Problem:

Certain Insights Advisor features differentiate between RHEL and OCP advisor

Goal:

Address top priority UI misalignments between RHEL and OCP advisor. Address UI features dropped from Insights ADvisor for OCP GA.

Scope:

Specific tasks and priority of them tracked in https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CCXDEV-7432

Managing PVs at scale for a fleet creates difficulties where "one size does not fit all". The ability for SRE to deploy prometheus with PVs and have retention based an on a desired size would enable easier management of these volumes across the fleet. 

The prometheus-operator exposes retentionSize.

This is a feature request to enable this configuration option via CMO cluster-monitoring-config ConfigMap.

cc Simon Pasquier  

Problem Alignment

The Problem

Today, all configuration for setting individual, for example, routing configuration is done via a single configuration file that only admins have access to. If an environment uses multiple tenants and each tenant, for example, has different systems that they are using to notify teams in case of an issue, then someone needs to file a request w/ an admin to add the required settings.

That can be bothersome for individual teams, since requests like that usually disappear in the backlog of an administrator. At the same time, administrators might get tons of requests that they have to look at and prioritize, which takes them away from more crucial work.

We would like to introduce a more self service approach whereas individual teams can create their own configuration for their needs w/o the administrators involvement.

Last but not least, since Monitoring is deployed as a Core service of OpenShift there are multiple restrictions that the SRE team has to apply to all OSD and ROSA clusters. One restriction is the ability for customers to use the central Alertmanager that is owned and managed by the SRE team. They can't give access to the central managed secret due to security concerns so that users can add their own routing information.

High-Level Approach

Provide a new API (based on the Operator CRD approach) as part of the Prometheus Operator that allows creating a subset of the Alertmanager configuration without touching the central Alertmanager configuration file.

Please note that we do not plan to support additional individual webhooks with this work. Customers will need to deploy their own version of the third party webhooks.

Goal & Success

• Allow users to deploy individual configurations that allow setting up Alertmanager for their needs without an administrator.

Solution Alignment

Key Capabilities

• As an OpenShift administrator, I want to control who can CRUD individual configuration so that I can make sure that any unknown third person can touch the central Alertmanager instance shipped within OpenShift Monitoring.
• As a team owner, I want to deploy a routing configuration to push notifications for alerts to my system of choice.

Key Flows

Team A wants to send all their important notifications to a specific Slack channel.

• Administrator gives permission to Team A to allow creating a new configuration CR in their individual namespace.
• Team A creates a new configuration CR.
• Team A configures what alerts should go into their Slack channel.
• Open Questions & Key Decisions (optional)
• Do we want to improve anything inside the developer console to allow configuration?

Copy/paste from [_https://github.com/openshift-cs/managed-openshift/issues/60_]

Which service is this feature request for?
OpenShift Dedicated and Red Hat OpenShift Service on AWS

What are you trying to do?
Allow ROSA/OSD to integrate with AWS Managed Prometheus.

Describe the solution you'd like
Remote-write of metrics is supported in OpenShift but it does not work with AWS Managed Prometheus since AWS Managed Prometheus requires AWS SigV4 auth.

• Note that Prometheus supports AWS SigV4 since v2.26 and OpenShift 4.9 uses v2.29.

Describe alternatives you've considered
There is the workaround to use the "AWS SigV4 Proxy" but I'd think this is not properly supported by RH.
https://mobb.ninja/docs/rosa/cluster-metrics-to-aws-prometheus/

Additional context
The customer wants to use an open and portable solution to centralize metrics storage and analysis. If they also deploy to other clouds, they don't want to have to re-configure. Since most clouds offer a Prometheus service (or it's easy to self-manage Prometheus), app migration should be simplified.

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Feature Template descriptions and documentation.

Feature Overview.

Early customer feedback is that they see SNO as a great solution covering smaller footprint deployment, but are wondering what is the evolution story OpenShift is going to provide where more capacity or high availability are needed in the future.

While migration tooling (moving workload/config to new cluster) could be a mid-term solution, customer desire is not to include extra hardware to be involved in this process.

 For Telecommunications Providers, at the Far Edge they intend to start small and then grow. Many of these operators will start with a SNO-based DU deployment as an initial investment, but as DUs evolve, different segments of the radio spectrum are added, various radio hardware is provisioned and features delivered to the Far Edge, the Telecommunication Providers desire the ability for their Far Edge deployments to scale up from 1 node to 2 nodes to n nodes. On the opposite side of the spectrum from SNO is MMIMO where there is a robust cluster and workloads use HPA.

Goals

• Provide the capability to expand a single replica control plane topology to host more workloads capacity - add worker
• Provide the capability to expand a single replica control plane to be a highly available control plane
• To satisfy MMIMO Telecommunications providers will want the ability to scale a SNO to a multi-node cluster that can support HPA.
• Telecommunications providers do not want workload (DU specifically) downtime when migrating from SNO to a multi-node cluster.
• Telecommunications providers wish to be able to scale from one to two or more nodes to support a variety of radio hardware.
• Support CP scaling (CP HA) for 2 node cluster, 3 node cluster and n node cluster. As the number of nodes in the cluster increases so does the failure domain of the cluster. The cluster is now supporting more cell sectors and therefore has more of a need for HA and resiliency including the cluster CP.

Requirements

• TBD

(Optional) Use Cases

This Section:

• Main success scenarios - high-level user stories
• Alternate flow/scenarios - high-level user stories
• ...

Questions to answer…

• ...

Out of Scope

• …

Background, and strategic fit

This Section: What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? What context can be provided to frame this feature.

Assumptions

• ...

Customer Considerations

• ...

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

• What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
• Does this feature have doc impact?
• New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
• If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
• What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
• How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
• What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
• Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
• What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

Feature Overview

• As an infrastructure owner, I want a repeatable method to quickly deploy the initial OpenShift cluster.

• As an infrastructure owner, I want to install the first (management, hub, “cluster 0”) cluster to manage other (standalone, hub, spoke, hub of hubs) clusters.

Goals

• Enable customers and partners to successfully deploy a single “first” cluster in disconnected, on-premises settings

Requirements

4.11 MVP Requirements

• Customers and partners needs to be able to download the installer
• Enable customers and partners to deploy a single “first” cluster (cluster 0) using single node, compact, or highly available topologies in disconnected, on-premises settings
• Installer must support advanced network settings such as static IP assignments, VLANs and NIC bonding for on-premises metal use cases, as well as DHCP and PXE provisioning environments.
• Installer needs to support automation, including integration with third-party deployment tools, as well as user-driven deployments.
• In the MVP automation has higher priority than interactive, user-driven deployments.
• For bare metal deployments, we cannot assume that users will provide us the credentials to manage hosts via their BMCs.
• Installer should prioritize support for platforms None, baremetal, and VMware.
• The installer will focus on a single version of OpenShift, and a different build artifact will be produced for each different version.
• The installer must not depend on a connected registry; however, the installer can optionally use a previously mirrored registry within the disconnected environment.

Use Cases

• As a Telco partner engineer (Site Engineer, Specialist, Field Engineer), I want to deploy an OpenShift cluster in production with limited or no additional hardware and don’t intend to deploy more OpenShift clusters [Isolated edge experience].
• As a Enterprise infrastructure owner, I want to manage the lifecycle of multiple clusters in 1 or more sites by first installing the first  (management, hub, “cluster 0”) cluster to manage other (standalone, hub, spoke, hub of hubs) clusters [Cluster before your cluster].
• As a Partner, I want to package OpenShift for large scale and/or distributed topology with my own software and/or hardware solution.
• As a large enterprise customer or Service Provider, I want to install a “HyperShift Tugboat” OpenShift cluster in order to offer a hosted OpenShift control plane at scale to my consumers (DevOps Engineers, tenants) that allows for fleet-level provisioning for low CAPEX and OPEX, much like AKS or GKE [Hypershift].
• As a new, novice to intermediate user (Enterprise Admin/Consumer, Telco Partner integrator, RH Solution Architect), I want to quickly deploy a small OpenShift cluster for Poc/Demo/Research purposes.

Questions to answer…

Out of Scope

Out of scope use cases (that are part of the Kubeframe/factory project):

• As a Partner (OEMs, ISVs), I want to install and pre-configure OpenShift with my hardware/software in my disconnected factory, while allowing further (minimal) reconfiguration of a subset of capabilities later at a different site by different set of users (end customer) [Embedded OpenShift].
• As an Infrastructure Admin at an Enterprise customer with multiple remote sites, I want to pre-provision OpenShift centrally prior to shipping and activating the clusters in remote sites.

Background, and strategic fit

• This Section: What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? What context can be provided to frame this feature.

Assumptions

1. The user has only access to the target nodes that will form the cluster and will boot them with the image presented locally via a USB stick. This scenario is common in sites with restricted access such as government infra where only users with security clearance can interact with the installation, where software is allowed to enter in the premises (in a USB, DVD, SD card, etc.) but never allowed to come back out. Users can't enter supporting devices such as laptops or phones.
2. The user has access to the target nodes remotely to their BMCs (e.g. iDrac, iLo) and can map an image as virtual media from their computer. This scenario is common in data centers where the customer provides network access to the BMCs of the target nodes.
3. We cannot assume that we will have access to a computer to run an installer or installer helper software.

Customer Considerations

• ...

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

• What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
• Does this feature have doc impact?
• New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
• If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
• What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
• How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
• What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
• Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
• What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

References

• Bootable Ephemeral Installer Image for Disconnected Cluster 0 Deployments

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Feature Template descriptions and documentation.
<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Feature --->
<--- Remove the descriptive text as appropriate --->

Feature Overview

• As RH OpenShift Product Owners, we want to enable new providers/platforms/service with varying levels of capabilities and integration with minimal reliance on OpenShift Engineering.
• As a new provider/platform partner, I want to enable my solution (hardware and/or software) with OpenShift with minimal effort.

Problem

• It is currently challenging for us to enable new platforms / providers without taking the heavy burden on doing the platform specific development ourselves.

Goals

• We want to enable the long-tail new platforms/providers to expand our reach into new markets and/or support new use cases.
• We want to remove strict dependencies we have on Engineering teams to review, support and test new providers.
• We want to lower the effort required for onboarding new platforms/providers.
• We want to enable new platform/providers to self-certify.
• We want to define tiered model for provider/platform integration that delineates ownership and responsibilities throughout new provider/platform development lifecycle and support model.
• We want to reduce time to onboard new provider/platform – ideally to a single release.
• We want to maintain consistent customer experience across all providers/platforms.

Requirements

• Step-by-step guide on how to add a new platform/provider for each tier
• Certification tool for partner to self-certify
• Certification tool results for (at least) each Y/minor release submitted by partner to Red Hat for acknowledgement
• DCI program to enable partners to run CI with OpenShift on their platform
• Well documented, accessible, and up-to-date test suites for providing the test coverage of the partner
• CI includes upgrade testing of OpenShift with partner's components
• Partner component upgrade failure should not block OpenShift upgrade
• Partner code is available in repositories in the openshift org on github with an open source license compatible with OpenShift

(Optional) Use Cases

This Section:

• Main success scenarios - high-level user stories
• Alternate flow/scenarios - high-level user stories
• ...

Questions to answer…

• ...

Out of Scope

• …

Background, and strategic fit

This Section: What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? What context can be provided to frame this feature.

Assumptions

• ...

Customer Considerations

• ...

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

• What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
• Does this feature have doc impact?
• New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
• If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
• What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
• How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
• What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
• Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
• What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

References

• [ Notes - OpenShift Everywhere - Onboarding new providers/platforms|https://www.google.com/url?q=[https://docs.google.com/document/d/1M1zLG2-wmkeCWTS8omN5G8vsDKvDeZfmegsi7cCVh-U/edit?usp%3Dsharing&sa=D&source=calendar&ust=1641920246517943&usg=AOvVaw2ZIl_XuE7OsSr4wCmRjOp3]] 
• OKD Installer Architecture Brainstorming Working Group Meeting Minutes
• New-Platform Documentation Working Group Meeting Minutes

Goal

Increase integration of Shipwright, Tekton, Argo CD in OpenShift GitOps with OpenShift platform and related products such as ACM.

Feature Overview

We drive OpenShift cross-market customer success and new customer adoption with constant improvements and feature additions to the existing capabilities of our OpenShift Core Networking (SDN and Network Edge). This feature captures that natural progression of the product.

Goals

• Feature enhancements (performance, scale, configuration, UX, ...)
• Modernization (incorporation and productization of new technologies)

Requirements

• Core Networking Stability
• Core Networking Performance and Scale
• Core Neworking Extensibility (Multus CNIs)
• Core Networking UX (Observability)
• Core Networking Security and Compliance

In Scope

• Network Edge (ingress, DNS, LB)
• SDN (CNI plugins, openshift-sdn, OVN, network policy, egressIP, egress Router, ...)
• Networking Observability

Out of Scope

There are definitely grey areas, but in general:

• CNV
• Service Mesh
• CNF

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

• What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
• Does this feature have doc impact?
• New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
• If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
• What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
• How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
• What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
• Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
• What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

tldr: three basic claims, the rest is explanation and one example

1. We cannot improve long term maintainability solely by fixing bugs.
2. Teams should be asked to produce designs for improving maintainability/debugability.
3. Specific maintenance items (or investigation of maintenance items), should be placed into planning as peer to PM requests and explicitly prioritized against them.

While bugs are an important metric, fixing bugs is different than investing in maintainability and debugability. Investing in fixing bugs will help alleviate immediate problems, but doesn't improve the ability to address future problems. You (may) get a code base with fewer bugs, but when you add a new feature, it will still be hard to debug problems and interactions. This pushes a code base towards stagnation where it gets harder and harder to add features.

One alternative is to ask teams to produce ideas for how they would improve future maintainability and debugability instead of focusing on immediate bugs. This would produce designs that make problem determination, bug resolution, and future feature additions faster over time.

I have a concrete example of one such outcome of focusing on bugs vs quality. We have resolved many bugs about communication failures with ingress by finding problems with point-to-point network communication. We have fixed the individual bugs, but have not improved the code for future debugging. In so doing, we chase many hard to diagnose problem across the stack. The alternative is to create a point-to-point network connectivity capability. this would immediately improve bug resolution and stability (detection) for kuryr, ovs, legacy sdn, network-edge, kube-apiserver, openshift-apiserver, authentication, and console. Bug fixing does not produce the same impact.

We need more investment in our future selves. Saying, "teams should reserve this" doesn't seem to be universally effective. Perhaps an approach that directly asks for designs and impacts and then follows up by placing the items directly in planning and prioritizing against PM feature requests would give teams the confidence to invest in these areas and give broad exposure to systemic problems.

Relevant links:

• Documentation:
  • Edge Diagnostics Scratchpad, our team's internal diagnostic guide.
  • Troubleshooting OCP networking issues - The complete guide, the SDN team's diagnostic guide.
  • Linux Performance, Brendan Gregg's guide to analyzing Linux performance issues.
  • RFC: A proper feedback loop on Alerts.
  • OpenShift Router Reload Technical Overview on Access.
  • Performance Scaling HAProxy with OpenShift on Access.
  • How to collect worker metrics to troubleshoot CPU load, memory pressure and interrupt issues and networking on worker nodes in OCP 4 on Access.
  • OpenShift Performance and Scale Knowledge Base on Mojo, results from OpenShift scalability testing.
  • Scalability and performance, OCP 4.5 documentation about the router's currently known scalability limits.
  • Scaling OpenShift Container Platform HAProxy Router, OCP 3.11 documentation about the manual performance configuration that was possible in OCP 3.
  • Timing web requests with cURL and Chrome from the Cloudflare blog.
  • tcpdump advanced filters, some useful tcpdump commands.
  • OpenShift SDN - Networking, OCP 3.11 documentation on the SDN (useful background reading).
  • Ingress Operator and Controller Status Conditions, design document for improved status condition reporting.
  • Observability tips for HAProxy, a slide deck by Willy Tarreau.
  • Interesting Traces - Out of Order versus Retransmissions, analysis using tshark.
  • The PCP Book: A Complete Documentation of Performance Co-Pilot, by Yogesh Babar.
  • Debugging kernel networking bug, brief guide to using SystemTap on RHCOS.
  • Troubleshooting throughput issues from the OCP 4.5 documentation.
  • Troubleshooting OpenShift Clusters and Workloads.
  • Red Hat Enterprise Linux Network Performance Tuning Guide (PDF).
  • openshift/enhancements#289 stability: point to point network check, a diagnostic built into the kube-apiserver operator.
• Diagnostic tools:
  • dropwatch to watch for packet drops.
  • ethtool to check NIC configuration.
  • iovisor/bcc: BCC - Tools for BPF-based Linux IO analysis, networking, monitoring, and more to trace and diagnose various issues in the networking stack.
  • r-curler to gather timing information about HTTP/HTTPS connections.
  • route-monitor, to monitor routes for reachability.
  • hping(3), a programmable packet generator.
  • OpenTracing / Jaeger in OpenShift.
  • node-problem-detector, a possible integration point for new diagnostics.
  • Using SystemTap by Brendan Gregg.
  • DTrace SystemTap cheatsheet (PDF).
• Visualization and more sophisticated diagnostic tools:
  • eldadru/ksniff, kubectl plugin for tcpdump & Wireshark.
  • ironcladlou/ditm, Dan's "Dan in the Middle" tool.
  • Skydive, network diagnostic and visualization tool.
  • ali, a "load testing tool capable of performing real-time analysis" with visualization.
• Testing tools:
  • stress-ng, a general stress-loading tool (CPU, filesystem, network, ...).
  • mb, the networking benchmarking tool written and used by Jiri Mencak from our Perf+Scale team.
• Case studies:
  • BZ1763206 is an example of diagnosing DNS latency/timeouts.
  • BZ1829779 Investigation details the diagnosis of route latency.
  • BZ1845545 is an example of diagnosing misconfigured DNS for an external LB.
  • Debugging network stalls on Kubernetes, from the GitHub Blog, about diagnosing Kubernetes performance issues related to ksoftirqd.

Feature Overview

• This Section:* High-Level description of the feature ie: Executive Summary

• Note: A Feature is a capability or a well defined set of functionality that delivers business value. Features can include additions or changes to existing functionality. Features can easily span multiple teams, and multiple releases.

Goals

• This Section:* Provide high-level goal statement, providing user context and expected user outcome(s) for this feature

• …

Requirements

• This Section:* A list of specific needs or objectives that a Feature must deliver to satisfy the Feature.. Some requirements will be flagged as MVP. If an MVP gets shifted, the feature shifts. If a non MVP requirement slips, it does not shift the feature.

(Optional) Use Cases

This Section: 

• Main success scenarios - high-level user stories

• Alternate flow/scenarios - high-level user stories

• ...

Questions to answer…

• ...

Out of Scope

• …

Background, and strategic fit

This Section: What does the person writing code, testing, documenting need to know? What context can be provided to frame this feature.

Assumptions

• ...

Customer Considerations

• ...

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:

• What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?

• Does this feature have doc impact?  

• New Content, Updates to existing content,  Release Note, or No Doc Impact

• If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.

• What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?

• How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?

• What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?

• Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.

• What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

Feature Overview

Customers are asking for improvements to the upgrade experience (both over-the-air and disconnected). This is a feature tracking epics required to get that work done.  

Goals

1. Have an option to do upgrades in more discrete steps under admin control. Specifically, these steps are: 
   • Control plane upgrade
   • Worker nodes upgrade
   • Workload enabling upgrade (i..e. Router, other components) or infra nodes
2. Better visibility into any errors during the upgrades and documentation of what they error means and how to recover. 
3. An user experience around an end-2-end back-up and restore after a failed upgrade 
4. OTA-810  - Better Documentation: 
   • Backup procedures before upgrades. 
   • More control over worker upgrades (with tagged pools between user Vs admin)
   • The kinds of pre-upgrade tests that are run, the errors that are flagged and what they mean and how to address them. 
   • Better explanation of each discrete step in upgrades, and what each CVO Operator is doing and potential errors, troubleshooting and mitigating actions.

References

• OpenShift Upgrades Customer Issues Discussion -6/22/2023
• Select Customer Experiences and Feedback on Upgrades

Feature Overview

Enable sharing ConfigMap and Secret across namespaces

Requirements

Questions to answer…

NA

Out of Scope

NA

Background, and strategic fit

Consumption of RHEL entitlements has been a challenge on OCP 4 since it moved to a cluster-based entitlement model compared to the node-based (RHEL subscription manager) entitlement mode. In order to provide a sufficiently similar experience to OCP 3, the entitlement certificates that are made available on the cluster (OCPBU-93) should be shared across namespaces in order to prevent the need for cluster admin to copy these entitlements in each namespace which leads to additional operational challenges for updating and refreshing them. 

Documentation Considerations

Questions to be addressed:
 * What educational or reference material (docs) is required to support this product feature? For users/admins? Other functions (security officers, etc)?
 * Does this feature have doc impact?
 * New Content, Updates to existing content, Release Note, or No Doc Impact
 * If unsure and no Technical Writer is available, please contact Content Strategy.
 * What concepts do customers need to understand to be successful in [action]?
 * How do we expect customers will use the feature? For what purpose(s)?
 * What reference material might a customer want/need to complete [action]?
 * Is there source material that can be used as reference for the Technical Writer in writing the content? If yes, please link if available.
 * What is the doc impact (New Content, Updates to existing content, or Release Note)?

Summary (PM+lead)

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/AUTH-2 revealed that, in prinicipal, Pod Security Admission is possible to integrate into OpenShift while retaining SCC functionality.

This epic is about the concrete steps to enable Pod Security Admission by default in OpenShift

Motivation (PM+lead)

Goals (lead)

• Enable Pod Security Admission in "restricted" policy level by default
• Migrate existing core workloads to comply to the "restricted" pod security policy level

Non-Goals (lead)

• Other OpenShift workloads must be migrated by the individual responsible teams.

Deliverables

Proposal (lead)

Enhancement - https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/pull/1010

User Stories (PM)

Dependencies (internal and external, lead)

Previous Work (lead)

Open questions (lead)

1. ...

Done Checklist

• CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
• Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
• DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
• QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
• QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
• DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-authentication-operator/pull/570
• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-csi-snapshot-controller-operator/pull/120
• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-samples-operator/pull/425

Epic Goal

HyperShift provisions OpenShift clusters with externally managed control-planes. It follows a slightly different process for provisioning clusters. For example, HyperShift uses cluster API as a backend and moves all the machine management bits to the management cluster.  

Why is this important?

showing machine management/cluster auto-scaling tabs in the console is likely to confuse users and cause unnecessary side effects. 

Definition of Done

• MachineConfig and MachineConfigPool should not be present, they should be either removed or hidden when the cluster is spawned using HyperShift. 
• Cluster Settings show say the control plane is externally managed and be read-only.
• Cluster Settings -> Configuration resources should be read-only, maybe hide the tab
• Some resources should go in an allowlist. Most will be hidden
• Review getting started steps

See Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1k76JtRRHBdCCEjHPqKcYvbNVsuaGmRhWDLESWIm0mbo/edit#

Setup / Testing

It's based on the SERVER_FLAG controlPlaneTopology being set to External is really the driving factor here; this can be done in one of two ways:

• Locally via a Bridge Variable, export BRIDGE_CONTROL_PLANE_TOPOLOGY_MODE="External"
• Locally / OnCluster via modifying the window.SERVER_FLAGS.controlPlaneTopology to External in the dev tools

To test work related to cluster upgrade process, use a 4.10.3 cluster set on the candidate-4.10 upgrade channel using 4.11 frontend code.

Epic Goal

• Ensure that OCP Admin console can enable dark mode
• Mechanism for switching between light/dark mode, based on user preferences or User Settings in OCP
• Identify changes needed for OCP console's dynamic plugins
• Status as we work through the stories: https://docs.google.com/document/d/18ib0A9ZtSYo1e2aOtM2LtZcsNFs1aRCHXx6NAPsIAso/edit#

Why is this important?

• So the UX satisfies the current trands, where dark mode is becoming a standard for modern services.  

Acceptance Criteria

• OCP admin console must be rendered in a preferred mode based on `prefers-color-scheme` media query
• OCP admin console must be rendered in a preferred mode selected in the User Setting page
• Create an followup epic/story for and listing and tracking changes needed in OCP console's dynamic plugins

Dependencies (internal and external)

1. PatternFly - Dark mode PF variables

Previous Work (Optional):

1. Mike Coker has worked on a POC from the PF point of view on both the admin and dev console, and the screenshot results are listed below along with the repo branch. Also listed is a document covering some of the common issues found when putting together the admin console POC. https://github.com/mcoker/console/tree/dark-theme
   Background POC work completed for reference:

PatternFly Dark Theme Handbook: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1mRYEfUoOjTsSt7hiqjbeplqhfo3_rVDO0QqMj2p67pw/edit

Admin Console -> Workloads & Pods

• Screenshots: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1BoOpXpX96_uNUhVJiEqGUCZ-JMYh1A78fXJhk3H86K8/edit#slide=id.p
• Github branch: https://github.com/mcoker/console/tree/dark-theme
• Github PR for Dark Theme WIP by Vikram: https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/10947{}

Dev Console -> Gotcha pages: Observe Dashboard and Metrics, Add, Pipelines: builder, list, log, and run

• Screenshots: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/13jagAf_JEu82hd_KpEHRmj25xCEqwImWpNufzVopuUs/edit#slide=id.p
• Github branch: https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/10815
• Evaluation: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1fBCPPb4Z1sqUDKgQkpueGe8VQZo4pBUA9PV4vnFCnDw/edit#gid=0

Open questions::

1. Who should be responsible for updating DynamicPlugins to be able to render in dark mode?

An epic we can duplicate for each release to ensure we have a place to catch things we ought to be doing regularly but can tend to fall by the wayside.

This epic contains all the Dynamic Plugins related stories for OCP release-4.11 

Epic Goal

• Track all the stories under a single epic

Acceptance Criteria

Goal

• Add the ability for users to select supported but not recommended updates.
• Refine workflow when both "upgradeable=false" and "supported-but-not-recommended" updates occur

Background
RFE: for 4.10, Cincinnati and the cluster-version operator are adding conditional updates (a.k.a. targeted edge blocking): https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OTA-267

High-level plans in https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/master/enhancements/update/targeted-update-edge-blocking.md#update-client-support-for-the-enhanced-schema

Example of what the oc adm upgrade UX will be in https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/master/enhancements/update/targeted-update-edge-blocking.md#cluster-administrator.

The oc implementation landed via https://github.com/openshift/oc/pull/961.

Design

• Use case 01: "supported but not recommended" occurs to the latest version:
  • Add an info icon next to the version on update path with a pop-over to explain about why updating to this version is supported, but not recommended and a link to known risks
  • Identify the difference in "recommended" versions, "supported but not recommended" versions, and "blocked" versions (upgradeable=false) in the + more modal.
  • The latest version is pre-selected in the dropdown in the update modal with an inline alert to inform users about supported-but-not-recommended version with link to known risks. Users can choose to update to another recommended versions, update to a supported-but-not-recommended one, or wait.
  • The "recommended" and "supported but not recommended" updates are separated in the dropdown.
  • If a user selects a "recommended" update, the inline alert disappears.
• Use case 02: When both "upgradeable=false" and "supported but not recommended" occur:
  • Add an alert banner to explain why users shouldn’t update to the latest version and link to how to resolve on the cluster settings details page. Users have the options to resolve the issue, update to a patch version, or wait.
  • If users open the update modal without resolving the "upgradeable=false" issue, the next recommended version is pre-selected. An expandable link "View blocked versions (#)" is included under the dropdown to show "upgradeable=false" versions with resolve link.
  • If users resolve the "upgradeable=false" issue, the cluster settings page will change to use case 01

• • Question: Priority on changing the upgradeable=false alert banner in update modal and blocked versions in dropdown

See design doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Nja4whdsI5dKmQNS_rXyN8IGtRXDJ8gXuU_eSxBLMIY/edit#

See marvel: https://marvelapp.com/prototype/h3ehaa4/screen/86077932

Epic Goal

• Add telemetry so that we know how image stream features are used.

Why is this important?

• We have a long standing epic to create image streams v2. We need to better understand how image streams are used today.

Scenarios

1. ...

Acceptance Criteria

• CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
• Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
• ...

Dependencies (internal and external)

1. ...

Previous Work (Optional):

1. …

Open questions::

1. …

Done Checklist

• CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
• Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
• DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
• QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
• QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
• DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Epic Goal

• Make the image registry distributed across availability zones.

Why is this important?

• The registry should be highly available and zone failsafe.

Scenarios

1. As an administrator I want to rely on a default configuration that spreads image registry pods across topology zones so that I don't suffer from a long recovery time (>6 mins) in case of a complete zone failure if all pods are impacted.

Acceptance Criteria

• CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
• Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.

Dependencies (internal and external)

1. Pod's topologySpreadConstraints

Done Checklist

• CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
• Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
• DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: https://github.com/openshift/cluster-image-registry-operator/pull/730
• DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
• QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
• QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
• DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Goal

Remove Jenkins from the OCP Payload.

Problem

• Jenkins images are "non-trival in size, impact experience around OCP payloads
• Security advisories cannot be handled once, but against all actively supported OCP releases, adding to response time for handling said advisories
• Some customers may now want to upgrade Jenkins as OCP upgrades (making this configurable is more ideal)

Why is this important

• This is an engineering motivated item to reduce costs so we have more cycles for strategic work
• Aside from the team itself, top level OCP architects want this to reduce the image size, improve general OCP upgrade experience
• Sends a mix message with respect to what is startegic CI/CI when Jenkins is baked into OCP, but Tekton/Pipelines is an add-on, day 2 install sort of thing

Dependencies (internal and external)

See epic linking - need alternative non payload image available to provide relatively seamless migration

Also, the EP for this is approved and merged at https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/master/enhancements/builds/remove-jenkins-payload.md

Estimate (xs, s, m, l, xl, xxl):

Questions:

• in addition to needing the CPaaS Image available first, have we confirmed the "deprecate first, then remove" requirements?  Per grooming we've assigned Rob Gormley the task https://issues.redhat.com/browse/JKNS-274 for tracking this down.  I will be reaching out to Ben Parees (he is currently on vacation) to confirm from an OCP staff engineer / architect perspective if his approval of https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/pull/841 is sufficient signoff from that end.

       PARTIAL ANSWER ^^:  confirmed with Ben Parees in https://coreos.slack.com/archives/C014MHHKUSF/p1646683621293839 that EP merging is currently sufficient OCP "technical leadership" approval.

Previous work

Customers

assuming none

Epic Goal

• Remove this UI from our stack that we cannot support.

Why is this important?

• Reduce support burden.
• Remove Bugzilla burden of addressing continuous CVEs found in this project.

Acceptance Criteria

• All Prometheus upstream UI links are removed
• Related documentation is updated
• Ports/routes etc configured to expose access to this UI are removed such that no configuration we provide enables access to this UI or its codepaths.
• There is no reason any CVEs found in this UI would ever require intervention by the Monitoring Team.

Dependencies (internal and external)

1. Make the Prometheus Targets information available in Console UI (https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MON-1079)

Previous Work (Optional):

1. …

Open questions::

1. …

Done Checklist

• CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
• Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
• DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
• QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
• QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
• DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Epic Goal

When users configure CMO to interact with systems outside of an OpenShift cluster, we want to provide an easy way to add the cluster ID to the data send.

Why is this important?

Technically this can be achieved today, by adding an identifying label to the remote_write configuration for a given cluster. The operator adding the remote_write integration needs to take care that the label is unique over the managed fleet of clusters. This however adds management complexity. Any given cluster already has a pseudo-unique datum, that can be used for this purpose.

• Starting in 4.9 we support the Prometheus remote_write feature to send metric data to a storage integration outside of the cluster similar to our own Telemetry service.
• In Telemetry we already use the cluster ID to distinguish the various clusters.
• For users of remote_write this could add an easy way to add such distinguishing information.

Scenarios

1. An organisation with multiple OpenShift clusters want to store their metric data centralized in a dedicated system and use remote_write in all their clusters to send this data. When querying their centralized storage, metadata (here a label) is needed to separate the data of the various clusters.
2. Service providers who manage multiple clusters for multiple customers via a centralized storage system need distinguishing metadata too. See https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSD-6573 for example

Acceptance Criteria

• CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
• Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
• Document how to use this feature

Dependencies (internal and external)

1. none

Previous Work (Optional):

1. none

Open questions::

Done Checklist

• CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
• Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
• DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
• QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
• QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
• DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

Implementation proposal:

Expose a flag in the CMO configuration, that is false by default (keeps backward compatibility) and when set to true will add the _id label to a remote_write configuration. More specifically it will be added to the top of a remote_write relabel_config list via the replace action. This will add the label as expect, but additionally a user could alter this label in a later relabel config to suit any specific requirements (say rename the label or add additional information to the value).
The location of this flag is the remote_write Spec, so this can be set for individual remote_write configurations.

Epic Goal

• Offer the option to double the scrape intervals for CMO controlled ServiceMonitors in single node deployments
• Alternatively automatically double the same scrape intervals if CMO detects an SNO setup

The potential target ServiceMonitors are:

• kubelet
• kube-state-metrics
• node-exporter
• etcd
• openshift-state-metrics

Why is this important?

• Reduce CPU usage in SNO setups
• Specifically doubling the scrape interval is important because:

1. we are confident that this will have the least chance to interfere with existing rules. We typically have rate queries over the last 2 minutes (no shorter time window). With 30 second scrape intervals (the current default) this gives us 4 samples in any 2 minute window. rate needs at least 2 samples to work, we want another 2 for failure tolerance. Doubling the scrape interval will still give us 2 samples in most 2 minute windows. If a scrape fails, a few rule evaluations might fail intermittently.
2. We expect a measureable reduction of CPU resources (see previous work)

Scenarios

1. RAN deployments (Telco Edge) are SNO deployments. In these setups a full CMO deployment is often not needed and the default setup consumes too many resources. OpenShift as a whole has only very limited CPU cycles available and too many cycles are spend on Monitoring

Acceptance Criteria

• CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
• Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.
• ...

Previous Work (Optional):

1. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/MON-1569

Open questions:

1. Whether doubling some scrape intervals reduces CPU usage to fit into the assigned budget

Non goals

• Allow arbitrarily long scrape intervals. This will interfere with alert and recoring rules
• Implement a global override to scrape intervals.

Problem:

This epic is mainly focused on the 4.10 Release QE activities

Goal:

1. Identify the scenarios for automation
2. Segregate the test Scenarios into smoke, Regression and other user stories
a. Update the https://docs.jboss.org/display/ODC/Automation+Status+Report
3. Align with layered operator teams for updating scripts
3. Work closely with dev team for epic automation
4. Create the automation scripts using cypress
5. Implement CI for nightly builds
6. Execute scripts on sprint basis

Why is it important?

To the track the QE progress at one place in 4.10 Release Confluence page

Use cases:

1. <case>

Acceptance criteria:

1. <criteria>

Dependencies (External/Internal):

Design Artifacts:

Exploration:

Note:

Goal:

This epic covers a number of customer requests(RFEs) as well as increases usability.

Why is it important?

Customer satisfaction as well as improved usability.

Acceptance Criteria

1. Allow user to re-arrange the resources which have ben added to nav by the user
2. Improved user experience (form based experience)
   1. Form based editing of Routes
   2. Form based creation and editing of Config Maps
   3. Form base creation of Deployments
3. Improved discovery
   1. Include Share my project on the Add page to increase discoverability
   2. NS Helm Chart Repo
      1. Add tile to Add page for discoverability
      2. Provide a form driven creation experience
      3. User should be able to switch back and forth from Form/YAML
      4. change the intro text to the below & have the link in the intro text bring up the full page form
         1. Browse for charts that help manage complex installations and upgrades. Cluster administrators can customize the content made available in the catalog. Alternatively, developers can try to configure their own custom Helm Chart repository.

Dependencies (External/Internal):

None

Exploration:

Miro board from Epic Exploration

Problem:

Currently we are only able to get limited telemetry from the Dev Sandbox, but not from any of our managed clusters or on prem clusters.

Goals:

1. Enable gathering segment telemetry whenever cluster telemetry is enabled on OSD clusters
2. Have our OSD clusters opt into telemetry by default
3. Work with PM & UX to identify additional metrics to capture in addition to what we have enabled currently on Sandbox.
4. Ability to get a single report from woopra across all of our Sandbox and OSD clusters.
5. Be able to generate a report including metrics of a single cluster or all clusters of a certain type ( sandbox, or OSD)

Why is it important?

In order to improve properly analyze usage and the user experience, we need to be able to gather as much data as possible.

Goal:
Enhance oc adm release new (and related verbs info, extract, mirror) with heterogeneous architecture support

Epic Goal

• Update image registry dependencies (Kubernetes and OpenShift) to the latest versions.

Why is this important?

• New versions usually bring improvements that are needed by the registry and help with getting updates for z-stream.

Scenarios

1. As an OpenShift engineer, I want my components to use the versions of dependencies, so that they get fixes for known issues and can be easily updated in z-stream.

Acceptance Criteria

• CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated

Dependencies (internal and external)

1. Kubernetes 1.24

Previous Work (Optional):

1. IR-210

Done Checklist

• CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
• DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>

Epic Goal

• Provide a dedicated dashboard for NVIDIA GPU usage visualization in the OpenShift Console.

Why is this important?

• Customers that use GPUs in their clusters usually have the GPU workloads as the main purpose of their cluster. As such, it makes much more sense to have the details about the usage they are doing of GPGPU resources AND CPU/RAM rather than just CPU/RAM

Scenarios

1. As an admin of a cluster dedicated to data science, I want to quickly find out how much of my very costly resources are currently in use and if things are getting queued due to lack of resources

Acceptance Criteria

• CI - MUST be running successfully with tests automated
• Release Technical Enablement - Provide necessary release enablement details and documents.

Dependencies (internal and external)

1. The NVIDIA GPU Operator must export to prometheus the relevant data

Open questions::

1. Will NVIDIA agree to these extra data exports in their GPU Operator?

I asked Zvonko Kaiser and he seemed open to it. I need to confirm with Shiva Merla

Done Checklist

• CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
• Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
• DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
• QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
• QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
• DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

OCP/Telco Definition of Done
Epic Template descriptions and documentation.

<--- Cut-n-Paste the entire contents of this description into your new Epic --->

Epic Goal

• Run OpenShift builds that do not execute as the "root" user on the host node.

Why is this important?

• OpenShift builds require an elevated set of capabilities to build a container image
• Builds currently run as root to maintain adequate performance
• Container workloads should run as non-root from the host's perspective. Containers running as root are a known security risk.
• Builds currently run as root and require a privileged container. See BUILD-225 for removing the privileged container requirement.

Scenarios

1. Run BuildConfigs in a multi-tenant environment
2. Run BuildConfigs in a heightened security environment/deployment

Acceptance Criteria

• Developers can opt into running builds in a cri-o user namespace by providing an environment variable with a specific value.
• When the correct environment variable is provided, builds run in a cri-o user namespace, and the build pod does not require the "privileged: true" security context.
• User namespace builds can pass basic test scenarios for the Docker and Source strategy build.
• Steps to run unprivileged builds are documented.

Dependencies (internal and external)

1. Buildah supports running inside a non-privileged container
2. CRI-O allows workloads to opt into running containers in user namespaces.

Previous Work (Optional):

1. BUILD-225 - remove privileged requirement for builds.

Open questions::

1. …

Done Checklist

• CI - CI is running, tests are automated and merged.
• Release Enablement <link to Feature Enablement Presentation>
• DEV - Upstream code and tests merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Upstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR or GitHub Issue>
• DEV - Downstream build attached to advisory: <link to errata>
• QE - Test plans in Polarion: <link or reference to Polarion>
• QE - Automated tests merged: <link or reference to automated tests>
• DOC - Downstream documentation merged: <link to meaningful PR>

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-baremetal-operator/pull/321

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-kube-apiserver-operator/pull/1448
• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-kube-controller-manager-operator/pull/703
• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-kube-scheduler-operator/pull/464

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-8491. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

Image registry pods panic while deploying OCP in ap-southeast-4 AWS region

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0

How reproducible:

Deploy OCP in AWS ap-southeast-4 region

Steps to Reproduce:

Deploy OCP in AWS ap-southeast-4 region 

Actual results:

panic: Invalid region provided: ap-southeast-4

Expected results:

Image registry pods should come up with no errors

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-image-registry-operator/pull/848
• https://github.com/openshift/image-registry/pull/364

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-676. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
the machine approver isn't recognizing hostnames that use capital letters as valid even though DNS is case-insensitive

an example of this is in OHSS-14709:

I0822 19:04:51.587266       1 controller.go:114] Reconciling CSR: csr-vdtpv
I0822 19:04:51.600941       1 csr_check.go:156] csr-vdtpv: CSR does not appear to be client csr
I0822 19:04:51.603648       1 csr_check.go:542] retrieving serving cert from ip-100-66-119-117.ec2.internal (100.66.119.117:10250)
I0822 19:04:51.604003       1 csr_check.go:181] Failed to retrieve current serving cert: dial tcp 100.66.119.117:10250: connect: connection refused
I0822 19:04:51.604017       1 csr_check.go:201] Falling back to machine-api authorization for ip-100-66-119-117.ec2.internal
E0822 19:04:51.604024       1 csr_check.go:392] csr-vdtpv: DNS name 'ip-100-66-119-117.tech-ace-maint-prd.aws.delta.com' not in machine names: ip-100-66-119-117.ec2.internal ip-100-66-119-117.ec2.internal ip-100-66-119-117.tech-ACE-maint-prd.aws.delta.com
I0822 19:04:51.604033       1 csr_check.go:204] Could not use Machine for serving cert authorization: DNS name 'ip-100-66-119-117.tech-ace-maint-prd.aws.delta.com' not in machine names: ip-100-66-119-117.ec2.internal ip-100-66-119-117.ec2.internal ip-100-66-119-117.tech-ACE-maint-prd.aws.delta.com
I0822 19:04:51.606777       1 controller.go:199] csr-vdtpv: CSR not authorized

This can be worked around by manually approving the CSR

The relevant line in the machine approver appears to be here: https://github.com/openshift/cluster-machine-approver/blob/master/pkg/controller/csr_check.go#L378

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-machine-approver/pull/181

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1543

Description of problem:

During an upgrade from 4.10.0-0.nightly-2022-09-06-081345 -> 4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-09-06-074353

DNS operator stuck in progressing state with following error in dns-defalt pod

2022-09-07T00:47:35.959931289Z [WARNING] plugin/kubernetes: Kubernetes API connection failure: Get "https://172.30.0.1:443/version": dial tcp 172.30.0.1:443: i/o timeout

must-gather: http://shell.lab.bos.redhat.com/~anusaxen/must-gather-136172-050448657.tar.gz

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-09-06-074353

How reproducible:

Intermittent

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Perform upgrade from 4.10->4.11
2.
3.

Actual results:

Upgrade unsuccessful due to API svc unreachability

Expected results:

Upgrade should be successful

Additional info:

$ omg get co | grep -v "True.*False.*False"
NAME                                      VERSION                             AVAILABLE  PROGRESSING  DEGRADED  SINCE
dns                                       4.10.0-0.nightly-2022-09-06-081345  True       True         False     3h4m
network                                   4.11.0-0.nightly-2022-09-06-074353  True       True         False     3h5m

$ omg logs dns-default-5mqz4 -c dns -n openshift-dns
/home/anusaxen/Downloads/must-gather-136208-318613238/must-gather.local.4033693973186012455/quay-io-openshift-release-dev-ocp-v4-0-art-dev-sha256-d995e1608ba83a1f71b5a1c49705aa3cef38618e0674ee256332d1b0e2cb0e23/namespaces/openshift-dns/pods/dns-default-5mqz4/dns/dns/logs/current.log
2022-09-07T00:45:36.355161941Z [INFO] plugin/kubernetes: waiting for Kubernetes API before starting server
2022-09-07T00:45:36.854403897Z [INFO] plugin/kubernetes: waiting for Kubernetes API before starting server
2022-09-07T00:45:37.354367197Z [INFO] plugin/kubernetes: waiting for Kubernetes API before starting server
2022-09-07T00:45:37.861427861Z [INFO] plugin/kubernetes: waiting for Kubernetes API before starting server
2022-09-07T00:45:38.355095996Z [INFO] plugin/kubernetes: waiting for Kubernetes API before starting server
2022-09-07T00:45:38.855063626Z [INFO] plugin/kubernetes: waiting for Kubernetes API before starting server
2022-09-07T00:45:39.355170472Z [INFO] plugin/kubernetes: waiting for Kubernetes API before starting server
2022-09-07T00:45:39.855296624Z [INFO] plugin/kubernetes: waiting for Kubernetes API before starting server
2022-09-07T00:45:40.355481413Z [INFO] plugin/kubernetes: waiting for Kubernetes API before starting server
2022-09-07T00:45:40.855455283Z [WARNING] plugin/kubernetes: starting server with unsynced Kubernetes API
2022-09-07T00:45:40.856166731Z .:5353
2022-09-07T00:45:40.856166731Z [INFO] plugin/reload: Running configuration SHA512 = 7c3db3182389e270fe3af971fef9e7157a34bde01eb750d58c2d4895a965ecb2e2d00df34594b6a819653088b6efa2590e748ce23f9e16cbb0f44d74a4fc3587
2022-09-07T00:45:40.856166731Z CoreDNS-1.9.2
2022-09-07T00:45:40.856166731Z linux/amd64, go1.18.4, 
2022-09-07T00:46:05.957503195Z [WARNING] plugin/kubernetes: Kubernetes API connection failure: Get "https://172.30.0.1:443/version": dial tcp 172.30.0.1:443: i/o timeout
2022-09-07T00:47:25.444876534Z [INFO] SIGTERM: Shutting down servers then terminating
2022-09-07T00:47:25.444984367Z [INFO] plugin/health: Going into lameduck mode for 20s
2022-09-07T00:47:35.959931289Z [WARNING] plugin/kubernetes: Kubernetes API connection failure: Get "https://172.30.0.1:443/version": dial tcp 172.30.0.1:443: i/o timeout

• https://github.com/openshift/sdn/pull/488

This fix contains the following changes coming from updated version of kubernetes up to v1.24.12:

Changelog:

v1.24.12: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/release-1.24/CHANGELOG/CHANGELOG-1.24.md#changelog-since-v12411

• https://github.com/openshift/kubernetes/pull/1536
• https://github.com/openshift/kubernetes/pull/1529

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-2895. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

Current validation will not accept Resource Groups or DiskEncryptionSets which have upper-case letters.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11

How reproducible:

Attempt to create a cluster/machineset using a DiskEncryptionSet with an RG or Name with upper-case letters

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Create cluster with DiskEncryptionSet with upper-case letters in DES name or in Resource Group name

Actual results:

See error message:

encountered error: [controlPlane.platform.azure.defaultMachinePlatform.osDisk.diskEncryptionSet.resourceGroup: Invalid value: \"v4-e2e-V62447568-eastus\": invalid resource group format, compute[0].platform.azure.defaultMachinePlatform.osDisk.diskEncryptionSet.resourceGroup: Invalid value: \"v4-e2e-V62447568-eastus\": invalid resource group format]

Expected results:

Create a cluster/machineset using the existing and valid DiskEncryptionSet

Additional info:

I have submitted a PR for this already, but it needs to be reviewed and backported to 4.11: https://github.com/openshift/installer/pull/6513

• https://github.com/openshift/installer/pull/6537

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1417

Description of problem:

The 4.11 version of openshift-installer does not support the mon01 zone

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/installer/pull/6341

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-669. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

This is an OCP clone of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2099794

In summary, NetworkManager reports the network as being up before the ipv6 address of the primary interface is ready and crio fails to bind to it.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/baremetal-runtimecfg/pull/192

Description of problem:

NodePort port not accessible

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

OCP 4.8.20

How reproducible:

$oc -n ui-nprd get services -o wide
NAME TYPE CLUSTER-IP EXTERNAL-IP PORT(S) AGE SELECTOR
docker-registry ClusterIP 10.201.219.240 <none> 5000/TCP 24d app=registry
docker-registry-lb LoadBalancer 10.201.252.253 internal-xxxxxx.xx-xxxx-1.elb.amazonaws.com 5000:30779/TCP 3d22h app=registry
docker-registry-np NodePort 10.201.216.26 <none> 5000:32428/TCP 3d16h app=registry

$oc debug node/ip-xxx.ca-central-1.compute.internal
Starting pod/ip-xxx.ca-central-1computeinternal-debug ...
To use host binaries, run `chroot /host`
Pod IP: 10.81.23.96
If you don't see a command prompt, try pressing enter.
sh-4.2# chroot /host
sh-4.4# nc -vz 10.81.23.96 32428
Ncat: Version 7.70 ( https://nmap.org/ncat )
Ncat: Connection timed out.

In a new-created namespaces the same deployment works:

[RHEL7:> oc project
Using project "test-c1" on server "https://api.xx.xx.xxxx.xx.xx:6443".
[RHEL7:- ~/tmp]> oc port-forward service/docker-registry-np 5000:5000
Forwarding from 127.0.0.1:5000 -> 5000

[1]+ Stopped oc4 port-forward service/docker-registry-np 5000:5000
[RHEL7: ~/tmp]> bg %1
[1]+ oc4 port-forward service/docker-registry-np 5000:5000 &
[RHEL7: ~/tmp]> nc -v localhost 5000
Ncat: Version 7.50 ( https://nmap.org/ncat )
Ncat: Connected to 127.0.0.1:5000.
Handling connection for 5000

[RHEL7: ~/tmp]> kill %1
[RHEL7: ~/tmp]>
[1]+ Terminated oc4 port-forward service/docker-registry-np 5000:5000
[RHEL7: ~/tmp]> oc get services
NAME TYPE CLUSTER-IP EXTERNAL-IP PORT(S) AGE
docker-registry-np NodePort 10.201.224.174 <none> 5000:31793/TCP 68s

[RHEL7: ~/tmp]> oc get pods -o wide
NAME READY STATUS RESTARTS AGE IP NODE NOMINATED NODE READINESS GATES
registry-75b7c7fd94-rx29j 1/1 Running 0 7m5s 10.201.1.29 ip-xxx.ca-central-1.compute.internal <none> <none>
[RHEL7: ~/tmp]> oc debug node/ip-xxx.ca-central-1.compute.internal
Starting pod/ip-xxxca-central-1computeinternal-debug ...
To use host binaries, run `chroot /host`
Pod IP: 10.81.23.87
If you don't see a command prompt, try pressing enter.
sh-4.2# chroot /host
sh-4.4# nc -v 10.81.23.87 31793
Ncat: Version 7.70 ( https://nmap.org/ncat )
Ncat: Connected to 10.81.23.87:31793.

Actual results:

• Working on new created namespace
• Not working on already created namespace

Expected results:

• Suppose to work on all namespaces.

Additional info:

• This cluster get upgrade from 4.7.x to 4.8 and then they manually enable OVN.
• The issue was happening on all namespaces but after restarting the ovnkube-master-xxxx pods only the newly created namespaces work.

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1478

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3117. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3084. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Upstream Issue: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/77603

Long log lines get corrupted when using '--timestamps' by the Kubelet.

The root cause is that the buffer reads up to a new line. If the line is greater than 4096 bytes and '--timestamps' is turrned on the kubelet will write the timestamp and the partial log line. We will need to refactor the ReadLogs function to allow for a partial line read.

https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/f892ab1bd7fd97f1fcc2e296e85fdb8e3e8fb82d/pkg/kubelet/kuberuntime/logs/logs.go#L325

apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
  name: logs
spec:
  restartPolicy: Never
  containers:
  - name: logs
    image: fedora
    args:
    - bash
    - -c
    - 'for i in `seq 1 10000000`; do echo -n $i; done'

kubectl logs logs --timestamps

• https://github.com/openshift/kubernetes/pull/1408

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-1522. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

Normal user cannot open the debug container from the pods(crashLoopbackoff) they created, And would be got error message:
pods "<pod name>" is forbidden: cannot set blockOwnerDeletion if an ownerReference refers to a resource you can't set finalizers on: , <nil>

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12.0-0.nightly-2022-09-20-040107, 4.11.z, 4.10.z

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Login OCP as a normal user
   eg: flexy-htpasswd-provider
2. Create a project, go to Developer prespective -> +Add page
3. Click "Import from Git", and provide below data to get a Pods with CrashLoopBackOff state
   Git Repo URL: https://github.com/sclorg/nodejs-ex.git
   Name: nodejs-ex-git
   Run command: star a wktw
4. Navigate to /k8s/ns/<project name>/pods page, find the pod with CrashLoopBackOff status, and go to it details page -> Logs Tab
5. Click the link of "Debug container"
6. Check if the Debug container can be opened

Actual results:

6. Error message would be shown on page, user cannot open debug container via UI
   pods "nodejs-ex-git-6dd986d8bd-9h2wj-debug-tkqk2" is forbidden: cannot set blockOwnerDeletion if an ownerReference refers to a resource you can't set finalizers on: , <nil>

Expected results:

6. Normal user could use debug container without any error message

Additional info:

The debug container could be created for the normal user successfully via CommandLine
 $ oc debug <crashloopbackoff pod name> -n <project name>

• https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/12100

clone of 4.12 bug https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGSM-47294

• https://github.com/openshift/machine-config-operator/pull/3292

The kube-state-metric pod inside the openshift-monitoring namespace is not running as expected.

On checking the logs I am able to see that there is a memory panic

~~~
2022-11-22T09:57:17.901790234Z I1122 09:57:17.901768 1 main.go:199] Starting kube-state-metrics self metrics server: 127.0.0.1:8082
2022-11-22T09:57:17.901975837Z I1122 09:57:17.901951 1 main.go:66] levelinfomsgTLS is disabled.http2false
2022-11-22T09:57:17.902389844Z I1122 09:57:17.902291 1 main.go:210] Starting metrics server: 127.0.0.1:8081
2022-11-22T09:57:17.903191857Z I1122 09:57:17.903133 1 main.go:66] levelinfomsgTLS is disabled.http2false
2022-11-22T09:57:17.906272505Z I1122 09:57:17.906224 1 builder.go:191] Active resources: certificatesigningrequests,configmaps,cronjobs,daemonsets,deployments,endpoints,horizontalpodautoscalers,ingresses,jobs,leases,limitranges,mutatingwebhookconfigurations,namespaces,networkpolicies,nodes,persistentvolumeclaims,persistentvolumes,poddisruptionbudgets,pods,replicasets,replicationcontrollers,resourcequotas,secrets,services,statefulsets,storageclasses,validatingwebhookconfigurations,volumeattachments
2022-11-22T09:57:17.917758187Z E1122 09:57:17.917560 1 runtime.go:78] Observed a panic: "invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference" (runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference)
2022-11-22T09:57:17.917758187Z goroutine 24 [running]:
2022-11-22T09:57:17.917758187Z k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/runtime.logPanic(

)
2022-11-22T09:57:17.917758187Z /usr/lib/golang/src/runtime/panic.go:1038 +0x215
2022-11-22T09:57:17.917758187Z k8s.io/kube-state-metrics/v2/internal/store.ingressMetricFamilies.func6(0x40)
2022-11-22T09:57:17.917758187Z /go/src/k8s.io/kube-state-metrics/internal/store/ingress.go:136 +0x189
2022-11-22T09:57:17.917758187Z k8s.io/kube-state-metrics/v2/internal/store.wrapIngressFunc.func1(

)
2022-11-22T09:57:17.917758187Z /go/src/k8s.io/kube-state-metrics/pkg/metric_generator/generator.go:107 +0xd8
~~~

Logs are attached to the support case

• https://github.com/openshift/kube-state-metrics/pull/85

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-2079. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

The setting of systemReserved: ephemeral-storage in KubeletConfig is not working as expected. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.10.z, may exist on other OCP versions as well. 

How reproducible:

always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Create a KubeletConfig on the node:

apiVersion: machineconfiguration.openshift.io/v1
kind: KubeletConfig
metadata:
  name: system-reserved-config
spec:
  machineConfigPoolSelector:
    matchLabels:
      pools.operator.machineconfiguration.openshift.io/master: ""
  kubeletConfig:
    systemReserved:
      cpu: 500m
      memory: 500Mi
      ephemeral-storage: 10Gi


2. Check node allocatable storage with command: oc describe node |grep -C 5 ephemeral-storage

Actual results:

The Allocatable:ephemeral-storage on the node is not capacity.ephemeral-storage - systemReserved.ephemeral-storage - eviction-thresholds (10% of the capacity.ephemeral-storage by default)  

Expected results:

The Allocatable:ephemeral-storage on the node should be capacity.ephemeral-storage - systemReserved.ephemeral-storage - eviction-thresholds (10% of the capacity.ephemeral-storage by default) 

Additional info:

The root cause might be: process argument '--system-reserved=cpu=500m,memory=500Mi' overwrote the setting in /etc/kubernetes/kubelet.conf, one example:

root        6824       1 27 Sep30 ?        1-09:00:24 kubelet --config=/etc/kubernetes/kubelet.conf --bootstrap-kubeconfig=/etc/kubernetes/kubeconfig --kubeconfig=/var/lib/kubelet/kubeconfig --container-runtime=remote --container-runtime-endpoint=/var/run/crio/crio.sock --runtime-cgroups=/system.slice/crio.service --node-labels=node-role.kubernetes.io/master,node.openshift.io/os_id=rhcos --node-ip=192.168.58.47 --minimum-container-ttl-duration=6m0s --cloud-provider= --volume-plugin-dir=/etc/kubernetes/kubelet-plugins/volume/exec --hostname-override= --register-with-taints=node-role.kubernetes.io/master=:NoSchedule --pod-infra-container-image=quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-v4.0-art-dev@sha256:4a7b6408460148cb73c59677dbc2c261076bc07226c43b0c9192cc70aef5ba62 --system-reserved=cpu=500m,memory=500Mi --v=2 --housekeeping-interval=30s

• https://github.com/openshift/machine-config-operator/pull/3381

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4486. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-95. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
In an OpenShift cluster with OpenShiftSDN network plugin with egressIP and NMstate operator configured, there are some conditions when the egressIP is deconfigured from the network interface.

The bug is 100% reproducible.

Steps for reproducing the issue are:

1. Install a cluster with OpenShiftSDN network plugin.

2. Configure egressip for a project.

3. Install NMstate operator.

4. Create a NodeNetworkConfigurationPolicy.

5. Identify on which node the egressIP is present.

6. Restart the nmstate-handler pod running on the identified node.

7. Verify that the egressIP is no more present.

Restarting the sdn pod related to the identified node will reconfigure the egressIP in the node.

This issue has a high impact since any changes triggered for the NMstate operator will prevent application traffic. For example, in the customer environment, the issue is triggered any time a new node is added to the cluster.

The expectation is that NMstate operator should not interfere with SDN configuration.

• https://github.com/openshift/sdn/pull/492

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-6831. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:
The console crashes when it used with a user settings ConfigMap that is created with a 4.13+ console. This version saves "null" for the key "console.pinnedResources" which doesn't happen before and the old console version could not handle this well.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.8-4.12

How reproducible:
Always, but only in the edge case that someone used a newer console first and then downgraded.

This can happen only by manually applying the user settings ConfigMap or when downgrading a cluster.

Steps to Reproduce:
Open the user-settings ConfigMap and set "console.pinedResources" to "null" (with quotes as all ConfigMap values needs to be strings)

Or run this patch command:

oc patch -n openshift-console-user-settings configmaps user-settings-kubeadmin --type=merge --patch '{"data":{"console.pinnedResources":"null"}}'

Open console...

Actual results:
Console crashes

Expected results:
Console should not crash

• https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/12581

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5185. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-5165. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Currently, the Dev Sandbox clusters sends the clusterType "OSD" instead of "DEVSANDBOX" because the configuration annotations of the console config are automatically overridden by some SyncSets.

Open Dev Sandbox and browser console and inspect window.SERVER_FLAGS.telemetry

• https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/12413

Clone of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106803 to backport the e2e fix to 4.11 and 4.10.

Description of problem: E2E: intermittent failure is seen on tests for devfile due to network call to devfile registry

Deploy git workload with devfile from topology page: A-04-TC01

https://gcsweb-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/gcs/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/pull/openshift_console/11726/pull-ci-openshift-console-master-e2e-gcp-console/1547046629775773696/artifacts/e2e-gcp-console/test/artifacts/gui_test_screenshots/cypress/screenshots/e2e/add-flow-ci.feature/Deploy%20git%20workload%20with%20devfile%20from%20topology%20page%20A-04-TC01%20--%20after%20each%20hook%20(failed).png

https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/pull/openshift_console/11768/pull-ci-openshift-console-master-e2e-gcp-console/1547061730478133248

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible: Intermittent

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Run test for add-flow-ci.feature to test Deploy git workload with devfile from topology page: A-04-TC01

Actual results:

Expected results: Show always pass

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/12020

Description of problem:

Dummy bug that is needed to track backport of https://github.com/ovn-org/ovn-kubernetes/pull/2975/commits/816e30a1fbb5beb8b20fe3e96906285762dd8eb6 which is already merged in 4.12

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1305

Description of problem:

When adding new nodes to the existing cluster, the newly allocated node-subnet can be overlapped with the existing node.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

openshift 4.10.30

How reproducible:

It's quite hard to reproduce but  there is a possibility it can happen any time. 

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Create a OVN dual-stack cluster
2. add nodes to the existing cluster
3. check the allocated node subnet 

Actual results:

Some newly added nodes have the same node-subnet and ovn-k8s-mp0 IP as some existing nodes.

Expected results:

Should have duplicated node-subnet and ovn-k8s-mp0 IP

Additional info:

Additional info can be found at the case 03329155 and the must-gather attached(comment #1) 

% omg logs ovnkube-master-v8crc -n openshift-ovn-kubernetes -c ovnkube-master | grep '2022-09-30T06:42:50.857'
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857031565Z W0930 06:42:50.857020       1 master.go:1422] Did not find any logical switches with other-config
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857112441Z I0930 06:42:50.857099       1 master.go:1003] Allocated Subnets [10.131.0.0/23 fd02:0:0:4::/64] on Node worker01.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857122455Z I0930 06:42:50.857105       1 master.go:1003] Allocated Subnets [10.129.4.0/23 fd02:0:0:a::/64] on Node oam04.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857130289Z I0930 06:42:50.857122       1 kube.go:99] Setting annotations map[k8s.ovn.org/node-subnets:{"default":["10.131.0.0/23","fd02:0:0:4::/64"]}] on node worker01.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857140773Z I0930 06:42:50.857132       1 kube.go:99] Setting annotations map[k8s.ovn.org/node-subnets:{"default":["10.129.4.0/23","fd02:0:0:a::/64"]}] on node oam04.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857166726Z I0930 06:42:50.857156       1 master.go:1003] Allocated Subnets [10.128.2.0/23 fd02:0:0:5::/64] on Node oam01.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857176132Z I0930 06:42:50.857157       1 master.go:1003] Allocated Subnets [10.131.0.0/23 fd02:0:0:4::/64] on Node rhel01.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857176132Z I0930 06:42:50.857167       1 kube.go:99] Setting annotations map[k8s.ovn.org/node-subnets:{"default":["10.128.2.0/23","fd02:0:0:5::/64"]}] on node oam01.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857185257Z I0930 06:42:50.857157       1 master.go:1003] Allocated Subnets [10.128.6.0/23 fd02:0:0:d::/64] on Node call03.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857192996Z I0930 06:42:50.857183       1 kube.go:99] Setting annotations map[k8s.ovn.org/node-subnets:{"default":["10.131.0.0/23","fd02:0:0:4::/64"]}] on node rhel01.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857200017Z I0930 06:42:50.857190       1 kube.go:99] Setting annotations map[k8s.ovn.org/node-subnets:{"default":["10.128.6.0/23","fd02:0:0:d::/64"]}] on node call03.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857282717Z I0930 06:42:50.857258       1 master.go:1003] Allocated Subnets [10.130.2.0/23 fd02:0:0:7::/64] on Node call01.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857304886Z I0930 06:42:50.857293       1 kube.go:99] Setting annotations map[k8s.ovn.org/node-subnets:{"default":["10.130.2.0/23","fd02:0:0:7::/64"]}] on node call01.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857338896Z I0930 06:42:50.857314       1 master.go:1003] Allocated Subnets [10.128.4.0/23 fd02:0:0:9::/64] on Node f501.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857349485Z I0930 06:42:50.857329       1 master.go:1003] Allocated Subnets [10.131.2.0/23 fd02:0:0:8::/64] on Node call02.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857371344Z I0930 06:42:50.857354       1 kube.go:99] Setting annotations map[k8s.ovn.org/node-subnets:{"default":["10.128.4.0/23","fd02:0:0:9::/64"]}] on node f501.ss1.samsung.local
2022-09-30T06:42:50.857371344Z I0930 06:42:50.857361       1 kube.go:99] Setting annotations map[k8s.ovn.org/node-subnets:{"default":["10.131.2.0/23","fd02:0:0:8::/64"]}] on node call02.ss1.samsung.local

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1415

Description of problem:

For some reason, the LSP of a pod is not properly added to the port group where the ACL of a NetworkPolicy is applied. This results on the networkpolicy not being applied to the pod and communication not possible.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.10

How reproducible:

Always with a concrete pod at customer environment.

Steps to Reproduce:

(not known exactly yet)

Actual results:

LSP not in port group. ACL not applied. Netpol not in effect.

Expected results:

LSP in port group. ACL applied. Netpol in effect.

Additional info:

Details in private comments, as they involve sensitive data.

Deleting the pod does nothing, but it is possible that this has something to do with the pod being recreated with the same name (although the LSPs UUIDs are different in each incarnation).

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1447

Description of problem: Backport owners for 4.11 (only)

• https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/11936

This is a clone of OCPBUGS-853.

Description of problem:

Large OpenShift Container Platform 4.10.24 - Cluster is failing to update router-certs secret in openshift-config-managed namespace as the given secret is too big.

2022-09-01T06:24:15.157333294Z 2022-09-01T06:24:15.157Z ERROR operator.init.controller.certificate_publisher_controller controller/controller.go:266  Reconciler error  {"name": "foo-bar", "namespace": "openshift-ingress-operator", "error": "failed to ensure global secret: failed to update published router certificates secret: Secret \"router-certs\" is invalid: data: Too long: must have at most 1048576 bytes"}

The OpenShift Container Platform 4 - Cluster has 180 IngressController configured with endpointPublishingStrategy set to private.

Now the default certificate needs to be replaced but is not properly replicated to openshift-authentication namespace and potentially other location because of the problem mentioned (since the required secret can not be updated)

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

OpenShift Container Platform 4.10.24

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Install OpenShift Container Platform 4.10
2. Create 180 IngressController with specific certificates
3. Check openshift-ingress-operator logs to see how it fails to update/create the necessary secret in openshift-config-managed

Actual results:

2022-09-01T06:24:15.157333294Z 2022-09-01T06:24:15.157Z ERROR operator.init.controller.certificate_publisher_controller controller/controller.go:266  Reconciler error  {"name": "foo-bar", "namespace": "openshift-ingress-operator", "error": "failed to ensure global secret: failed to update published router certificates secret: Secret \"router-certs\" is invalid: data: Too long: must have at most 1048576 bytes"}

Expected results:

No matter how many IngressController is created, secret management taken care by Operators need to work, even if data exceed 1 MB size limitation. In that case an approach needs to exist to split data into multiple secrets or handle it otherwise.

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-ingress-operator/pull/894

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4897. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-2500. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

When the Ux switches to the Dev console the topology is always blank in a Project that has a large number of components.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Always occurs

Steps to Reproduce:

1.Create a project with at least 12 components (Apps, Operators, knative Brokers)
2. Go to the Administrator Viewpoint
3. Switch to Developer Viewpoint/Topology
4. No components displayed
5. Click on 'fit to screen'
6. All components appear

Actual results:

Topology renders with all controls but no components visible (see screenshot 1)

Expected results:

All components should be visible

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/12398

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-6672. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4684. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

In DeploymentConfig both the Form view and Yaml view are not in sync

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11.13

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. Create a DC with selector and labels as given below
spec:
  replicas: 1
  selector:
    app: apigateway
    deploymentconfig: qa-apigateway
    environment: qa
  strategy:
    activeDeadlineSeconds: 21600
    resources: {}
    rollingParams:
      intervalSeconds: 1
      maxSurge: 25%
      maxUnavailable: 25%
      timeoutSeconds: 600
      updatePeriodSeconds: 1
    type: Rolling
  template:
    metadata:
      labels:
        app: apigateway
        deploymentconfig: qa-apigateway
        environment: qa

2. Now go to GUI--> Workloads--> DeploymentConfig --> Actions--> Edit DeploymentConfig, first go to Form view and now switch to Yaml view, the selector and labels shows as app: ubi8 while it should display app: apigateway

  selector:
    app: ubi8
    deploymentconfig: qa-apigateway
    environment: qa
  template:
    metadata:
      creationTimestamp: null
      labels:
        app: ubi8
        deploymentconfig: qa-apigateway
        environment: qa

3. Now in yaml view just click reload and the value is displayed as it is when it was created (app: apigateway).

Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/12714

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-12914. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-12878. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
We want to add the dual-stack tests to the CNI plugin conformance test suite, for the currently supported releases.

(This has no impact on OpenShift itself. We're just modifying a test suite that OCP does not use.)

• https://github.com/openshift/origin/pull/27904

• https://github.com/openshift/installer/pull/6350

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1383

Description of problem: Issue described in following issue: https://github.com/openshift/multus-admission-controller/issues/40

Fixed in: https://github.com/openshift/cluster-network-operator/pull/1515

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): OCP 4.10

Official Red Hat tracker. Issue has been merged already.

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-network-operator/pull/1698

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-7445. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-7207. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
At some point in the mtu-migration development a configuration file was generated at /etc/cno/mtu-migration/config which was used as a flag to indicate to configure-ovs that a migration procedure was in progress. When that file was missing, it was assumed the migration procedure was over and configure-ovs did some cleaning on behalf of it.

But that changed and /etc/cno/mtu-migration/config is never set. That causes configure-ovs to remove mtu-migration information when the procedure is still in progress making it to use incorrect MTU values and either causing nodes to be tainted with "ovn.k8s.org/mtu-too-small" blocking the procedure itself or causing network disruption until the procedure is over.

However, this was not a problem for the CI job as it doesn't use the migration procedure as documented for the sake of saving limited time available to run CI jobs. The CI merges two steps of the procedure into one so that there is never a reboot while the procedure is in progress and hiding this issue.

This was probably not detected in QE as well for the same reason as CI.

• https://github.com/openshift/machine-config-operator/pull/3607

Missing backport from https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2093826 in 4.11.

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1310

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-7732. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

When services are deleted, the services controller cache should also remove the service from its top level cache to avoid growing forever.

While this is not an issue in 4.13 once the lb_cache rework merges [1], the 4.12 and older branches have this problem because that rework is meant for 4.13 only.

[1]: https://github.com/ovn-org/ovn-kubernetes/pull/3387

This is the location where alreadyApplied is not deleting the removal: 
https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/blob/cf9fb51510e1870961bf3a0f064b73536757a4f8/go-controller/pkg/ovn/controller/services/services_controller.go#L269

It should do the similar changes depicted here (currently merged upstream):
https://github.com/ovn-org/ovn-kubernetes/blob/cd78ae1af4657d38bdc41003a8737aa958d62b9d/go-controller/pkg/ovn/controller/services/services_controller.go#L322-L324

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to Reproduce:

1. create service -- use unique name
2. remove service
3. notice how alreadyApplied grows and never gets smaller
4. repeat

Actual results:

^^

Expected results:

alreadyApplied should not grow forever

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/ovn-kubernetes/pull/1598

4.12 will have an option in cri-o: add_inheritable_capabilities which will allow a user to opt-out of dropping inheritable capabilities (which comes as a fix for CVE-2022-27652). We should add it by default as a drop-in in 4.11 so clusters that upgrade from it inherit the old behavior

• https://github.com/openshift/machine-config-operator/pull/3352

As discussed previously by email, customer support case 03211616 requests a means to use the latest patch version of a given X.Y golang via imagestreams, with the blocking issue being the lack of X.Y tags for the go-toolset containers on RHCC.

The latter has now been fixed with the latest version also getting a :1.17 tag, and the imagestream source has been modified accordingly, which will get picked up in 4.12. We can now fix this in 4.11.z by backporting this to the imagestream files bundled in cluster-samples-operator.

/cc Ian Watson Feny Mehta

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-samples-operator/pull/467

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-683. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:

{See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2118563#c5,
The following messages here are "normal" on startup, but it is very misleading with error statement, suggest suppress them or update them to some more clear context that we can know they are in normal process.

E0818 02:18:53.709223       1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-c955q': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-c955q, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue
E0818 02:18:53.715530       1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue
E0818 02:18:53.735885       1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue
E0818 02:18:53.775984       1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue
E0818 02:18:53.790449       1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-c955q': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-c955q, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue
E0818 02:18:53.856911       1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue
E0818 02:18:53.950782       1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-c955q': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-c955q, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue
E0818 02:18:54.017583       1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue
E0818 02:18:54.271967       1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-c955q': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-c955q, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue
E0818 02:18:54.338944       1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue
E0818 02:18:54.916988       1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-c955q': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-c955q, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue
E0818 02:18:54.982211       1 controller.go:165] error syncing 'br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn': error retrieving the private IP configuration for node: br709bt-b5564-6jgdx-worker-0-sl9jn, err: cannot parse valid nova server ID from providerId '', requeuing in node workqueue}

Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/cloud-network-config-controller/pull/85

Created attachment 1905034 [details]
Plugin page with error

Steps to reproduce:

1. Install a plugin with a page that has a runtime error. (Demo Plugin -> Dynamic Nav 1 currently has an error for me, but you can reproduce by editing any plugin and introducing an error.)
2. Observe the "something went wrong" error message.
3. Navigate to any other page (e.g. Workloads -> Pods)

Expected result:

The pods page is displayed.

Action result:

The error message persists. There is no way to clear except to refresh the browser.

• https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/11968

• https://github.com/openshift/etcd/pull/170

Description of problem:

Customer is facing issue similar to https://github.com/devfile/api/issues/897

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

OCP 4.10.17

How reproducible:
N/A
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

Tried working around it with ALL_PROXY but it did not help. Note because the console operator reverts changes pretty quickly testing this was a bit of a PITA

• https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/12028

• https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/12174

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-2495. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Failures like:

$ oc login --token=...

Logged into "https://api..." as "..." using the token provided.

Error from server (Timeout): the server was unable to return a response in the time allotted, but may still be processing the request (get projects.project.openshift.io)

break login, which tries to gather information before saving the configuration, including a giant project list.

Ideally login would be able to save the successful login credentials, even when the informative gathering had difficulties. And possibly the informative gathering could be made conditional (--quiet or similar?) so expensive gathering could be skipped in use-cases where the context was not needed.

• https://github.com/openshift/oc/pull/1274

During initial backporting, due to a number of other colliding commits in upstream, the cobra commands facilitating caching did not get downstreamed. 

This is to downstream those two lines.

• https://github.com/openshift/operator-framework-olm/pull/382

Description of problem:

When creating a pod with an additional network that contains a `spec.config.ipam.exclude` range, any address within the excluded range is still iterated while searching for a suitable IP candidate. As a result, pod creation times out when large exclude ranges are used.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

with big exclude ranges, 100%

Steps to Reproduce:

1. create network-attachment-definition with a large range:

$ cat <<EOF| oc apply -f -       
apiVersion: k8s.cni.cncf.io/v1                                            
kind: NetworkAttachmentDefinition
metadata:
  name: nad-w-excludes
spec:
  config: |-
    {
      "cniVersion": "0.3.1",
      "name": "macvlan-net",
      "type": "macvlan",
      "master": "ens3",
      "mode": "bridge",
      "ipam": {
         "type": "whereabouts",
         "range": "fd43:01f1:3daa:0baa::/64",
         "exclude": [ "fd43:01f1:3daa:0baa::/100" ],
         "log_file": "/tmp/whereabouts.log",
         "log_level" : "debug"
      }
    }
EOF
2. create a pod with the network attached:

$ cat <<EOF|oc apply -f -
apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
  name: pod-with-exclude-range
  annotations:
    k8s.v1.cni.cncf.io/networks: nad-w-excludes
spec:
  containers:
  - name: pod-1
    image: openshift/hello-openshift
EOF

3. check pod status, event log and whereabouts logs after a while: 

$ oc get pods
NAME                        READY   STATUS              RESTARTS   AGE
pod-with-exclude-range      0/1     ContainerCreating   0          2m23s

$ oc get events
<...>
6m39s       Normal    Scheduled                                    pod/pod-with-exclude-range                   Successfully assigned default/pod-with-exclude-range to <worker-node>
6m37s       Normal    AddedInterface                               pod/pod-with-exclude-range                   Add eth0 [10.129.2.49/23] from openshift-sdn
2m39s       Warning   FailedCreatePodSandBox                       pod/pod-with-exclude-range                   Failed to create pod sandbox: rpc error: code = DeadlineExceeded desc = context deadline exceeded

$ oc debug node/<worker-node> - tail /host/tmp/whereabouts.log
Starting pod/<worker-node>-debug ...
To use host binaries, run `chroot /host`
2022-10-27T14:14:50Z [debug] Finished leader election
2022-10-27T14:14:50Z [debug] IPManagement: {fd43:1f1:3daa:baa::1 ffffffffffffffff0000000000000000} , <nil>
2022-10-27T14:14:59Z [debug] Used defaults from parsed flat file config @ /etc/kubernetes/cni/net.d/whereabouts.d/whereabouts.conf
2022-10-27T14:14:59Z [debug] ADD - IPAM configuration successfully read: {Name:macvlan-net Type:whereabouts Routes:[] Datastore:kubernetes Addresses:[] OmitRanges:[fd43:01f1:3daa:0baa::/80] DNS: {Nameservers:[] Domain: Search:[] Options:[]} Range:fd43:1f1:3daa:baa::/64 RangeStart:fd43:1f1:3daa:baa:: RangeEnd:<nil> GatewayStr: EtcdHost: EtcdUsername: EtcdPassword:********* EtcdKeyFile: EtcdCertFile: EtcdCACertFile: LeaderLeaseDuration:1500 LeaderRenewDeadline:1000 LeaderRetryPeriod:500 LogFile:/tmp/whereabouts.log LogLevel:debug OverlappingRanges:true SleepForRace:0 Gateway:<nil> Kubernetes: {KubeConfigPath:/etc/kubernetes/cni/net.d/whereabouts.d/whereabouts.kubeconfig K8sAPIRoot:} ConfigurationPath:PodName:pod-with-exclude-range PodNamespace:default} 
2022-10-27T14:14:59Z [debug] Beginning IPAM for ContainerID: f4ffd0e07d6c1a2b6ffb0fa29910c795258792bb1a1710ff66f6b48fab37af82
2022-10-27T14:14:59Z [debug] Started leader election
2022-10-27T14:14:59Z [debug] OnStartedLeading() called
2022-10-27T14:14:59Z [debug] Elected as leader, do processing
2022-10-27T14:14:59Z [debug] IPManagement - mode: 0 / containerID:f4ffd0e07d6c1a2b6ffb0fa29910c795258792bb1a1710ff66f6b48fab37af82 / podRef: default/pod-with-exclude-range
2022-10-27T14:14:59Z [debug] IterateForAssignment input >> ip: fd43:1f1:3daa:baa:: | ipnet: {fd43:1f1:3daa:baa:: ffffffffffffffff0000000000000000} | first IP: fd43:1f1:3daa:baa::1 | last IP: fd43:1f1:3daa:baa:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff

Actual results:

Failed to create pod sandbox: rpc error: code = DeadlineExceeded desc = context deadline exceeded

Expected results:

additional network gets attached to the pod

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/whereabouts-cni/pull/104

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-10497. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-10213. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-8468. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

RHCOS is being published to new AWS regions (https://github.com/openshift/installer/pull/6861) but aws-sdk-go need to be bumped to recognize those regions

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

master/4.14

How reproducible:

always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. openshift-install create install-config
2. Try to select ap-south-2 as a region
3.

Actual results:

New regions are not found. New regions are: ap-south-2, ap-southeast-4, eu-central-2, eu-south-2, me-central-1.

Expected results:

Installer supports and displays the new regions in the Survey

Additional info:

See https://github.com/openshift/installer/blob/master/pkg/asset/installconfig/aws/regions.go#L13-L23

• https://github.com/openshift/installer/pull/7000

Our Prometheus alerts are inconsistent with both upstream and sometimes our own vendor folder. Let's do a clean update run before the next release is branched off.

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-etcd-operator/pull/957

• https://github.com/openshift/machine-config-operator/pull/3419

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3889. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-3744. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

Egress router POD creation on Openshift 4.11 is failing with below error.
~~~
Nov 15 21:51:29 pltocpwn03 hyperkube[3237]: E1115 21:51:29.467436    3237 pod_workers.go:951] "Error syncing pod, skipping" err="failed to \"CreatePodSandbox\" for \"stage-wfe-proxy-ext-qrhjw_stage-wfe-proxy(c965a287-28aa-47b6-9e79-0cc0e209fcf2)\" with CreatePodSandboxError: \"Failed to create sandbox for pod \\\"stage-wfe-proxy-ext-qrhjw_stage-wfe-proxy(c965a287-28aa-47b6-9e79-0cc0e209fcf2)\\\": rpc error: code = Unknown desc = failed to create pod network sandbox k8s_stage-wfe-proxy-ext-qrhjw_stage-wfe-proxy_c965a287-28aa-47b6-9e79-0cc0e209fcf2_0(72bcf9e52b199061d6e651e84b0892efc142601b2442c2d00b92a1ba23208344): error adding pod stage-wfe-proxy_stage-wfe-proxy-ext-qrhjw to CNI network \\\"multus-cni-network\\\": plugin type=\\\"multus\\\" name=\\\"multus-cni-network\\\" failed (add): [stage-wfe-proxy/stage-wfe-proxy-ext-qrhjw/c965a287-28aa-47b6-9e79-0cc0e209fcf2:openshift-sdn]: error adding container to network \\\"openshift-sdn\\\": CNI request failed with status 400: 'could not open netns \\\"/var/run/netns/8c5ca402-3381-4935-baed-ea454161d669\\\": unknown FS magic on \\\"/var/run/netns/8c5ca402-3381-4935-baed-ea454161d669\\\": 1021994\\n'\"" pod="stage-wfe-proxy/stage-wfe-proxy-ext-qrhjw" podUID=c965a287-28aa-47b6-9e79-0cc0e209fcf2
~~~

I have checked SDN POD log from node where egress router POD is failing and I could see below error message.

~~~
2022-11-15T21:51:29.283002590Z W1115 21:51:29.282954  181720 pod.go:296] CNI_ADD stage-wfe-proxy/stage-wfe-proxy-ext-qrhjw failed: could not open netns "/var/run/netns/8c5ca402-3381-4935-baed-ea454161d669": unknown FS magic on "/var/run/netns/8c5ca402-3381-4935-baed-ea454161d669": 1021994
~~~

Crio is logging below event and looking at the log it seems the namespace has been created on node.

~~~
Nov 15 21:51:29 pltocpwn03 crio[3150]: time="2022-11-15 21:51:29.307184956Z" level=info msg="Got pod network &{Name:stage-wfe-proxy-ext-qrhjw Namespace:stage-wfe-proxy ID:72bcf9e52b199061d6e651e84b0892efc142601b2442c2d00b92a1ba23208344 UID:c965a287-28aa-47b6-9e79-0cc0e209fcf2 NetNS:/var/run/netns/8c5ca402-3381-4935-baed-ea454161d669 Networks:[] RuntimeConfig:map[multus-cni-network:{IP: MAC: PortMappings:[] Bandwidth:<nil> IpRanges:[]}] Aliases:map[]}"
~~~

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.11.12

How reproducible:

Not Sure

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

Egress router POD is failing to create. Sample application could be created without any issue.

Expected results:

Egress router POD should get created

Additional info:

Egress router POD is created following below document and it does contain pod.network.openshift.io/assign-macvlan: "true" annotation.

https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.11/networking/openshift_sdn/deploying-egress-router-layer3-redirection.html#nw-egress-router-pod_deploying-egress-router-layer3-redirection

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-network-operator/pull/1631

• https://github.com/openshift/machine-config-operator/pull/3434

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-8261. The following is the description of the original issue:
—

Description of problem:

An update from 4.13.0-ec.2 to 4.13.0-ec.3 stuck on:

$ oc get clusteroperator machine-config
NAME             VERSION       AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   DEGRADED   SINCE   MESSAGE
machine-config   4.13.0-ec.2   True        True          True       30h     Unable to apply 4.13.0-ec.3: error during syncRequiredMachineConfigPools: [timed out waiting for the condition, error pool worker is not ready, retrying. Status: (pool degraded: true total: 105, ready 105, updated: 105, unavailable: 0)]

The worker MachineConfigPool status included:

Unable to find source-code formatter for language: node. Available languages are: actionscript, ada, applescript, bash, c, c#, c++, cpp, css, erlang, go, groovy, haskell, html, java, javascript, js, json, lua, none, nyan, objc, perl, php, python, r, rainbow, ruby, scala, sh, sql, swift, visualbasic, xml, yaml      type: NodeDegraded
    - lastTransitionTime: "2023-02-16T14:29:21Z"
      message: 'Failed to render configuration for pool worker: Ignoring MC 99-worker-generated-containerruntime
        generated by older version 8276d9c1f574481043d3661a1ace1f36cd8c3b62 (my version:
        c06601510c0917a48912cc2dda095d8414cc5182)'

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.13.0-ec.3. The behavior was apparently introduced as part of OCPBUGS-6018, which has been backported, so the following update targets are expected to be vulnerable: 4.10.52+, 4.11.26+, 4.12.2+, and 4.13.0-ec.3.

How reproducible:

100%, when updating into a vulnerable release, if you happen to have leaked MachineConfig.

Steps to Reproduce:

1. 4.12.0-ec.1 dropped cleanUpDuplicatedMC. Run a later release, like 4.13.0-ec.2.
2. Create more than one KubeletConfig or ContainerRuntimeConfig targeting the worker pool (or any pool other than master). The number of clusters who have had redundant configuration objects like this is expected to be small.
3. (Optionally?) delete the extra KubeletConfig and ContainerRuntimeConfig.
4. Update to 4.13.0-ec.3.

Actual results:

Update sticks on the machine-config ClusterOperator, as described above.

Expected results:

Update completes without issues.

• https://github.com/openshift/machine-config-operator/pull/3577

• https://github.com/openshift/baremetal-operator/pull/256

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-kube-apiserver-operator/pull/1386

We will want to establish some basic metrics we can report back to Telemetry.

Let's consider:

• Operator installs
• Backups, created, success, error
• Restores created, success, error

Below is some background info from MTC when we added Telemetry support that may help

See:  https://github.com/konveyor/metrics-queries/blob/master/README.md

• MTC - active customers from telemetry
• Migration Toolkit - telemetry usage tracking
• MIG - Metrics Info

Design/Development info:

OpenShift Monitoring Integration Guide

Sending metrics via telemetry

Monitoring integration with OLM operators

https://www.openshift.com/blog/observability-superpower-correlation

Source Code:

https://github.com/konveyor/mig-controller/blob/master/pkg/controller/migmigration/metrics.go

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-monitoring-operator/pull/1536

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-1678. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:
pkg/devfile/sample_test.go fails after devfile registry was updated (https://github.com/devfile/registry/pull/126)

OCPBUGS-1677 is about updating our assertion so that the CI job runs successfully again. We might want to backport this as well.

This is about updating the code that the test should use a mock response instead of the latest registry content OR check some specific attributes instead of comparing the full JSON response.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.12

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Clone openshift/console
2. Run ./test-backend.sh

Actual results:
Unit tests fail

Expected results:
Unit tests should pass again

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/console/pull/12137

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-1226. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
We added server groups for control plane and computes as part of OSASINFRA-2570, except for UPI that only creates server group for the control plane.

We need to update the UPI scripts to create server group for computes to be consistent with IPI and have the instruction at https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.11/machine_management/creating_machinesets/creating-machineset-osp.html work out of the box in case customers want to create MachineSets on their UPI clusters.

Related to OCPCLOUD-1135.

• https://github.com/openshift/installer/pull/6351

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-11404. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-11333. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-10690. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

according to PR: https://github.com/openshift/cluster-monitoring-operator/pull/1824, startupProbe for UWM prometheus/platform prometheus should be 1 hour, but startupProbe for UWM prometheus is still 15m after enabled UWM, platform promethues does not have issue, startupProbe is increased to 1 hour

$ oc -n openshift-user-workload-monitoring get pod prometheus-user-workload-0 -oyaml | grep startupProbe -A20
    startupProbe:
      exec:
        command:
        - sh
        - -c
        - if [ -x "$(command -v curl)" ]; then exec curl --fail http://localhost:9090/-/ready;
          elif [ -x "$(command -v wget)" ]; then exec wget -q -O /dev/null http://localhost:9090/-/ready;
          else exit 1; fi
      failureThreshold: 60
      periodSeconds: 15
      successThreshold: 1
      timeoutSeconds: 3
...

$ oc -n openshift-monitoring get pod prometheus-k8s-0 -oyaml | grep startupProbe -A20
    startupProbe:
      exec:
        command:
        - sh
        - -c
        - if [ -x "$(command -v curl)" ]; then exec curl --fail http://localhost:9090/-/ready;
          elif [ -x "$(command -v wget)" ]; then exec wget -q -O /dev/null http://localhost:9090/-/ready;
          else exit 1; fi
      failureThreshold: 240
      periodSeconds: 15
      successThreshold: 1
      timeoutSeconds: 3

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.13.0-0.nightly-2023-03-19-052243

How reproducible:

always

Steps to Reproduce:

1. enable UWM, check startupProbe for UWM prometheus/platform prometheus
2.
3.

Actual results:

startupProbe for UWM prometheus is still 15m

Expected results:

startupProbe for UWM prometheus should be 1 hour

Additional info:

since startupProbe for platform prometheus is increased to 1 hour, and no similar bug for UWM prometheus, won't fix the issue is OK.

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-monitoring-operator/pull/1938

Description of problem:

Each LB created for a Service type LoadBalancer results in 1 client rule and <# of public subnets> health rules being created.  The rules per SG quota in AWS is quite small; 60 by default, and 200 hard max.  OCP has about 40 rules OOTB. Assuming an HA cluster in 3 AZs, that is 4 rules per LB.  With default AWS quota, only ~5 LBs can be create and with the hard max of 200, only ~40 LBs can be created.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

4.12

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:

1.  Create Service type LoadBalancer and observe increase in master-sg and worker-sg rules sets
2.
3.

Actual results:

4 rules are created

Expected results:

1 rules is created when the client rule is a superset of the per-subnet health rules

Additional info:

This ~4x the number of Services of type LoadBalancer.  This is required for Hypershift.

• https://github.com/openshift/kubernetes/pull/1375

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4851. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-4850. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
Description of problem:

Kuryr might take a while to create Pods because it has to create Neutron ports for the pods. If a pod gets deleted while this is being processed, a
warning Event will be generated causing the "[sig-network] pods should successfully create sandboxes by adding pod to network" to fail.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:

1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

• https://github.com/openshift/origin/pull/27621

This is a clone of issue OCPBUGS-268. The following is the description of the original issue:
—
The linux kernel was updated:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/20/1030
to include steal

accounting

This would greatly assist in troubleshooting vSphere performance issues
caused by over-provisioned ESXi hosts.

• https://github.com/openshift/installer/pull/6260
• https://github.com/openshift/machine-api-operator/pull/1081

Description of problem:

Disconnected IPI OCP 4.10.22 cluster install on baremetal fails when hostname of master nodes does not include "master"    

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 4.10.22

How reproducible:  Perform disconnected IPI install of OCP 4.10.22 on bare metal with master nodes that do not contain the text "master"

Steps to Reproduce:

Perform disconnected IPI install of OCP 4.10.22 on bare metal with master nodes that do not contain the text "master"

Actual results: master nodes do come up.

Expected results: master nodes should come up despite that the text "master" is not in their hostname.

Additional info:

Disconnected IPI OCP 4.10.22 cluster install on baremetal fails when hostname of master nodes does not include "master"    

The code for the cluster-baremetal-operator at the following link: 

https://github.com/openshift/cluster-baremetal-operator/blob/49d7b249c5dcef8228f206eff4530a25f03b201f/controllers/provisioning_controller.go#L441

The following condition is concerning:

if strings.Contains(bmh.Name, "master") && len(bmh.Spec.BootMACAddress) > 0

The packages reveal that bmh.Name references the name inside the metadata of the BMH object. 

Should a customer have masters with names that do not include the text "master", the above condition can never become true, and so, the following slice is never created :

macs = append(macs, bmh.Spec.BootMACAddress)

• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-baremetal-operator/pull/307
• https://github.com/openshift/cluster-baremetal-operator/pull/283