64,sdn,ha}                                  |     5.7800000000000000
 {vsphere-ipi,amd64,ovn,ha}                          |     5.6458333333333333
 {openstack,amd64,ovn,upgrade,upgrade-minor,ha}      |     5.6250000000000000
 {metal-ipi,amd64,ovn,upgrade,upgrade-micro,ha}      |     5.5882352941176471
 {aws,amd64,sdn,upgrade,upgrade-micro,ha}            |     5.5789473684210526

Here's a sippy link for 4.12 job runs with > 50 failures: https://sippy.dptools.openshift.org/sippy-ng/jobs/4.12/runs?filters=%257B%2522items%2522%253A%255B%257B%2522columnField%2522%253A%2522test_failures%2522%252C%2522operatorValue%2522%253A%2522%253E%2522%252C%2522value%2522%253A%252250%2522%257D%252C%257B%2522columnField%2522%253A%2522overall_result%2522%252C%2522operatorValue%2522%253A%2522equals%2522%252C%2522value%2522%253A%2522F%2522%257D%255D%252C%2522linkOperator%2522%253A%2522and%2522%257D&sort=desc&sortField=timestamp

Description of problem:

some upgrade ci jobs from 4.11.z to 4.12 nightly build are failed, because system unit machine-config-daemon-update-rpmostree-via-container is failed

e.g. job https://qe-private-deck-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/view/gs/qe-private-deck/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-openshift-tests-private-release-4.12-nightly-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-aws-ipi-proxy-p1/1579169944476585984

omg get mcp
NAME    CONFIG                                            UPDATED  UPDATING  DEGRADED  MACHINECOUNT  READYMACHINECOUNT  UPDATEDMACHINECOUNT  DEGRADEDMACHINECOUNT  AGE
worker  rendered-worker-6e18de1272fad7a5ca1529941e3ceaed  False    True      True      3             0                  0                    1                     3h53m
master  rendered-master-60f4ff5893c94f53acd9ebb7a6bf53d4  False    True      True      3             0                  0                    1                     3h53m 

check issued node

omg get node/ip-10-0-57-74.us-east-2.compute.internal -o yaml|yq -y '.metadata.annotations'
cloud.network.openshift.io/egress-ipconfig: '[{"interface":"eni-0f6de21569b5b65c8","ifaddr":{"ipv4":"10.0.48.0/20"},"capacity":{"ipv4":14,"ipv6":15}}]'
csi.volume.kubernetes.io/nodeid: '{"ebs.csi.aws.com":"i-01a34f6b5f2cd1e41"}'
machine.openshift.io/machine: openshift-machine-api/ci-op-kb95kxx9-2a438-r6z94-master-2
machineconfiguration.openshift.io/controlPlaneTopology: HighlyAvailable
machineconfiguration.openshift.io/currentConfig: rendered-master-065664319cfbaee64277097d49a8a5a6
machineconfiguration.openshift.io/desiredConfig: rendered-master-60f4ff5893c94f53acd9ebb7a6bf53d4
machineconfiguration.openshift.io/desiredDrain: drain-rendered-master-60f4ff5893c94f53acd9ebb7a6bf53d4
machineconfiguration.openshift.io/lastAppliedDrain: drain-rendered-master-60f4ff5893c94f53acd9ebb7a6bf53d4
machineconfiguration.openshift.io/reason: 'error running systemd-run --unit machine-config-daemon-update-rpmostree-via-container
  --collect --wait -- podman run --authfile /var/lib/kubelet/config.json --privileged
  --pid=host --net=host --rm -v /:/run/host quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev@sha256:0daf5c4a35424410e88dde102022fc3581302bc8a98e09e2e4748502c59b3661
  rpm-ostree ex deploy-from-self /run/host: Running as unit: machine-config-daemon-update-rpmostree-via-container.service


  Finished with result: exit-code


  Main processes terminated with: code=exited/status=125


  Service runtime: 2min 52ms


  CPU time consumed: 144ms


  : exit status 125'
machineconfiguration.openshift.io/state: Degraded
volumes.kubernetes.io/controller-managed-attach-detach: 'true' 

check mcd log on issued node

omg get pod -n openshift-machine-config-operator  -o json | jq -r '.items[]|select(.spec.nodeName=="ip-10-0-57-74.us-east-2.compute.internal")|.metadata.name' | grep daemon
machine-config-daemon-znbvf

2022-10-09T22:12:58.797891917Z I1009 22:12:58.797821  179598 update.go:1917] Updating OS to layered image quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev@sha256:0daf5c4a35424410e88dde102022fc3581302bc8a98e09e2e4748502c59b3661
2022-10-09T22:12:58.797891917Z I1009 22:12:58.797846  179598 rpm-ostree.go:447] Running captured: rpm-ostree --version
2022-10-09T22:12:58.815829171Z I1009 22:12:58.815800  179598 update.go:2068] rpm-ostree is not new enough for layering; forcing an update via container
2022-10-09T22:12:58.817577513Z I1009 22:12:58.817555  179598 update.go:2053] Running: systemd-run --unit machine-config-daemon-update-rpmostree-via-container --collect --wait -- podman run --authfile /var/lib/kubelet/config.json --privileged --pid=host --net=host --rm -v /:/run/host quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev@sha256:0daf5c4a35424410e88dde102022fc3581302bc8a98e09e2e4748502c59b3661 rpm-ostree ex deploy-from-self /run/host 
...
2022-10-09T22:15:00.831959313Z E1009 22:15:00.831949  179598 writer.go:200] Marking Degraded due to: error running systemd-run --unit machine-config-daemon-update-rpmostree-via-container --collect --wait -- podman run --authfile /var/lib/kubelet/config.json --privileged --pid=host --net=host --rm -v /:/run/host quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev@sha256:0daf5c4a35424410e88dde102022fc3581302bc8a98e09e2e4748502c59b3661 rpm-ostree ex deploy-from-self /run/host: Running as unit: machine-config-daemon-update-rpmostree-via-container.service
2022-10-09T22:15:00.831959313Z Finished with result: exit-code
2022-10-09T22:15:00.831959313Z Main processes terminated with: code=exited/status=125
2022-10-09T22:15:00.831959313Z Service runtime: 2min 52ms
2022-10-09T22:15:00.831959313Z CPU time consumed: 144ms
2022-10-09T22:15:00.831959313Z : exit status 125

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12

Steps to Reproduce:

upgrade cluster from 4.11.8 to 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-05-053337  

Actual results:

upgrade is failed due to node is degraded, rpm-ostree update via container is failed

Expected results:

upgrade can be completed successfully

Additional info:

must-gather: https://gcsweb-qe-private-deck-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/gcs/qe-private-deck/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-openshift-tests-private-release-4.12-nightly-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-aws-ipi-proxy-p1/1579169944476585984/artifacts/aws-ipi-proxy-p1/gather-must-gather/artifacts/must-gather.tar

Other build logs of failed jobs

https://gcsweb-qe-private-deck-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/gcs/qe-private-deck/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-openshift-tests-private-release-4.12-nightly-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-aws-ipi-proxy-cco-manual-security-token-service-p1/1579200140067999744/build-log.txt

https://gcsweb-qe-private-deck-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/gcs/qe-private-deck/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-openshift-tests-private-release-4.12-nightly-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-azure-ipi-proxy-p1/1579094436883730432/build-log.txt

https://gcsweb-qe-private-deck-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/gcs/qe-private-deck/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-openshift-tests-private-release-4.12-nightly-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-azure-ipi-proxy-workers-rhcos-rhel8-p2/1578747158293647360/build-log.txt

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4026. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:
There is an endless re-render loop and a browser feels slow to stuck when opening the add page or the topology.

Saw also endless API calls to /api/kubernetes/apis/binding.operators.coreos.com/v1alpha1/bindablekinds/bindable-kinds

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
1. Console UI 4.12-4.13 (master)
2. Service Binding Operator (tested with 1.3.1)

How reproducible:
Always with installed SBO

But the "stuck feeling" depends on the browser (Firefox feels more stuck) and your locale machine power

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install Service Binding Operator
2. Create or update the BindableKinds resource "bindable-kinds"

apiVersion: binding.operators.coreos.com/v1alpha1
kind: BindableKinds
metadata:
  name: bindable-kinds

3. Open the browser console log
4. Open the console UI and navigate to the add page

Actual results:
1. Saw endless API calls to /api/kubernetes/apis/binding.operators.coreos.com/v1alpha1/bindablekinds/bindable-kinds
2. Browser feels slow and get stuck after some time
3. The page crashs after some time

Expected results:
1. The API call should be called just once
2. The add page should just work without feeling laggy
3. No crash

Additional info:
Get introduced after we watching the bindable-kinds resource with https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/11161

It looks like this happen only if the SBO is installed and the bindable-kinds resource exist, but doesn't contain any status.

The status list all available bindable resource types. I could not reproduce this by installing and uninstalling an operator, but you can manually create or update this resource as mentioned above.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-14127. The following is the description of the original issue:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-14125. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

Since registry.centos.org is closed, tests relying on this registry in e2e-agnostic-ovn-cmd job are failing.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

all

How reproducible:

Trigger e2e-agnostic-ovn-cmd job

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

Description of problem: After I run the golang script for OCP-53608, I find the created 

ingress-controller couldn't be deleted

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-08-15-150248

How reproducible: Run the script and try to delete the custom ingress-controller

Steps to Reproduce:
1.

% oc get clusterversion

NAME      VERSION                              AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   SINCE   STATUS

version   4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-08-15-150248   True        False         43m     Cluster version is 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-08-15-150248

shudi@Shudis-MacBook-Pro openshift-tests-private %

2. Run the script

shudi@Shudis-MacBook-Pro openshift-tests-private % ./bin/extended-platform-tests run all --dry-run | grep 53608 | ./bin/extended-platform-tests run -f -

...

---------------------------------------------------------

Received interrupt.  Running AfterSuite...

^C again to terminate immediately

Aug 18 10:35:51.087: INFO: Running AfterSuite actions on all nodes

Aug 18 10:35:51.088: INFO: Waiting up to 7m0s for all (but 100) nodes to be ready

STEP: Destroying namespace "e2e-test-router-tunning-77627" for this suite.

Aug 18 10:35:54.654: INFO: Running AfterSuite actions on node 1

 

failed: (15m4s) 2022-08-18T02:35:54 "[sig-network-edge] Network_Edge should Author:shudili-Low-53608-Negative Test of Expose a Configurable Reload Interval in HAproxy [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]"

 

Failing tests:

 

[sig-network-edge] Network_Edge should Author:shudili-Low-53608-Negative Test of Expose a Configurable Reload Interval in HAproxy [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]

 

error: 1 fail, 0 pass, 0 skip (15m4s)

shudi@Shudis-MacBook-Pro openshift-tests-private % 

3.  show the ingress-controllers

shudi@Shudis-MacBook-Pro openshift-tests-private % oc -n openshift-ingress-operator get ingresscontroller

NAME       AGE

default    113m

ocp53608   42m

shudi@Shudis-MacBook-Pro openshift-tests-private %

 

4. Try to delete the ingress-controller ocp53608, when the message "ingresscontroller.operator.openshift.io "ocp53608" deleted" appears, it is hanged for a long time until the error message appears.

shudi@Shudis-MacBook-Pro openshift-tests-private % oc -n openshift-ingress-operator delete ingresscontroller ocp53608

ingresscontroller.operator.openshift.io "ocp53608" deleted

error: An error occurred while waiting for the object to be deleted: an error on the server ("unable to decode an event from the watch stream: http2: client connection lost") has prevented the request from succeedingUnable to connect to the server: dial tcp 35.194.1.60:6443: i/o timeout

shudi@Shudis-MacBook-Pro openshift-tests-private %

 

5. After "ingresscontroller.operator.openshift.io "ocp53608" deleted" message appears, show the ingress-controller, ocp53608 isn't deleted

shudi@Shudis-MacBook-Pro golang % oc -n openshift-ingress-operator get ingresscontroller

NAME       AGE

default    3h

ocp53608   109m

shudi@Shudis-MacBook-Pro golang %

 

6.  After the error message(rror: An error occurred while waiting for the object to be deleted) appears, try to show the ingresscontroller

shudi@Shudis-MacBook-Pro openshift-tests-private % oc -n openshift-ingress-operator get ingresscontroller

E0818 12:21:57.272967    4168 request.go:1085] Unexpected error when reading response body: net/http: request canceled (Client.Timeout or context cancellation while reading body)

E0818 12:21:57.273379    4168 request.go:1085] Unexpected error when reading response body: net/http: request canceled (Client.Timeout or context cancellation while reading body)

E0818 12:21:57.274306    4168 request.go:1085] Unexpected error when reading response body: net/http: request canceled (Client.Timeout or context cancellation while reading body)

Unable to connect to the server: dial tcp 35.194.1.60:6443: i/o timeout

shudi@Shudis-MacBook-Pro openshift-tests-private %

 

Actual results:  ingress-controller ocp53608  is still there after executed the oc delete command

Expected results:

ingress-controller ocp53608  will be deleted soon after executed the oc delete command

Additional info:

Description of problem: Knative tests were disabled due to https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-190  to unblock the queue and should be enabled back again

https://coreos.slack.com/archives/C6A3NV5J9/p1660659719046909 

https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/11956#discussion_r948075848 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

Description of problem:

hypershift pull secret update failed on 4.12

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

Currently, the AWS actuator has a static list of instance types embedded in it. This means that as new instance types are added, we have to continually update this list.

Ideally, we could fetch this information from the AWS API as we do in GCP.

DoD:

  • Investigate availability of instance memory and CPU capacity as an API on AWS
  • Determine if we can use this for the autoscaling scale from zero annotations
  • If possible, implement the change.

Description of problem:

The origin issue is from SDB-3484. When a customer wants to update its pull-secret, we find that sometimes the insight operator does not execute the cluster transfer process with the message 'no available accepted cluster transfer'. The root cause is that the insight operator does the cluster transfer process per 24 hours, and the telemetry does the registration process per 24 hours, on the ams side, both the two call /cluster_registration do the same process, so it means the telemetry will complete the cluster transfer before the insight operator. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Create two OCP clusters.
2. Create a PSR that will help create two 'pending' CTs. The pending CTs will be accepted after ~6 hours.
3. Wait for ~24 hours, check the PSR, and check the logs in IO, and also check the pull-secrets in the clusters.

Actual results:

The PSR is completed, but there is no successfully transfer logs in IO, and the pull-secrets in the clusters are not updated. 

Expected results:

The transfer process is executed successfully, and the pull-secrets are updated on the clusters.

Additional info:


Description of problem:

openshift-apiserver, openshift-oauth-apiserver and kube-apiserver pods cannot validate the certificate when trying to reach etcd reporting certificate validation errors:

}. Err: connection error: desc = "transport: authentication handshake failed: x509: certificate is valid for ::1, 127.0.0.1, ::1, fd69::2, not 2620:52:0:198::10"
W1018 11:36:43.523673      15 logging.go:59] [core] [Channel #186 SubChannel #187] grpc: addrConn.createTransport failed to connect to {
  "Addr": "[2620:52:0:198::10]:2379",
  "ServerName": "2620:52:0:198::10",
  "Attributes": null,
  "BalancerAttributes": null,
  "Type": 0,
  "Metadata": null
}. Err: connection error: desc = "transport: authentication handshake failed: x509: certificate is valid for ::1, 127.0.0.1, ::1, fd69::2, not 2620:52:0:198::10"

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Deploy SNO with single stack IPv6 via ZTP procedure

Actual results:

Deployment times out and some of the operators aren't deployed successfully.

NAME                                       VERSION                              AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   DEGRADED   SINCE   MESSAGE
authentication                             4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   False       False         True       124m    APIServerDeploymentAvailable: no apiserver.openshift-oauth-apiserver pods available on any node....
baremetal                                  4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      112m    
cloud-controller-manager                   4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      111m    
cloud-credential                           4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      115m    
cluster-autoscaler                         4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      111m    
config-operator                            4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      124m    
console                                                                                                                      
control-plane-machine-set                  4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      111m    
csi-snapshot-controller                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      111m    
dns                                        4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      111m    
etcd                                       4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         True       121m    ClusterMemberControllerDegraded: could not get list of unhealthy members: giving up getting a cached client after 3 tries
image-registry                             4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   False       True          True       104m    Available: The registry is removed...
ingress                                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        True          True       111m    The "default" ingress controller reports Degraded=True: DegradedConditions: One or more other status conditions indicate a degraded state: DeploymentReplicasAllAvailable=False (DeploymentReplicasNotAvailable: 0/1 of replicas are available)
insights                                   4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      118s    
kube-apiserver                             4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      102m    
kube-controller-manager                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         True       107m    GarbageCollectorDegraded: error fetching rules: Get "https://thanos-querier.openshift-monitoring.svc:9091/api/v1/rules": dial tcp [fd02::3c5f]:9091: connect: connection refused
kube-scheduler                             4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      107m    
kube-storage-version-migrator              4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      117m    
machine-api                                4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      111m    
machine-approver                           4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      111m    
machine-config                             4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      115m    
marketplace                                4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      116m    
monitoring                                                                      False       True          True       98m     deleting Thanos Ruler Route failed: Timeout: request did not complete within requested timeout - context deadline exceeded, deleting UserWorkload federate Route failed: Timeout: request did not complete within requested timeout - context deadline exceeded, reconciling Alertmanager Route failed: retrieving Route object failed: the server was unable to return a response in the time allotted, but may still be processing the request (get routes.route.openshift.io alertmanager-main), reconciling Thanos Querier Route failed: retrieving Route object failed: the server was unable to return a response in the time allotted, but may still be processing the request (get routes.route.openshift.io thanos-querier), reconciling Prometheus API Route failed: retrieving Route object failed: the server was unable to return a response in the time allotted, but may still be processing the request (get routes.route.openshift.io prometheus-k8s), prometheuses.monitoring.coreos.com "k8s" not found
network                                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      124m    
node-tuning                                4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      111m    
openshift-apiserver                        4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      104m    
openshift-controller-manager               4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      107m    
openshift-samples                                                               False       True          False      103m    The error the server was unable to return a response in the time allotted, but may still be processing the request (get imagestreams.image.openshift.io) during openshift namespace cleanup has left the samples in an unknown state
operator-lifecycle-manager                 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      111m    
operator-lifecycle-manager-catalog         4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      111m    
operator-lifecycle-manager-packageserver   4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      106m    
service-ca                                 4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      124m    
storage                                    4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-10-18-041406   True        False         False      111m  

Expected results:

Deployment succeeds without issues.

Additional info:

I was unable to run must-gather so attaching the pods logs copied from the host file system.

Description of problem:

Git icon shown in the repository details page should be based on the git provider.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Create a Repository with gitlab repo url
2. Trigger a PLR for the repository 
3. Navigates to PLR details page

Actual results:

github icon is displayed for the gitlab url and URL is not correct

Expected results:

gitlab icon should be displayed for the gitlab url. And repository URL should be correct

Additional info:

use `GitLabIcon` and `BitBucketIcon` from patternfly react-icons.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-10213. The following is the description of the original issue:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-8468. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

RHCOS is being published to new AWS regions (https://github.com/openshift/installer/pull/6861) but aws-sdk-go need to be bumped to recognize those regions

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

master/4.14

How reproducible:

always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. openshift-install create install-config
2. Try to select ap-south-2 as a region
3.

Actual results:

New regions are not found. New regions are: ap-south-2, ap-southeast-4, eu-central-2, eu-south-2, me-central-1.

Expected results:

Installer supports and displays the new regions in the Survey

Additional info:

See https://github.com/openshift/installer/blob/master/pkg/asset/installconfig/aws/regions.go#L13-L23

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-13168. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

oc login --token=$token
--server=https://api.dalh-dev-hs-2.05zb.p3.openshiftapps.com:443 --certificate-authority=ca.crt
The server uses a certificate signed by an unknown authority.
You can bypass the certificate check, but any data you send to the server could be intercepted by others.

The referenced "ca.crt" comes from the Secret created when a Service Account is created.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 4.12.12

How reproducible: Always

Description of problem:

revert "force cert rotation every couple days for development" in 4.12

We want short expiry times during development and long expiry times when we ship.

--- Additional comment from Eric Paris on 2020-04-02 19:57:29 CEST ---

This bug has been set to target the 4.5.0 release without specifying a severity. As part of triage when determining the priority of bugs a severity should be specified. Since these bugs have no been properly triaged I am removing the target release. Teams will need to add a severity before deferring these bugs again.

--- Additional comment from Michal Fojtik on 2020-05-12 12:45:25 CEST ---

This bug hasn't had any activity in the last 30 days. Maybe the problem got resolved, was a duplicate of something else, or became less pressing for some reason - or maybe it's still relevant but just hasn't been looked at yet.

As such, we're marking this bug as "LifecycleStale" and decreasing the severity. 

If you have further information on the current state of the bug, please update it, otherwise this bug will be automatically closed in 7 days. The information can be, for example, that the problem still occurs, that you still want the feature, that more information is needed, or that the bug is (for whatever reason) no longer relevant.

--- Additional comment from Standa Laznicka on 2020-05-12 14:53:12 CEST ---

you don't really want to close this

--- Additional comment from Stefan Schimanski on 2020-05-19 13:11:00 CEST ---

Waiting for master to open. We will fix it then on the release branch.

--- Additional comment from Stefan Schimanski on 2020-06-18 12:23:34 CEST ---

Will be done when 4.6 branches from master.

--- Additional comment from Michal Fojtik on 2020-07-09 14:46:02 CEST ---

Stefan is PTO, adding UpcomingSprint to his bugs to fulfill the duty.

--- Additional comment from Michal Fojtik on 2020-08-24 15:12:08 CEST ---

This bug hasn't had any activity in the last 30 days. Maybe the problem got resolved, was a duplicate of something else, or became less pressing for some reason - or maybe it's still relevant but just hasn't been looked at yet. As such, we're marking this bug as "LifecycleStale" and decreasing the severity/priority. If you have further information on the current state of the bug, please update it, otherwise this bug can be closed in about 7 days. The information can be, for example, that the problem still occurs, that you still want the feature, that more information is needed, or that the bug is (for whatever reason) no longer relevant.

--- Additional comment from Michal Fojtik on 2020-08-31 15:59:33 CEST ---

This bug hasn't had any activity 7 days after it was marked as LifecycleStale, so we are closing this bug as WONTFIX. If you consider this bug still valuable, please reopen it or create new bug.

--- Additional comment from Michal Fojtik on 2020-08-31 17:00:25 CEST ---

The LifecycleStale keyword was removed because the bug got commented on recently.
The bug assignee was notified.

--- Additional comment from Stefan Schimanski on 2020-09-11 13:00:27 CEST ---

This is waiting for Eric Paris to stop fast forwarding release-4.6 from master.

--- Additional comment from Michal Fojtik on 2020-10-30 11:12:07 CET ---

This bug hasn't had any activity in the last 30 days. Maybe the problem got resolved, was a duplicate of something else, or became less pressing for some reason - or maybe it's still relevant but just hasn't been looked at yet. As such, we're marking this bug as "LifecycleStale" and decreasing the severity/priority. If you have further information on the current state of the bug, please update it, otherwise this bug can be closed in about 7 days. The information can be, for example, that the problem still occurs, that you still want the feature, that more information is needed, or that the bug is (for whatever reason) no longer relevant. Additionally, you can add LifecycleFrozen into Keywords if you think this bug should never be marked as stale. Please consult with bug assignee before you do that.

--- Additional comment from Nick Stielau on 2021-01-20 18:49:09 CET ---

Can we get some context on why this is blocker+?  Would we further delay the release if we don't get a fix in for this?

--- Additional comment from Stefan Schimanski on 2021-03-16 17:28:08 CET ---

--- Additional comment from Eric Paris on 2021-06-08 14:00:16 CEST ---

This bug sets blocker+ without setting a Target Release. This is an invalid state as it is impossible to determine what is being blocked. Please be sure to set Priority, Severity, and Target Release before you attempt to set blocker+

--- Additional comment from Michal Fojtik on 2021-06-10 10:49:36 CEST ---

This is a blocker? until we have Target Release 4.9 (it is a blocker+ for 4.9).

--- Additional comment from Wally on 2021-06-11 15:14:26 CEST ---

Setting blocker- until next week to clear reports heading to code freeze.  Will reset once 4.9 opens.

--- Additional comment from Wally on 2021-08-31 19:26:13 UTC ---

Setting blocker- until next week to clear reports heading to code freeze.  Will reset once 4.10 opens.

--- Additional comment from Michal Fojtik on 2022-02-03 21:53:15 UTC ---

** A NOTE ABOUT USING URGENT **

This BZ has been set to urgent severity and priority. When a BZ is marked urgent priority Engineers are asked to stop whatever they are doing, putting everything else on hold.
Please be prepared to have reasonable justification ready to discuss, and ensure your own and engineering management are aware and agree this BZ is urgent. Keep in mind, urgent bugs are very expensive and have maximal management visibility.

NOTE: This bug was automatically assigned to an engineering manager with the severity reset to *unspecified* until the emergency is vetted and confirmed. Please do not manually override the severity.

** INFORMATION REQUIRED **

Please answer these questions before escalation to engineering:

1. Has a link to must-gather output been provided in this BZ? We cannot work without. If must-gather fails to run, attach all relevant logs and provide the error message of must-gather.
2. Give the output of "oc get clusteroperators -o yaml".
3. In case of degraded/unavailable operators, have all their logs and the logs of the operands been analyzed [yes/no]
4. List the top 5 relevant errors from the logs of the operators and operands in (3).
5. Order the list of degraded/unavailable operators according to which is likely the cause of the failure of the other, root-cause at the top.
6. Explain why (5) is likely the right order and list the information used for that assessment.
7. Explain why Engineering is necessary to make progress.

--- Additional comment from Wally on 2022-02-09 20:11:25 UTC ---

Setting blocker- for now but will add reminder and keep in my queue for visibility.

--- Additional comment from Red Hat Bugzilla on 2022-05-09 08:32:21 UTC ---

Account disabled by LDAP Audit for extended failure

--- Additional comment from OpenShift Automated Release Tooling on 2022-06-24 01:06:13 UTC ---

Elliott changed bug status from MODIFIED to ON_QA.
This bug is expected to ship in the next 4.11 release.

--- Additional comment from Ke Wang on 2022-06-24 15:24:03 UTC ---

To verify the bug, refer to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1921139#c6

--- Additional comment from OpenShift BugZilla Robot on 2022-06-25 12:40:12 UTC ---

Bugfix included in accepted release 4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-06-25-081133
Bug will not be automatically moved to VERIFIED for the following reasons:
- PR openshift/cluster-kube-apiserver-operator#1307 not approved by QA contact

This bug must now be manually moved to VERIFIED by dpunia@redhat.com

--- Additional comment from Deepak Punia on 2022-06-27 08:20:33 UTC ---

Below is the steps to verify this bug:

# oc adm release info --commits registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release:4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-06-25-081133|grep -i cluster-kube-apiserver-operator
  cluster-kube-apiserver-operator                https://github.com/openshift/cluster-kube-apiserver-operator                7764681777edfa3126981a0a1d390a6060a840a3

# git log --date local --pretty="%h %an %cd - %s" 776468 |grep -i "#1307"
08973b820 openshift-ci[bot] Thu Jun 23 22:40:08 2022 - Merge pull request #1307 from tkashem/revert-cert-rotation

# oc get clusterversions.config.openshift.io 
NAME      VERSION                              AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   SINCE   STATUS
version   4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-06-25-081133   True        False         64m     Cluster version is 4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-06-25-081133

$ cat scripts/check_secret_expiry.sh
FILE="$1"
if [ ! -f "$1" ]; then
  echo "must provide \$1" && exit 0
fi
export IFS=$'\n'
for i in `cat "$FILE"`
do
  if `echo "$i" | grep "^#" > /dev/null`; then
    continue
  fi
  NS=`echo $i | cut -d ' ' -f 1`
  SECRET=`echo $i | cut -d ' ' -f 2`
  rm -f tls.crt; oc extract secret/$SECRET -n $NS --confirm > /dev/null
  echo "Check cert dates of $SECRET in project $NS:"
  openssl x509 -noout --dates -in tls.crt; echo
done

$ cat certs.txt
openshift-kube-controller-manager-operator csr-signer-signer
openshift-kube-controller-manager-operator csr-signer
openshift-kube-controller-manager kube-controller-manager-client-cert-key
openshift-kube-apiserver-operator aggregator-client-signer
openshift-kube-apiserver aggregator-client
openshift-kube-apiserver external-loadbalancer-serving-certkey
openshift-kube-apiserver internal-loadbalancer-serving-certkey
openshift-kube-apiserver service-network-serving-certkey
openshift-config-managed kube-controller-manager-client-cert-key
openshift-config-managed kube-scheduler-client-cert-key
openshift-kube-scheduler kube-scheduler-client-cert-key

Checking the Certs,  they are with one day expiry times, this is as expected.
# ./check_secret_expiry.sh certs.txt
Check cert dates of csr-signer-signer in project openshift-kube-controller-manager-operator:
notBefore=Jun 27 04:41:38 2022 GMT
notAfter=Jun 28 04:41:38 2022 GMT

Check cert dates of csr-signer in project openshift-kube-controller-manager-operator:
notBefore=Jun 27 04:52:21 2022 GMT
notAfter=Jun 28 04:41:38 2022 GMT

Check cert dates of kube-controller-manager-client-cert-key in project openshift-kube-controller-manager:
notBefore=Jun 27 04:52:26 2022 GMT
notAfter=Jul 27 04:52:27 2022 GMT

Check cert dates of aggregator-client-signer in project openshift-kube-apiserver-operator:
notBefore=Jun 27 04:41:37 2022 GMT
notAfter=Jun 28 04:41:37 2022 GMT

Check cert dates of aggregator-client in project openshift-kube-apiserver:
notBefore=Jun 27 04:52:26 2022 GMT
notAfter=Jun 28 04:41:37 2022 GMT

Check cert dates of external-loadbalancer-serving-certkey in project openshift-kube-apiserver:
notBefore=Jun 27 04:52:26 2022 GMT
notAfter=Jul 27 04:52:27 2022 GMT

Check cert dates of internal-loadbalancer-serving-certkey in project openshift-kube-apiserver:
notBefore=Jun 27 04:52:49 2022 GMT
notAfter=Jul 27 04:52:50 2022 GMT

Check cert dates of service-network-serving-certkey in project openshift-kube-apiserver:
notBefore=Jun 27 04:52:28 2022 GMT
notAfter=Jul 27 04:52:29 2022 GMT

Check cert dates of kube-controller-manager-client-cert-key in project openshift-config-managed:
notBefore=Jun 27 04:52:26 2022 GMT
notAfter=Jul 27 04:52:27 2022 GMT

Check cert dates of kube-scheduler-client-cert-key in project openshift-config-managed:
notBefore=Jun 27 04:52:47 2022 GMT
notAfter=Jul 27 04:52:48 2022 GMT

Check cert dates of kube-scheduler-client-cert-key in project openshift-kube-scheduler:
notBefore=Jun 27 04:52:47 2022 GMT
notAfter=Jul 27 04:52:48 2022 GMT
# 

# cat check_secret_expiry_within.sh
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# usage: ./check_secret_expiry_within.sh 1day # or 15min, 2days, 2day, 2month, 1year
WITHIN=${1:-24hours}
echo "Checking validity within $WITHIN ..."
oc get secret --insecure-skip-tls-verify -A -o json | jq -r '.items[] | select(.metadata.annotations."auth.openshift.io/certificate-not-after" | . != null and fromdateiso8601<='$( date --date="+$WITHIN" +%s )') | "\(.metadata.annotations."auth.openshift.io/certificate-not-before")  \(.metadata.annotations."auth.openshift.io/certificate-not-after")  \(.metadata.namespace)\t\(.metadata.name)"'

# ./check_secret_expiry_within.sh 1day
Checking validity within 1day ...
2022-06-27T04:41:37Z  2022-06-28T04:41:37Z  openshift-kube-apiserver-operator	aggregator-client-signer
2022-06-27T04:52:26Z  2022-06-28T04:41:37Z  openshift-kube-apiserver	aggregator-client
2022-06-27T04:52:21Z  2022-06-28T04:41:38Z  openshift-kube-controller-manager-operator	csr-signer
2022-06-27T04:41:38Z  2022-06-28T04:41:38Z  openshift-kube-controller-manager-operator	csr-signer-signer

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3458. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:

Since way back in 4.8, we've had a banner with To request update recommendations, configure a channel that supports your version when ClusterVersion has RetrievedUpdates=False . But that's only one of several reasons we could be RetrievedUpdates=False. Can we pivot to passing through the ClusterVersion condition message?

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.8 and later.

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Launch a cluster-bot cluster like 4.11.12.
2. Set a channel with oc adm upgrade channel stable-4.11.
3. Scale down the CVO with oc scale --replicas 0 -n openshift-cluster-version deployments/cluster-version-operator.
4. Patch in a RetrievedUpdates condition with:

$ CONDITIONS="$(oc get -o json clusterversion version | jq -c '[.status.conditions[] | if .type == "RetrievedUpdates" then .status = "False" | .message = "Testing" else . end]')"
$ oc patch --subresource status clusterversion version --type json -p "[{\"op\": \"add\", \"path\": \"/status/conditions\", \"value\": ${CONDITIONS}}]"

5. View the admin console at /settings/cluster.

Actual results:

Advice about configuring the channel (but it's already configured).

Expected results:

See the message you patched into the RetrievedUpdates condition.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-6799. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:
The pipelines -> repositories list view in Dev Console does not show the running pipelineline as the last pipelinerun in the table.

Original BugZilla Link: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2016006
OCPBUGSM: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGSM-36408

Tracker issue for bootimage bump in 4.12. This issue should block issues which need a bootimage bump to fix.

The previous bump was OCPBUGS-5960.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3304. The following is the description of the original issue:

Assisted-service can use only one mirror of the release image. In the install-config, the user may specify multiple matching mirrors. Currently the last matching mirror is the one used by assisted-service. This is confusing; we should use the first matching one instead.

Since 4.11 OCP comes with OperatorHub definition which declares a capability
and enables all catalog sources. For OKD we want to enable just community-operators
as users may not have Red Hat pull secret set.
This commit would ensure that OKD version of marketplace operator gets
its own OperatorHub manifest with a custom set of operator catalogs enabled

Description of problem:

For OVNK to become CNCF complaint, we need to support session affinity timeout feature and enable the e2e's on OpenShift side. This bug tracks the efforts to get this into 4.12 OCP.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

TestEditUnmanagedPodDisruptionBudget flakes in the console-operator e2e

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12

How reproducible:

Flake

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Check https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/pull/openshift_console-operator/665/pull-ci-openshift-console-operator-master-e2e-aws-operator/1562005782164148224
2.
3.

Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

There is a chance that the PDB instances is not present since prior to the Unmanaged* TCs the RemoveTest is running which is removing all the console resources (Pods, Services, PDBs, ...).

 

Description of problem:

The default catalogSources in the openshift-4.12 payload are using the 4.12 image tag

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install a 4.12 OpenShift cluster
2. Inspect the default catalogSource image tags.

Actual results:

The default catalogSources reference the 4.11 image tags.

Expected results:

The default catalogSources reference the 4.12 image tags.

Additional info:

 

 

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3172. The following is the description of the original issue:

Customer is trying to install the Logging operator, which appears to attempt to install a dynamic plugin. The operator installation fails in the console because permissions aren't available to "patch resource consoles".

We shouldn't block operator installation if permission issues prevent dynamic plugin installation.

This is an OSD cluster, presumably for a customer with "cluster-admin", although it may be a paired down permission set called "dedicated-admin".

See https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hYS-bm6aH7S6z7We76dn9XOFcpi9CGYcGoJys514YSY/edit for permissions investigation work on OSD

Copied from an upstream issue: https://github.com/operator-framework/operator-lifecycle-manager/issues/2830

What did you do?

When attempting to reinstall an operator that uses conversion webhooks by

  • Deleting the operator subscription and any CSVs associated with it
  • Recreating the operator subscription

The resulting InstallPlan enters a failed state with message similar to

error validating existing CRs against new CRD's schema for "devworkspaces.workspace.devfile.io": error listing resources in GroupVersionResource schema.GroupVersionResource{Group:"workspace.devfile.io", Version:"v1alpha1", Resource:"devworkspaces"}: conversion webhook for workspace.devfile.io/v1alpha2, Kind=DevWorkspace failed: Post "https://devworkspace-controller-manager-service.test-namespace.svc:443/convert?timeout=30s": service "devworkspace-controller-manager-service" not found

When the original CSVs are deleted, the operator's main deployment and service are removed, but CRDs are left in-cluster. However, since the service/CA bundle/deployment that serve the conversion webhook are removed, conversion webhooks are broken at that point. Eventually this impacts garbage collection on the cluster as well.

This can be reproduced by installing the DevWorkspace Operator from the Red Hat catalog. (I can provide yamls/upstream images that reproduce as well, if that's helpful). It may be necessary to create a DevWorkspace in the cluster before deletion, e.g. by oc apply -f https://raw.githubusercontent.com/devfile/devworkspace-operator/main/samples/plain.yaml

What did you expect to see?
Operator is able to be reinstalled without removing CRDs and all instances.

What did you see instead? Under which circumstances?
It's necessary to completely remove the operator including CRDs. For our operator (DevWorkspace), this also makes uninstall especially complicated as finalizers are used (so CRDs cannot be deleted if the controller is removed, and the controller cannot be restored by reinstalling)

Environment

operator-lifecycle-manager version: 4.10.24

Kubernetes version information: Kubernetes Version: v1.23.5+012e945 (OpenShift 4.10.24)

Kubernetes cluster kind: OpenShift

Description of problem: upon attempting to install OCP 4.10 UPI on baremetal ppc64le, the openshift-install gather command returns `panic: unsupported platform "none"`

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

OCP 4.10.16

openshift-install 4.10.24 

How reproducible:

easily

Steps to Reproduce:
1. create install config
2. create manifests
3. create ignition configs

4. openshift-install gather bootstrap --log-level "debug"

Actual results:

DEBUG OpenShift Installer 4.10.24                  
DEBUG Built from commit d63a12ba0ec33d492093a8fc0e268a01a075f5da 
DEBUG Fetching Bootstrap SSH Key Pair...           
DEBUG Loading Bootstrap SSH Key Pair...            
DEBUG Using Bootstrap SSH Key Pair loaded from state file 
DEBUG Reusing previously-fetched Bootstrap SSH Key Pair 
DEBUG Fetching Install Config...                   
DEBUG Loading Install Config...                    
DEBUG   Loading SSH Key...                         
DEBUG   Loading Base Domain...                     
DEBUG     Loading Platform...                      
DEBUG   Loading Cluster Name...                    
DEBUG     Loading Base Domain...                   
DEBUG     Loading Platform...                      
DEBUG   Loading Networking...                      
DEBUG     Loading Platform...                      
DEBUG   Loading Pull Secret...                     
DEBUG   Loading Platform...                        
DEBUG Loading Install Config from both state file and target directory 
DEBUG On-disk Install Config matches asset in state file 
DEBUG Using Install Config loaded from state file  
DEBUG Reusing previously-fetched Install Config    
panic: unsupported platform "none"

goroutine 1 [running]:
github.com/openshift/installer/pkg/terraform/stages/platform.StagesForPlatform({0x146f2d0a, 0x1619aa08})
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/installer/pkg/terraform/stages/platform/stages.go:55 +0x2ff
main.runGatherBootstrapCmd({0x14d8e028, 0x1})
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/installer/cmd/openshift-install/gather.go:115 +0x2d6
main.newGatherBootstrapCmd.func1(0xc001364500, {0xc0005a0b40, 0x2, 0x2})
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/installer/cmd/openshift-install/gather.go:65 +0x59
github.com/spf13/cobra.(*Command).execute(0xc001364500, {0xc0005a0b20, 0x2, 0x2})
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/installer/vendor/github.com/spf13/cobra/command.go:860 +0x5f8
github.com/spf13/cobra.(*Command).ExecuteC(0xc001334c80)
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/installer/vendor/github.com/spf13/cobra/command.go:974 +0x3bc
github.com/spf13/cobra.(*Command).Execute(...)
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/installer/vendor/github.com/spf13/cobra/command.go:902
main.installerMain()
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/installer/cmd/openshift-install/main.go:72 +0x29e
main.main()
        /go/src/github.com/openshift/installer/cmd/openshift-install/main.go:50 +0x125

Expected results:

I'm not really sure what I expected to happen.  I've never used that gather before..

I would assume at least no panicking.

Additional info:

Description of problem:

After IPI installing a 3-node Hub Cluster, and converting them to dual stack, fd69::/125 address is seen in the Baremetal br-ex interface

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0

How reproducible:

Ranodmly reproduced and this IP is assigned in one of the 3 master hub cluster nodes

Steps to Reproduce:

1. IPI install 4.12.0
2. Use the Convert from IPv4/IPv6 dual stack procedure. 
3. 

Actual results:

Check for the IP fd69::/125 in the br-ex interface

OVN CrashLoopBackOff

Expected results:

The IP is a internal OVNKUBE IP, and it should not appear on the interface.
fd69::2/125 should be present on br-ex, but make sure fd69::2 does not :

  1. show up as an address in the node Status.Addresses list at all
  2. exist in any Node object annotations

Additional info:

This is one of the issues in IPv6 that is discovered, the other issue is linked here as well.

`aws-ebs-csi-driver-operator` runs in the mgmt cluster and does not need to be configured with the guest cluster proxy

hypershift proxy conformance test currently fails because the `storage` CO never becomes `Available`

https://k8s-testgrid.appspot.com/redhat-hypershift#4.12-conformance-aws-ovn-proxy

Description of problem:

Cluster running 4.10.52 had three aws-ebs-csi-driver-node pods begin to consume multiple GB of memory, causing heavy node memory pressure as the pods have no memory limit. 

All other aws-ebs-csi-driver-node pods were still in the 50-70MB range:

NAME                                            CPU(cores)   MEMORY(bytes)   
aws-ebs-csi-driver-controller-59867579b-d6s2q   0m           397Mi           
aws-ebs-csi-driver-controller-59867579b-t4wgq   0m           276Mi           
aws-ebs-csi-driver-node-4rmvk                   0m           53Mi            
aws-ebs-csi-driver-node-5799f                   0m           50Mi            
aws-ebs-csi-driver-node-6dpvg                   0m           59Mi            
aws-ebs-csi-driver-node-6ldzk                   0m           65Mi            
aws-ebs-csi-driver-node-6mbk5                   0m           54Mi            
aws-ebs-csi-driver-node-bkvsr                   0m           50Mi            
aws-ebs-csi-driver-node-c2fb2                   0m           62Mi            
aws-ebs-csi-driver-node-f422m                   0m           61Mi            
aws-ebs-csi-driver-node-lwzbb                   6m           1940Mi          
aws-ebs-csi-driver-node-mjznt                   0m           53Mi            
aws-ebs-csi-driver-node-pczsj                   0m           62Mi            
aws-ebs-csi-driver-node-pmskn                   0m           3493Mi          
aws-ebs-csi-driver-node-qft8w                   0m           68Mi            
aws-ebs-csi-driver-node-v5bpx                   11m          2076Mi          
aws-ebs-csi-driver-node-vn8km                   0m           84Mi            
aws-ebs-csi-driver-node-ws6hx                   0m           73Mi            
aws-ebs-csi-driver-node-xsk7k                   0m           59Mi            
aws-ebs-csi-driver-node-xzwlh                   0m           55Mi            
aws-ebs-csi-driver-operator-8c5ffb6d4-fk6zk     5m           88Mi            

Deleting the pods caused them to recreate, with normal memory consumption levels.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.10.52

How reproducible:

Unknown

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-12272. The following is the description of the original issue:

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-11057. The following is the description of the original issue:

Description of problem:
When import a Serverless Service from a git repository the topology shows an Open URL decorator also when "Add Route" checkbox was unselected (which is selected by default).

The created kn Route makes the Service available within the cluster and the created URL looks like this: http://nodeinfo-private.serverless-test.svc.cluster.local

So the Service is NOT accidentally exposed. It's "just" that we link an internal route that will not be accessible to the user.

This might happen also for Serverless functions import flow and the import container image import flow.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Tested older versions and could see this at least on 4.10+

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:

  1. Install the OpenShift Serverless operator and create the required kn Serving resource.
  2. Navigate to the Developer perspective > Add > Import from Git
  3. Enter a git repository (like https://gitlab.com/jerolimov/nodeinfo
  4. Unselect "Add Route" and press Create

Actual results:
The topology shows the new kn Service with a Open URL decorator on the top right corner.

The button is clickable but the target page could not be opened (as expected).

Expected results:
The topology should not show an Open URL decorator for "private" kn Routes.

The topology sidebar shows similar information, we should maybe release the Link there as well with a Text+Copy button???

A fix should be tested as well with Serverless functions as container images!

Additional info:
When the user unselects the "Add route" option an additional label is added to the kn Service. This label could also be added and removed later. When this label is specified the Open URL decorator should not be shown:

metadata:
  labels:
    networking.knative.dev/visibility: cluster-local

See also:

https://github.com/openshift/console/blob/1f6e238b924f4a4337ef917a0eba8aadae161e9c/frontend/packages/knative-plugin/src/utils/create-knative-utils.ts#L108

https://github.com/openshift/console/blob/1f6e238b924f4a4337ef917a0eba8aadae161e9c/frontend/packages/knative-plugin/src/topology/components/decorators/getServiceRouteDecorator.tsx#L15-L21

Name: DNS
Description: Please change the "DNS" component to be a subcomponent "DNS" of the "Networking" component.

Component: change to "Networking".
Subcomponent: change to "DNS".

Existing fields (default assignee, default QA contact, default CC email list, etc.) should remain the same as they currently are.
Default Assignee: aos-network-edge-staff@bot.bugzilla.redhat.com
Default QA Contact: hongli@redhat.com
Default CC List: aos-network-edge-staff@bot.bugzilla.redhat.com
Additional Notes:
I filled in "Default CC email list" because the form validation would not permit me to omit it. However, it can be left empty in Bugzilla (it is currently empty).

If possible, we would like this change to be done prior to the Bugzilla-to-Jira migration to avoid the need to make the change after the migration.

Description of problem:

The icon color of Alerts in the Topology list view should be based on alert type.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

 

Steps to Reproduce:

1. create a deployment
2. Create a resource quota so that quota alert will be visible in topology list page
3. navigate to topology list page
3.

Actual results:

Alert icon color is black and white. See the screenshots

Expected results:

Alert icon color should be base on alert type. 

Additional info:

 

Description of problem:

Bootstrap fail in SNO installation

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

 

How reproducible:

always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Test this in libvirt env. Agent-config and install-config in attached.
2. Use attached agent-config and install-config to create image
3. Install SNO:
virt-install --connect qemu:///system -n control-0 -r 33000 --vcpus 8 --cdrom ./agent.iso --disk pool=installer,size=120 --boot uefi,hd,cdrom --os-variant=rhel8.5 --network network=default,mac=52:54:00:aa:aa:aa --wait=-1 --check mac_in_use=off
4. There is following error in bootkube.service log:
-- Logs begin at Fri 2022-09-30 08:58:21 UTC, end at Fri 2022-09-30 09:19:40 UTC. --
Sep 30 09:00:51 test.metalkube.org systemd[1]: Starting Bootkube - bootstrap in place post reboot...
Sep 30 09:00:51 test.metalkube.org bootstrap-in-place-post-reboot.sh[2409]: Running bootkube bootstrap-in-place post reboot
Sep 30 09:00:52 test.metalkube.org bootstrap-in-place-post-reboot.sh[2409]: Waiting for api ...
Sep 30 09:00:57 test.metalkube.org bootstrap-in-place-post-reboot.sh[2409]: Waiting for api ...
Sep 30 09:01:02 test.metalkube.org bootstrap-in-place-post-reboot.sh[2409]: Waiting for api ...
Sep 30 09:01:07 test.metalkube.org bootstrap-in-place-post-reboot.sh[2409]: Waiting for api ...
Sep 30 09:01:12 test.metalkube.org bootstrap-in-place-post-reboot.sh[2409]: Waiting for api ...
Sep 30 09:01:17 test.metalkube.org bootstrap-in-place-post-reboot.sh[2409]: Approving csrs ...
Sep 30 09:01:17 test.metalkube.org bootstrap-in-place-post-reboot.sh[3045]: error: error executing jsonpath "{.items[0].status.conditions[?(@.type==\"Ready\")].status}": Error executing template: array index out of bounds: index 0, length 0. Printing more information for debugging the template:
Sep 30 09:01:17 test.metalkube.org bootstrap-in-place-post-reboot.sh[3045]:         template was:
Sep 30 09:01:17 test.metalkube.org bootstrap-in-place-post-reboot.sh[3045]:                 {.items[0].status.conditions[?(@.type=="Ready")].status}
Sep 30 09:01:17 test.metalkube.org bootstrap-in-place-post-reboot.sh[3045]:         object given to jsonpath engine was:
Sep 30 09:01:17 test.metalkube.org bootstrap-in-place-post-reboot.sh[3045]:                 map[string]interface {}{"apiVersion":"v1", "items":[]interface {}{}, "kind":"List", "metadata":map[string]interface {}{"resourceVersion":""}}
Sep 30 09:01:17 test.metalkube.org bootstrap-in-place-post-reboot.sh[2409]: Approving csrs ...
Sep 30 09:01:51 test.metalkube.org bootstrap-in-place-post-reboot.sh[3142]: error: error executing jsonpath "{.items[0].status.conditions[?(@.type==\"Ready\")].status}": Error executing template: array index out of bounds: index 0, length 0. Printing more information for debugging the template:
Sep 30 09:01:51 test.metalkube.org bootstrap-in-place-post-reboot.sh[3142]:         template was:
Sep 30 09:01:51 test.metalkube.org bootstrap-in-place-post-reboot.sh[3142]:                 {.items[0].status.conditions[?(@.type=="Ready")].status}
Sep 30 09:01:51 test.metalkube.org bootstrap-in-place-post-reboot.sh[3142]:         object given to jsonpath engine was:
Sep 30 09:01:51 test.metalkube.org bootstrap-in-place-post-reboot.sh[3142]:                 map[string]interface {}{"apiVersion":"v1", "items":[]interface {}{}, "kind":"List", "metadata":map[string]interface {}{"resourceVersion":""}}
Sep 30 09:01:51 test.metalkube.org bootstrap-in-place-post-reboot.sh[2409]: Approving csrs ...
Sep 30 09:02:21 test.metalkube.org bootstrap-in-place-post-reboot.sh[2409]: Approving csrs ...
Sep 30 09:02:52 test.metalkube.org bootstrap-in-place-post-reboot.sh[2409]: Approving csrs ...

Actual results:

 

Expected results:

 

Additional info:

 

This is a clone of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2083087 (OCPBUGSM-44070) to backport this issue.

Description of problem:
"Delete dependent objects of this resource" is a bit of confusing for some users because when creating the Application in Dev console not only the deployment but also IS, route, svc, secret objects will be created as well. When deleting the Application (in fact it is deployment), there is an option called "Delete dependent objects of this resource" and some users might think this means the IS, route, svc and any other objects which are created alongside with the deployment will be deleted as well

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.8

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create Application in Dev console
2. Delete the deployment
3. Check "Delete dependent objects of this resource"

Actual results:
Only deployment will be deleted and IS, svc, route will not be deleted

Expected results:
We either change the description of this option, or we really delete IS, svc, route and any other objects created under this Application.

Additional info:

Tracker issue for bootimage bump in 4.12. This issue should block issues which need a bootimage bump to fix.

The previous bump was OCPBUGS-1941.

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3633. The following is the description of the original issue:

I think something is wrong with the alerts refactor, or perhaps my sync to 4.12.

Failed: suite=[openshift-tests], [sig-instrumentation][Late] Alerts shouldn't report any unexpected alerts in firing or pending state [apigroup:config.openshift.io] [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]

Passed 1 times, failed 0 times, skipped 0 times: we require at least 6 attempts to have a chance at success

We're not getting the passes - from https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/aggregated-azure-ovn-upgrade-4.12-micro-release-openshift-release-analysis-aggregator/1592021681235300352, the successful runs don't show any record of the test at all. We need to record successes and failures for aggregation to work right.